Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Jason Whitlock has officially descended into the intellectual basement. AKA Luciferian grifter world. In this clip, he claims: • Erika should step down • TPUSA should partner with Candace • And floats the implication that TPUSA may have been involved in Charlie’s death He also flat-out lies by saying...

bren45000's profile picture

Bren

13,183 subscribers

64,428 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.
1:34

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

36,934 views • 1 month ago

🤔 Tim Pool to his own credit did say what Candace was doing was morally wrong and borderline evil. “Is she carpet bombing the world with lies? No - Milo Welp??? Was she? Milo also says Candace tried to get him fired from Kanye… and says has no reason to defend her… but he does. He also begins parroting Erika is sinister & insinuates Charlie was gay. I wonder if Milo was pulled into this TPUSA echo chamber as well unwillingly or knew that may have been Candace’s intent all along. He helped state that Candace wasn’t directly accusing Erika of being involved with Charlie’s murder and even that he WASNT IN THE CASKET. Milo is a smart man. I’m starting to believe he may have helped bring controversy and cover for Candace’s theories to assist in what some consider an attempt at “burning down” TPUSA. Which in his own words he was GLAD SHE WAS. George Santos did defend Charlie also to his credit.
4:28

🤔 Tim Pool to his own credit did say what Candace was doing was morally wrong and borderline evil. “Is she carpet bombing the world with lies? No - Milo Welp??? Was she? Milo also says Candace tried to get him fired from Kanye… and says has no reason to defend her… but he does. He also begins parroting Erika is sinister & insinuates Charlie was gay. I wonder if Milo was pulled into this TPUSA echo chamber as well unwillingly or knew that may have been Candace’s intent all along. He helped state that Candace wasn’t directly accusing Erika of being involved with Charlie’s murder and even that he WASNT IN THE CASKET. Milo is a smart man. I’m starting to believe he may have helped bring controversy and cover for Candace’s theories to assist in what some consider an attempt at “burning down” TPUSA. Which in his own words he was GLAD SHE WAS. George Santos did defend Charlie also to his credit.

Johnny St.Pete

17,699 views • 29 days ago

So Michael Knowles has decided to make a statement on Candace Owens. No, he doesn’t condemn her actions. He condemns us—who are condemning her actions. No, I’m not kidding. He summarizes what Candace Owens and her cult are doing as “criticizing and antagonizing” Erika Kirk. No, Michael Knowles. That’s not what’s going on. Candace is slandering Erika Kirk—of conspiring to murder her husband and the father of her children, Charlie Kirk. She is also accusing her of sexually grooming minors—both with zero evidence whatsoever. That is not merely “criticizing” and “antagonizing” Erika Kirk. That is one of the most wicked things you can accuse someone of baselessly. It's also interesting that you say we're obsessed with spending our time defending Erika Kirk yet you don't mention how obsessed Candace is in trying to destroy Erika and TPUSA? The fact that you are more concerned with that and the way we are critiquing Candace rather than what she is doing is very revealing of yourself. Michael Knowles
0:43

So Michael Knowles has decided to make a statement on Candace Owens. No, he doesn’t condemn her actions. He condemns us—who are condemning her actions. No, I’m not kidding. He summarizes what Candace Owens and her cult are doing as “criticizing and antagonizing” Erika Kirk. No, Michael Knowles. That’s not what’s going on. Candace is slandering Erika Kirk—of conspiring to murder her husband and the father of her children, Charlie Kirk. She is also accusing her of sexually grooming minors—both with zero evidence whatsoever. That is not merely “criticizing” and “antagonizing” Erika Kirk. That is one of the most wicked things you can accuse someone of baselessly. It's also interesting that you say we're obsessed with spending our time defending Erika Kirk yet you don't mention how obsessed Candace is in trying to destroy Erika and TPUSA? The fact that you are more concerned with that and the way we are critiquing Candace rather than what she is doing is very revealing of yourself. Michael Knowles

Jordan S90

34,072 views • 7 months ago

🚨 Andrew Wilson goes NUCLEAR ☢️ on Candace Owens ‼️ He says he likes how TPUSA is basically saying 🖕 Candace’s stupid questions these days. And I agree. As someone who has been going against Candace and her cult for over a year now it’s nice to see TPUSA pushing back as well. He also points out the reason why TPUSA gave him evidence that they didn’t give to Candace. AND THE REASON WHY IS SIMPLE. It’s because he’s operating in good faith while Candace on the other hand has proven time and time again that she is not.
2:55

🚨 Andrew Wilson goes NUCLEAR ☢️ on Candace Owens ‼️ He says he likes how TPUSA is basically saying 🖕 Candace’s stupid questions these days. And I agree. As someone who has been going against Candace and her cult for over a year now it’s nice to see TPUSA pushing back as well. He also points out the reason why TPUSA gave him evidence that they didn’t give to Candace. AND THE REASON WHY IS SIMPLE. It’s because he’s operating in good faith while Candace on the other hand has proven time and time again that she is not.

Cinema Shogun

39,557 views • 1 day ago

🚨‼️Milo claims that Charlie spread lies about him & was ultimately responsible for ending his political career. Remember this when you see Milo making claims against TPUSA & Erika Kirk. Milo has a personal vendetta against Charlie because he got him canceled from college campuses. He is trying to take down TPUSA & Charlie’s legacy because he hated him. He is not operating in good faith here. He is out for vengeance. He is perfectly okay with spreading lies as long as it damages Kirk’s family, organization, & legacy. That’s all this is.
1:32

🚨‼️Milo claims that Charlie spread lies about him & was ultimately responsible for ending his political career. Remember this when you see Milo making claims against TPUSA & Erika Kirk. Milo has a personal vendetta against Charlie because he got him canceled from college campuses. He is trying to take down TPUSA & Charlie’s legacy because he hated him. He is not operating in good faith here. He is out for vengeance. He is perfectly okay with spreading lies as long as it damages Kirk’s family, organization, & legacy. That’s all this is.

Lizzie Marbach

87,589 views • 9 months ago

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”
0:41

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 views • 3 months ago

Here’s the “full context” since Barrett stans want to flip out in my comments. He said it and then used it as a way to flirt with Dee, which ALSO pissed me off. I don’t think Barrett is homophobic. That was not my point. I’m not an idiot. He has mostly gay friends. But for someone who has so many gay friends, he should definitely know the optics of saying something like this. And using the word gross in reference to cuddling with a gay person. And I’m allowed to point that out. Thanks.
0:24

Here’s the “full context” since Barrett stans want to flip out in my comments. He said it and then used it as a way to flirt with Dee, which ALSO pissed me off. I don’t think Barrett is homophobic. That was not my point. I’m not an idiot. He has mostly gay friends. But for someone who has so many gay friends, he should definitely know the optics of saying something like this. And using the word gross in reference to cuddling with a gay person. And I’m allowed to point that out. Thanks.

TV Tweets 📺

35,219 views • 2 months ago

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...
2:31

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...

DDGotAPodcast

222,726 views • 1 month ago

Unbelievable… TPUSA listener doesn’t understand why they won’t livestream with Candace Owens Blake Neff with a straight face says, “If it’s not in person, it’s not authentic”, literally while he has Andrew Kolvet on livestream. 🤦🏻‍♂️ This is the most ridiculous answer TPUSA could have given… If Candace Owens feels like TPUSA was legitimately involved and there is animosity between them, I understand why she doesn’t want to be there. There is no legitimate reason whatsoever why TPUSA cannot livestream the conversation. They literally do it all the time.
3:40

Unbelievable… TPUSA listener doesn’t understand why they won’t livestream with Candace Owens Blake Neff with a straight face says, “If it’s not in person, it’s not authentic”, literally while he has Andrew Kolvet on livestream. 🤦🏻‍♂️ This is the most ridiculous answer TPUSA could have given… If Candace Owens feels like TPUSA was legitimately involved and there is animosity between them, I understand why she doesn’t want to be there. There is no legitimate reason whatsoever why TPUSA cannot livestream the conversation. They literally do it all the time.

MJTruthUltra

108,202 views • 9 months ago

After Trump disavowed Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes says they should have expected it “Trump is a treacherous person and always has been…this is just what you come to expect with Trump. It’s the scorpion and the frog.” “All of these people supported Trump and sacrificed for the benefit of America First…Now they’ve all been devoured by it. They’ve all been backstabbed and betrayed and thrown under the bus by it.” “Do you not see who this person is? Trump is not a loyal person. He isn’t and never has been ever.” “He is not our friend. He is not the savior of Western civilization. He’s not God. He’s not your boss. He’s not your dad. He’s a politician. He’s a billionaire. He is a billionaire. He is a politician. And this extraordinary movement that he has built, historic as it is, and maybe at one point had noble intentions, always was there to enrich and benefit him. That was always the program.”
6:11

After Trump disavowed Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes says they should have expected it “Trump is a treacherous person and always has been…this is just what you come to expect with Trump. It’s the scorpion and the frog.” “All of these people supported Trump and sacrificed for the benefit of America First…Now they’ve all been devoured by it. They’ve all been backstabbed and betrayed and thrown under the bus by it.” “Do you not see who this person is? Trump is not a loyal person. He isn’t and never has been ever.” “He is not our friend. He is not the savior of Western civilization. He’s not God. He’s not your boss. He’s not your dad. He’s a politician. He’s a billionaire. He is a billionaire. He is a politician. And this extraordinary movement that he has built, historic as it is, and maybe at one point had noble intentions, always was there to enrich and benefit him. That was always the program.”

Fractured Light

102,056 views • 5 months ago

Michael Knowles responds to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate‼️ Andrew suggested that Michael could be a moderator and Candace accepted. However neither party had previously checked with Michael to see if he would do it. He says he thinks the case against Tyler Robinson should be debated in the actual courtroom and not in the court of public opinion. But he says he’s still thinking about doing it though and wants to hear from people with strong opinions over whether or not he should. SO LET’S HEAR IT 👂 You have strong opinions. I don’t care if you’re a Candace Owens fan or an Andrew Wilson fan. DO YOU THINK MICHAEL KNOWLES SHOULD MODERATE THIS DEBATE⁉️ Personally I have no real preferences over who moderates and I’m sure Michael Knowles could do a good job. I just know that a moderator (a much better one than Sneako) is most definitely needed in this debate or else Candace will immediately go off the rails.
1:05

Michael Knowles responds to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate‼️ Andrew suggested that Michael could be a moderator and Candace accepted. However neither party had previously checked with Michael to see if he would do it. He says he thinks the case against Tyler Robinson should be debated in the actual courtroom and not in the court of public opinion. But he says he’s still thinking about doing it though and wants to hear from people with strong opinions over whether or not he should. SO LET’S HEAR IT 👂 You have strong opinions. I don’t care if you’re a Candace Owens fan or an Andrew Wilson fan. DO YOU THINK MICHAEL KNOWLES SHOULD MODERATE THIS DEBATE⁉️ Personally I have no real preferences over who moderates and I’m sure Michael Knowles could do a good job. I just know that a moderator (a much better one than Sneako) is most definitely needed in this debate or else Candace will immediately go off the rails.

Cinema Shogun

96,063 views • 1 month ago

NEW: Tuker Carson (Not Tucker Carlson) says Turning Point USA is “doing a bad job” and says they aren’t equipped to run the organization. He attacked TPUSA for not endorsing Thomas Massie and for what he described as “caring more about Israel and their donors” than the “truth”. Since Charlie Kirk was killed, I’ve been saying that Tucker Carlson is trying to destroy TPUSA which is why he’s more than happy to watch Candace Owens and his guests LIE about Charlie’s assassination, Charlie’s friends, his colleagues and his wife Erika Kirk. Tucker even lied about this a few days ago when he interviewed Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 but Alex was not aggressive enough in pushing back when Tucker claimed he “didn’t know” about any of the nasty things people have been saying about Erika Kirk and TPUSA. Tucker posted the clip of himself badmouthing TPUSA on his official Tucker Carlson TikTok. I’ve been saying since day 1 Tucker wants to destroy TPUSA because it’s evangelical and Tucker wants a new youth organization that is more reminiscent of Hitler Youth or a modern day Madrassa. I warned Charlie before he was killed that Tucker Carlson was bad news. Sadly, Charlie didn’t listen, and now he’s dead and Tucker is trying to destroy TPUSA with Candace. Cc: Tyler Bowyer Andrew Kolvet Blake Neff
0:45

NEW: Tuker Carson (Not Tucker Carlson) says Turning Point USA is “doing a bad job” and says they aren’t equipped to run the organization. He attacked TPUSA for not endorsing Thomas Massie and for what he described as “caring more about Israel and their donors” than the “truth”. Since Charlie Kirk was killed, I’ve been saying that Tucker Carlson is trying to destroy TPUSA which is why he’s more than happy to watch Candace Owens and his guests LIE about Charlie’s assassination, Charlie’s friends, his colleagues and his wife Erika Kirk. Tucker even lied about this a few days ago when he interviewed Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 but Alex was not aggressive enough in pushing back when Tucker claimed he “didn’t know” about any of the nasty things people have been saying about Erika Kirk and TPUSA. Tucker posted the clip of himself badmouthing TPUSA on his official Tucker Carlson TikTok. I’ve been saying since day 1 Tucker wants to destroy TPUSA because it’s evangelical and Tucker wants a new youth organization that is more reminiscent of Hitler Youth or a modern day Madrassa. I warned Charlie before he was killed that Tucker Carlson was bad news. Sadly, Charlie didn’t listen, and now he’s dead and Tucker is trying to destroy TPUSA with Candace. Cc: Tyler Bowyer Andrew Kolvet Blake Neff

Laura Loomer

162,970 views • 2 months ago

WOW 😮 Blake Neff EXPOSES Candace Owens true intentions‼️ He believes that Candace is narcissistic/delusional enough to believe that TPUSA should belong to her after Charlie’s death. And says that Candace convinced herself that she’s the natural successor to TPUSA and that when she didn’t get a call to take over it was a massive blow to her ego. Which is why she’s been on a psycho rampage ever since. I don’t know about you guys but personally I don’t think Blake is too far off here. In fact he might’ve hit the nail right on the head with this one.
0:57

WOW 😮 Blake Neff EXPOSES Candace Owens true intentions‼️ He believes that Candace is narcissistic/delusional enough to believe that TPUSA should belong to her after Charlie’s death. And says that Candace convinced herself that she’s the natural successor to TPUSA and that when she didn’t get a call to take over it was a massive blow to her ego. Which is why she’s been on a psycho rampage ever since. I don’t know about you guys but personally I don’t think Blake is too far off here. In fact he might’ve hit the nail right on the head with this one.

Cinema Shogun

11,425 views • 1 month ago

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves
1:26

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

72,329 views • 2 months ago

Andrew Kolvet’s comments in the new American Martyr documentary may be among the most revealing moments in the entire film. He compares Charlie Kirk to Jesus. He compares himself, Blake Neff, Mikey McCoy, Tyler Bowyer, Jack Posobiec, and the rest of the TPUSA inner circle to Christ’s disciples. Then he compares Erika Kirk standing in Charlie’s studio just days after his assassination to Pentecost—the moment God poured out His Holy Spirit and the Church was born. That isn’t just an unfortunate analogy. It is a breathtaking act of spiritual manipulation. By wrapping TPUSA, Erika Kirk, and their leadership in biblical imagery, they blur the line between loyalty to Christ and loyalty to an organization. They elevate themselves into the story of redemption, encouraging grieving supporters to see TPUSA’s continuation as something spiritually ordained. In my view, this isn’t about honoring Charlie. It’s about directing grief, shaping perception, and persuading people that supporting Erika Kirk and TPUSA is part of a higher calling. Christ has no replacement. Pentecost happened once. The disciples were chosen by Jesus—not by a political organization after the death of its founder. Candace Owens Zach Costello Carrie Prejean Boller Tucker Carlson
3:44

Andrew Kolvet’s comments in the new American Martyr documentary may be among the most revealing moments in the entire film. He compares Charlie Kirk to Jesus. He compares himself, Blake Neff, Mikey McCoy, Tyler Bowyer, Jack Posobiec, and the rest of the TPUSA inner circle to Christ’s disciples. Then he compares Erika Kirk standing in Charlie’s studio just days after his assassination to Pentecost—the moment God poured out His Holy Spirit and the Church was born. That isn’t just an unfortunate analogy. It is a breathtaking act of spiritual manipulation. By wrapping TPUSA, Erika Kirk, and their leadership in biblical imagery, they blur the line between loyalty to Christ and loyalty to an organization. They elevate themselves into the story of redemption, encouraging grieving supporters to see TPUSA’s continuation as something spiritually ordained. In my view, this isn’t about honoring Charlie. It’s about directing grief, shaping perception, and persuading people that supporting Erika Kirk and TPUSA is part of a higher calling. Christ has no replacement. Pentecost happened once. The disciples were chosen by Jesus—not by a political organization after the death of its founder. Candace Owens Zach Costello Carrie Prejean Boller Tucker Carlson

The Black Line Brief

39,003 views • 2 months ago

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US
0:52

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 views • 7 months ago

Monty McCutchen on this moment: "It should have been you are not allowed into the game make sure he is clear that he is not allowed in the game or clear that he is allowed into the game and because we did such a poor job of that administratively I think it was best handled the way it was"
1:33

Monty McCutchen on this moment: "It should have been you are not allowed into the game make sure he is clear that he is not allowed in the game or clear that he is allowed into the game and because we did such a poor job of that administratively I think it was best handled the way it was"

Oh No He Didn't

302,287 views • 3 months ago

RVD admitted for the first time that Raja Jackson should “probably” do some jail time for what he did to Syko Stu. RVD is alright, folks. It is a complicated situation, I’ll admit it. He should not have been in the ring. Period. The fact is though, he was, and he almost killed a guy. You have to held accountable for your actions. #1ofaKind
2:55

RVD admitted for the first time that Raja Jackson should “probably” do some jail time for what he did to Syko Stu. RVD is alright, folks. It is a complicated situation, I’ll admit it. He should not have been in the ring. Period. The fact is though, he was, and he almost killed a guy. You have to held accountable for your actions. #1ofaKind

Hollywood Gump

157,956 views • 1 year ago

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”
0:50

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 views • 10 months ago