Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

.James Talarico: An Amazon worker recently died on a warehouse floor and management told the others: ‘Just turn around and don't look. Get back to work.’ That was a human being. That was a child of God. Sacrificed on the altar of corporate greed. Don’t conform to this world.... It’s not healthy to assimilate in a sick system. I’m asking you to question everything you’ve been told at school or at work or at church — and certainly anything you hear from a politician. Reject anything that makes you less human. A different world is possible. What if we built systems that brought out the best in us? What if we invested the same resources into peace that we invest into war? What if the only hunger was for justice?show more

Team Talarico

66,969 subscribers

182,879 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

#F1 | James Allison says Lewis Hamilton’s strategy at the #SingaporeGP was “a mistake.” “We shouldn’t have started on the softs. That was a mistake, if we could turn back time we would do what those around us did and select the mediums.” “The reasoning was that the soft tyre very often allows you to get away from the start abruptly and allows you good chance of jumping a place or two in the opening laps of the race.”

#F1 | James Allison says Lewis Hamilton’s strategy at the #SingaporeGP was “a mistake.” “We shouldn’t have started on the softs. That was a mistake, if we could turn back time we would do what those around us did and select the mediums.” “The reasoning was that the soft tyre very often allows you to get away from the start abruptly and allows you good chance of jumping a place or two in the opening laps of the race.”

deni

94,049 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ben on why bad policy is the biggest threat to America's future: "Venezuela was the fourth richest country in the world and then Communism, and that's that. If you look at how little comes out of so many of these countries in Europe that have so many smart people that went into communism. From inventing everything to nothing overnight. I think that that can absolutely happen here. We could outlaw AI. The last Biden administration executive order said that you could not sell a GPU without federal government approval. That was a real executive order. We were that close to being out of the global chip game. The other thing is technology solutions work much better than policy solutions. If you think about COVID, we could tell everybody to stay in their house. Well, that's got some extremely bad side effects and doesn't work that well. Or we could invent a vaccine that works. If you really want to change the world, if you really want to make it a better place, you can build a solution for darn near anything."

Ben on why bad policy is the biggest threat to America's future: "Venezuela was the fourth richest country in the world and then Communism, and that's that. If you look at how little comes out of so many of these countries in Europe that have so many smart people that went into communism. From inventing everything to nothing overnight. I think that that can absolutely happen here. We could outlaw AI. The last Biden administration executive order said that you could not sell a GPU without federal government approval. That was a real executive order. We were that close to being out of the global chip game. The other thing is technology solutions work much better than policy solutions. If you think about COVID, we could tell everybody to stay in their house. Well, that's got some extremely bad side effects and doesn't work that well. Or we could invent a vaccine that works. If you really want to change the world, if you really want to make it a better place, you can build a solution for darn near anything."

Patrick OShaughnessy

60,533 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BANNON: In Dec at AMFest, on that stage for the first time, President Trump told that audience that because of what Charlie Kirk brought and the intensity he carried, he ran for office again. He knew the 2020 election was stolen, and if we let that go, we were not going to have a republic. That is the power of what Charlie Kirk built. Charlie Kirk was a warrior to the end.

BANNON: In Dec at AMFest, on that stage for the first time, President Trump told that audience that because of what Charlie Kirk brought and the intensity he carried, he ran for office again. He knew the 2020 election was stolen, and if we let that go, we were not going to have a republic. That is the power of what Charlie Kirk built. Charlie Kirk was a warrior to the end.

Bannon’s WarRoom

46,496 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Gyokeres: "We were bringing in a proven goal scorer that had probably the best stats in Europe. And the second one, a player that comes to a different league, most demanding league in the world, what happens if he doesn't score for five or six goals? That was my only question. How are you going to react if you don't score in five or six goals? For six goals. Can you cope with that? And then what's going to happen in the next 100 games? And that's what we have to see."

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Gyokeres: "We were bringing in a proven goal scorer that had probably the best stats in Europe. And the second one, a player that comes to a different league, most demanding league in the world, what happens if he doesn't score for five or six goals? That was my only question. How are you going to react if you don't score in five or six goals? For six goals. Can you cope with that? And then what's going to happen in the next 100 games? And that's what we have to see."

afcnewsroom

141,066 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🔥🤔 YOU CANT UNSEE IT. When Reagan was shot his VP George H.W. Bush was out of town on his first ever trip. He left that morning and flew to Fort Worth, Texas. Guess what he was doing there? Bush was unveiling a plaque COMMEMORATING THE LAST PLACE JFK SPENT ON EARTH at the Texas Hotel. The same day Reagan was shot at the Hilton hotel. What if I told you Bush was in Dallas and stayed at the Sheraton Hotel on the night of 11/21/63. What if I told you that he owned an oil company called Zapata? Now what I told you that the same CIA code name for the Bay of Pigs invasion was…. OPERATION ZAPATA. What if I told you two of ships used in the operation were called “Houston” which is where Zapata had its HQ and “Barbara”. Bush’s wife’s name… Barbara. What if told you that Bush became Director of the CIA although people claim he NEVER worked for them. Now what if I told you that he was made the director of the CIA by Gerald Ford. What I told you that Gerald Ford is the only President we had that was NEVER ELECTED. Now what if I told you Ford was on the Warren Commission that investigated the assassination of JFK. Now what if I told you this final fact. George Bush Sr. Is the ONLY President that has NEVER discussed 11/22/1963 in either an interview or his memoirs. That seem strange to anyone else?

🔥🤔 YOU CANT UNSEE IT. When Reagan was shot his VP George H.W. Bush was out of town on his first ever trip. He left that morning and flew to Fort Worth, Texas. Guess what he was doing there? Bush was unveiling a plaque COMMEMORATING THE LAST PLACE JFK SPENT ON EARTH at the Texas Hotel. The same day Reagan was shot at the Hilton hotel. What if I told you Bush was in Dallas and stayed at the Sheraton Hotel on the night of 11/21/63. What if I told you that he owned an oil company called Zapata? Now what I told you that the same CIA code name for the Bay of Pigs invasion was…. OPERATION ZAPATA. What if I told you two of ships used in the operation were called “Houston” which is where Zapata had its HQ and “Barbara”. Bush’s wife’s name… Barbara. What if told you that Bush became Director of the CIA although people claim he NEVER worked for them. Now what if I told you that he was made the director of the CIA by Gerald Ford. What I told you that Gerald Ford is the only President we had that was NEVER ELECTED. Now what if I told you Ford was on the Warren Commission that investigated the assassination of JFK. Now what if I told you this final fact. George Bush Sr. Is the ONLY President that has NEVER discussed 11/22/1963 in either an interview or his memoirs. That seem strange to anyone else?

Johnny St.Pete

710,357 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

Terri Green

13,029 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This Veteran was driving into town. He noticed a funeral procession and pulled over. He noticed on the back of the hearse there was a USMC sticker, so he got out and stood at attention and saluted. “And as I did that, cars behind me started to honk. And they weren’t happy. I kept that salute through the honking and people scooting by…. I don’t know what kind of world we live in anymore and I don’t know if I’m created for a world that doesn’t exist anymore….So the question is, did I do what was right? Or am I just an echo from a long bygone era?” I salute you brother! You were taught and raised well, raised with respect. People don’t even pull over anymore. Not sure if they were taught to do so or they are all just in a dang big hurry like the rest of the world is to get where they need to be. Much respect for the person in the hearse and much respect for you for honoring that Veteran. Kudos brother 🤝🫡

This Veteran was driving into town. He noticed a funeral procession and pulled over. He noticed on the back of the hearse there was a USMC sticker, so he got out and stood at attention and saluted. “And as I did that, cars behind me started to honk. And they weren’t happy. I kept that salute through the honking and people scooting by…. I don’t know what kind of world we live in anymore and I don’t know if I’m created for a world that doesn’t exist anymore….So the question is, did I do what was right? Or am I just an echo from a long bygone era?” I salute you brother! You were taught and raised well, raised with respect. People don’t even pull over anymore. Not sure if they were taught to do so or they are all just in a dang big hurry like the rest of the world is to get where they need to be. Much respect for the person in the hearse and much respect for you for honoring that Veteran. Kudos brother 🤝🫡

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

355,058 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

American Nurse exposing New York BANNED CPR during Covid Even if a patient experienced cardiac arrest in the emergency room, they could not revive them Democrats really wanted those death numbers up “I went to work, and we were handed a memorandum that was from Governor Cuomo that said, basically, we're not going to be performing CPR on any patients because it's too risky. So if they come in and they're in cardiac arrest, or if somebody goes into cardiac arrest or respiratory arrest while they're a patient in the emergency room, we were told that we were not to revive them. It was too risky for the healthcare worker. And that, to me, was like, what? Against everything I had ever been taught, and just being a human being, you're like, well, if we're wearing our ppe, then what's the difference if we're taking the precaution? That just didn't sit right with me. And at that moment, I knew I had to get the hell out of there.”

American Nurse exposing New York BANNED CPR during Covid Even if a patient experienced cardiac arrest in the emergency room, they could not revive them Democrats really wanted those death numbers up “I went to work, and we were handed a memorandum that was from Governor Cuomo that said, basically, we're not going to be performing CPR on any patients because it's too risky. So if they come in and they're in cardiac arrest, or if somebody goes into cardiac arrest or respiratory arrest while they're a patient in the emergency room, we were told that we were not to revive them. It was too risky for the healthcare worker. And that, to me, was like, what? Against everything I had ever been taught, and just being a human being, you're like, well, if we're wearing our ppe, then what's the difference if we're taking the precaution? That just didn't sit right with me. And at that moment, I knew I had to get the hell out of there.”

Wall Street Apes

67,375 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jake Barber: “where I’m at with it, what I think might be going on taking in everything I’ve learned in the last 6 yrs plus my own personal experiences” .. it’s about controlling the population.. “you don’t need to go through man to get to God, you don’t need to go through the Catholic Church and those appointed in leadership at the time to have a relationship with God. You can have a personal direct line to god.” .. “I think that if humans learn that there is something special about us .. that we aren’t just beasts, we are also something like a god or have a portion of God or a connection to the world around us and other dimensions and to a higher level of consciousness, that it will be harder for governments to control and keep us suppressed.” .. goes onto explain that this understanding and elevation of our species would empower us in a way that would destabilise the current state of economics, politics, boarders, wars .. “all of that goes away”.

Jake Barber: “where I’m at with it, what I think might be going on taking in everything I’ve learned in the last 6 yrs plus my own personal experiences” .. it’s about controlling the population.. “you don’t need to go through man to get to God, you don’t need to go through the Catholic Church and those appointed in leadership at the time to have a relationship with God. You can have a personal direct line to god.” .. “I think that if humans learn that there is something special about us .. that we aren’t just beasts, we are also something like a god or have a portion of God or a connection to the world around us and other dimensions and to a higher level of consciousness, that it will be harder for governments to control and keep us suppressed.” .. goes onto explain that this understanding and elevation of our species would empower us in a way that would destabilise the current state of economics, politics, boarders, wars .. “all of that goes away”.

👽 (Ruby) 👽

58,917 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Yann LeCun (Yann LeCun) just revealed why he left Meta, Why are LLMs an extremely narrow field, and how "World model" is the way to build really meaningful agentic future. 🎯 Beautiful and simple in 1.5 mints. "I can’t imagine we can build agentic systems without those systems having the ability to predict, in advance, what the consequences of their actions are going to be. The way we act in the world is that we can predict the consequences of our actions, and that’s what allows us to plan. So what is a world model? Given the state of an environment, a system you want to control at time t, and given an action or intervention you imagine taking, can you predict the state of the world (or the system) at time t + 1? If you can, that’s a world model. You don’t do this at a pixel level, if it’s video. You do this in an abstract representation space, and that’s a crucial key insight." --- From 'AI House Davos" YT channel (full link in comment)

Yann LeCun (Yann LeCun) just revealed why he left Meta, Why are LLMs an extremely narrow field, and how "World model" is the way to build really meaningful agentic future. 🎯 Beautiful and simple in 1.5 mints. "I can’t imagine we can build agentic systems without those systems having the ability to predict, in advance, what the consequences of their actions are going to be. The way we act in the world is that we can predict the consequences of our actions, and that’s what allows us to plan. So what is a world model? Given the state of an environment, a system you want to control at time t, and given an action or intervention you imagine taking, can you predict the state of the world (or the system) at time t + 1? If you can, that’s a world model. You don’t do this at a pixel level, if it’s video. You do this in an abstract representation space, and that’s a crucial key insight." --- From 'AI House Davos" YT channel (full link in comment)

Rohan Paul

383,490 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)

"If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)

Joe Murgia

18,951 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

ATTENTION NEW/EMERGING ARTISTS! We have a dope segment on AFRICA NOW RADIO on Apple Music where we shine a light for the world to hear talented Emerging Artists from around the world. If you’re that person or know of someone @ me or that artist below and make sure you catch my show every Friday at 9am CAT on Apple Music to see if you or they made it, and if the world gets a chance to hear their music🚀❤️. It’s AFRICA TO THE WORLD 🌍 #ANR

ATTENTION NEW/EMERGING ARTISTS! We have a dope segment on AFRICA NOW RADIO on Apple Music where we shine a light for the world to hear talented Emerging Artists from around the world. If you’re that person or know of someone @ me or that artist below and make sure you catch my show every Friday at 9am CAT on Apple Music to see if you or they made it, and if the world gets a chance to hear their music🚀❤️. It’s AFRICA TO THE WORLD 🌍 #ANR

Nandi Madida 🇿🇦

44,453 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Matt Ridley just revealed something about Covid that most scientists missed. And it provides perhaps the strongest evidence yet that this virus was not natural. “Viruses jump out of animals and into people quite often.” “But they very, very rarely prove to be highly infectious from the start.” “They also tend to be pretty lethal.” “What we saw this time was completely different.” “A virus that was not very lethal… but very infectious.” “That, to me, tells you that it must have had training on human cells and human molecules in the months, if not years, leading up to the pandemic.” “It’s not very good at getting into bats at all, even though it’s originally a bat virus.” “What does that tell you?” “It tells you it hasn’t been in bats for a while.” “It's been in another species.” “It’s better at infecting humans than almost any other species.” “Given that we know this lab was taking SARS-like bat coronaviruses, this very type of virus, and infecting them into human cells and humanized mice for several years before the pandemic, it’s crazy to think that this wasn’t how this happened.” Matt Ridley

Matt Ridley just revealed something about Covid that most scientists missed. And it provides perhaps the strongest evidence yet that this virus was not natural. “Viruses jump out of animals and into people quite often.” “But they very, very rarely prove to be highly infectious from the start.” “They also tend to be pretty lethal.” “What we saw this time was completely different.” “A virus that was not very lethal… but very infectious.” “That, to me, tells you that it must have had training on human cells and human molecules in the months, if not years, leading up to the pandemic.” “It’s not very good at getting into bats at all, even though it’s originally a bat virus.” “What does that tell you?” “It tells you it hasn’t been in bats for a while.” “It's been in another species.” “It’s better at infecting humans than almost any other species.” “Given that we know this lab was taking SARS-like bat coronaviruses, this very type of virus, and infecting them into human cells and humanized mice for several years before the pandemic, it’s crazy to think that this wasn’t how this happened.” Matt Ridley

Jan Jekielek

41,011 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

VITTERT: At one point 3 different networks were playing a clip of you throwing a tear gas canister at the same time. Did you do that for show? BOVINO: If you look at that clip, what you see behind me are Border Patrol agents who had just been assaulted. One was spit on. It was time for me to deploy a less lethal munition. If we didn't have less lethal, what would we be left with?

VITTERT: At one point 3 different networks were playing a clip of you throwing a tear gas canister at the same time. Did you do that for show? BOVINO: If you look at that clip, what you see behind me are Border Patrol agents who had just been assaulted. One was spit on. It was time for me to deploy a less lethal munition. If we didn't have less lethal, what would we be left with?

Aaron Rupar

317,132 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Steve HIlton on Trump’s claims of a rigged election in California: Honestly, I have no idea about any of those conversations. I haven't spoken to the president or the US attorney. We had teams looking at everything, and we didn't see anything that would give us cause for concern. I don't know whether the resources of the justice department will turn anything up, but we don't see anything that was a problem.

Steve HIlton on Trump’s claims of a rigged election in California: Honestly, I have no idea about any of those conversations. I haven't spoken to the president or the US attorney. We had teams looking at everything, and we didn't see anything that would give us cause for concern. I don't know whether the resources of the justice department will turn anything up, but we don't see anything that was a problem.

Acyn

58,794 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Chamath: "If we go to war, this totally screws everything up. You could see oil double." "Every time we're on the verge of victory, somebody in the military industrial complex invents some escalation of something so that we can just go to war." "The answer always seems to be, let's go to war, or let's support a war, or let's enable a war. And the bulwark to that has been the president." "If we go to war, this totally screws everything up." "You could see oil double. Double!" "What happens to the economy of the world, of world GDP, of everything, of inflation, if you have oil at $100/barrel, or $112/barrel?" "It's not good." "So you have to wonder like, why would people want this escalation? Who wants this escalation?" "It's deeply beneficial for America to avoid anything calamitous happening here." "So I hope we find an off-ramp, and I hope that the president gets his way."

🚨Chamath: "If we go to war, this totally screws everything up. You could see oil double." "Every time we're on the verge of victory, somebody in the military industrial complex invents some escalation of something so that we can just go to war." "The answer always seems to be, let's go to war, or let's support a war, or let's enable a war. And the bulwark to that has been the president." "If we go to war, this totally screws everything up." "You could see oil double. Double!" "What happens to the economy of the world, of world GDP, of everything, of inflation, if you have oil at $100/barrel, or $112/barrel?" "It's not good." "So you have to wonder like, why would people want this escalation? Who wants this escalation?" "It's deeply beneficial for America to avoid anything calamitous happening here." "So I hope we find an off-ramp, and I hope that the president gets his way."

The All-In Podcast

307,607 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sebastian’s message at the end of Saladino’s zoom call: “The one thing that is on my mind is that, the beginning of this Charles Bukowski poem that says, “Your life is your life.”, and like, “don’t let it go down into darkness and submission” or something. You only get this one life, I always feel like we gotta try, if possible — and I say if possible because I’m always aware that people are encountering massive, massive challenges, and are overcoming traumas and circumstances beyond their control, and the world is insane, there’s so many things and pressure, but, again, we only have this one life, and I think about that a lot. I just think, if there’s a way to just be kinder to yourself, and even if it’s about just being here today, putting in this work, and if you’ve done this a couple of years, great, and you’re gonna do it again or not, or you’re gonna try something else. Or even if you don’t feel 100%, be kinder to yourself. If the thing isn’t turning out to be what you’ve thought, be kinder to yourself. Just try to not let you beat yourself down or let this [points to phone] or anybody else just beat yourself down, because it’s so easy to do that. I would say that, that’s my big takeaway.” 📲 malo.stan | TikTok

Sebastian’s message at the end of Saladino’s zoom call: “The one thing that is on my mind is that, the beginning of this Charles Bukowski poem that says, “Your life is your life.”, and like, “don’t let it go down into darkness and submission” or something. You only get this one life, I always feel like we gotta try, if possible — and I say if possible because I’m always aware that people are encountering massive, massive challenges, and are overcoming traumas and circumstances beyond their control, and the world is insane, there’s so many things and pressure, but, again, we only have this one life, and I think about that a lot. I just think, if there’s a way to just be kinder to yourself, and even if it’s about just being here today, putting in this work, and if you’ve done this a couple of years, great, and you’re gonna do it again or not, or you’re gonna try something else. Or even if you don’t feel 100%, be kinder to yourself. If the thing isn’t turning out to be what you’ve thought, be kinder to yourself. Just try to not let you beat yourself down or let this [points to phone] or anybody else just beat yourself down, because it’s so easy to do that. I would say that, that’s my big takeaway.” 📲 malo.stan | TikTok

Sebastian Stan Archive

12,050 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Zara Larsson accepts the Breakthrough award at the ‘Billboard Women In Music 2026’. #BBWomenInMusic “[…] I’m not new and there are so many years of hard work behind an overnight success or a breakthrough. I’ve been an artist for over a decade now but lately things have really changed for me in my life and my career. So I’ve been trying to figure out what was it that happened? What was it that made the change happen? And when I was younger I wanted to be the best so bad and the annoying part of being the best in any art is that it’s subjective and you just have to, what I learned is that you have to be the most you because only you could be the best of that. And I feel like I become the most me around amazing women. So I didn’t suddenly become a better performer. I just changed who I was around and that was my breakthrough…”

Zara Larsson accepts the Breakthrough award at the ‘Billboard Women In Music 2026’. #BBWomenInMusic “[…] I’m not new and there are so many years of hard work behind an overnight success or a breakthrough. I’ve been an artist for over a decade now but lately things have really changed for me in my life and my career. So I’ve been trying to figure out what was it that happened? What was it that made the change happen? And when I was younger I wanted to be the best so bad and the annoying part of being the best in any art is that it’s subjective and you just have to, what I learned is that you have to be the most you because only you could be the best of that. And I feel like I become the most me around amazing women. So I didn’t suddenly become a better performer. I just changed who I was around and that was my breakthrough…”

Updates Zara Larsson

210,289 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Josh Safdie asked Tyler, The Creator if his creative process as an actor is the same in his other creations: “[...] you built that blueprint for me to jump off of. And I just tried to give it the right care that I would if you gave me a color palette and I had to make you a hat and a sweater and figure out what that look was. The same love and passion went into that”, Tyler said.

Josh Safdie asked Tyler, The Creator if his creative process as an actor is the same in his other creations: “[...] you built that blueprint for me to jump off of. And I just tried to give it the right care that I would if you gave me a color palette and I had to make you a hat and a sweater and figure out what that look was. The same love and passion went into that”, Tyler said.

Archive Tyler, The Creator

577,462 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten