Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
🍑 Jane Wilde big dick double penetration interracial! This busty beauty gets both holes stretched by monster black cock like a desperate slut 😈💦 Jane Wilde
35,962 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![So I wanted to talk about some of the differences between The Boyz television adaption vs the original comics: -In the comics Homelander is benevolent (but increasingly jaded) it turns out Black Noir was manipulating him into doing the worst of things. -Butcher is not a cuck, in the comics the supe baby lasers out of his pregnant wife and kills her, he proceeds to smash Homelander's bastard son with a heavy candle holder. -In the comics both Homelander and Butcher die because Vought is so powerful they had the power to kill both the entire time and were pulling everyone's strings from the very start—overwhelming victory. (it was all for nothing) As you can see the original comic is a very different animal/beast, Homelander is far more compelling, Black Noir is the real monster manipulating Homelander (notice the overlaid transition), Butcher is not a cuck ("his wife's son" gets a late-term abortion) and in the end [Vought wins] the game was rigged from the very start. It says a lot that this ending (which is considered contraversial/bleak) is infinitely better than the "I'll suck your dick and eat shit" (which is out of character) humiliation ritual for Homelander that the show gave us—not because it made the ending good, but because it made the writer feel like he could "own those right wing chuds one last time" even if it completely destroyed the ending/anything good about the show just like The Joker 2 did for the Joker. Eric Kripke is a hack and a failure of a writer, newsflash Eric Kripke all the memes recreating your ending are not positive memes, people are literally MOCKING the scene (because it sucks), this is what happens when you put your politics/identity before staying consistent or sticking to the rules YOU established. You broke a Cardinal Sin of writing—you didn't want a "gay to die" or "muh tropes" (idfk what you even mean) so you had her survive the fall somehow. Honestly—you Butchered (cucked) (he's a cuck) the show and ruined it all because you are butthurt that Homelander was so popular and beloved. You destroyed the ending of your own show so you could "win the argument" on Twitter, X. You're a failure of a writer—your ending is absolute garbage.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2058066132087840845/amplify_video_thumb/2058057080142200832/img/FAO9LOZFttaYZBrT.jpg)
![Catherine Austin Fitts: "You think DOD is going to say, 'Oh, guess what, nobody gets any retirement. We stole [$20 trillion of taxpayer money]...&...sent it to Basel, Switzerland'?" "The pandemic was a military operation...implemented by the people who stole the $20 trillion." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts ), is taken from an interview with Dr. Jane Ruby (DR JANE RUBY™️) posted to The Dr. Jane Ruby Rumble channel today, June 18, 2025. For reference, Fitts is describing how she and MSU professor Mark Skidmore discovered that the Department of Defense has stolen at least $20+ TRILLION of U.S. taxpayer money. (That number was as of 2015, and it is likely much larger now.) Fitts notes that the DOD was also in charge of "the pandemic" here in the U.S. and that COVID—including the supposed "vaccines" for the disease (see full interview)—have been used to lower life expectancy in order to avoid a reckoning regarding Americans' missing pension money. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The moment they started the financial coup, they started to implement policies that made life expectancy go down. Because if you can't balance the budget by putting more funding behind the retirement system, the only way you can balance the— Well, you can, you can extend retirement, the date of retirement, or you can lower life expectancy, or both. But that's— You have to— if the population and the Congress refuse to do the financially responsible thing, then your only other choice is to is to lower life expectancy. "He [Mark Skidmore] was like, I don't understand what you're talking about. So when the pandemic hit, I knew exactly what it was. Because if the pandemic was a military operation, it is being implemented by the people who stole the $20 trillion. "Do you really think that DOD is going to say, 'Oh, guess what, nobody gets any retirement. We stole all the money... and we sent it to Basel, Switzerland'? Or wherever they've got a stockpile, or we sent it offshore, we send it wherever the money went, whatever it funded. "The American people, if you're the President of the United States, every day, every week, the primary dealers working with the New York Fed go out and borrow money. So they sell treasury bonds and treasury bills to your IRAs and your retirement accounts and your pension funds. Okay. So I sell a treasury bond to a pension fund. And so you work all your life, you put your cash in your pension fund. The pension fund buys a Treasury bond, the money goes into treasury, the bank account at the New York Fed for Treasury. And then it disappears out the back door. "When Dr. Skidmore documented and published a study in 2017 that 21 trillion was missing, the outstanding debt of the United States at that moment was 21 trillion. The balance sheet. So do we have too much debt or do we have a bank robbery? "But here's the thing. As a citizen now, my pension fund is not an asset, it's an IOU for myself as a taxpayer. So I've put cash into my pension fund, and my cash has been converted to an IOU that I owe myself as a taxpayer, without your consent. Because the bonds have a call on all of our assets. "If you're the Department of Defense, do you really want to tell somebody, oh, you know, we disappeared 20 trillion of your money, and so, you know, so the question is, how do you manage that situation? Anyway, so, yeah, you know, if DOD stole your money, I think it was, you know, that money disappeared out of DoD accounts at the New York Fed...."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1935526479909023945/amplify_video_thumb/1935518887010865152/img/pujM_8FqVWJAa97g.jpg)
![You are incorrect. There's no connection between sexuality and gender identity. A man can be gay, straight, bisexual, or otherwise, and identify as masculine, feminine, or neither. If you wanted artistic depictions of "robust masculinity," as you say, you can always go back to J. C. Leyendecker, a German-American immigrant responsible for producing some of the best commercial art during the early 20th century. Leyendecker, who is widely believed to be gay, created "The Arrow Man" for Arrow Shirts and hundreds of The Saturday Evening Post's covers. If you're into menswear, as I am, you are undoubtedly familiar with his work, as he created much of the menswear art during that period. "Trad" corners of Twitter also often put his art forward today as representations of "traditional Western society." Or you can check out Osmar Schindler, whose works are markedly homoerotic. See Muskelspiel (Muscle Play, 1907) and Germanic Warrior with Roman Helmet (1902), pictured in the second and third slides below. These images celebrate "robust masculinity," but there are often layers of meaning, which makes his work interesting. What you're hinting at is a stereotype that has always been around but, in my opinion, crystallized after the trial of Oscar Wilde. In his essay "Out of the Closet," Max Mosher writes about some of this history. An excerpt: “Pansy, Nellie, swish, queen: the fairy went by many names, but one thing universally acknowledged was that he wasn’t a ‘real man.' Sexual theories of the time suggested that homosexuals were women in men’s bodies, unnaturally devoid of masculinity. But the easily recognizable identity proved useful for lonely men desperate to find each other. Gay men flocked to the stereotype like fairies to a flame. [Later], masculine gays felt alienated from an identity that didn’t represent them; early queer activists worried that the fairy stereotype gave the community a bad name.” In the 1970s, gay men rejected this "fairy" stereotype and embraced over-the-top representations of masculinity, often forms connected to the working-class male. In San Francisco, some of these men were known as "The Clones" or "The Castroids" (for how they would hang around Castro Street, a historically LGBTQ+ area of the city). Moser continues: “Clones had taken the look of the working-class male and sexualized it, emphasizing muscles through tight t-shirts, and shapely buttocks through deliberately shrunken jeans. The Clone Look was, in fact, a deconstruction of the traditional male, a kind of ‘butch drag.’ By dressing like ‘real men,’ clones had discovered that masculinity was a performance with costumes no less contrived than the fairy’s tailored suits or the radical drag queens’ gowns. The Clone Look, the first style to say it was okay to be both gay and masculine, may have encouraged thousands of men to come out.” Today, much of this aesthetic has been co-opted by the far right, as conservatives wear skin-tight Buffalo plaid shirts, stretch denim, and work boots. Regardless, I don't care for the original image not because it depicts masculinity — which I'm totally fine with and in fact have built a career in writing about as an aesthetic — but because it's cliché. To be sure, it's remarkable as photojournalism, as it captures the moment when Secret Service agents rushed Reagan out of the Augusta National Golf Club when someone crashed the gate and took people hostage in 1983. But people are not necessarily reacting to that moment; they are reacting to the semiotics of the image. I find the image cliché because it's so inert and overdetermined. There are no layers to the image; people are just into the accumulation of masculine tropes in a small frame — preppy clothes (symbolizing wealth), semi-automatic weapons (violence), and a sense of urgency (ACTION!!). I find it cliché the same way I find it cliché when a certain kind of guy loves referencing the Scarface scene where Tony Montana says "say hello to my little friend." The red-carpeted mansion (wealth), shootout with semi-automatic weapons (violence), and fast-paced scene (ACTION!!) have some obvious appeal. But... it's also pretty cliché. You are easily impressed by low quality symbols, which is perhaps why our current political moment is so exciting for you.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2086563138481381888/amplify_video_thumb/2086557586678251520/img/ynB1h_6haBQvlPbO.jpg)
