Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic is incredibly dangerous because they are ruthlessly aligned around one mission: reaching super intelligence as fast as possible. "Anthropic has 7 co-founders, and none of them have left. They've all stayed, which is very impressive for an AI company. At OpenAI, everyone's left. Anthropic is... show more

PBD Podcast

552,607 subscribers

23,807 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Chud

Chud2 дней назад

This is literally an advertisement and you all are falling for it

Фото профиля karlaboi

karlaboi2 дней назад

PBD any comments on ur bestfriend Tate ?

Фото профиля Mike Bishop

Mike Bishop2 дней назад

One of your best episodes!

Фото профиля Paul Boggs

Paul Boggs2 дней назад

I wish you asked about how SI will impact universities and children born today. Will they be unmotivated to learn.

Фото профиля 🇺🇸 San Diego Sun

🇺🇸 San Diego Sun2 дней назад

Why are you listening to a kid who is intelligent doesn’t have the wisdom or the foresight that adults do from life experience.

Фото профиля Dalton Welbern

Dalton Welbern2 дней назад

Fascinating

Фото профиля Jeremy C. Jones

Jeremy C. Jones3 дней назад

A clear mission can make a team incredibly effective. It also makes the ability to question that mission from inside the company even more important.

Фото профиля ChristinaScaletta

ChristinaScaletta2 дней назад

On appelle ça la honte prométhéenne.

Фото профиля BOUNOUA Nadir

BOUNOUA Nadir2 дней назад

He breaks our heads with that intern’s face

Фото профиля Dogtown

Dogtown2 дней назад

Who's says SF aint fun. You got these guys running around the city on a mission to create the Kree Supreme Intelligence. Great starter conversation at Redwood room. Not enough f-ing Christians in SF. Spectrum weird belief dudes dominate. But got damn, Opus 5.5 is the bomb and Sol 6.x is mid. Hope Grok can catch up.

Похожие видео

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic employees call themselves “ants” and sacrifice their careers for the company’s singular pursuit of superintelligence, while calling OpenAI "distracted and messy" “At Anthropic, it felt a lot more like—well, for starters, the employees call themselves ants. They’re ants in the anthill. Everyone is like a worker ant trying to make Anthropic’s mission go well. “People are very willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the mission. They’ll take on work that’s less interesting, less big, bold and exciting, and less flashy. They’ll do it at a hit to their own interests for the good of the company. “That’s because every decision comes back down to, ‘Is this going to get us to superintelligence faster?’ “You’ve seen Sora, the video platform OpenAI made. Anthropic would never make Sora because it’s not on the core path to artificial superintelligence. OpenAI is distracted and messy. One guy says, ‘I want to do Sora,’ or, ‘I want to build a little device,’ and they let them do it because it doesn’t have the same focus. At Anthropic, that would never happen.” Patrick Bet-David: “Who would shut it down? The seven co-founders?” Jacob Coxon: “They’d all agree. It would be like, ‘This video isn’t the right direction for heading straight to superintelligence.’”

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic employees call themselves “ants” and sacrifice their careers for the company’s singular pursuit of superintelligence, while calling OpenAI "distracted and messy" “At Anthropic, it felt a lot more like—well, for starters, the employees call themselves ants. They’re ants in the anthill. Everyone is like a worker ant trying to make Anthropic’s mission go well. “People are very willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the mission. They’ll take on work that’s less interesting, less big, bold and exciting, and less flashy. They’ll do it at a hit to their own interests for the good of the company. “That’s because every decision comes back down to, ‘Is this going to get us to superintelligence faster?’ “You’ve seen Sora, the video platform OpenAI made. Anthropic would never make Sora because it’s not on the core path to artificial superintelligence. OpenAI is distracted and messy. One guy says, ‘I want to do Sora,’ or, ‘I want to build a little device,’ and they let them do it because it doesn’t have the same focus. At Anthropic, that would never happen.” Patrick Bet-David: “Who would shut it down? The seven co-founders?” Jacob Coxon: “They’d all agree. It would be like, ‘This video isn’t the right direction for heading straight to superintelligence.’”

Fireside Alpha

252,324 просмотров • 3 дней назад

.Axios AI Reporter Madison Mills says employees at Google DeepMind were at odds with Demis Hassabis over the company's mission: "I talked to people at Google DeepMind who are really at odds with Demis when it comes to the company mission." "The disagreement is around Google making deals with the US military." "At Anthropic, mission is such a core part of the culture. They even ask candidates about real-life moral dilemmas during interviews."

.Axios AI Reporter Madison Mills says employees at Google DeepMind were at odds with Demis Hassabis over the company's mission: "I talked to people at Google DeepMind who are really at odds with Demis when it comes to the company mission." "The disagreement is around Google making deals with the US military." "At Anthropic, mission is such a core part of the culture. They even ask candidates about real-life moral dilemmas during interviews."

etn.

53,927 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Tulsi Gabbard just called out CNN as the propaganda arm of the intelligence community. Wow. This is a must watch video. Tulsi: "They are exposing themselves essentially by making this indirect threat, using their propaganda arm through CNN that they’ve used over and over again to reveal their hand, that their loyalty is not at all to America, it is not to the American people or the Constitution, it is to themselves." "These are exactly the kinds of people that we need to root out." "I have to tell you, one of the byproducts of what I saw today is because of this immediate action of transparency and accountability." "I have people within the intelligence community reaching out to me personally and directly saying 'Hey, you need to know about this, you need to look over here.'" "People are stepping forward because they are all on board with the mission to clean house and refocus on our core mission of serving the American people."

Tulsi Gabbard just called out CNN as the propaganda arm of the intelligence community. Wow. This is a must watch video. Tulsi: "They are exposing themselves essentially by making this indirect threat, using their propaganda arm through CNN that they’ve used over and over again to reveal their hand, that their loyalty is not at all to America, it is not to the American people or the Constitution, it is to themselves." "These are exactly the kinds of people that we need to root out." "I have to tell you, one of the byproducts of what I saw today is because of this immediate action of transparency and accountability." "I have people within the intelligence community reaching out to me personally and directly saying 'Hey, you need to know about this, you need to look over here.'" "People are stepping forward because they are all on board with the mission to clean house and refocus on our core mission of serving the American people."

Gunther Eagleman™

15,167,991 просмотров • 1 год назад

SF Compute CEO evan conrad on his contrarian thesis that OpenAI and Anthropic won't eat the world, everyone will become OpenAI and Anthropic instead: "Our impression is not that OpenAI and Anthropic will eat the world, it's that everyone will look like OpenAI and Anthropic. That's simply the way that companies work now." "Every single company in the world that is of meaningful scale will look like a frontier lab. There is this belief that the large labs have won it all, and they've got this compounding advantage. The default assumption of that is assuming nobody else will do anything." "The bottleneck was there's 100 people, and they know how to train the models. Or you thought, the problem is compute. The problem of compute is credit. And OpenAI and Anthropic are not unique to having credit. In fact, they don't have as good credit as other people." "If you assume the problem is not the researchers, that that problem's basically gone away the moment you got to auto research, then what you should assume is that pretty much every other company is going to swap the way they work to look like a frontier lab. It won't be OpenAI and Anthropic take the whole world. It's that everyone's OpenAI and Anthropic now." San Francisco Compute

SF Compute CEO evan conrad on his contrarian thesis that OpenAI and Anthropic won't eat the world, everyone will become OpenAI and Anthropic instead: "Our impression is not that OpenAI and Anthropic will eat the world, it's that everyone will look like OpenAI and Anthropic. That's simply the way that companies work now." "Every single company in the world that is of meaningful scale will look like a frontier lab. There is this belief that the large labs have won it all, and they've got this compounding advantage. The default assumption of that is assuming nobody else will do anything." "The bottleneck was there's 100 people, and they know how to train the models. Or you thought, the problem is compute. The problem of compute is credit. And OpenAI and Anthropic are not unique to having credit. In fact, they don't have as good credit as other people." "If you assume the problem is not the researchers, that that problem's basically gone away the moment you got to auto research, then what you should assume is that pretty much every other company is going to swap the way they work to look like a frontier lab. It won't be OpenAI and Anthropic take the whole world. It's that everyone's OpenAI and Anthropic now." San Francisco Compute

MTS

135,546 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

DARIO AMODEI RESPONDS TO JACOB COXON, THE RESEARCHER WHO RESIGNED FROM ANTHROPIC SAYING IT AND OPENAI ARE "GAMBLING WITH OUR LIVES" Coxon's Sept. 8 resignation post drew more than 168 million views. Amodei says Coxon also called Anthropic the most responsible of the major players, and that the company is "talking to government officials every day." "He was calling out, honestly, the same thing that I'm calling out, which is the difficulty of the situation, the structural difficulty of the situation that we're all in, and that the plan that I've put out is designed to help us address... We are talking to government officials every day, in the Commerce Department... in the intelligence community, to tell them as much as we can what we know."

DARIO AMODEI RESPONDS TO JACOB COXON, THE RESEARCHER WHO RESIGNED FROM ANTHROPIC SAYING IT AND OPENAI ARE "GAMBLING WITH OUR LIVES" Coxon's Sept. 8 resignation post drew more than 168 million views. Amodei says Coxon also called Anthropic the most responsible of the major players, and that the company is "talking to government officials every day." "He was calling out, honestly, the same thing that I'm calling out, which is the difficulty of the situation, the structural difficulty of the situation that we're all in, and that the plan that I've put out is designed to help us address... We are talking to government officials every day, in the Commerce Department... in the intelligence community, to tell them as much as we can what we know."

IPO Newsroom

55,399 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Elon Musk on why Dario and the Anthropic team left OpenAI: "Dario, I think is not a fan of Sam Altman. In fact the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI" "I think Dario is a very principled person. He cares about things a lot, cares about the future of the world" "Everyone I've met at Anthropic so far, no one set off my evil detector. They always seem like they're well-intentioned" "The road to hell is, I think, mostly paved with bad intentions. There are a few well-intentioned paving stones in there, so we don't want to be complacent" "At the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk. Set aside our personal differences for the good of the world type of thing"

Elon Musk on why Dario and the Anthropic team left OpenAI: "Dario, I think is not a fan of Sam Altman. In fact the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI" "I think Dario is a very principled person. He cares about things a lot, cares about the future of the world" "Everyone I've met at Anthropic so far, no one set off my evil detector. They always seem like they're well-intentioned" "The road to hell is, I think, mostly paved with bad intentions. There are a few well-intentioned paving stones in there, so we don't want to be complacent" "At the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk. Set aside our personal differences for the good of the world type of thing"

Jaynit

91,572 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Musk: AI risk is rising fast. When people at Anthropic and OpenAI say their models are dangerous, believe them. It is wild to say there is a 10% chance of destroying humanity, then ask investors how much IPO allocation they want. 1/

Musk: AI risk is rising fast. When people at Anthropic and OpenAI say their models are dangerous, believe them. It is wild to say there is a 10% chance of destroying humanity, then ask investors how much IPO allocation they want. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

21,333 просмотров • 24 дней назад

"We know how to control nuclear weapons... We don't yet know how to control AI." Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who recently left the company, is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, calling it "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created." Coxon, who says he spent three years conducting research at Anthropic and OpenAI, wrote in a viral post on X that the companies are more focused on beating each other to build the most advanced AI models than they are on safety. He says an international AI arms race would be "disastrous," arguing global cooperation is the only way to manage the rapidly advancing technology. Special Report

"We know how to control nuclear weapons... We don't yet know how to control AI." Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who recently left the company, is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, calling it "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created." Coxon, who says he spent three years conducting research at Anthropic and OpenAI, wrote in a viral post on X that the companies are more focused on beating each other to build the most advanced AI models than they are on safety. He says an international AI arms race would be "disastrous," arguing global cooperation is the only way to manage the rapidly advancing technology. Special Report

Fox News

1,702,051 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Katie Miller to Elon Musk: People think you're a very difficult person to work for, but I think you're very kind. “People think you are a very demanding boss. I've never heard you yell at any employee. I think every employee who works at every single one of your companies is incredibly mission-driven, which is unlike any other workplace I've ever seen. Like, Starbase is the most inspirational place you'll ever go to. Everyone is there to work on a singular goal. And so I think, to me, the biggest misconception about you is how every employee at all of your companies is fiercely loyal because it's all mission-driven. And you are a very good employer to work for.” Interview with Katie Miller, December 10, 2025

Katie Miller to Elon Musk: People think you're a very difficult person to work for, but I think you're very kind. “People think you are a very demanding boss. I've never heard you yell at any employee. I think every employee who works at every single one of your companies is incredibly mission-driven, which is unlike any other workplace I've ever seen. Like, Starbase is the most inspirational place you'll ever go to. Everyone is there to work on a singular goal. And so I think, to me, the biggest misconception about you is how every employee at all of your companies is fiercely loyal because it's all mission-driven. And you are a very good employer to work for.” Interview with Katie Miller, December 10, 2025

ELON CLIPS

33,882 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Why was Anthropic’s Christopher Olah at the Vatican? For 10 years, the Catholic Church tried to engage Silicon Valley and was mostly rebuffed. Anthropic engaged. When Anthropic stood up to Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon last February, the Vatican made its choice: Anthropic is our friend in SV. But it isn’t a closed relationship. Any AI company willing to place the dignity of the human person at the center of its mission has a friend in Leo XIV.

Why was Anthropic’s Christopher Olah at the Vatican? For 10 years, the Catholic Church tried to engage Silicon Valley and was mostly rebuffed. Anthropic engaged. When Anthropic stood up to Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon last February, the Vatican made its choice: Anthropic is our friend in SV. But it isn’t a closed relationship. Any AI company willing to place the dignity of the human person at the center of its mission has a friend in Leo XIV.

Christopher Hale

20,148 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This is the best take I have heard around the existing AI landscape today Fantastic explanation around the constraints at OpenAI and Anthropic, focus on enterprise business models, and the doomerism narrative in AI From former AI czar David Sacks "Even though Anthropic's revenue has followed this exponential graph very predictably, it cannot do that ever. The reason is that as you hit new levels of scale, you encounter new problems. You are simply going to run out of compute, electricity, data centers, and infrastructure. There are limits to the physical world you are going to hit. And there is already evidence that Anthropic is hitting some of those limits."

This is the best take I have heard around the existing AI landscape today Fantastic explanation around the constraints at OpenAI and Anthropic, focus on enterprise business models, and the doomerism narrative in AI From former AI czar David Sacks "Even though Anthropic's revenue has followed this exponential graph very predictably, it cannot do that ever. The reason is that as you hit new levels of scale, you encounter new problems. You are simply going to run out of compute, electricity, data centers, and infrastructure. There are limits to the physical world you are going to hit. And there is already evidence that Anthropic is hitting some of those limits."

Boring_Business

236,523 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel on what most founders don’t understand about differentiation “I think you want to have very big differences inside the team, and then from the outside, you want to be seen as very different from the rest of the world.” For example, SpacEx’s mission is to go to Mars: “Everybody at the company thinks: we’re the only place in the world where people are going to go to Mars. And that one idea separates it very sharply from the rest of the world.” And then within a company, you want the roles to be as differentiated as possible. One of the challenges in an early stage startup is that the roles tend to fluctuate a lot. Thiel believes this is one of the ways in which conflicts tend to arise. “If you were a sociopathic boss who just wanted to create conflicts amongst your employees for no reason at all, the formula for creating conflicts is to tell two people to do the exact same thing.” To summarize his point, Thiel concludes: “You want to have roles differentiated sharply differentiated within companies. And you want to have the mission of the company differentiated sharply from the rest of the world.” Source: Saïd Business School (May 2015)

Peter Thiel on what most founders don’t understand about differentiation “I think you want to have very big differences inside the team, and then from the outside, you want to be seen as very different from the rest of the world.” For example, SpacEx’s mission is to go to Mars: “Everybody at the company thinks: we’re the only place in the world where people are going to go to Mars. And that one idea separates it very sharply from the rest of the world.” And then within a company, you want the roles to be as differentiated as possible. One of the challenges in an early stage startup is that the roles tend to fluctuate a lot. Thiel believes this is one of the ways in which conflicts tend to arise. “If you were a sociopathic boss who just wanted to create conflicts amongst your employees for no reason at all, the formula for creating conflicts is to tell two people to do the exact same thing.” To summarize his point, Thiel concludes: “You want to have roles differentiated sharply differentiated within companies. And you want to have the mission of the company differentiated sharply from the rest of the world.” Source: Saïd Business School (May 2015)

Startup Archive

25,702 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel on what most founders don’t understand about differentiation “I think you want to have very big differences inside the team, and then from the outside, you want to be seen as very different from the rest of the world.” For example, SpacEx’s mission is to go to Mars: “Everybody at the company thinks: we’re the only place in the world where people are going to go to Mars. And that one idea separates it very sharply from the rest of the world.” And then within a company, you want the roles to be as differentiated as possible. One of the challenges in an early stage startup is that the roles tend to fluctuate a lot. Thiel believes this is one of the ways in which conflicts tend to arise. “If you were a sociopathic boss who just wanted to create conflicts amongst your employees for no reason at all, the formula for creating conflicts is to tell two people to do the exact same thing.” To summarize his point, Thiel concludes: “You want to have roles differentiated sharply differentiated within companies. And you want to have the mission of the company differentiated sharply from the rest of the world.” Video source: Saïd Business School (2015)

Peter Thiel on what most founders don’t understand about differentiation “I think you want to have very big differences inside the team, and then from the outside, you want to be seen as very different from the rest of the world.” For example, SpacEx’s mission is to go to Mars: “Everybody at the company thinks: we’re the only place in the world where people are going to go to Mars. And that one idea separates it very sharply from the rest of the world.” And then within a company, you want the roles to be as differentiated as possible. One of the challenges in an early stage startup is that the roles tend to fluctuate a lot. Thiel believes this is one of the ways in which conflicts tend to arise. “If you were a sociopathic boss who just wanted to create conflicts amongst your employees for no reason at all, the formula for creating conflicts is to tell two people to do the exact same thing.” To summarize his point, Thiel concludes: “You want to have roles differentiated sharply differentiated within companies. And you want to have the mission of the company differentiated sharply from the rest of the world.” Video source: Saïd Business School (2015)

Startup Archive

43,752 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Anthropic could have the biggest IPO in history, right as the company sounds the alarm over the supposed power of their AI technology. Despite the alarm, Anthropic is racing ahead with going public, a move that could make their 300 investors very, very rich. These early investors have put $130 billion into the company already, and they're among richest people on Earth. So they won't settle for anything less than massive returns, a huge IPO, and endless growth from Anthropic.

Anthropic could have the biggest IPO in history, right as the company sounds the alarm over the supposed power of their AI technology. Despite the alarm, Anthropic is racing ahead with going public, a move that could make their 300 investors very, very rich. These early investors have put $130 billion into the company already, and they're among richest people on Earth. So they won't settle for anything less than massive returns, a huge IPO, and endless growth from Anthropic.

More Perfect Union

15,367 просмотров • 7 дней назад

🚨 BREAKING MICHAEL BURRY JUST SAID WHAT EVERYONE ELSE IS MISSING ABOUT ANTHROPIC’S IPO “Adjusted for inflation, the SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs will raise as much or more than the 300 internet and TMT IPOs did in 2000” THE BIG SHORT GUY SAYS ANTHROPIC IS PART OF AN IPO WAVE BIGGER THAN THE DOT-COM BUBBLE VERY DANGEROUS FOR MARKETS

🚨 BREAKING MICHAEL BURRY JUST SAID WHAT EVERYONE ELSE IS MISSING ABOUT ANTHROPIC’S IPO “Adjusted for inflation, the SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs will raise as much or more than the 300 internet and TMT IPOs did in 2000” THE BIG SHORT GUY SAYS ANTHROPIC IS PART OF AN IPO WAVE BIGGER THAN THE DOT-COM BUBBLE VERY DANGEROUS FOR MARKETS

Leshka.eth ⛩

22,926 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

IAPS Severin Field 🦅 says Chinese AI companies are far less AGI-pilled than OpenAI and Anthropic, treating AI as a normal technology rather than something that will out-think humanity: "I do think that Chinese AI companies, when you compare them to OpenAI and Anthropic, they are a lot less AGI-pilled." "They are more in the camp of seeing AI as a normal technology, whereas people at the top at Anthropic legitimately believe they're building something which will change the course of human history." "A lot of the Chinese companies, DeepSeek for example, will talk about things like recursive self-improvement, but their model of it is quite different, much closer to what you typically see academic machine learning people talk about." "You don't have this almost pseudo-religious component of legitimately believing you are going to build something that out-thinks humans and grapples with all those implications. That is largely confined to Anthropic, OpenAI, some at DeepMind, places like Thinking Machines, some corners of academia." Institute for AI Policy and Strategy (IAPS)

IAPS Severin Field 🦅 says Chinese AI companies are far less AGI-pilled than OpenAI and Anthropic, treating AI as a normal technology rather than something that will out-think humanity: "I do think that Chinese AI companies, when you compare them to OpenAI and Anthropic, they are a lot less AGI-pilled." "They are more in the camp of seeing AI as a normal technology, whereas people at the top at Anthropic legitimately believe they're building something which will change the course of human history." "A lot of the Chinese companies, DeepSeek for example, will talk about things like recursive self-improvement, but their model of it is quite different, much closer to what you typically see academic machine learning people talk about." "You don't have this almost pseudo-religious component of legitimately believing you are going to build something that out-thinks humans and grapples with all those implications. That is largely confined to Anthropic, OpenAI, some at DeepMind, places like Thinking Machines, some corners of academia." Institute for AI Policy and Strategy (IAPS)

MTS

21,849 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🚨 Ed Elson says the government should subpoena OpenAI and Anthropic and demand the evidence behind their alarming claims: Elson: If Anthropic believes that they have created a technology that might destroy society, I'm waiting for Anthropic to come out there and say, here is the empirical evidence. As soon as an Anthropic employee comes out and says what he said, that is a corporate communication by the company. It was by an Anthropic employee. The entire organization is responsible for the words that were published and transmitted to literally millions of people all over the world. They are accountable for that. Now let's talk about the government side of this. The government is accountable to pursuing action against illegal activity. If someone is building a technology that is going to murder people or destroy society, I think we can all agree that that is a bad thing and it's illegal. You can't be doing that. That's now the government's responsibility to go out and pursue action against these companies. Now, what do you do if you want to pursue action? Well, it needs, again, we need to investigate their claims. The government should hand a subpoena to Anthropic and to OpenAI and say, “Hey, you've just said something very, very serious. We're going to take it seriously. We want you to show us the evidence and show us your claims.” And if it's true that what they've built is seriously bad, then we need to start working together on this. If it turns out that what they're saying is hyperbolic and it's not true at all and it's just some guy who went online and wanted to get clicks and drum up some hysteria and some drama, then we're talking about a different problem. Now we're talking about things like securities fraud. Now we're talking about things like public deception.

🚨🚨 Ed Elson says the government should subpoena OpenAI and Anthropic and demand the evidence behind their alarming claims: Elson: If Anthropic believes that they have created a technology that might destroy society, I'm waiting for Anthropic to come out there and say, here is the empirical evidence. As soon as an Anthropic employee comes out and says what he said, that is a corporate communication by the company. It was by an Anthropic employee. The entire organization is responsible for the words that were published and transmitted to literally millions of people all over the world. They are accountable for that. Now let's talk about the government side of this. The government is accountable to pursuing action against illegal activity. If someone is building a technology that is going to murder people or destroy society, I think we can all agree that that is a bad thing and it's illegal. You can't be doing that. That's now the government's responsibility to go out and pursue action against these companies. Now, what do you do if you want to pursue action? Well, it needs, again, we need to investigate their claims. The government should hand a subpoena to Anthropic and to OpenAI and say, “Hey, you've just said something very, very serious. We're going to take it seriously. We want you to show us the evidence and show us your claims.” And if it's true that what they've built is seriously bad, then we need to start working together on this. If it turns out that what they're saying is hyperbolic and it's not true at all and it's just some guy who went online and wanted to get clicks and drum up some hysteria and some drama, then we're talking about a different problem. Now we're talking about things like securities fraud. Now we're talking about things like public deception.

MeidasTouch

43,763 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Anthropic CEO: “At Anthropic, we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself.” Meanwhile, Anthropic says every new model is given code that trains a small AI model and asked to make it faster. Claude Opus 4 achieved a 3x speedup. Mythos Preview reached 52x. Recursive self-improvement is starting to look real The models are helping build what comes next.

Anthropic CEO: “At Anthropic, we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself.” Meanwhile, Anthropic says every new model is given code that trains a small AI model and asked to make it faster. Claude Opus 4 achieved a 3x speedup. Mythos Preview reached 52x. Recursive self-improvement is starting to look real The models are helping build what comes next.

CG

343,756 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад