正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

721,864 subscribers

98,833 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Acyn

85,083 次观看 • 6 个月前

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

FactPost

13,087 次观看 • 6 个月前

JACK SMITH publicly testifies for the first time: "I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump..." "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican."

JACK SMITH publicly testifies for the first time: "I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump..." "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican."

Fox News

162,859 次观看 • 6 个月前

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 次观看 • 6 个月前

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,485 次观看 • 6 个月前

Smith: For nearly three decades I have been a career prosecutor. I have served during both Republican and Democratic administrations and I've been guided by those principles in every role I've held. I continued to honor those principles when I was appointed to serve as special counsel in November of 2022. The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. I remain grateful for the counsel, judgment, and advice of my team as I executed my responsibilities. I am both saddened and angered that President Trump has sought revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff simply for doing their jobs and for having worked on those cases. These dedicated public servants are the best of us, and they have been wrongly vilified and improperly dismissed from their jobs. I made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump's political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 Presidential election. We took our actions based on the facts and the law, the very lessons I learned early in my career as a prosecutor. We followed Justice Department policies and observed legal requirements. The timing and speed of our work reflects the strength of the evidence and our confidence that we would have secured convictions at trial. If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat.

Smith: For nearly three decades I have been a career prosecutor. I have served during both Republican and Democratic administrations and I've been guided by those principles in every role I've held. I continued to honor those principles when I was appointed to serve as special counsel in November of 2022. The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. I remain grateful for the counsel, judgment, and advice of my team as I executed my responsibilities. I am both saddened and angered that President Trump has sought revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff simply for doing their jobs and for having worked on those cases. These dedicated public servants are the best of us, and they have been wrongly vilified and improperly dismissed from their jobs. I made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump's political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 Presidential election. We took our actions based on the facts and the law, the very lessons I learned early in my career as a prosecutor. We followed Justice Department policies and observed legal requirements. The timing and speed of our work reflects the strength of the evidence and our confidence that we would have secured convictions at trial. If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

213,321 次观看 • 7 个月前

Trump: If you go back a long way, the sitting president, whether Democrat or Republican, always loses the midterm. There is something down deep psychologically with the voters that they want maybe a check or something,

Trump: If you go back a long way, the sitting president, whether Democrat or Republican, always loses the midterm. There is something down deep psychologically with the voters that they want maybe a check or something,

Acyn

186,422 次观看 • 7 个月前

Mutsvangwa was asked whether the persuaders will success to persuade President Mnangagwa to extend his term and he warned the President to take a lesson on what old age can do to a leader , referring to the former President Mugabe !!

Mutsvangwa was asked whether the persuaders will success to persuade President Mnangagwa to extend his term and he warned the President to take a lesson on what old age can do to a leader , referring to the former President Mugabe !!

Noby

64,464 次观看 • 5 个月前

Q: "Does the president have an enemies list?" Vance: "No...If he thinks a person has violated a law, whether they're a Republican or a Democrat, he's going to encourage his Department of Justice to go after that person."

Q: "Does the president have an enemies list?" Vance: "No...If he thinks a person has violated a law, whether they're a Republican or a Democrat, he's going to encourage his Department of Justice to go after that person."

The Bulwark

114,597 次观看 • 11 个月前

Ford: I didn't realize that the person that would be deciding whether or not talent should be on television would be the president

Ford: I didn't realize that the person that would be deciding whether or not talent should be on television would be the president

Acyn

98,602 次观看 • 10 个月前

Former President Donald Trump said at a rally in Wisconsin on Wednesday that if reelected, he would protect women "whether the women like it or not."

Former President Donald Trump said at a rally in Wisconsin on Wednesday that if reelected, he would protect women "whether the women like it or not."

CBS News

52,034 次观看 • 1 年前

Jack Smith: James Comey, Letitia James, Jerome Powell. There's not criminality here. I mean, seashells?? The only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people. He has people who are his former personal lawyers who are going to do what he says, regardless of the facts or law

Jack Smith: James Comey, Letitia James, Jerome Powell. There's not criminality here. I mean, seashells?? The only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people. He has people who are his former personal lawyers who are going to do what he says, regardless of the facts or law

Acyn

74,927 次观看 • 1 个月前

.President Donald J. Trump responds to the news that Deranged Jack Smith tracked private communications of Republican Senators: "He was a sleazebag... what he did to the lives of so many people, and he tried on me, this guy was a bad guy... Jack Smith was a SICK person."

.President Donald J. Trump responds to the news that Deranged Jack Smith tracked private communications of Republican Senators: "He was a sleazebag... what he did to the lives of so many people, and he tried on me, this guy was a bad guy... Jack Smith was a SICK person."

Rapid Response 47

211,909 次观看 • 10 个月前

Leavitt: Regarding Iran… I have a message directly from the president, and I quote, " based on the fact that there is a chance of substantial negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks."

Leavitt: Regarding Iran… I have a message directly from the president, and I quote, " based on the fact that there is a chance of substantial negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks."

Acyn

366,423 次观看 • 1 年前

Vance: I would encourage everybody whether you are Republican, Democrat or Independent who thinks we are doing a good job, remember to get out and vote in 2026

Vance: I would encourage everybody whether you are Republican, Democrat or Independent who thinks we are doing a good job, remember to get out and vote in 2026

Acyn

86,440 次观看 • 11 个月前

Disgraced former Congressman George Santos says that regardless of whether Trump pardons him, he’ll continue to support Trump: “I don’t care if I get killed in prison… I’m so glad that whether I die or spend 7 years in prison, we have Donald Trump as president until 2028.”

Disgraced former Congressman George Santos says that regardless of whether Trump pardons him, he’ll continue to support Trump: “I don’t care if I get killed in prison… I’m so glad that whether I die or spend 7 years in prison, we have Donald Trump as president until 2028.”

Republicans against Trump

563,492 次观看 • 1 年前