Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Itzyagurlloss

62,415 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Ottawa — Well, that didn’t take long. In what can only be described as a public humiliation, Conservative MP Frank Caputo (Frank Caputo) dismantled Trudeau’s Public Safety Minister, Gary Anandasangaree, in a fiery parliamentary showdown that laid bare the rot at the heart of the Liberal government’s so-called border and public safety agenda. “The Globe and Mail reported 600 people are missing. You’re the minister. You’re expected to know this. The buck stops with you.” That was Caputo’s opening shot and the Minister never recovered. Now, for context: those 600 people are foreign nationals who were ordered deported from Canada — 70 percent of them violent criminals, including sex offenders. That’s not a rounding error. That’s a national disgrace. So Caputo asked the obvious question: Where are they? What did Minister Anandasangaree say? Nothing. He filibustered. He squirmed. He muttered something about “unprecedented removals.” Caputo cut through it instantly: “Do you know where they are — yes or no?” Still nothing. Then came the TikTok moment... literally. When Caputo pressed the Minister on the 1,000 border agents the Liberals promised but never hired, the Minister sneered, “I’m not here for your TikTok videos.” Excuse me? TikTok! The Chinese spyware app banned on government phones, is now a Liberal talking point? Caputo didn’t blink: “TikTok is banned. I don’t have an account. I’m here for Canadians. I’m here for answers.” It got worse. The Minister admitted, under pressure, that the RCMP haven’t hired a single one of the 1,000 officers they promised, despite a spike in violent crime across the country. Caputo’s response: “Okay, that’s a zero, I take it then.” Then Caputo dropped the hammer. He played the leaked audio... audio where Minister Anandasangaree admits the Liberal gun buyback scheme is a political stunt that won’t work. His words: “Don’t ask me to explain the logic to you. I’m not an expert on this.” And now he wants Canadians to believe the program is going “great” in Cape Breton, where, shocker, a Liberal MP’s brother-in-law just happens to be involved. When Caputo asked if the Minister spoke to that chief directly, Anandasangaree dodged again, reciting talking points from the Mass Casualty Commission like a robot. Caputo wasn’t having it: “He doesn’t get to talk out the clock… He has to speak to the questions he’s given. And I won’t stand for this.” And he didn’t. What happened in that committee room was simple: a government caught lying, stalling, and hiding, and one MP willing to call them out. Caputo exposed the truth: Carneys hand-picked “public safety” minister doesn’t know where violent criminals are, hasn’t hired a single new cop, and is overseeing a disarmament program he doesn’t even believe in — all while claiming it’s for “our safety.” This is the Liberal Party in 2025: globalist talking points, zero accountability, and a minister who can’t answer basic questions. But don’t worry — they’re watching your bank account and planning new laws to censor you online.

Dan Knight

59,758 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Dear Milords, A few questions for you: 1) Circumcision/Hijab/Christian Traditions - Circumcision: A Muslim child gets circumcised before the age of 7. Does he go through the process of his own will? If not, doesn't it qualify as child abuse? - Hijab: What about hijab? Courts have repeatedly said that a girl has the right to choose to wear a hijab or not, even within an educational institution. - Nuns/Brothers/Priests: In the Christian tradition, many families groom their children to be nuns or priests from a young age. Is there free will there? Isn't it brainwashing, in that case? Have ever asked, why a father and mother who got married and had children, are forcing their children to be nuns/priests? In short, YOU RESPECT CUSTOMS OF CERTAIN RELIGIONS, BUT NOT HINDUISM? 2) Do you have children? Are your children practicing law? Are they lawyers or HC judges? - If yes, why did you force your profession on them? - If not, why did you allow them not to be in the legal field? I hope you got my point. Do you realize that there is something called free will? 3) What was the need to drag Sadhguru's daughter into this discussion? If Sadhguru's daughter had chosen to be a "hermitess," would you ask: "Why is Sadhguru forcing his will on his daughter?" 4) Do you have any evidence that Sadhguru forces anyone to be a "hermit" or "hermitess?" If not, why make such a loose remark? 5) In Hinduism, what path one chooses is entirely up to the individual! And no, there is no coercion, unlike some other faiths. We have many spiritual paths, unlike foreign faiths. If you don't know what the Yogic path is all about, you must first learn about it before making irresponsible remarks like this one. 6) This case has been going on for almost a decade. This man approaches the police again and again, even though his daughters have made it clear to the court, in the past that they are staying at the Isha Foundation of their own free will. 7) You imply that Sadhguru is against marriage. Do you know that you can get married at Isha Yoga Center? Lastly, don't you have millions of cases pending all around the country? And then you spend your time making such inane, irresponsible comments? As a tax-paying citizen of Bharat, I expect you to be more responsible with your observations in the future! Regards, A Concerned Hindu

Anand #IndianfromSouth

388,006 просмотров • 1 год назад