Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Ivermectin: The Truth – From Legendary Filmmaker Mikki Willis (@Plandemic3Movie) "There's a little-known federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.' So if Tony Fauci or...

2,621,700 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

: "The suppression of this drug is one of the greatest stories of our lifetime, and we're not going to let it go."

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore): "It won the friggin' Nobel Prize for human medicine, and it's on the WHO list of essential medicines — but Fauci just made everybody watching that show think it was a dangerous medicine."

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

: "After penicillin, this is probably the most important medication ever developed by the medical science." "You're more likely to die from aspirin or Tylenol than taking ivermectin."

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

Drug Adverse Reactions Per Year Resulting in Death: • Ivermectin - 15 • HCQ - 69 • Flu Vaccine - 77 • Dexamethasone - 618 • Remdesivir - 921 • Tylenol - 1024 • COVID Vaccine - 20,175

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

• Discovered on a golf course in Japan • Has brought river blindness to the brink of elimination • Won the Nobel prize in 2015 • Recognized, 2nd to penicillin, for having the greatest impact on human health • Over 3.7B doses

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

: "If Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines, and they could have never gotten them approved."

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊3 лет назад

Many thanks to Mikki Willis (@Plandemic3Movie) for making such a brilliant short film. He's got another one in the works – Plandemic 3 – so be sure to give him a follow for updates on that.

Фото профиля Re-Coyle
Re-Coyle3 лет назад

@Plandemic3Movie I did not trust the vaccines. My doctor prescribe me, my husband , and my daughter ivermectin. We got the first round of Covid. We now have natural immunity, i’ve many people getting Covid two or three times even after the vaccine. None of us ever got Covid again!

Фото профиля Mark Changizi
Mark Changizi3 лет назад

@Plandemic3Movie ‘Ivermectin’s most predictable clinical outcome was censorship.

Фото профиля idahohills
idahohills3 лет назад

@Plandemic3Movie The suppression of this story is criminal period!! Early treatment would have saved lives I know I took it and I gave it to my husband and others successfully! There’s many people to investigate over this. Dr. Andrew Hill, WHO and many others!

Похожие видео

IT’S TIME FOR ALLY TO APOLOGISE If she is to retain any creditability, Ally Langdon must apologise to Australian public for her dangerously misleading, factually incorrect and poorly researched comments on Ivermectin. We will never know exactly how Australians died unnecessarily from Covid because of people like Ally Langdon declared war on Ivermectin. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be his next secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services) : "Yesterday the chief attorney for FDA admitted because he lost the case in court against the doctor, but there was no reason to discourage people from taking ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very, very devastating cure. or COVID, it literally obliterated COVID. And by depriving people of ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe died." "And they didn't need to. There were cures for COVID from day one and very effective cures. But they didn't want that. They wanted the vaccine only. And there was a rule, a little known federal rule that they were all aware of. which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use." "Oh, if they admitted that hydroxychloroquine or famotidine or ivermectin or any of the twenty five existing therapeutic drugs that were very effective against COVID, if they admitted that any of them were effective. the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They couldn't have done it. And so they decided that they were going to pretend that there was no cure except for the vaccine."

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

74,547 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones. At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight. Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution. But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved. This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?

Camus

1,090,871 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад