正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I've updated my open-source AI slideshow template! It's got a bunch of new features: ✦ Drag-and-drop elements, double-click to edit text. ✦ Editing is collaborative, users have presence. ✦ Multiplayer undo/redo, in both views. ✦ Create multiple slides. Get it ↓

11,101 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

In 2007, I designed tools that let anyone draw on top of Google Maps. People could drop pins, draw lines and shapes, and layer their own meaning onto the world with "My Maps." But nearly 20 years later, one tiny design debate has stayed with me: how should people draw a shape? At the time, we had two options. 1. Draw mode: users click and drag to create. 2. Drop + edit: the app drops a default shape, then users resize + move it. I pushed hard for draw mode. People were tracing rivers and roads, so precision mattered. A default square dropped in the middle of Kansas wasn’t going to cut it. Decades later, this same debate is still playing out in modern tools: → Figma, Illustrator, Google Slides use draw mode → Canva, Keynote, PowerPoint use drop + edit While there clearly isn't consensus, some newer products are evolving beyond these patterns: → FigJam gracefully merges draw mode and drop + edit into one concept with its semi-transparent “ghost” objects. → Apple Photos on iPhone is a great context for drop + edit. The canvas is small and the mobile user inputs are limited. After decades of using digital drawing tools, I still bristle when a tool drops an unsolicited rectangle onto my screen. At best, it feels presumptuous. At worst, it feels lazy. When we built My Maps, we designed tools that invited users to create. We provided the means, but we let people lead. That same principle applies to every product today: understand who you’re building for and what they need, then design the simplest, most intuitive workflows — ones that let users lead. Because in the end, the best tools don’t assume what users want. They respond. Full breakdown in comments below.

Elizabeth Laraki

175,676 次观看 • 11 个月前

So Cluely is getting 400k+ views with AI TikTok slideshows. And I just automated the entire system 🤯 AI selfie hook → listicle slides → soft CTA on the last slide. Rinse. Repeat. Scale. And now my n8n + Airtable system runs it on complete autopilot. Perfect for e-comm brands & SaaS companies who want to test this format without the manual grind. Here's why this format is blowing up: → AI-generated "selfie" as the hook image → 5-8 slides with tips, hacks, or advice → Text overlays generated automatically → Promotes product on the final slide → Music added automatically on publish 362k views. 462k views. 492k views. Same playbook, multiple accounts, fully automated. Here's what my system does: → Define your niche, tone, and content style in Airtable → AI generates slide text and hooks automatically → Nano Banana creates every image with text overlays → Preview and approve before anything goes live → Blotato publishes to TikTok on your schedule—with music No manual Canva work. No writing slides one by one. No posting by hand. What you control in Airtable: * Niche and content direction * Hook style and tone * Image aesthetic and reference images * Posting schedule (days + times) * Approval before publish Set it up once. Let it run daily. I recorded a full step-by-step tutorial showing exactly how to build this system. Want access for free? > Like this post > Comment "SLIDES" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

181,662 次观看 • 8 个月前