Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨I’ve carefully watched the full video in slow motion, frame by frame. Right before he goes down, the pensioner shifts his weight and catches his own foot—he trips himself. At the exact moment he starts falling, the officer already grips the arm of his coat. You can clearly see...

134,851 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. ​The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. ​When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. ​It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. ​The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: ​The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. ​Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. ​How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. ​Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? ​Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. ​ ​This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. ​ ​Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. ​The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. ​What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?

Giggling Ganon

725,200 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This truck driver is crocked. He does not even recognize his boss. Scary to think he was climbing in that truck getting ready to drive it. ​This wild bodycam footage out of the Palmetto Police Department in Florida shows the absolute dismantling of a commercial truck driver’s career in real-time. Officers were on the lot of Philadelphia-based Inox Cargo Inc., officers quickly realized the driver was in no condition to be behind the wheel of an 80,000-pound rig as he was exiting the rig. ​When asked point-blank by the officer if he was intoxicated, the driver didn't even try to hide it—just gave a casual, slurry "Yeah." ​But the real kicker happens when the officer points to a man standing right outside the cab. "You know this gentleman here?" The driver stares blankly, completely failing to recognize his own boss. The officer has to spell it out for him: "He owns the truck. That's your boss." ​With the truck still running, the officer warns him that he's looking at a commercial DUI and can say goodbye to his CDL. Hearing enough, the fed-up owner steps in to tell the officers that the driver is officially terminated on the spot. The boss demands the driver get his gear out immediately so they can search the cab for illegal substances, making it clear he’s not letting his business go down with the ship. ​Scary stuff right there as this man really could hurt someone if he was out on the road in this condition.

Giggling Ganon

470,500 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

193,913 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce