Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
IVERMECTIN and LACTOFERRIN TESTIMONIAL - Oscar Nacu (Philippines, Aug.2022) IVERMECTIN and LACTOFERRIN Synergy Both compounds exhibit anticancer properties through overlapping pathways, such as inducing apoptosis (programmed cell death), modulating immune responses, and disrupting cancer cell metabolism and proliferation Lactoferrin can enhance Ivermectin’s effects by amplifying immune activation and oxidative... show more
48,226 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
![Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin has multiple anti-cancer effects. “There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin,” oncologist Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, told The Epoch Times. The news outlet reported: "It [ivermectin] has a broad impact on the immune system, increasing immune offense against cancers." "It also inhibits cancer cell cycles, helping prevent the formation of new cancer cells. The drug promotes the killing of cancer cells by inducing mitochondrial stress and prevents cancer survival by preventing new blood vessels, which transport energy and fuel to cancers, from forming near cancer cells." Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, a cancer surgeon, observed a resounding improvement in three patients under her consultation after they started using ivermectin with additional therapies. One patient, facing terminal stage 4 prostate cancer and given only three weeks to live after all treatments failed, began using ivermectin. Remarkably, within two months, his indicators of prostate cancer plummeted, and by six months, his cancer had significantly receded. Less than a year later, he was energetically dancing for four hours, three nights a week. This miraculous recovery was not isolated, as two more patients experienced similar outcomes. Dr. Ruddy, with over 30 years in cancer surgery, reflected on these cases, saying, “I’ve been a cancer surgeon for over 30 years. I’ve never seen anything like this in one patient—let alone three in a row.” Read the full report in the comment below:](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1772028699803611626/ext_tw_video_thumb/1772028331103227930/pu/img/zDeD9_RqENr9mha3.jpg)
![Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2011663028648026498/amplify_video_thumb/2011661209100304388/img/DJHOW69erAX5Hmbo.jpg)
