正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
.James Talarico: An Amazon worker recently died on a warehouse floor and management told the others: ‘Just turn around and don't look. Get back to work.’ That was a human being. That was a child of God. Sacrificed on the altar of corporate greed. Don’t conform to this world.... show more
35 条评论
@jamestalarico Don't you support abortion? Those are also children of God. And you advocate for their murder.
@jamestalarico "It is no sign of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society" - Krishnamurthi
@MaxFlugrath @jamestalarico This has to stop.
@jamestalarico Meanwhile, you support the murder of unborn children, millions and millions of tiny bodies stacked up like cordwood, while you parade around, a smug, sanctimonious Holy Joe.
@jamestalarico Notice that the gay, fake preacher has to have this account push propaganda for him or he gets lit up?
@NicholsUprising @jamestalarico Exploiting tragedy for political gain is the lowest form of scum there is. Democrats are truly the scum of the earth in search of power.
@jamestalarico Amen. I'm not particularly religious but amen.
@MurieAnita1 @jamestalarico You mean like how you and your media friends tell us to look away when illegals rape and murder US citizens?
Of course the story is a lie. It's one of the dems favorite trick. "The company confirmed that after the incident, employees were sent home with pay for the remainder of the day. Work operations resumed the next day, on April 7, and time off was granted for employees who requested it." "On-site grief counselors were provided to anybody who chose to come to work and needed them," Nantel said.
@jamestalarico He is not a Christian. He uses the name of God for political purposes. He is a demon.
This fraud ☝️is trying to convince you “we’re all in this together”. The ugly truth is we’re all on our own. The sooner you accept that, the faster you’ll enter REAL adulthood. He doesn’t care about you. I’ve seen his kind dozens of times in my 71 years on God’s earth. He’s a fraud. Just like Obama. Just like Biden. Just like Trump. They ALL make promises they never plan to keep. The sooner you wrap your heads around this truth, the sooner we can rid ourselves of them.
@jamestalarico Would you please stop talking like you’re a spiritual man. We know what you’re doing.
@RockyinTX @jamestalarico Hey MAGA…that might have been one of your cult members laying dead on the floor! You are being used and your orange pedo prez could care less once you are dead
@jamestalarico All of these things needed to be said. Pray that the ears of America can hear.
@jamestalarico This man will be president one day.
@TrumpLOST5 @jamestalarico I like Talarico, but I wish he wouldn't campaign from a pulpit. We need more separation between church and state, not less. This practice, makes me nervous, very nervous.
While there is a lot that I dislike about Amazon, and distrust it's founder, the commie scum here is a known liar. If he is "bending the truth" for his own gain, he cannot be trusted. We already have so many Representatives in government that do this, why would we need another? Don't send another scumbag to Washington.
You're a hypocritical heretic. You're allegedly a seminarian... a man called to SERVE GOD. When an opportunity to serve God in a huge way came upon you, you IGNORED the call and DENIED The Great Commission (Matthew 21: 18-20) when you told your legislature colleagues, "IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CHRISTIANS TO EDUCATE PEOPLE ABOUT GOD." If Mr. Talarico, the Episcopalian seminarian, can deny His Father God, do you really think he'll stand up for Texans as a US Senator?
@jamestalarico This is a fabricated exaggerated story and stop bringing God into your posts as you are an apostate and you do not speak for God or Jesus or Christians.
@jamestalarico THANK YOU
Was that corporate greed or the failings of mankind? The management team that said don't look and keep working will have to account for that. The workers who continued working during the tragedy are also accountable for having done so. Saying all of those things are corporate greed misses a far bigger issue. We can't transpose morality on any entity that we truly do not possess in ourselves. Not one person stood for what was right in the moment you describe (assuming all aspects are true since you have exhibited a fast and loose relationship with the truth). If the people who make up the company don't stand for something, then the company can be no better or worse than they are.
@jim_sinclairjr @jamestalarico What if we were in government and we prosecuted motherfuckers who acted w craven indifference to the labor they steal, instead of talking abt ephemeral ideals and wishlists?
@jamestalarico Tell us about aborted babies now. Are they children of God as well?
@jamestalarico You cannot be concerned about a "Child of God" and then support abortion. I doesn't work.
@jamestalarico You have a lot to learn. You are so gullible. You might want to try another state, or country. But in Texas you don't have a chance. But nice job trying to twist the truth to fit your agenda.
@jamestalarico It ALLEGEDLY happened in Oregon… due to democrat policy they’re immune to seeing dead bodies everywhere.
@jamestalarico Why on God’s earth does one man, the owner of Amazon, need more wealth than he can spend in 100 lifetimes? And he keeps it all for himself while others slave away for him.
@jamestalarico It’s sounds like a terrible story. But what does it have to do with your competency to represent TX as a legislator? You can’t legislate morality. It has been tried and never works. But you know that. Because you are a Sophist.
@jamestalarico MEGA scared shitless of James!! 😆 🤣 😂 Look at all the attacks.
@jamestalarico Jimmy… why not tell folks it happened in one of the utopian blue states? Democrats ruin everything.
@jamestalarico 100% chance James Talarico uses Amazon regularly.
@jamestalarico Its time we start cutting the grass & exposing snakes like this fool more often. Absolute blasphemy spews from his mouth. May god not have mercy on your soul & may you be judged by your intentional misleading of his children. The fire may not feel hot now but your soul will burn
@jamestalarico You’re giving a political speech at a college graduation.
@jamestalarico this is what a christian looks like.
@jamestalarico The rich are the enemy.
![At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2075660060995260826/amplify_video_thumb/2075659984059146240/img/-AJFtTo2QCRyxERK.jpg)
!["If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2030480027666747596/amplify_video_thumb/2030373285926694913/img/_-25iW0LmiKeRcjI.jpg)
