Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Ivermectin: The Truth – From Legendary Filmmaker Mikki Willis (@Plandemic3Movie) "There's a little-known federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.' So if Tony Fauci or... show more

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,975,648 subscribers

2,622,096 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

: "The suppression of this drug is one of the greatest stories of our lifetime, and we're not going to let it go."

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore): "It won the friggin' Nobel Prize for human medicine, and it's on the WHO list of essential medicines — but Fauci just made everybody watching that show think it was a dangerous medicine."

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

: "After penicillin, this is probably the most important medication ever developed by the medical science." "You're more likely to die from aspirin or Tylenol than taking ivermectin."

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

Drug Adverse Reactions Per Year Resulting in Death: • Ivermectin - 15 • HCQ - 69 • Flu Vaccine - 77 • Dexamethasone - 618 • Remdesivir - 921 • Tylenol - 1024 • COVID Vaccine - 20,175

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

• Discovered on a golf course in Japan • Has brought river blindness to the brink of elimination • Won the Nobel prize in 2015 • Recognized, 2nd to penicillin, for having the greatest impact on human health • Over 3.7B doses

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

: "If Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines, and they could have never gotten them approved."

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 3 Jahren

Many thanks to Mikki Willis (@Plandemic3Movie) for making such a brilliant short film. He's got another one in the works – Plandemic 3 – so be sure to give him a follow for updates on that.

Profilbild von Re-Coyle

Re-Coylevor 3 Jahren

@Plandemic3Movie I did not trust the vaccines. My doctor prescribe me, my husband , and my daughter ivermectin. We got the first round of Covid. We now have natural immunity, i’ve many people getting Covid two or three times even after the vaccine. None of us ever got Covid again!

Profilbild von Mark Changizi

Mark Changizivor 3 Jahren

@Plandemic3Movie ‘Ivermectin’s most predictable clinical outcome was censorship.

Profilbild von idahohills

idahohillsvor 3 Jahren

@Plandemic3Movie The suppression of this story is criminal period!! Early treatment would have saved lives I know I took it and I gave it to my husband and others successfully! There’s many people to investigate over this. Dr. Andrew Hill, WHO and many others!

Ähnliche Videos

.Robert F. Kennedy Jr Explains Why Fauci Had Such a Problem With Early Treatment "Tony Fauci's problem is this: there's a little known federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.' So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines and they could have never gotten them approved, and a 200 billion dollar enterprise would have collapsed."

.Robert F. Kennedy Jr Explains Why Fauci Had Such a Problem With Early Treatment "Tony Fauci's problem is this: there's a little known federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.' So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines and they could have never gotten them approved, and a 200 billion dollar enterprise would have collapsed."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,662,220 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

139,468 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Robert F. Kennedy Jr Red Pills Fox News Why Early Treatment for COVID Had to Be Destroyed “There’s a little-known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if an existing therapeutic drug that hasn’t been approved for any purpose proves to be effective against the target disease.” “So if they had admitted that hydroxychloroquine, which they knew from day one that it worked against COVID,” he added, “it would have killed” the vaccination campaign. Hat tip and clip, thanks to @c_plushie. Please give him a follow.

.Robert F. Kennedy Jr Red Pills Fox News Why Early Treatment for COVID Had to Be Destroyed “There’s a little-known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if an existing therapeutic drug that hasn’t been approved for any purpose proves to be effective against the target disease.” “So if they had admitted that hydroxychloroquine, which they knew from day one that it worked against COVID,” he added, “it would have killed” the vaccination campaign. Hat tip and clip, thanks to @c_plushie. Please give him a follow.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

895,123 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

.Robert F. Kennedy Jr Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

.Robert F. Kennedy Jr Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

7,057,088 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Here is, Secretary of Health and Human Services RFK Jr. RE: IVERMECTIN Why the mass-murderer Anthony Fauci has a problem. "There's a little-known federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.'" Now, the mass-murderer should be hauled before Congress every single month and forced to take the vaccine for the Xi Jinping-19 he co-created.

Here is, Secretary of Health and Human Services RFK Jr. RE: IVERMECTIN Why the mass-murderer Anthony Fauci has a problem. "There's a little-known federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.'" Now, the mass-murderer should be hauled before Congress every single month and forced to take the vaccine for the Xi Jinping-19 he co-created.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

56,202 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Now that vaccine pusher Chris Cuomo admits, "Joe Rogan was right" and that "We were given bad information about ivermectin," let's revisit why this Nobel Prize-honored drug was smeared as "horse dewormer." Robert Kennedy Jr. says, "They had to destroy ivermectin." Why? Because its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Now that vaccine pusher Chris Cuomo admits, "Joe Rogan was right" and that "We were given bad information about ivermectin," let's revisit why this Nobel Prize-honored drug was smeared as "horse dewormer." Robert Kennedy Jr. says, "They had to destroy ivermectin." Why? Because its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

955,287 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨: SHOCKING: RFK Jr; "According to federal law, Fauci had to remove ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine because, under federal law, emergency use authorization cannot be granted to a vaccine if there exists an approved drug for any purpose that has been shown to be effective against the disease in question..."👇👇 Between the cure and GENOCIDE; they chose GENOCIDE because with it they raked in millions of dollars!!!🔥🔥🔥

🚨: SHOCKING: RFK Jr; "According to federal law, Fauci had to remove ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine because, under federal law, emergency use authorization cannot be granted to a vaccine if there exists an approved drug for any purpose that has been shown to be effective against the disease in question..."👇👇 Between the cure and GENOCIDE; they chose GENOCIDE because with it they raked in millions of dollars!!!🔥🔥🔥

THE Q STORM

24,595 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

During COVID, drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were heavily demonized by Fauci and others, not because they didn’t work, but because their effectiveness meant Fauci and his friends would be unable to roll out their vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization. “If you had an effective treatment, you couldn’t have an emergency use authorized vaccine.” “The Tony Fauci’s of the world were prohibiting those therapies to come forward. Because if there was an effective therapy, then there was no way you could get new patented drugs, biologics and vaccines approved under emergency use authorization.”

During COVID, drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were heavily demonized by Fauci and others, not because they didn’t work, but because their effectiveness meant Fauci and his friends would be unable to roll out their vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization. “If you had an effective treatment, you couldn’t have an emergency use authorized vaccine.” “The Tony Fauci’s of the world were prohibiting those therapies to come forward. Because if there was an effective therapy, then there was no way you could get new patented drugs, biologics and vaccines approved under emergency use authorization.”

Children’s Health Defense

10,277 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

IT’S TIME FOR ALLY TO APOLOGISE If she is to retain any creditability, Ally Langdon must apologise to Australian public for her dangerously misleading, factually incorrect and poorly researched comments on Ivermectin. We will never know exactly how Australians died unnecessarily from Covid because of people like Ally Langdon declared war on Ivermectin. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be his next secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services) : "Yesterday the chief attorney for FDA admitted because he lost the case in court against the doctor, but there was no reason to discourage people from taking ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very, very devastating cure. or COVID, it literally obliterated COVID. And by depriving people of ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe died." "And they didn't need to. There were cures for COVID from day one and very effective cures. But they didn't want that. They wanted the vaccine only. And there was a rule, a little known federal rule that they were all aware of. which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use." "Oh, if they admitted that hydroxychloroquine or famotidine or ivermectin or any of the twenty five existing therapeutic drugs that were very effective against COVID, if they admitted that any of them were effective. the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They couldn't have done it. And so they decided that they were going to pretend that there was no cure except for the vaccine."

IT’S TIME FOR ALLY TO APOLOGISE If she is to retain any creditability, Ally Langdon must apologise to Australian public for her dangerously misleading, factually incorrect and poorly researched comments on Ivermectin. We will never know exactly how Australians died unnecessarily from Covid because of people like Ally Langdon declared war on Ivermectin. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be his next secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services) : "Yesterday the chief attorney for FDA admitted because he lost the case in court against the doctor, but there was no reason to discourage people from taking ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very, very devastating cure. or COVID, it literally obliterated COVID. And by depriving people of ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe died." "And they didn't need to. There were cures for COVID from day one and very effective cures. But they didn't want that. They wanted the vaccine only. And there was a rule, a little known federal rule that they were all aware of. which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use." "Oh, if they admitted that hydroxychloroquine or famotidine or ivermectin or any of the twenty five existing therapeutic drugs that were very effective against COVID, if they admitted that any of them were effective. the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They couldn't have done it. And so they decided that they were going to pretend that there was no cure except for the vaccine."

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

74,557 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. drops the ultimate truth bomb on the COVID era: "They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine… because if they had acknowledged that it was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed."

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. drops the ultimate truth bomb on the COVID era: "They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine… because if they had acknowledged that it was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed."

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

38,618 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🔻RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Are Being Suppressed RFK Jr. makes a shocking revelation about the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs, decades of proven safety, billions of doses administered, were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons but for legal and financial reasons. The problem boils down to a little-known federal law that bars the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if there is evidence that any existing, approved medication is effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine was found to be effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. What did it result in? A $200 billion vaccine business could have gone belly up overnight. Instead of listening to the growing evidence – 17,000 doctors signing petitions, countless peer-reviewed studies – Tony Fauci and other officials went on a warpath to discredit these treatments. A Nobel Prize-winning drug, Ivermectin, was derided as “horse medicine,” and hydroxychloroquine was falsely maligned as dangerous. The aim? To make sure the vaccines remained the only “approved” cure. But why did the attacks continue after the vaccines were granted EUA? It looks like the law requires that EUA status to be revoked if a functional treatment is found. And the motivation for “killing” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never scientific, but rather to protect a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field) have successfully treated tens of thousands of COVID patients with these drugs. And their bottom line, backed up by numbers: 500,000 American lives could have been saved. This is not merely a medical scandal, it is a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: how many lives were sacrificed to protect a narrative? Share this ! ⟁

🔻RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Are Being Suppressed RFK Jr. makes a shocking revelation about the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs, decades of proven safety, billions of doses administered, were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons but for legal and financial reasons. The problem boils down to a little-known federal law that bars the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if there is evidence that any existing, approved medication is effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine was found to be effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. What did it result in? A $200 billion vaccine business could have gone belly up overnight. Instead of listening to the growing evidence – 17,000 doctors signing petitions, countless peer-reviewed studies – Tony Fauci and other officials went on a warpath to discredit these treatments. A Nobel Prize-winning drug, Ivermectin, was derided as “horse medicine,” and hydroxychloroquine was falsely maligned as dangerous. The aim? To make sure the vaccines remained the only “approved” cure. But why did the attacks continue after the vaccines were granted EUA? It looks like the law requires that EUA status to be revoked if a functional treatment is found. And the motivation for “killing” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never scientific, but rather to protect a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field) have successfully treated tens of thousands of COVID patients with these drugs. And their bottom line, backed up by numbers: 500,000 American lives could have been saved. This is not merely a medical scandal, it is a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: how many lives were sacrificed to protect a narrative? Share this ! ⟁

Mr. Pool

50,487 Aufrufe • vor 21 Stunden

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” RFK Jr. told Joe Rogan earlier this year: “They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” RFK Jr. told Joe Rogan earlier this year: “They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,401,840 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Phil Outraged as RFK Jr. Exposes NIH Kickbacks from Moderna Vaccine Not only does the NIH own half of the Moderna shots, raking in billions of dollars, but 4 to 6 high-level deputies under Fauci pocket a staggering $150,000 a year forever from it. It gets worse. Kennedy believes that there was a deliberate effort to suppress effective therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to make way mass vaccination. Because the Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine because the COVID shots wouldn't be allowed to exist if these drugs were shown to be effective.

Dr. Phil Outraged as RFK Jr. Exposes NIH Kickbacks from Moderna Vaccine Not only does the NIH own half of the Moderna shots, raking in billions of dollars, but 4 to 6 high-level deputies under Fauci pocket a staggering $150,000 a year forever from it. It gets worse. Kennedy believes that there was a deliberate effort to suppress effective therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to make way mass vaccination. Because the Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine because the COVID shots wouldn't be allowed to exist if these drugs were shown to be effective.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,993,972 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones. At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight. Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution. But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved. This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones. At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight. Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution. But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved. This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?

Camus

1,092,141 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

RFK Jr: “There still has to be a reckoning” for Covid “The mainstream media hasn’t caught up with the science, but the science is out there now and it’s devastating.” “Yesterday, the chief attorney for FDA admitted, because he lost a case in court against a doctor, that there was no reason to discourage people from taking Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very devastating cure for Covid. It literally obliterated Covid. By depriving people of Ivermectin, millions of people around the globe died. There were cures for Covid from day one … but they didn’t want that, they wanted the vaccine only. There’s a little-known federal rule that they were all aware of which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use. If they admitted that any of them were effective, the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They gave people a product that was not properly tested. Now, we have a whole generation of kids that got myocarditis, these terrible heart problems in young athletic boys. You’re seeing so many kids now drop dead on playing fields. We never saw anything like this before. The average, I think, was 29 a month globally athletes who died on the field, and we’re getting to hundreds a month now.” From the Limitless Expo

RFK Jr: “There still has to be a reckoning” for Covid “The mainstream media hasn’t caught up with the science, but the science is out there now and it’s devastating.” “Yesterday, the chief attorney for FDA admitted, because he lost a case in court against a doctor, that there was no reason to discourage people from taking Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very devastating cure for Covid. It literally obliterated Covid. By depriving people of Ivermectin, millions of people around the globe died. There were cures for Covid from day one … but they didn’t want that, they wanted the vaccine only. There’s a little-known federal rule that they were all aware of which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use. If they admitted that any of them were effective, the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They gave people a product that was not properly tested. Now, we have a whole generation of kids that got myocarditis, these terrible heart problems in young athletic boys. You’re seeing so many kids now drop dead on playing fields. We never saw anything like this before. The average, I think, was 29 a month globally athletes who died on the field, and we’re getting to hundreds a month now.” From the Limitless Expo

Holden Culotta

2,790,783 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Federal law gave Anthony Fauci and the FDA a built-in reason to hope ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine failed. The FDA cannot grant emergency authorization for a vaccine if an approved treatment is already shown effective against the same disease. That single rule created a clear incentive problem for every regulator overseeing the vaccine program. COVID vaccines turned into a $200 billion business, so any finding that early treatments looked too promising threatened the entire operation. A conflict of interest does not require a conspiracy when the structure itself rewards one conclusion over another. Leading trials never showed those drugs worked against COVID, and Kennedy’s point stays fixed on the incentives the decision makers faced. Whether the drugs worked or not, the law meant the people in charge had every reason to hope they did not. That is how you run a pandemic under a system designed to protect the expensive option.

Federal law gave Anthony Fauci and the FDA a built-in reason to hope ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine failed. The FDA cannot grant emergency authorization for a vaccine if an approved treatment is already shown effective against the same disease. That single rule created a clear incentive problem for every regulator overseeing the vaccine program. COVID vaccines turned into a $200 billion business, so any finding that early treatments looked too promising threatened the entire operation. A conflict of interest does not require a conspiracy when the structure itself rewards one conclusion over another. Leading trials never showed those drugs worked against COVID, and Kennedy’s point stays fixed on the incentives the decision makers faced. Whether the drugs worked or not, the law meant the people in charge had every reason to hope they did not. That is how you run a pandemic under a system designed to protect the expensive option.

Rothmus 🏴

21,394 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

IVERMECTIN : FOLLOW THE MONEY They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. They didn’t care how many people they killed. Because if they had acknowledged that Ivermectin or HCQ was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed. And the politicians that wanted to claim glory for "saving everyone" with a free injection would have been exposed as frauds.

IVERMECTIN : FOLLOW THE MONEY They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. They didn’t care how many people they killed. Because if they had acknowledged that Ivermectin or HCQ was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed. And the politicians that wanted to claim glory for "saving everyone" with a free injection would have been exposed as frauds.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

77,731 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Now, why would they do such a thing? Because ivermectin’s existence threatened a multi-hundred billion dollar vaccine enterprise. The COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin. And in doing so, Dr. Pierre Kory, MD MPA says, “that has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Now, why would they do such a thing? Because ivermectin’s existence threatened a multi-hundred billion dollar vaccine enterprise. The COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin. And in doing so, Dr. Pierre Kory, MD MPA says, “that has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,152,244 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren