Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Jacking Off While Riding A Big Cumming Dildo 🐴🩷 (Exclusive Full Audio First 🔗 In Bio) nsfwtwt | edging cumshots | sex toys audio | whimpering | overstimulation porn | dildo ramblefap | ASMR | kinda gay tbh..

Masami

125,219 subscribers

199,714 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Eating Out A Sex Toy While Jacking Off For You ♡ (Exclusive Full Audio First 🔗 In Bio) nsfwtwt | loud orgasm | submissive moans | oral audio | whimpering | overstimulation | wet | ASMR

Sensitive content

Eating Out A Sex Toy While Jacking Off For You ♡ (Exclusive Full Audio First 🔗 In Bio) nsfwtwt | loud orgasm | submissive moans | oral audio | whimpering | overstimulation | wet | ASMR

Masami

133,073 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Eating Out A Fleshlight While I Touch Myself 🩷 🔗: nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | oral | sex toy eating | jacking off | messy | edging | whimpering | porn ASMR

Sensitive content

Eating Out A Fleshlight While I Touch Myself 🩷 🔗: nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | oral | sex toy eating | jacking off | messy | edging | whimpering | porn ASMR

Masami

142,102 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

‼️🤍 Nonstop Stimulation For An Entire Hour 🤍‼️ Full Audio On P@TREON (first🔗 in bio) #nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | cumshot | sex toys | jacking off

Sensitive content

‼️🤍 Nonstop Stimulation For An Entire Hour 🤍‼️ Full Audio On P@TREON (first🔗 in bio) #nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | cumshot | sex toys | jacking off

Masami

240,817 просмотров • 2 лет назад

⛓️ Handcuffed, Desperate, and Jacking Off For You ⛓️ 🔗: Nsfwtwt | Male Moaning | Whimpering Audio Porn | Overstimulation | Cumshot | Bondage | Kinda Gay

Sensitive content

⛓️ Handcuffed, Desperate, and Jacking Off For You ⛓️ 🔗: Nsfwtwt | Male Moaning | Whimpering Audio Porn | Overstimulation | Cumshot | Bondage | Kinda Gay

Masami

362,896 просмотров • 1 год назад

Grown Man Moans Like A Girl While Taking A 10 INCH DILDO 🎀💗 🔗: nsfwtwt | femboy twink | submissive male moaning | whimpering | anal audio porn | jacking off | kinda gay ngl

Sensitive content

Grown Man Moans Like A Girl While Taking A 10 INCH DILDO 🎀💗 🔗: nsfwtwt | femboy twink | submissive male moaning | whimpering | anal audio porn | jacking off | kinda gay ngl

Masami

462,531 просмотров • 1 год назад

Using 3 Toys At Once Until I Cum 🤍‼️ 🔗: #nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | sex toy review | jacking off

Sensitive content

Using 3 Toys At Once Until I Cum 🤍‼️ 🔗: #nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | sex toy review | jacking off

Masami

380,298 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Making You Cum Through A Screen 🪻💜 🔗: nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | cumshot | JOI | jacking off | porn

Sensitive content

Making You Cum Through A Screen 🪻💜 🔗: nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | cumshot | JOI | jacking off | porn

Masami

294,066 просмотров • 1 год назад

23 Year Old Man Moans Like A Girl While Bouncing On It 🎀💗 🔗: nsfwtwt | femboy twink | submissive male moaning | whimpering | anal audio porn | jacking off | kinda gay ngl

Sensitive content

23 Year Old Man Moans Like A Girl While Bouncing On It 🎀💗 🔗: nsfwtwt | femboy twink | submissive male moaning | whimpering | anal audio porn | jacking off | kinda gay ngl

Masami

1,075,250 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Fucking A Cake For 30K On Twitter 🎂‼️ 🔗: #nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | food play | overstimulation | cumshot | jacking off

Sensitive content

Fucking A Cake For 30K On Twitter 🎂‼️ 🔗: #nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | food play | overstimulation | cumshot | jacking off

Masami

269,576 просмотров • 1 год назад

Stalking Your Stalker Leads To Rough Sex Full Audio On PH and 🔗: Nsfwtwt | Male Moaning | Whimpering Audio Porn | Overstimulation | Cumshot | Anal | Mutual Masturbation

Sensitive content

Stalking Your Stalker Leads To Rough Sex Full Audio On PH and 🔗: Nsfwtwt | Male Moaning | Whimpering Audio Porn | Overstimulation | Cumshot | Anal | Mutual Masturbation

Masami

299,022 просмотров • 1 год назад

Spontaneous NSFW Male Moaning + Whimpering Audio Which Happens To Be My First Ever RambleFap ‼️ ‼️ 🔗watch the full audio (on PH or) here: nsfwtwt | mutual masturbation | Edging🫶💤

Spontaneous NSFW Male Moaning + Whimpering Audio Which Happens To Be My First Ever RambleFap ‼️ ‼️ 🔗watch the full audio (on PH or) here: nsfwtwt | mutual masturbation | Edging🫶💤

Masami

107,348 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Talking About My Kinks While I Jack Off For You (full audio 🔗 you know where 💞) nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | verbal dirty talk | yapping

Talking About My Kinks While I Jack Off For You (full audio 🔗 you know where 💞) nsfwtwt | male moaning | whimpering audio | overstimulation | verbal dirty talk | yapping

Masami

226,888 просмотров • 2 лет назад

— ✧ Soft Ramblefap Listen to the full audio here or over on GWA (link in comment below). [F4M] I want more 🏷 Tags [ramblefap] [why am I so awkward] [begging] [soft moans] [imagine with me] [rain sounds] [overstim] [don't stop] [whimpering] [real orgasm x2] [pussy is a funny word] [I bought my first bottle of lube for you] [slight fourth wall break] [please just fuck me] [I deserve this] 📖 Summary The dating scene is rough. And sometimes you want more than a quick fuck. You want someone to hold. Someone to love. Someone who will love you back. It can get lonely, but at least we have each other. ─── ⋆⁺‧₊ ☾ ₊‧⁺⋆ ─── Hi Dreamers, I made this while testing out some audio equipment upgrades as I ramble and yearn. I don't do ramblefaps often. I always feel a little awkward doing them as opposed to roleplays. But I'm thinking I might do them more—not a lot, but not as opposed to doing them anymore. Just feeling myself as I imagine things I'd want to do with someone. It's just another way to explore what I want, like roleplays, right? Maybe you and I can imagine we're doing all these things with each other. Sweet dreams, Kimari 🌙🥀

Sensitive content

— ✧ Soft Ramblefap Listen to the full audio here or over on GWA (link in comment below). [F4M] I want more 🏷 Tags [ramblefap] [why am I so awkward] [begging] [soft moans] [imagine with me] [rain sounds] [overstim] [don't stop] [whimpering] [real orgasm x2] [pussy is a funny word] [I bought my first bottle of lube for you] [slight fourth wall break] [please just fuck me] [I deserve this] 📖 Summary The dating scene is rough. And sometimes you want more than a quick fuck. You want someone to hold. Someone to love. Someone who will love you back. It can get lonely, but at least we have each other. ─── ⋆⁺‧₊ ☾ ₊‧⁺⋆ ─── Hi Dreamers, I made this while testing out some audio equipment upgrades as I ramble and yearn. I don't do ramblefaps often. I always feel a little awkward doing them as opposed to roleplays. But I'm thinking I might do them more—not a lot, but not as opposed to doing them anymore. Just feeling myself as I imagine things I'd want to do with someone. It's just another way to explore what I want, like roleplays, right? Maybe you and I can imagine we're doing all these things with each other. Sweet dreams, Kimari 🌙🥀

KimariRoseVA 🌙🥀

45,979 просмотров • 4 дней назад

🚨 THE WHITE HOUSE PANIC: WHAT IS MELANIA TRYING TO BURY? 🕵️‍♀️ The internet is exploding after Yesterday's high-stakes, on-camera denial from First Lady Melania Trump at the White House regarding any connection to Jeffrey Epstein. She called the ongoing claims “lies” that “need to end today.” But the timing is raising massive questions. Why is the East Wing suddenly in a state of high alert over a story they claim is ancient history? 📚 THE SCRUBBED MANUSCRIPT The answer may lie in the legal firestorm surrounding the book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie. Reports confirm that the initial 2025 hardcover print run contained a nuclear-level quote attributed to a 2007 interview with Jeffrey Epstein: “The first time Donald had sex with Melania was on my plane. Little did he know I beat him to the punch a year before... things got wild... I ended up almost naked in the back of a limo, going at it with Melania.” ⚖️ THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS As soon as those first 60,000 copies hit the shelves, Melania’s legal team descended. The Recall: HarperCollins UK was forced to recall the book and scrub the passage from all future printings, e-books, and audiobooks. The Apology: The publisher issued a public apology, attempting to bury the claim entirely. The Missing Tapes: While Michael Wolff’s 2017 tapes (containing a different claim about the couple) are public, the raw audio or full transcript of this specific 2007 interview has never surfaced. ❓ THE PREEMPTIVE STRIKE Is Melania’s White House address a genuine defense of her character, or a preemptive strike against something else about to break? The book was scrubbed. The alleged 2007 interview tape is still missing. And now—just months later—the First Lady is using the White House podium to declare the Epstein talk must end. Why was the legal response to this specific book so aggressive? Why did she wait until April 2026 to make this specific on-camera denial? If the story is "defamatory and false," why the sudden five-alarm fire drill in the West Wing? 🧊 THE BIG PICTURE The Epstein shadow continues to loom over the administration, and this level of damage control suggests the "official narrative" is under serious pressure. Melania says the talk needs to "end today," but without the release of the unedited 2007 interview transcripts, the questions will only grow. Is this the final cover-up of the Epstein era, or the crack in the armor that brings the whole house of cards down? Share this before the "Handlers" scrub it again. 🕊️ Video from: RT

🚨 THE WHITE HOUSE PANIC: WHAT IS MELANIA TRYING TO BURY? 🕵️‍♀️ The internet is exploding after Yesterday's high-stakes, on-camera denial from First Lady Melania Trump at the White House regarding any connection to Jeffrey Epstein. She called the ongoing claims “lies” that “need to end today.” But the timing is raising massive questions. Why is the East Wing suddenly in a state of high alert over a story they claim is ancient history? 📚 THE SCRUBBED MANUSCRIPT The answer may lie in the legal firestorm surrounding the book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie. Reports confirm that the initial 2025 hardcover print run contained a nuclear-level quote attributed to a 2007 interview with Jeffrey Epstein: “The first time Donald had sex with Melania was on my plane. Little did he know I beat him to the punch a year before... things got wild... I ended up almost naked in the back of a limo, going at it with Melania.” ⚖️ THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS As soon as those first 60,000 copies hit the shelves, Melania’s legal team descended. The Recall: HarperCollins UK was forced to recall the book and scrub the passage from all future printings, e-books, and audiobooks. The Apology: The publisher issued a public apology, attempting to bury the claim entirely. The Missing Tapes: While Michael Wolff’s 2017 tapes (containing a different claim about the couple) are public, the raw audio or full transcript of this specific 2007 interview has never surfaced. ❓ THE PREEMPTIVE STRIKE Is Melania’s White House address a genuine defense of her character, or a preemptive strike against something else about to break? The book was scrubbed. The alleged 2007 interview tape is still missing. And now—just months later—the First Lady is using the White House podium to declare the Epstein talk must end. Why was the legal response to this specific book so aggressive? Why did she wait until April 2026 to make this specific on-camera denial? If the story is "defamatory and false," why the sudden five-alarm fire drill in the West Wing? 🧊 THE BIG PICTURE The Epstein shadow continues to loom over the administration, and this level of damage control suggests the "official narrative" is under serious pressure. Melania says the talk needs to "end today," but without the release of the unedited 2007 interview transcripts, the questions will only grow. Is this the final cover-up of the Epstein era, or the crack in the armor that brings the whole house of cards down? Share this before the "Handlers" scrub it again. 🕊️ Video from: RT

Project Constitution

43,336 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

‼️EXCLUSIVE: Turning Point USA Just Sent Me My Third Cease and Desist — And It’s Insane😱 I just received my third cease and desist letter from Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk’s legal team. This one came from their lawyer, Louis T. Perry of Faegre Drinker, dated June 11, 2026. What are they demanding this time? They’re ordering me to immediately and permanently stop using Charlie Kirk’s name, image, likeness, voice, video, or audio in any way on my account. They’re also demanding I remove every post, banner, profile picture, and anything else that features Charlie. Let that sink in. They’re threatening legal action against one of Charlie’s own supporters for using his photo as a memorial in my logo. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of thousands of accounts using that same photo. But apparently, I’m the only one they’re going after with lawyers. This isn’t about copyright. This is a blatant attempt to silence me from reporting on them. They’re trying to strip away my First Amendment rights to free speech and press by demanding I can no longer use Charlie’s name or image while criticizing Turning Point USA. They’re doing all of this with tax-free donor money — money that was given to support Charlie’s mission. Charlie himself never once sent cease and desist letters or sued people for reporting negatively on Turning Point. He would be disgusted by this. So far, Candace Owens and Zach from WolvesAndFinance have each received one. I’m the only one who’s received three. I’ll be posting my full response to their attorney very soon. In the meantime, here are all three cease and desist letters I’ve received. You can pause and read them yourself. These people are evil. ⚠️I am NOT kidding when i say my channel is under attack to try to bankrupt me. If you want to support me and help me keep fighting these demons... Donate here:🔗 CC: Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

167,074 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

As promised, here is the audio footage from an unprovoked verbal assault from @JoeDalyPB4PMayo and also visual footage of a subsequent assault of my partner Stephen Kerr (Joe bumped him from behind twice with his car and then drove off with Stephen on the bonnet). I had gotten 12 feet PAST Daly on the street when his young colleague stepped in my path (not knowing who I was) to speak to me. Daly then launched into a verbal attack, which resulted in my child crying (rest of video including audio from a stranger who witnessed what happened with the car is here ) He calls me a fascist probably over a dozen times. This is funny because fascists aggressively attack and suppress anyone with opposing views. So, who is the fascist? I think attacking someone without provocation while they are with their child minding their business might be classed as aggressive tactics toward someone with a different opinion to yours, and the irony is I agree with their stance on neutrality which is what they were engaging the public on when this incident unfolded. I was recording because I was warned he was about town and a buddy of Joe's (who he teamed up with to cancel Mise Éire, including making nuisance threatening calls to the hotel who hosted it) is taking Stephen and I to court for a vexatious civil restraining order. This person has also physically assaulted Stephen and has verbally assaulted us multiple times. As a consequence, we now record everything because these people are liars, and the stalking and harrassment is the other way around (clearly). I have witnessed Stephen be assaulted five times now by various people. Mostly PB4P members. The attacks are always unprovoked. Evidence of their lies can be seen on Daly's page. He wrote of this latest incident that I was the instigator and harrasser. But as people will hear, I did not speak to him first, and I was polite to his colleague. The longer version of this video has been posted already on YouTube and FB, and the vast majority of comments are from people who are disgusted at Daly (a teacher!) and supportive of us. One or two comments were from highly abusive PB4P supporters, and one or two said I should have just said nothing and moved on. But I teach my child you stand up to big bullies. Also when I say "f***ing" in this video I was highly upset at that point because my child had started to cry and to be honest I wanted to do more than curse at that point in relation to this big man, but I refrained. He sounds lower than me because he is a few feet away and the phone was close to my mouth. PB4P have become very emboldened lately. Remember recently, Ryan Casey being targeted by them in the most vile manner, despite that his girlfriend Ashling Murphy was almost decapitated? All because he has a valid and reasonable opinion on immigration? They are emboldened because the state is on their side. But I can tell Mr.Daly now that I will not be letting this matter (below) go. You did not have the decency to leave me alone while with my little girl. You hit my partner with your car. Teachers have a code of conduct they must follow and must be able to demonstrate an even and calm temperament. I will be making a complaint and the Gardaí have been notified of these incidents. You lied to the Gardaí and online about what happened. You didn't think that your verbal assault was recorded in full. I will ensure you stay away from me, my family and my partner. I give you my word. You have gone too far and better remove defamatory statement about me from your page ASAP.

As promised, here is the audio footage from an unprovoked verbal assault from @JoeDalyPB4PMayo and also visual footage of a subsequent assault of my partner Stephen Kerr (Joe bumped him from behind twice with his car and then drove off with Stephen on the bonnet). I had gotten 12 feet PAST Daly on the street when his young colleague stepped in my path (not knowing who I was) to speak to me. Daly then launched into a verbal attack, which resulted in my child crying (rest of video including audio from a stranger who witnessed what happened with the car is here ) He calls me a fascist probably over a dozen times. This is funny because fascists aggressively attack and suppress anyone with opposing views. So, who is the fascist? I think attacking someone without provocation while they are with their child minding their business might be classed as aggressive tactics toward someone with a different opinion to yours, and the irony is I agree with their stance on neutrality which is what they were engaging the public on when this incident unfolded. I was recording because I was warned he was about town and a buddy of Joe's (who he teamed up with to cancel Mise Éire, including making nuisance threatening calls to the hotel who hosted it) is taking Stephen and I to court for a vexatious civil restraining order. This person has also physically assaulted Stephen and has verbally assaulted us multiple times. As a consequence, we now record everything because these people are liars, and the stalking and harrassment is the other way around (clearly). I have witnessed Stephen be assaulted five times now by various people. Mostly PB4P members. The attacks are always unprovoked. Evidence of their lies can be seen on Daly's page. He wrote of this latest incident that I was the instigator and harrasser. But as people will hear, I did not speak to him first, and I was polite to his colleague. The longer version of this video has been posted already on YouTube and FB, and the vast majority of comments are from people who are disgusted at Daly (a teacher!) and supportive of us. One or two comments were from highly abusive PB4P supporters, and one or two said I should have just said nothing and moved on. But I teach my child you stand up to big bullies. Also when I say "f***ing" in this video I was highly upset at that point because my child had started to cry and to be honest I wanted to do more than curse at that point in relation to this big man, but I refrained. He sounds lower than me because he is a few feet away and the phone was close to my mouth. PB4P have become very emboldened lately. Remember recently, Ryan Casey being targeted by them in the most vile manner, despite that his girlfriend Ashling Murphy was almost decapitated? All because he has a valid and reasonable opinion on immigration? They are emboldened because the state is on their side. But I can tell Mr.Daly now that I will not be letting this matter (below) go. You did not have the decency to leave me alone while with my little girl. You hit my partner with your car. Teachers have a code of conduct they must follow and must be able to demonstrate an even and calm temperament. I will be making a complaint and the Gardaí have been notified of these incidents. You lied to the Gardaí and online about what happened. You didn't think that your verbal assault was recorded in full. I will ensure you stay away from me, my family and my partner. I give you my word. You have gone too far and better remove defamatory statement about me from your page ASAP.

Susanne Delaney

21,575 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 So Apparently Erika Kirk and TPUSA are also now part of this shady "History Rocks Tour" sponsored by the Dept. of Education with Linda McMahon. More evidence of The Trump admin colluding with Erika and Turning Point. . Genoa- Kingston High School in IL was the ONLY high school picked in the entire state, all thanks to their newly minted TPUSA "Club America" chapter (sounds culty already, right?). But Erika? Total MESS: Low-energy zombie mode, disheveled AF with rat's nest hair, awkward pauses like she's glitching on her script. And the HYPOCRISY? Off the charts! Let's cook her line-by-line—I'm going word-for-word, exposing every lie, fake act, cult vibe, and bitter shade. This is her using Charlie as a prop while preaching what she NEVER practices. 🔥 Let's break it down because this fraud needs a full roast: 1⃣Invoking Charlie RIGHT OFF THE BAT: "Charlie lived his life in a way where he was not afraid to speak. He chose to use his voice for something so powerful..." 🙄 Classic crutch! Erika, you trot out Charlie's name like a emotional shield EVERY time. But reminder: You've been gaslighting everyone about his death, hiding 4K footage, and firing 40+ staff who MIGHT speak out. Hypocrite Alert: You silence voices while praising "using your voice"? Cult-like manipulation—using a dead man's legacy to prop up your failing empire. And that voice change? From soft "emotional" whisper to loud preach—pure acting, flipping on a dime like a bad soap opera. 2⃣Soul-Marking Choices BS: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... As a young man, know that one day you're gonna be a father. Know that the way that you treat women... It matters." 😂 Erika preaching morality? YOU, who allegedly orchestrated shady deals with "Pierre" (billions in French-Israeli trafficking vibes?), lied about your whereabouts on Sept 10th, and sent cease-and-desist letters to shut down free speech? Lie Exposed: You fire people for "might" be talking smack online, but tell kids decisions "mark your soul"? Your soul's got more red flags than a communist parade. Bitter much? This screams adversarial—projecting your own guilt onto teens. 3⃣Ladies, Be Ladies Hypocrisy: "Ladies, be that. Be ladies, be modest. Live your life in a way that's honoring, honor your parents." 😤 LOOK AT YOU, Erika! Disheveled mess on stage—hair like a bird's nest after a storm, low-energy slop. You're the OPPOSITE of "proper" or "modest." Hypocrite Level 1000: Telling girls to "be ladies" while you act like a hot mess express? And honoring parents? You dishonor Charlie's memory by using him as a prop! Voice shift here: Goes soft and "inspirational," but it's FAKE—eyes dead, pauses like she's reading cue cards. Culty: Pushing this "higher standard" while your org's a purge factory. 4⃣Building Greater Things Lie: "Build something greater than just focusing on what's next in your life. Don't compromise your character." 🤡 "Build something"? Erika, WHAT have YOU built? TPUSA was Charlie's baby—you're just the widow riding coattails, firing loyalists, and dodging transparency. Lie Called Out: You compromise character DAILY—gaslighting about assassinations, ignoring questions, outright lying on Fox. Bitter Tone: "You guys might think it's great to go along with the crowd... to laugh at certain things that aren't funny." Projecting your online hate? People are "laughing" at YOU for being fake and inauthentic. Act Detected: Loud emphasis on "build," then soft pause—shifting expressions like a chameleon. 5⃣Newspaper Front Page Wisdom?: "My aunt used to tell me, never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper. Live your life in that way... not because you're afraid, but because you hold yourself to a higher standard." 💀 IRONY OVERLOAD! Erika, your scandals ARE front-page material: Shady Egyptian planes, Bibi Netanyahu ties, firing sprees, hypocrisy on transparency. Hypocrite Roast: You hide behind lawyers and PR billions, but preach "higher standard"? Cult Vibe: This "people are watching" paranoia sounds like Big Brother TPUSA—watching staff, silencing critics. Voice Weirdness: Draws out "higher standard" loudly, then whispers—total performance, not genuine. 6⃣Insulting People & Assassin's Choices: "You might think it's cool to insult people... The man that took my husband's life, he made a choice over a course of time. He made the wrong decision consistently." 😡 Using the assassin as a moral prop? Low blow, Erika. But YOU insult and attack creators with legal threats for using First Amendment rights! Lie Exposed: "Stand up for the First Amendment" elsewhere, but here warning against "insulting"? You're feeling the online heat—words DO hurt when they're true about your fakeness. Adversarial Bitter: Blaming "choices" while your choices include cover-ups and psyops. Act Alert: Pauses dramatically before "he made the wrong decision"—theatrical AF. 7⃣Grocery Cart Eternal Soul Mark?: "Even though your choice might be small... deciding whether or not to put the grocery cart back... Those choices leave a mark on your soul, feed for eternity. People are watching." 🤦‍♂️ Culty AF! Turning a cart into "eternal soul mark"? This is fear-mongering manipulation—guilt-tripping kids into obedience. Hypocrite: You "watch" your staff like a hawk, firing them preemptively. Bitter Projection: "One day, your kids will watch you." Subtle shade at critics? Voice Shift: Soft and "wise," but it's scripted—long pause before "feed for eternity" like she forgot her line. 8⃣Emotional Breakdown Act: "Sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days. I apologize." 🥱 FAKE TEARS ALERT! This "emotional" pivot? Pure act—voice cracks on cue, but eyes say otherwise. Using "Charlie started here" as another prop. Hypocrite: Preaching boldness while you're low-energy and messy. Cult End: "Be bold and fearless. Not everyone is called to be on the front lines." Translation: Obey quietly, don't protest like those outside! This clip is PEAK Erika: Hypocritical, culty, acting queen using Charlie as bait. Protests outside? Deserved! Tag Candace Owens, watch, and RT if you're over the lies—TPUSA's crumbling! 💥 📡Side Note: Help us expose TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" below 👇 -WE NEED YOUR HELP

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 So Apparently Erika Kirk and TPUSA are also now part of this shady "History Rocks Tour" sponsored by the Dept. of Education with Linda McMahon. More evidence of The Trump admin colluding with Erika and Turning Point. . Genoa- Kingston High School in IL was the ONLY high school picked in the entire state, all thanks to their newly minted TPUSA "Club America" chapter (sounds culty already, right?). But Erika? Total MESS: Low-energy zombie mode, disheveled AF with rat's nest hair, awkward pauses like she's glitching on her script. And the HYPOCRISY? Off the charts! Let's cook her line-by-line—I'm going word-for-word, exposing every lie, fake act, cult vibe, and bitter shade. This is her using Charlie as a prop while preaching what she NEVER practices. 🔥 Let's break it down because this fraud needs a full roast: 1⃣Invoking Charlie RIGHT OFF THE BAT: "Charlie lived his life in a way where he was not afraid to speak. He chose to use his voice for something so powerful..." 🙄 Classic crutch! Erika, you trot out Charlie's name like a emotional shield EVERY time. But reminder: You've been gaslighting everyone about his death, hiding 4K footage, and firing 40+ staff who MIGHT speak out. Hypocrite Alert: You silence voices while praising "using your voice"? Cult-like manipulation—using a dead man's legacy to prop up your failing empire. And that voice change? From soft "emotional" whisper to loud preach—pure acting, flipping on a dime like a bad soap opera. 2⃣Soul-Marking Choices BS: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... As a young man, know that one day you're gonna be a father. Know that the way that you treat women... It matters." 😂 Erika preaching morality? YOU, who allegedly orchestrated shady deals with "Pierre" (billions in French-Israeli trafficking vibes?), lied about your whereabouts on Sept 10th, and sent cease-and-desist letters to shut down free speech? Lie Exposed: You fire people for "might" be talking smack online, but tell kids decisions "mark your soul"? Your soul's got more red flags than a communist parade. Bitter much? This screams adversarial—projecting your own guilt onto teens. 3⃣Ladies, Be Ladies Hypocrisy: "Ladies, be that. Be ladies, be modest. Live your life in a way that's honoring, honor your parents." 😤 LOOK AT YOU, Erika! Disheveled mess on stage—hair like a bird's nest after a storm, low-energy slop. You're the OPPOSITE of "proper" or "modest." Hypocrite Level 1000: Telling girls to "be ladies" while you act like a hot mess express? And honoring parents? You dishonor Charlie's memory by using him as a prop! Voice shift here: Goes soft and "inspirational," but it's FAKE—eyes dead, pauses like she's reading cue cards. Culty: Pushing this "higher standard" while your org's a purge factory. 4⃣Building Greater Things Lie: "Build something greater than just focusing on what's next in your life. Don't compromise your character." 🤡 "Build something"? Erika, WHAT have YOU built? TPUSA was Charlie's baby—you're just the widow riding coattails, firing loyalists, and dodging transparency. Lie Called Out: You compromise character DAILY—gaslighting about assassinations, ignoring questions, outright lying on Fox. Bitter Tone: "You guys might think it's great to go along with the crowd... to laugh at certain things that aren't funny." Projecting your online hate? People are "laughing" at YOU for being fake and inauthentic. Act Detected: Loud emphasis on "build," then soft pause—shifting expressions like a chameleon. 5⃣Newspaper Front Page Wisdom?: "My aunt used to tell me, never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper. Live your life in that way... not because you're afraid, but because you hold yourself to a higher standard." 💀 IRONY OVERLOAD! Erika, your scandals ARE front-page material: Shady Egyptian planes, Bibi Netanyahu ties, firing sprees, hypocrisy on transparency. Hypocrite Roast: You hide behind lawyers and PR billions, but preach "higher standard"? Cult Vibe: This "people are watching" paranoia sounds like Big Brother TPUSA—watching staff, silencing critics. Voice Weirdness: Draws out "higher standard" loudly, then whispers—total performance, not genuine. 6⃣Insulting People & Assassin's Choices: "You might think it's cool to insult people... The man that took my husband's life, he made a choice over a course of time. He made the wrong decision consistently." 😡 Using the assassin as a moral prop? Low blow, Erika. But YOU insult and attack creators with legal threats for using First Amendment rights! Lie Exposed: "Stand up for the First Amendment" elsewhere, but here warning against "insulting"? You're feeling the online heat—words DO hurt when they're true about your fakeness. Adversarial Bitter: Blaming "choices" while your choices include cover-ups and psyops. Act Alert: Pauses dramatically before "he made the wrong decision"—theatrical AF. 7⃣Grocery Cart Eternal Soul Mark?: "Even though your choice might be small... deciding whether or not to put the grocery cart back... Those choices leave a mark on your soul, feed for eternity. People are watching." 🤦‍♂️ Culty AF! Turning a cart into "eternal soul mark"? This is fear-mongering manipulation—guilt-tripping kids into obedience. Hypocrite: You "watch" your staff like a hawk, firing them preemptively. Bitter Projection: "One day, your kids will watch you." Subtle shade at critics? Voice Shift: Soft and "wise," but it's scripted—long pause before "feed for eternity" like she forgot her line. 8⃣Emotional Breakdown Act: "Sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days. I apologize." 🥱 FAKE TEARS ALERT! This "emotional" pivot? Pure act—voice cracks on cue, but eyes say otherwise. Using "Charlie started here" as another prop. Hypocrite: Preaching boldness while you're low-energy and messy. Cult End: "Be bold and fearless. Not everyone is called to be on the front lines." Translation: Obey quietly, don't protest like those outside! This clip is PEAK Erika: Hypocritical, culty, acting queen using Charlie as bait. Protests outside? Deserved! Tag Candace Owens, watch, and RT if you're over the lies—TPUSA's crumbling! 💥 📡Side Note: Help us expose TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" below 👇 -WE NEED YOUR HELP

Project Constitution

947,261 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

For those like me who don’t like reading just excerpts and prefer to see the full picture — here you can find Trump’s full comments aboard Air Force One reacting to all the latest developments. What’s really striking is that, alongside the full-throated excuses for Witkoff, there are also some tough questions from journalists. And there are also these oddly detailed conversations about the land concessions Ukraine is supposedly expected to accept. Trump sounds convinced that Russia is winning — which is simply not true. Journalist: Could you start off by telling the latest on Russia and Ukraine? Are you expecting President Zelensky to come visit you? The US President Donald Trump: I would like for him to come, but I think we should get a deal done first. We're having good talks. We started with Russia, by having some talks with Russia. Ukraine is doing well. I think they're pretty happy about it. They'd like to see it ended. We won't know for a little while, but we're making progress. We settled eight wars, and I thought this would be one of the easier ones, because of my relationship with President Putin. But this is probably one of the more difficult ones. There is a lot of hatred. Journalist: You were saying there are still disagreements, can you please tell us what those are about? The US President Donald Trump: Yeah, there are a few. Just standard things. But people are starting to realize it's a good deal for both parties, and they’ve got to stop the war. They're losing a lot of people, a lot of soldiers, mostly soldiers. Journalist: Can you explain what the current proposal involves? The US President Donald Trump: That was in original proposal. And then from there, we went back and forth. Journalist: Regarding giving land to Russia — is that still on the table? Has that changed? The US President Donald Trump: Well, they’re talking about giving land both ways. They’re trying to clean up the border. You know, you can't go through the middle of a house, you can’t go through the middle of a highway. So they're trying to work something. It's a complicated process. It doesn’t go that quickly. Journalist: On the security guarantees for Ukraine… The US President Donald Trump: We're working that out with Europe. Europe will be largely involved in that. We're working it out with Europe. Europe really wants to see an end if possible. Journalist: There were a lot of Republicans who felt that the first — the 28-point plan — was too favorable to Russia. Have you changed that? The US President Donald Trump: Well, that was just a map. All that was is a map. That was not a plan. It was a concept. And from there, they're taking each one of the 28 points, and then you get down to 22 points. A lot of them were solved. And actually very favorably solved. So we'll see what happens. Journalist: Do you think Ukraine was being asked to give too much land back to Russia? The US President Donald Trump: The way it's going, if you look, it's just moving in one direction. So eventually, that land, over the next couple of months, might be gotten by Russia anyway. So do you want to fight and lose another 50, 60,000 people, or you want to do something now? In some cases, the land is going in the other direction. So they're negotiating. They're trying to get it done. You want to have a border. You can't have a border that goes through a highway, or a border that goes through the middle of a town — so it doesn't work. So it's a long, complicated process. And it’s very sad, because so many people are being killed. Journalist: What’s the next step in the negotiations? The US President Donald Trump: They're gonna keep talking. They're talking to Russia now. Steve Witkoff is going over, maybe with Jared. I'm not sure about Jared going, but he's involved in the process, smart guy. And they're gonna be meeting with President Putin, I believe next week in Moscow. Journalist: Next week in Moscow? The US President Donald Trump: I think so, yeah Journalist: What kind of concessions are the Russians going to have to make? The US President Donald Trump: Well, they’re making concessions. The big concession is if they stop fighting, and they don't take any more land. Again, it’s a war that would have never happened if I was president. This was not anything that was going to happen. This happened because of stupidity. Journalist: If the talks are going to Russia next week, does that mean that the Thanksgiving deadline doesn’t stand anymore for Ukraine? The US President Donald Trump: We're going to see what happens. They set up a date — the date is going to be sometime in the very near future. Journalist: Do you have a new deadline? The US President Donald Trump: No, I don’t have a deadline. The deadline for me is when it's over. And I think everybody's tired of fighting in this moment. They're losing too many people. Journalist: Have you heard that audio that Bloomberg has of Witkoff coaching the Russians on how to appeal to you? The US President Donald Trump: I haven't heard it, no, but that’s a standard thing, because he's got to sell this to Ukraine. He's got to sell Ukraine to Russia. That's what a dealmaker does. He's got to say, “Look, they want this, you got to convince them with this.” You know, that's a very standard form of negotiation. I haven't heard it, but I heard it was standard negotiation. And I would imagine he's saying the same thing to Ukraine, because each party has to give and take. Journalist: So you don’t worry that he is too pro-Russian? The US President Donald Trump: No, I think… look… This war could go on for years, and Russia's got a lot more people, a lot more soldiers. So I think if Ukraine can make a deal, it's a good thing. I think it's great for both. Frankly, I think it's great for both. Ukraine has a much smaller, much smaller group of people. They’ve lost a lot of people. Russia has lost a lot of people, but Russia has a much bigger pool of people.

For those like me who don’t like reading just excerpts and prefer to see the full picture — here you can find Trump’s full comments aboard Air Force One reacting to all the latest developments. What’s really striking is that, alongside the full-throated excuses for Witkoff, there are also some tough questions from journalists. And there are also these oddly detailed conversations about the land concessions Ukraine is supposedly expected to accept. Trump sounds convinced that Russia is winning — which is simply not true. Journalist: Could you start off by telling the latest on Russia and Ukraine? Are you expecting President Zelensky to come visit you? The US President Donald Trump: I would like for him to come, but I think we should get a deal done first. We're having good talks. We started with Russia, by having some talks with Russia. Ukraine is doing well. I think they're pretty happy about it. They'd like to see it ended. We won't know for a little while, but we're making progress. We settled eight wars, and I thought this would be one of the easier ones, because of my relationship with President Putin. But this is probably one of the more difficult ones. There is a lot of hatred. Journalist: You were saying there are still disagreements, can you please tell us what those are about? The US President Donald Trump: Yeah, there are a few. Just standard things. But people are starting to realize it's a good deal for both parties, and they’ve got to stop the war. They're losing a lot of people, a lot of soldiers, mostly soldiers. Journalist: Can you explain what the current proposal involves? The US President Donald Trump: That was in original proposal. And then from there, we went back and forth. Journalist: Regarding giving land to Russia — is that still on the table? Has that changed? The US President Donald Trump: Well, they’re talking about giving land both ways. They’re trying to clean up the border. You know, you can't go through the middle of a house, you can’t go through the middle of a highway. So they're trying to work something. It's a complicated process. It doesn’t go that quickly. Journalist: On the security guarantees for Ukraine… The US President Donald Trump: We're working that out with Europe. Europe will be largely involved in that. We're working it out with Europe. Europe really wants to see an end if possible. Journalist: There were a lot of Republicans who felt that the first — the 28-point plan — was too favorable to Russia. Have you changed that? The US President Donald Trump: Well, that was just a map. All that was is a map. That was not a plan. It was a concept. And from there, they're taking each one of the 28 points, and then you get down to 22 points. A lot of them were solved. And actually very favorably solved. So we'll see what happens. Journalist: Do you think Ukraine was being asked to give too much land back to Russia? The US President Donald Trump: The way it's going, if you look, it's just moving in one direction. So eventually, that land, over the next couple of months, might be gotten by Russia anyway. So do you want to fight and lose another 50, 60,000 people, or you want to do something now? In some cases, the land is going in the other direction. So they're negotiating. They're trying to get it done. You want to have a border. You can't have a border that goes through a highway, or a border that goes through the middle of a town — so it doesn't work. So it's a long, complicated process. And it’s very sad, because so many people are being killed. Journalist: What’s the next step in the negotiations? The US President Donald Trump: They're gonna keep talking. They're talking to Russia now. Steve Witkoff is going over, maybe with Jared. I'm not sure about Jared going, but he's involved in the process, smart guy. And they're gonna be meeting with President Putin, I believe next week in Moscow. Journalist: Next week in Moscow? The US President Donald Trump: I think so, yeah Journalist: What kind of concessions are the Russians going to have to make? The US President Donald Trump: Well, they’re making concessions. The big concession is if they stop fighting, and they don't take any more land. Again, it’s a war that would have never happened if I was president. This was not anything that was going to happen. This happened because of stupidity. Journalist: If the talks are going to Russia next week, does that mean that the Thanksgiving deadline doesn’t stand anymore for Ukraine? The US President Donald Trump: We're going to see what happens. They set up a date — the date is going to be sometime in the very near future. Journalist: Do you have a new deadline? The US President Donald Trump: No, I don’t have a deadline. The deadline for me is when it's over. And I think everybody's tired of fighting in this moment. They're losing too many people. Journalist: Have you heard that audio that Bloomberg has of Witkoff coaching the Russians on how to appeal to you? The US President Donald Trump: I haven't heard it, no, but that’s a standard thing, because he's got to sell this to Ukraine. He's got to sell Ukraine to Russia. That's what a dealmaker does. He's got to say, “Look, they want this, you got to convince them with this.” You know, that's a very standard form of negotiation. I haven't heard it, but I heard it was standard negotiation. And I would imagine he's saying the same thing to Ukraine, because each party has to give and take. Journalist: So you don’t worry that he is too pro-Russian? The US President Donald Trump: No, I think… look… This war could go on for years, and Russia's got a lot more people, a lot more soldiers. So I think if Ukraine can make a deal, it's a good thing. I think it's great for both. Frankly, I think it's great for both. Ukraine has a much smaller, much smaller group of people. They’ve lost a lot of people. Russia has lost a lot of people, but Russia has a much bigger pool of people.

Kateryna Lisunova

113,961 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад