Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I’ve been keeping something from you. The way I cope with hard things is by doing the work and putting the pain in a box. But the truth is—since I spoke out against insurance companies, things have been really hard. My practice is struggling. I built a surgery center...

271,288 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Brent A. Williams, MD's profile picture
Brent A. Williams, MD1 year ago

They are trying to kill us off.

Sean Wheeler, MD's profile picture
Sean Wheeler, MD1 year ago

Consider this… there are terrible doctors with terrible outcomes. All still contracted with insurance companies. But you speak out against the the way insurance companies restrict your ability to care for patients… You would think that it is their money, and not the subscribers who expect them to use the money given to them, to pay for the care they need

Paul Mackiewicz's profile picture
Paul Mackiewicz1 year ago

I'd happily have my company build you an AI powered website and online presence marketing machine for free. Your a real soldier in the good fight and we need people like you. Shoot me a DM

The Short Straw's profile picture
The Short Straw1 year ago

You need to kick this up to legal action.

Mel's profile picture
Mel1 year ago

Praying that many blessings come your way. Thank you for all that you do for your patients and for everyone else by speaking out.

Grace Kane's profile picture
Grace Kane1 year ago

Carry on! It is soul-crushing to have a life dream like yours crushed. Do not give up. You have the attention of a lot of people who will likely offer to help you (not financially) to find a new way. Too bad that surgery is likely unable to adopt the headshrinkers' model. They will not touch insurance. They hand clients a diagnostic code and a bill and wish the clients well in submitting for insurance reimbursement.

MommaSue's profile picture
MommaSue1 year ago

Can you name the insurance companies? We can try to avoid purchasing our health insurance through them.

donald ballai's profile picture
donald ballai1 year ago

Always build a reserve fund before taking on big businesses like this. You have to be realistic, they are going to fight to protect their models unless change is forced upon them. Perhaps you need to join with a partner of bigger practice. Being right doesnt mean youll win.

mpmcgeefnp's profile picture
mpmcgeefnp1 year ago

Honestly, best advice I can give is to move to Canada or another country where they respect medical professionals (and human rights)

Richard Walton's profile picture
Richard Walton1 year ago

How can we help?!

Related Videos

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 views • 1 year ago

A U-Haul truck ran hit a pipe hanging from the ceiling breaking it open. Instantly water geysered out, smashing windows and windshields, and flooding cars. Initially the parking garage said the driver was at fault for hitting the pipe, but U-Haul said that the clearance signs were inaccurate. I think that the driver ultimately should be liable for all damages, even if the pipe was lower than expected, it didn’t just shoot water out without provocation. I understand the concept of liability and insurance. However I would file a claim with my own insurance company. I used to be an insurance adjuster out of college. I know that when liability is in a gray area, the companies will dispute it amongst themselves and the owners of the damaged cars would have to wait until liability is determined and accepted. Even with a good team, this could take weeks or months all the while nothing happens to my car. So if I file my own claim, use my coverage to fix my car, I would have to pay a deductible and it initially would be a claim on my insurance possibly raising my rates. However once a liability decision is reached, my insurance would go after the other company for the money in a process called subrogation. I’ve used this tactic before and it’s literally the quickest way to get the car fixed or totaled out. I know for some people they don’t want their insurance involved unless they have to but I beg you to think about a worst case scenario and waiting months only to find out a decision still hasn’t been reached while the car owner doesn’t have use of their own car.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

139,970 views • 3 months ago