Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. If asked to prosecute a former president today based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

FactPost

221,465 subscribers

20,009 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

George Ryan2 days ago

Do Senate Republicans think this show does them some good? One theory is that they know this hearing hangs Trump out to dry, and they hope that engenders some independent support

Tracey Gallagher2 days ago

Smith had him

T. G. Mac2 days ago

Why didn’t he prosecute Biden then? Such a hack.

Martin2 days ago

A concept alien to every MAGA drone.

KSK2 days ago

💪🇺🇸

Carey2 days ago

except that’s not true much as his claims were thrown out of court. He was thrown out of court when he doctored evidence. The guy is a complete scumbag.

Moon Dance Dairy2 days ago

Proof? What a nasty lying bastard. Jack Smith needs to be sent to GITMO and kept there for the rest of his sorry life!

Alexandra Montoya2 days ago

. . .

Katht Richeson 2 days ago

What a liar! 🤥

the ghostly wife2 days ago

What about other countries P Os . America is a “superpower” in nothing but terrorism and imposing utter misery on the good in the world.

Mr.X2 days ago

👍

Related Videos

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

Jack Smith: Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country.

FactPost

13,087 views • 8 months ago

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican.

Acyn

85,091 views • 8 months ago

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers as he defended his decision to prosecute Trump. Testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith said he stands by his decision to bring charges and would do so again based on the same facts, “regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.”

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers as he defended his decision to prosecute Trump. Testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith said he stands by his decision to bring charges and would do so again based on the same facts, “regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.”

CBS News

427,883 views • 2 days ago

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

Jack Smith: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did.”

The Bulwark

46,147 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

98,833 views • 9 months ago

BREAKING: JACK SMITH UNDER OATH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

BREAKING: JACK SMITH UNDER OATH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

Brian Allen

1,255,627 views • 2 days ago

“Investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt” “President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation" - Jack Smith Former DOJ Prosecutor 9-29-2026 TikTok credit MeidasTouch

“Investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt” “President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation" - Jack Smith Former DOJ Prosecutor 9-29-2026 TikTok credit MeidasTouch

Not Your Average Liberal

16,798 views • 2 days ago

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

JACK SMITH: “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

The Tennessee Holler

79,390 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith: "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation ... rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power"

Jack Smith: "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation ... rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power"

Aaron Rupar

2,348,943 views • 2 days ago

JACK SMITH publicly testifies for the first time: "I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump..." "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican."

JACK SMITH publicly testifies for the first time: "I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump..." "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican."

Fox News

162,871 views • 8 months ago

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity." –Jack Smith testifying before Congress.

Pod Save America

20,181 views • 8 months ago

Jack Smith just told the Truth LOUD and CLEAR! “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat. “The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Grand juries in two separate districts reached this conclusion based on his actions, as alleged in the indictments they returned. “Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power. “After leaving office in January of 2021, President Trump illegally kept classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago social club and repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. “Highly sensitive national security information was held in a bathroom and a ballroom where events and gatherings took place.

Jack Smith just told the Truth LOUD and CLEAR! “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat. “The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Grand juries in two separate districts reached this conclusion based on his actions, as alleged in the indictments they returned. “Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power. “After leaving office in January of 2021, President Trump illegally kept classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago social club and repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents. “Highly sensitive national security information was held in a bathroom and a ballroom where events and gatherings took place.

Brian Krassenstein

483,163 views • 2 days ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Former special counsel Jack Smith: “I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Republicans against Trump

78,167 views • 8 months ago

🚨 Disgraced Special Counsel Jack Smith just sat in front of the Senate and said he STANDS BY charging President Trump — and that he’d do it AGAIN today. “I stand by my decision to bring charges against President Trump.” “I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.” “Serious crimes against our nation.”

🚨 Disgraced Special Counsel Jack Smith just sat in front of the Senate and said he STANDS BY charging President Trump — and that he’d do it AGAIN today. “I stand by my decision to bring charges against President Trump.” “I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.” “Serious crimes against our nation.”

Mr Producer

13,549 views • 2 days ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith said Tuesday that he stands by his decision to bring charges against President Donald Trump over his mishandling of classified documents and role in the Jan. 6 attack. “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” Smith said during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Smith, who in 2022 led investigations into Trump and secured two indictments, said he made decisions in the case "without regard” for Trump’s “political association activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.” “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,” he said. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, referred Smith to the Justice Department for possible prosecution, alleging that Smith made false statements during an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December. Smith has denied accusations of bias, saying he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. “I stand by my testimony before the House of Representatives, and I will not be silenced by continued threats of prosecution,” he told the committee.

Former special counsel Jack Smith said Tuesday that he stands by his decision to bring charges against President Donald Trump over his mishandling of classified documents and role in the Jan. 6 attack. “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” Smith said during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Smith, who in 2022 led investigations into Trump and secured two indictments, said he made decisions in the case "without regard” for Trump’s “political association activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.” “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,” he said. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, referred Smith to the Justice Department for possible prosecution, alleging that Smith made false statements during an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December. Smith has denied accusations of bias, saying he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. “I stand by my testimony before the House of Representatives, and I will not be silenced by continued threats of prosecution,” he told the committee.

PBS News

33,689 views • 2 days ago

Jack Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, he engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power.

Jack Smith: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump. Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, he engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power.

Headquarters

309,855 views • 2 days ago

Jack Smith, Special Counsel: I stand by my decisions, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump— it wasn’t political. “It was proven without a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

Jack Smith, Special Counsel: I stand by my decisions, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump— it wasn’t political. “It was proven without a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation.”

MJTruthUltra

51,115 views • 2 days ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,488 views • 8 months ago

IN THE HEARING ROOM: GOP calls Jack Smith for public hearing Smith unleashes an unequivocal statement about his criminal case against Trump: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump committed serious crimes”

IN THE HEARING ROOM: GOP calls Jack Smith for public hearing Smith unleashes an unequivocal statement about his criminal case against Trump: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump committed serious crimes”

Scott MacFarlane

24,328 views • 2 days ago

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

Republicans against Trump

185,834 views • 9 months ago