Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
James Forrest penalty given by ref Callum Scott after getting forearmed in the face running into the box. Andrew Dallas on VAR overturned it as 'clear & obvious error' to give a penalty. Wouldn't be Scottish football without an absurd decision from the Referees at some point...
99,801 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
11 Comments

There were 2 fouls on Forrest. VAR got involved when they should not. Similar to Muir at Easter road, in that they broke their own protocols. Dallas needs removed, simply cause it would be good for the game, poor as a referee and as a VAR.

Flash Shelton, an anti-squatting activist, reveals how squatters in California exploit tenant laws, blurring the lines between tenant rights and unlawful occupation. He shares strategies for dealing with squatters and the challenges homeowners face in reclaiming their properties.

I thought it was just me that thought it was a stonewall penalty I said so at the time and having seen it since I got home my opinion hasn't changed.

Dallas should be nowhere near our games he’s a bigot. Everytime I see this it’s a pen so what did Dallas spot !! . Doesn’t matter what the score was sooner or later the decisions are going to cost us . Like no additional time WTF

I thought the first tackle was a penalty. Funnily, I would have given their goal as it was a great strike, even though it was a foul too.

They gave the penalty based on the tackle on the ground, they then var check that challenge overturn the penalty based on that, but completely over look the forearm coming in, 😳

Forearm smash to the face no foul. Happen to make ANY kind of contact with a trfc (or any other opposition) player anywhere else on the pitch a foul is immediately given. Slightest touch, contact or any chance of them losing the ball, down they go, FK given.

Could have awarded 2 penalties for this incident.

Penalty Rangers?

No chance that was given? 😂

Hetate blocking the goalkeeper’s view whilst offside





