Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

“Jack Smith is taking this on the horns, and deciding that it appropriate to speak in court filings, but that it is also appropriate for him to explain that this is a bunch of malarkey” Carol Leonnig on Jack Smith fighting Trump’s lies about classified info w/ Nicolle Wallace

Deadline White House

379,823 subscribers

80,610 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Lindsey McBride

Lindsey McBride2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace Finally, clearly stating the extreme criminality of @realDonaldTrump -that he stole & refused to return top secret US taxpayer property. Disgraceful. Corrupt. Probably already sold to Russia, MBS, UAE, Qatar & others. @DonaldJTrumpJr @IvankaTrump @jaredkushner @EricTrump @gop

Фото профиля Rarely Tolerable.

Rarely Tolerable.1 год назад

Senator Whitehouse asks Pam Bondi about the weaponization of the DOJ during her confirmation hearing. Whitehouse: "it would not be appropriate for a prosecutor to start with a name and look for a crime. It's a prosecutor's job to start with a crime and look for a name, correct?" Bondi: "Senator, I think that is the whole problem with the weaponization that we have seen the last four years and what's been happening to Donald Trump. They targeted Donald Trump. They went after him, actually starting back in 2016. They targeted his campaign. They have launched countless investigations against him. That will not be the case if I am Attorney General. I will not politicize that office. I will not target people simply because of their political affiliation. Justice will be administered even handedly throughout this country. Senator, we've got to bring this country back together. We've got to move forward or we're going to lose our country."

Фото профиля Katherine Ford

Katherine Ford2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace In October 2021, the 5th or 6th, a story dropped saying that the CIA had a shocking loss of informants and assets. The damage with the Top Secret documents was done before we even knew he had them. He sold us out as fast as he could.

Фото профиля Bill Johnson

Bill Johnson2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace Traitors, including the Rosenbergs, passed our atomic bomb secrets to Russia in 1944. The Manhattan project had spies. Now, we have another spy from Manhattan, who stole 3500 pages of secret documents, that is selling us down the river.

Фото профиля Real Benisons

Real Benisons2 лет назад

@NicolleDWallace re your conversation with @MichaelSteele, I would complete @JoeBiden's sentence with "Trump's ideas for America are older than me or the Constitution or Magna Carta, Trump hates our freedoms so much he wants to go back to the medieval ordeal (for everybody but him) + Germanic law

Фото профиля Bernice Hall

Bernice Hall2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace It's like he's been in the maga huddle. He knows what play they're gonna call and he's out in front of it....

Фото профиля Erik Ghirarduzzi

Erik Ghirarduzzi2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace He's speaking volumes without saying a word. He's writing a living, real-time, history novel, a filing at a time.

Фото профиля SaveDemocracy 🟠🌈🌊✊🏾

SaveDemocracy 🟠🌈🌊✊🏾2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace Jack Smith has been completely outplayed. Or he knew this was gonna happen all along & didn’t want to put Trump in jail. Trump should’ve been arrested immediately. Trump‘s other property should’ve been searched. We never should’ve filed the indictments under Judge Cannon,.

Фото профиля Lori Sirianni

Lori Sirianni2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace Well-said, Carol. The gravest and most worrisome part of Trump's deliberate theft, retention, concealment, and obstruction of the govt's & grand jury's attempts to recover those highly-classified documents is sneaking boxes of them onto aircraft he flew up north. WHERE are they?

Фото профиля Polly Haag

Polly Haag2 лет назад

@CarolLeonnig @NicolleDWallace So glad to see Carol looking healthy once again - she's my favorite newswriter and contributor along with you, Nicolle ! And where Is her counterpart these days ?

Похожие видео

Attorney for Jack Smith: There is no immunity that is in the constitution unless this court creates it today.

Attorney for Jack Smith: There is no immunity that is in the constitution unless this court creates it today.

Acyn

560,897 просмотров • 2 лет назад

CNN NewsNight panelist Jeffrey Toobin claims “it’s not even news” and “wasn’t an overreach” for Jack Smith to track the private communications and phone calls of nearly a dozen Republican senators. Abby Phillip: “Was it an overreach on Jack Smith’s part.” Jeffrey Toobin: “Well, not only wasn‘t it an overreach, it‘s not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep this a secret. And remember what Jack Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump‘s attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in Congress.” “He was lobbying members of Congress to do just that. That was evidence in the case. So it is, of course, appropriate for him to investigate the time and nature, or at least the time and the duration of calls with members of Congress. It‘s a complete non-story, except that Jack Smith was doing his job.” Incredible!

CNN NewsNight panelist Jeffrey Toobin claims “it’s not even news” and “wasn’t an overreach” for Jack Smith to track the private communications and phone calls of nearly a dozen Republican senators. Abby Phillip: “Was it an overreach on Jack Smith’s part.” Jeffrey Toobin: “Well, not only wasn‘t it an overreach, it‘s not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep this a secret. And remember what Jack Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump‘s attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in Congress.” “He was lobbying members of Congress to do just that. That was evidence in the case. So it is, of course, appropriate for him to investigate the time and nature, or at least the time and the duration of calls with members of Congress. It‘s a complete non-story, except that Jack Smith was doing his job.” Incredible!

RedWave Press

253,261 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene is about to meet with Mike Johnson and demand that they remove Special Counsel Jack Smith. This is the opposite of “law and order”. If she believed in Trump’s innocence she would embrace a trial to prove that Trump is not guilty of what Smith alleges.

BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene is about to meet with Mike Johnson and demand that they remove Special Counsel Jack Smith. This is the opposite of “law and order”. If she believed in Trump’s innocence she would embrace a trial to prove that Trump is not guilty of what Smith alleges.

Brian Krassenstein

1,171,162 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

Eric Daugherty

40,632 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"If this is worse than Watergate, isn't it about time we get to the primary source: Jack Smith under oath?" -- Durbin points out the ridiculousness of Republicans holding conspiracy hearings about Jack Smith while refusing to allow him to testify on camera

"If this is worse than Watergate, isn't it about time we get to the primary source: Jack Smith under oath?" -- Durbin points out the ridiculousness of Republicans holding conspiracy hearings about Jack Smith while refusing to allow him to testify on camera

Aaron Rupar

307,777 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

On Tuesday, Trump went on the Simon Conway show, and said that it would be “very dangerous for Jack Smith to put him in jail” because of his “tremendously passionate” voters. Three things: 1. Jack Smith is not the one who will “put Trump in jail.” A jury of his peers will.

On Tuesday, Trump went on the Simon Conway show, and said that it would be “very dangerous for Jack Smith to put him in jail” because of his “tremendously passionate” voters. Three things: 1. Jack Smith is not the one who will “put Trump in jail.” A jury of his peers will.

Andrew—#IAmTheResistance

569,043 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Nicolle Wallace: Is this the beginning of speaking out more regularly, more frequently? Will you come back? Jack Smith: We'll see... I don't have an interest in being on TV to talk just so I can be on TV to talk. If there's a way that I feel like I can be helpful, I'm going to do it.

Nicolle Wallace: Is this the beginning of speaking out more regularly, more frequently? Will you come back? Jack Smith: We'll see... I don't have an interest in being on TV to talk just so I can be on TV to talk. If there's a way that I feel like I can be helpful, I'm going to do it.

Blue Georgia

294,142 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We had completely forgotten about this, it fell off of our map. Eileen Cannon has still been sitting on that Jack Smith report on the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

We had completely forgotten about this, it fell off of our map. Eileen Cannon has still been sitting on that Jack Smith report on the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸

58,599 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Trump posted Jim Rickards' video and this was a tiny part of it. The full video is on geopolitical events (upcoming) that includes indictments, re-indictments, political fallout, Trump's 3rd term path, financial market impacts and how to prepare, etc. This part is on Trump's Target List! Trump called out Jack Smith at the WHCD by saying Jack Smith is in a "different kind of house"...would that be the big house?!? Trump's Target List: James Comey Letitia James Jack Smith Tim Walz Biden's Inner Circle (this could be hundreds of people)

Trump posted Jim Rickards' video and this was a tiny part of it. The full video is on geopolitical events (upcoming) that includes indictments, re-indictments, political fallout, Trump's 3rd term path, financial market impacts and how to prepare, etc. This part is on Trump's Target List! Trump called out Jack Smith at the WHCD by saying Jack Smith is in a "different kind of house"...would that be the big house?!? Trump's Target List: James Comey Letitia James Jack Smith Tim Walz Biden's Inner Circle (this could be hundreds of people)

Santa Surfing

20,172 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jack Smith: "It is very important for me to note that the defendant in this case must be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. To that end, my office will seek a speedy trial in this matter."

Jack Smith: "It is very important for me to note that the defendant in this case must be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. To that end, my office will seek a speedy trial in this matter."

Aaron Rupar

3,211,752 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Jack Smith is filing a 180 page brief on election interference today that will work around Trump’s immunity. He also plans to push to have the underacted report put out for the American people to read. Bring it on. 🔥🔥🔥

Jack Smith is filing a 180 page brief on election interference today that will work around Trump’s immunity. He also plans to push to have the underacted report put out for the American people to read. Bring it on. 🔥🔥🔥

Hey Maga’s,it’s the Constitution. F your feelings.

1,131,510 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Charlie Kirk

578,773 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Rep. Jim Jordan blasts Jack Smith after the House Judiciary Committee released new documents on the DOJ’s “Arctic Frost” investigation: "With Jack Smith, what we learned is that his investigation was much broader and more expansive than we ever thought. And remember, this is the same Jack Smith who put a gag order on President Trump and who raided his home. This is the same Jack Smith whose two deputies came before our committee and took the Fifth—71 and 72 times, respectively. This is the same Jack Smith who we already know spied on eight United States senators. This is why we want Jack Smith in front of our committee, in a deposition format, after we get the documents—so we can ask him some of the same questions we asked his deputies, which they took the Fifth on."

Rep. Jim Jordan blasts Jack Smith after the House Judiciary Committee released new documents on the DOJ’s “Arctic Frost” investigation: "With Jack Smith, what we learned is that his investigation was much broader and more expansive than we ever thought. And remember, this is the same Jack Smith who put a gag order on President Trump and who raided his home. This is the same Jack Smith whose two deputies came before our committee and took the Fifth—71 and 72 times, respectively. This is the same Jack Smith who we already know spied on eight United States senators. This is why we want Jack Smith in front of our committee, in a deposition format, after we get the documents—so we can ask him some of the same questions we asked his deputies, which they took the Fifth on."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

105,714 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Acting AG Todd Blanche on new $1.8B "anti-weaponization" fund: "This is unusual. That is true. But it is not unprecedented, and it was done to address… years of weaponization…It's not limited to the Biden weaponization. It's not limited…to January 6th, or to Jack Smith."

Acting AG Todd Blanche on new $1.8B "anti-weaponization" fund: "This is unusual. That is true. But it is not unprecedented, and it was done to address… years of weaponization…It's not limited to the Biden weaponization. It's not limited…to January 6th, or to Jack Smith."

CSPAN

15,231 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: "My fear is that we have seen the rule of law function in our country for so long that many of us have come to take it for granted. The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it."

Jack Smith: "My fear is that we have seen the rule of law function in our country for so long that many of us have come to take it for granted. The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it."

The Bulwark

19,566 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: "My fear is that we have seen the rule of law function in our country for so long that many of us have come to take it for granted. The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it."

Jack Smith: "My fear is that we have seen the rule of law function in our country for so long that many of us have come to take it for granted. The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it."

Aaron Rupar

531,956 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

There’s nothing appropriate about this for children. This is the left today and this is the culture that will dominate our country if we allow it to..

There’s nothing appropriate about this for children. This is the left today and this is the culture that will dominate our country if we allow it to..

Jeffery Mead

59,948 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#BREAKING: Alex Witt: “…House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan…on Wednesday, referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution. He alleges Smith knowingly made false statements during testimony about his team’s access to lawmakers phone records during the January 6th investigation…top Judiciary Democrat Jamie Raskin said if the referral is ever brought before a judge, it will get laughed out of court. Is Raskin right?” Rep Lieu: “Well, let me first say that gas prices are up, grocery prices are up, inflation is up and House Republicans are focused on going after the president’s perceived enemies. That’s actually what is happening, and in this case, it is an absurd attack because under the law, there is no obligation for a witness to volunteer information. And in this case, Jack Smith simply didn’t volunteer some information, but the House Republicans can’t point to a single statement that Jack Smith made that was false. And so Jamie Raskin, who is an amazing leader of our House Judiciary Committee is absolutely correct, this is gonna be laughed out of court.” 😳

#BREAKING: Alex Witt: “…House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan…on Wednesday, referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution. He alleges Smith knowingly made false statements during testimony about his team’s access to lawmakers phone records during the January 6th investigation…top Judiciary Democrat Jamie Raskin said if the referral is ever brought before a judge, it will get laughed out of court. Is Raskin right?” Rep Lieu: “Well, let me first say that gas prices are up, grocery prices are up, inflation is up and House Republicans are focused on going after the president’s perceived enemies. That’s actually what is happening, and in this case, it is an absurd attack because under the law, there is no obligation for a witness to volunteer information. And in this case, Jack Smith simply didn’t volunteer some information, but the House Republicans can’t point to a single statement that Jack Smith made that was false. And so Jamie Raskin, who is an amazing leader of our House Judiciary Committee is absolutely correct, this is gonna be laughed out of court.” 😳

Emoluments Clause

25,860 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Overton

397,286 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Interestingly, Jack Smith has been on a little PR tour of late to let everyone know how apolitical and non-partisan he is. He chose famously apolitical, non-partisan media figures Nicolle Wallace and Jon Stewart to help him make the case.

Interestingly, Jack Smith has been on a little PR tour of late to let everyone know how apolitical and non-partisan he is. He chose famously apolitical, non-partisan media figures Nicolle Wallace and Jon Stewart to help him make the case.

Western Lensman

84,798 просмотров • 1 месяц назад