Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Jeff Bezos just explained the “AI bubble” better than anyone. At Italian Tech Week 2025, Bezos didn’t deny the hype, he embraced it. “Yes, there’s a bubble. But AI is real and it’s going to transform every single industry.” He called it an industrial bubble, not a financial one....

VraserX's profile picture

VraserX e/acc

22,055 subscribers

630,193 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducationScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Jeff Bezos just gave the single clearest explanation of why the current AI frenzy is NOT like the dot-com crash or 2008—and why it actually matters way more than people think. In his words: “When people get very excited, every experiment gets funded. Good ideas and bad ideas. Six people, no product, $20B valuation—that’s happening today. Investors can’t tell the difference in the middle of the mania. But this is an industrial bubble, not a financial one. The 90s had a biotech bubble. As a group, investors lost money… but society still got life-saving drugs that are used every single day. AI is the same—only bigger. It’s not about a handful of AI-first companies. The biggest impact is that AI will transform every single company on Earth. It’s a horizontal layer that raises quality and productivity everywhere. The valuations are insane. Some will go to zero. But when the dust settles, humanity keeps the inventions. That’s how real progress works.” Bezos has never been more bullish—or more sober—about what’s actually happening right now. Watch the full 2:31 clip.
2:31

Jeff Bezos just gave the single clearest explanation of why the current AI frenzy is NOT like the dot-com crash or 2008—and why it actually matters way more than people think. In his words: “When people get very excited, every experiment gets funded. Good ideas and bad ideas. Six people, no product, $20B valuation—that’s happening today. Investors can’t tell the difference in the middle of the mania. But this is an industrial bubble, not a financial one. The 90s had a biotech bubble. As a group, investors lost money… but society still got life-saving drugs that are used every single day. AI is the same—only bigger. It’s not about a handful of AI-first companies. The biggest impact is that AI will transform every single company on Earth. It’s a horizontal layer that raises quality and productivity everywhere. The valuations are insane. Some will go to zero. But when the dust settles, humanity keeps the inventions. That’s how real progress works.” Bezos has never been more bullish—or more sober—about what’s actually happening right now. Watch the full 2:31 clip.

Camus

693,157 views • 8 months ago

Jeff Bezos believes that AI is an “industrial bubble”, which means every type of company or experiment — good idea or bad idea — will get funded. Even if investors don’t make money, AI is very “real” and “will change every industry”. He cites biotech bubble in 1990s: investors as whole lost money but society gained a number of life-saving drugs (similarly, the telecom bubble resulted in a massive cable buildout we still use).
3:55

Jeff Bezos believes that AI is an “industrial bubble”, which means every type of company or experiment — good idea or bad idea — will get funded. Even if investors don’t make money, AI is very “real” and “will change every industry”. He cites biotech bubble in 1990s: investors as whole lost money but society gained a number of life-saving drugs (similarly, the telecom bubble resulted in a massive cable buildout we still use).

Bearly AI

655,787 views • 10 months ago

🦔 Bezos says AI is an "industrial bubble" not a "financial bubble," and that's supposed to make it okay. His argument: investors may lose money, but society still gets the inventions. Like the dot-com bust left us with the internet infrastructure. He's not wrong about the pattern. The dot-com crash left behind dark fiber that companies still use today. But notice the framing shift. We went from "it's not a bubble" to "it's a bubble, but it's the good kind." That's progress, I guess. My Take The guy with billions riding on AI telling you the AI bubble is actually fine is worth taking with some skepticism. Yes, some useful technology will survive whatever correction comes. But trillions in investment requires more than "useful." It requires world-changing returns to justify the spending. The real question is who pays for the difference between what was invested and what actually pays off. In the dot-com crash, retail investors and pension funds took massive losses. The infrastructure survived, but people's retirement accounts didn't. Bezos emerged from that wreckage as one of the richest people alive. When billionaires tell you bubbles can benefit society, ask who specifically benefits and who holds the bag. Hedgie🤗
1:33

🦔 Bezos says AI is an "industrial bubble" not a "financial bubble," and that's supposed to make it okay. His argument: investors may lose money, but society still gets the inventions. Like the dot-com bust left us with the internet infrastructure. He's not wrong about the pattern. The dot-com crash left behind dark fiber that companies still use today. But notice the framing shift. We went from "it's not a bubble" to "it's a bubble, but it's the good kind." That's progress, I guess. My Take The guy with billions riding on AI telling you the AI bubble is actually fine is worth taking with some skepticism. Yes, some useful technology will survive whatever correction comes. But trillions in investment requires more than "useful." It requires world-changing returns to justify the spending. The real question is who pays for the difference between what was invested and what actually pays off. In the dot-com crash, retail investors and pension funds took massive losses. The infrastructure survived, but people's retirement accounts didn't. Bezos emerged from that wreckage as one of the richest people alive. When billionaires tell you bubbles can benefit society, ask who specifically benefits and who holds the bag. Hedgie🤗

Hedgie

18,818 views • 6 months ago

🎯 Jeff Bezos beautifully explains how AI boom as ‘good’ kind of bubble that will benefit the world Bezos argued that “industrial bubbles” like AI are very different from financial bubbles like the 2008 banking crash, because the inventions survive even if the hype fades. He compared today’s AI boom to the dotcom era’s spending on fiber optics and the biotech wave of the 1990s, where even though many companies failed, the technology and discoveries that remained were hugely valuable. AI’s impact is “real” and will change every industry, though investors right now may struggle to tell the difference between strong ideas and weak ones. He also predicted that in the coming decades millions of people will live in space, with robots handling much of the work and massive AI data centers powered by the sun operating there. --- From 'DRM News' YT Channel
1:18

🎯 Jeff Bezos beautifully explains how AI boom as ‘good’ kind of bubble that will benefit the world Bezos argued that “industrial bubbles” like AI are very different from financial bubbles like the 2008 banking crash, because the inventions survive even if the hype fades. He compared today’s AI boom to the dotcom era’s spending on fiber optics and the biotech wave of the 1990s, where even though many companies failed, the technology and discoveries that remained were hugely valuable. AI’s impact is “real” and will change every industry, though investors right now may struggle to tell the difference between strong ideas and weak ones. He also predicted that in the coming decades millions of people will live in space, with robots handling much of the work and massive AI data centers powered by the sun operating there. --- From 'DRM News' YT Channel

Rohan Paul

959,146 views • 10 months ago

Jeff Bezos built a trillion dollar company on infrastructure paid for by people who went bankrupt. And he just explained why it’s about to happen again with AI. In the 1990s, companies poured billions into laying fiber optic cable across the planet. Every one of them went broke. Bezos: “All of that fiber optic cable that got laid, and by the way, the companies who laid all that cable went out of business.” They died. The cable stayed. And it became the foundation of everything that followed. Now it’s happening again. Six people. No product. They started yesterday. $20 billion valuation. Bezos: “Investors don’t usually give a team of 6 people a couple of billion dollars with no product. It’s rare. And that’s happening today.” Everyone sees this and screams bubble. Bezos sees the same thing and recognizes something older. There are two kinds of bubbles. A financial bubble, like 2008, is pure destruction. Capital vanishes. Society inherits the crater. An industrial bubble runs on entirely different logic. Bezos: “This is a kind of industrial bubble, as opposed to financial bubbles.” The 90s biotech boom burned through billions. Stocks collapsed. Companies disappeared. The drugs they created are still saving lives today. Bezos: “As a group, they all lost money. But we did get a couple of life saving drugs.” The investors lose. The inventions remain. Every single time. Most AI companies being funded right now won’t exist in five years. The people writing the checks already know it. They are not confused. They are not reckless. They are financing infrastructure the entire world will inherit. Bezos: “The benefits to society from AI are going to be gigantic.” 25 years ago, no one could have predicted what the internet would become. Least of all the people who laid the cable. They went broke before the world they built ever switched on. The AI bubble is not a sign that something has gone wrong. It is how civilization has always financed things too large for any rational person to justify. Every piece of technology you use without thinking was once someone’s life savings disappearing in real time. That is what a successful bubble looks like from the other side. You stop seeing it. It just becomes the world. The system only works because the builders believe they will be the exception. If they ever saw the pattern clearly, they would stop. And the future would stop arriving. Progress does not run on genius. It runs on brilliant people being catastrophically, necessarily wrong. The people who build the future have never been the ones who get to live in it. That is not a flaw in the system. That is the system.
2:05

Jeff Bezos built a trillion dollar company on infrastructure paid for by people who went bankrupt. And he just explained why it’s about to happen again with AI. In the 1990s, companies poured billions into laying fiber optic cable across the planet. Every one of them went broke. Bezos: “All of that fiber optic cable that got laid, and by the way, the companies who laid all that cable went out of business.” They died. The cable stayed. And it became the foundation of everything that followed. Now it’s happening again. Six people. No product. They started yesterday. $20 billion valuation. Bezos: “Investors don’t usually give a team of 6 people a couple of billion dollars with no product. It’s rare. And that’s happening today.” Everyone sees this and screams bubble. Bezos sees the same thing and recognizes something older. There are two kinds of bubbles. A financial bubble, like 2008, is pure destruction. Capital vanishes. Society inherits the crater. An industrial bubble runs on entirely different logic. Bezos: “This is a kind of industrial bubble, as opposed to financial bubbles.” The 90s biotech boom burned through billions. Stocks collapsed. Companies disappeared. The drugs they created are still saving lives today. Bezos: “As a group, they all lost money. But we did get a couple of life saving drugs.” The investors lose. The inventions remain. Every single time. Most AI companies being funded right now won’t exist in five years. The people writing the checks already know it. They are not confused. They are not reckless. They are financing infrastructure the entire world will inherit. Bezos: “The benefits to society from AI are going to be gigantic.” 25 years ago, no one could have predicted what the internet would become. Least of all the people who laid the cable. They went broke before the world they built ever switched on. The AI bubble is not a sign that something has gone wrong. It is how civilization has always financed things too large for any rational person to justify. Every piece of technology you use without thinking was once someone’s life savings disappearing in real time. That is what a successful bubble looks like from the other side. You stop seeing it. It just becomes the world. The system only works because the builders believe they will be the exception. If they ever saw the pattern clearly, they would stop. And the future would stop arriving. Progress does not run on genius. It runs on brilliant people being catastrophically, necessarily wrong. The people who build the future have never been the ones who get to live in it. That is not a flaw in the system. That is the system.

Dustin

84,671 views • 11 days ago

Jeff Bezos just made the most counterintuitive argument in tech. An AI crash wouldn’t destroy the future. It would fund it. Jeff Bezos: “If we go back 25 years ago when the internet was in that bubble-ish moment, no one would have predicted a lot of the industrial benefits.” The dot-com bubble erased trillions in market value. Companies that raised hundreds of millions were gone within months. The money vanished. The infrastructure didn’t. Bezos: “All of that fiber optic cable that got laid, and by the way, the companies who laid all that cable went out of business.” Billions worth of fiber optic cable buried under oceans and across continents. Laid by companies that no longer exist. They went bankrupt. The cable stayed in the ground. Bezos: “Like literally went bankrupt. But the fiber optic cable was still there. And we got to use it.” Amazon. Google. Netflix. Uber. Every cloud platform. Every streaming service. All built on infrastructure paid for by dead companies. They funded the future. They just didn’t survive long enough to see it. That exact pattern is about to repeat. Hundreds of billions are flooding into AI infrastructure right now. Data centers. Chip fabrication. Power generation. Cooling systems. Some of the companies writing those checks will not exist in five years. The market will correct. Valuations will crater. The bubble narrative will be everywhere. And the infrastructure will still be standing. Data centers don’t vanish when the stock price hits zero. GPUs don’t disappear when the company folds. Power grids don’t downgrade when investors pull out. Every dollar being spent right now is permanently reshaping the physical world. It doesn’t matter which companies survive to use it. The bubble isn’t the risk. The bubble is the funding mechanism. The railroad bubble overbuilt track that connected a continent. The telegraph bubble laid wire that enabled global communication. The dot-com bubble buried fiber that carries the modern internet. Each time, the investors lost. Each time, civilization gained. AI is that same pattern running at a scale we’ve never seen. The crash will feel like a catastrophe. In hindsight, it will look like something else entirely. The largest involuntary infrastructure investment in human history. The companies that fail will have already served their purpose. The compute layer stays. And the survivors build on top of it. The question was never whether the AI bubble will pop. It’s who will be standing in the rubble with a blueprint.
0:38

Jeff Bezos just made the most counterintuitive argument in tech. An AI crash wouldn’t destroy the future. It would fund it. Jeff Bezos: “If we go back 25 years ago when the internet was in that bubble-ish moment, no one would have predicted a lot of the industrial benefits.” The dot-com bubble erased trillions in market value. Companies that raised hundreds of millions were gone within months. The money vanished. The infrastructure didn’t. Bezos: “All of that fiber optic cable that got laid, and by the way, the companies who laid all that cable went out of business.” Billions worth of fiber optic cable buried under oceans and across continents. Laid by companies that no longer exist. They went bankrupt. The cable stayed in the ground. Bezos: “Like literally went bankrupt. But the fiber optic cable was still there. And we got to use it.” Amazon. Google. Netflix. Uber. Every cloud platform. Every streaming service. All built on infrastructure paid for by dead companies. They funded the future. They just didn’t survive long enough to see it. That exact pattern is about to repeat. Hundreds of billions are flooding into AI infrastructure right now. Data centers. Chip fabrication. Power generation. Cooling systems. Some of the companies writing those checks will not exist in five years. The market will correct. Valuations will crater. The bubble narrative will be everywhere. And the infrastructure will still be standing. Data centers don’t vanish when the stock price hits zero. GPUs don’t disappear when the company folds. Power grids don’t downgrade when investors pull out. Every dollar being spent right now is permanently reshaping the physical world. It doesn’t matter which companies survive to use it. The bubble isn’t the risk. The bubble is the funding mechanism. The railroad bubble overbuilt track that connected a continent. The telegraph bubble laid wire that enabled global communication. The dot-com bubble buried fiber that carries the modern internet. Each time, the investors lost. Each time, civilization gained. AI is that same pattern running at a scale we’ve never seen. The crash will feel like a catastrophe. In hindsight, it will look like something else entirely. The largest involuntary infrastructure investment in human history. The companies that fail will have already served their purpose. The compute layer stays. And the survivors build on top of it. The question was never whether the AI bubble will pop. It’s who will be standing in the rubble with a blueprint.

Dustin

140,490 views • 3 months ago

Jeff Bezos $AMZN believes AI is an industrial bubble — where market frenzy pushes billions of dollars into newly founded companies with 5–6 people and no product. Just look at: • Thinking Machines by Mira Murati, valued at $12B • Safe Superintelligence by Ilya Sutskever, valued at $32B In a context like this, the real skill is knowing how to separate the winners from the rest. The benefits to society from AI will be gigantic. The challenge is not missing them — and not losing money by backing the wrong ones.
1:39

Jeff Bezos $AMZN believes AI is an industrial bubble — where market frenzy pushes billions of dollars into newly founded companies with 5–6 people and no product. Just look at: • Thinking Machines by Mira Murati, valued at $12B • Safe Superintelligence by Ilya Sutskever, valued at $32B In a context like this, the real skill is knowing how to separate the winners from the rest. The benefits to society from AI will be gigantic. The challenge is not missing them — and not losing money by backing the wrong ones.

Daniel

180,637 views • 6 months ago

Jeff Bezos explains the stock-is-not-company rule behind Amazon's $113 to $6 collapse. "Our stock peaked somewhere around $113." "Then after the internet bubble busted open, our stock went down to $6." "It went from $113 to $6 in less than a year." "My annual shareholder letter that year starts with a one word sentence." "Ouch." Then Bezos gives the rule most operators forget in a crash: "The stock is not the company, and the company is not the stock." While the outside price was collapsing, he was watching the inside machine: "Number of customers." "Profit per unit." "Defects." "Every single thing about the business was getting better and fast." The useful idea: do not let the market's scoreboard replace your operating dashboard. A price can scream panic while the business is quietly getting healthier. - Jeff Bezos (Jeff Bezos) on Bloomberg's The David Rubenstein Show
1:27

Jeff Bezos explains the stock-is-not-company rule behind Amazon's $113 to $6 collapse. "Our stock peaked somewhere around $113." "Then after the internet bubble busted open, our stock went down to $6." "It went from $113 to $6 in less than a year." "My annual shareholder letter that year starts with a one word sentence." "Ouch." Then Bezos gives the rule most operators forget in a crash: "The stock is not the company, and the company is not the stock." While the outside price was collapsing, he was watching the inside machine: "Number of customers." "Profit per unit." "Defects." "Every single thing about the business was getting better and fast." The useful idea: do not let the market's scoreboard replace your operating dashboard. A price can scream panic while the business is quietly getting healthier. - Jeff Bezos (Jeff Bezos) on Bloomberg's The David Rubenstein Show

andrew engler

1,337,505 views • 23 days ago

RAY DALIO JUST SAID HE THINKS THE AI BUBBLE IS GOING TO POP On Bloomberg, he laid out exactly when, why, and how he sees it happening. He also compared the current market to two specific years: "We are right now rising closer to, not at, the same level in 2000 and the same level in 1929, a specific level where you say, oh no, here's the one that we really need to worry about." On all tech revolutions: "All great technology changes produce bubbles. And the reason they produce bubbles is because nobody can get it exactly right." On the mechanism that pops bubbles: "There's a bubble, and then there's the pricking of the bubble. The pricking of the bubble happens when there's a need for wealth to be sold to get the money." On the wealth gap that comes with it: "A very small percentage of the population is going to do unbelievably and a lot of people won't." On a political solution: "I'm not optimistic on us working together to solve." He says the technology is real. The prices and the debt are the problem.
4:26

RAY DALIO JUST SAID HE THINKS THE AI BUBBLE IS GOING TO POP On Bloomberg, he laid out exactly when, why, and how he sees it happening. He also compared the current market to two specific years: "We are right now rising closer to, not at, the same level in 2000 and the same level in 1929, a specific level where you say, oh no, here's the one that we really need to worry about." On all tech revolutions: "All great technology changes produce bubbles. And the reason they produce bubbles is because nobody can get it exactly right." On the mechanism that pops bubbles: "There's a bubble, and then there's the pricking of the bubble. The pricking of the bubble happens when there's a need for wealth to be sold to get the money." On the wealth gap that comes with it: "A very small percentage of the population is going to do unbelievably and a lot of people won't." On a political solution: "I'm not optimistic on us working together to solve." He says the technology is real. The prices and the debt are the problem.

WOLF

183,672 views • 2 months ago

Jeff Bezos just delivered the clearest definition of what artificial intelligence actually is. The market is still debating which department should own the AI budget. They’re asking the wrong question entirely. Bezos: “AI, modern AI is a horizontal enabling layer. It can be used to improve everything. It will be in everything. This is most like electricity.” This isn’t a software product. It’s the new utility grid of the global economy. Don’t treat it like a feature update. Treat it like the invention of alternating current. When a horizontal layer hits the board, it doesn’t improve a single vertical. It violently rewrites the baseline physics of every industry it touches. The companies that survive this decade won’t be the ones that bought a new AI tool. They’ll be the ones that ripped out their entire infrastructure and rewired the execution engine to run on the new grid. Bezos: “Because we are literally working on a thousand applications internally. I guarantee you there is not a single application that you can think of that is not going to be made better by AI.” The standard enterprise strategy is to launch one or two safe, isolated AI pilots and test the waters. You don’t pilot a horizontal enabling layer. You saturate the board immediately. Amazon isn’t building a single monolithic chatbot. It’s deploying a thousand specialized execution loops across every friction point in the empire. If your deployment strategy isn’t total saturation, you’re already bleeding margin to someone whose is. Interviewer: “What is it that you’re doing at Amazon?” Bezos: “AI. It’s 95% AI.” The standard CEO delegates automation strategy to a mid-level committee while focusing on quarterly earnings. The operator commanding a trillion-dollar supply chain is spending 95 percent of his personal bandwidth on a single vector. That is the market signal. If the leader of your organization isn’t driving algorithmic integration from the top down with everything they have, the company is already dead. It just hasn’t received the memo yet.
0:39

Jeff Bezos just delivered the clearest definition of what artificial intelligence actually is. The market is still debating which department should own the AI budget. They’re asking the wrong question entirely. Bezos: “AI, modern AI is a horizontal enabling layer. It can be used to improve everything. It will be in everything. This is most like electricity.” This isn’t a software product. It’s the new utility grid of the global economy. Don’t treat it like a feature update. Treat it like the invention of alternating current. When a horizontal layer hits the board, it doesn’t improve a single vertical. It violently rewrites the baseline physics of every industry it touches. The companies that survive this decade won’t be the ones that bought a new AI tool. They’ll be the ones that ripped out their entire infrastructure and rewired the execution engine to run on the new grid. Bezos: “Because we are literally working on a thousand applications internally. I guarantee you there is not a single application that you can think of that is not going to be made better by AI.” The standard enterprise strategy is to launch one or two safe, isolated AI pilots and test the waters. You don’t pilot a horizontal enabling layer. You saturate the board immediately. Amazon isn’t building a single monolithic chatbot. It’s deploying a thousand specialized execution loops across every friction point in the empire. If your deployment strategy isn’t total saturation, you’re already bleeding margin to someone whose is. Interviewer: “What is it that you’re doing at Amazon?” Bezos: “AI. It’s 95% AI.” The standard CEO delegates automation strategy to a mid-level committee while focusing on quarterly earnings. The operator commanding a trillion-dollar supply chain is spending 95 percent of his personal bandwidth on a single vector. That is the market signal. If the leader of your organization isn’t driving algorithmic integration from the top down with everything they have, the company is already dead. It just hasn’t received the memo yet.

Dustin

404,759 views • 4 months ago

Jeff Bezos just said an AI crash would be the best thing that ever happened to AI. Sounds insane until you look at what happened last time. Telecom companies invested $500 billion into fiber optic cable between 1996 and 2001. Most of it financed with debt. The growth in capacity outstripped demand by orders of magnitude. By 2005, 85% of the fiber they laid was still dark. Unused. The companies that built it went bankrupt. WorldCom. Global Crossing. 360networks. Exposed as fraud, overleveraged, or both. $2 trillion in telecom stock value evaporated. The cable stayed in the ground. 80.2 million miles of fiber, representing 76% of all digital wiring in the United States at that point, survived every bankruptcy filing and liquidation sale. The glass in the ground didn't care who owned the company above it. Amazon launched Prime Video on that fiber. Netflix streamed its first original on it. Google built YouTube on bandwidth that cost 90% less than it would have before the crash because dead companies had already paid for the capacity. Every cloud platform, every streaming service, every video call you've taken in the last decade runs on infrastructure that bankrupt telecom companies subsidized with investor money they never returned. Now look at 2026. Big Tech is spending $400 billion on data centers this year alone. Amazon's capex plan is $200 billion, the largest in corporate history. The AI bubble, by one estimate, is 17 times the size of the dot-com bubble. Bezos himself called it an "industrial bubble" at Italian Tech Week. Here's why he's calm about it. He watched the exact same movie in 2001. Amazon nearly died in that crash. Stock dropped 90%. But when the dust settled, Bezos had cheap bandwidth, empty data centers looking for tenants, and a trained workforce of engineers that the dead dot-coms had paid to train. AWS was built on the rubble. The pattern is specific. Investors fund infrastructure. Companies die. Infrastructure survives. The next generation builds on it at a fraction of the original cost. Data centers don't disappear when an AI startup folds. Chips depreciate, but the buildings, the power connections, the cooling systems, the land with energy contracts attached to it: all of that persists. When AI companies fail, they'll leave behind computing capacity that someone else will rent for pennies on the dollar. Bezos is making a $200 billion bet with full awareness that much of the industry around him will collapse. He's seen this before. The last time the bubble popped, it handed him the raw materials to build a $2 trillion company. The investors who funded the fiber never saw a return. The company that inherited it became the most valuable on earth.
0:39

Jeff Bezos just said an AI crash would be the best thing that ever happened to AI. Sounds insane until you look at what happened last time. Telecom companies invested $500 billion into fiber optic cable between 1996 and 2001. Most of it financed with debt. The growth in capacity outstripped demand by orders of magnitude. By 2005, 85% of the fiber they laid was still dark. Unused. The companies that built it went bankrupt. WorldCom. Global Crossing. 360networks. Exposed as fraud, overleveraged, or both. $2 trillion in telecom stock value evaporated. The cable stayed in the ground. 80.2 million miles of fiber, representing 76% of all digital wiring in the United States at that point, survived every bankruptcy filing and liquidation sale. The glass in the ground didn't care who owned the company above it. Amazon launched Prime Video on that fiber. Netflix streamed its first original on it. Google built YouTube on bandwidth that cost 90% less than it would have before the crash because dead companies had already paid for the capacity. Every cloud platform, every streaming service, every video call you've taken in the last decade runs on infrastructure that bankrupt telecom companies subsidized with investor money they never returned. Now look at 2026. Big Tech is spending $400 billion on data centers this year alone. Amazon's capex plan is $200 billion, the largest in corporate history. The AI bubble, by one estimate, is 17 times the size of the dot-com bubble. Bezos himself called it an "industrial bubble" at Italian Tech Week. Here's why he's calm about it. He watched the exact same movie in 2001. Amazon nearly died in that crash. Stock dropped 90%. But when the dust settled, Bezos had cheap bandwidth, empty data centers looking for tenants, and a trained workforce of engineers that the dead dot-coms had paid to train. AWS was built on the rubble. The pattern is specific. Investors fund infrastructure. Companies die. Infrastructure survives. The next generation builds on it at a fraction of the original cost. Data centers don't disappear when an AI startup folds. Chips depreciate, but the buildings, the power connections, the cooling systems, the land with energy contracts attached to it: all of that persists. When AI companies fail, they'll leave behind computing capacity that someone else will rent for pennies on the dollar. Bezos is making a $200 billion bet with full awareness that much of the industry around him will collapse. He's seen this before. The last time the bubble popped, it handed him the raw materials to build a $2 trillion company. The investors who funded the fiber never saw a return. The company that inherited it became the most valuable on earth.

Aakash Gupta

104,079 views • 3 months ago

🚨This is how you turn a crash into a great depression. This is a public bailout of the worst bubble in history. “It’s a concept out there that’s so much money and it’s so big… where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies… the American people can benefit from the success of AI and by doing that they’re going to like it better…”
0:54

🚨This is how you turn a crash into a great depression. This is a public bailout of the worst bubble in history. “It’s a concept out there that’s so much money and it’s so big… where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies… the American people can benefit from the success of AI and by doing that they’re going to like it better…”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

119,258 views • 1 month ago

Bill Gates was asked live on air whether AI is a bubble. he didn't soften his answer. the man who built Microsoft and lived through every tech wave of the last 50 years. "it's a bubble only in the sense that not all of these valuations will go up, some will fall. but behind it stands a deeply profound technology that will reshape the world. there's not the slightest doubt about that" he added that the competition will be brutal and a share of the overvalued companies won't be worth that much, but the technology itself is nothing anyone should doubt. bookmark it and watch the full interview ↓
1:59

Bill Gates was asked live on air whether AI is a bubble. he didn't soften his answer. the man who built Microsoft and lived through every tech wave of the last 50 years. "it's a bubble only in the sense that not all of these valuations will go up, some will fall. but behind it stands a deeply profound technology that will reshape the world. there's not the slightest doubt about that" he added that the competition will be brutal and a share of the overvalued companies won't be worth that much, but the technology itself is nothing anyone should doubt. bookmark it and watch the full interview ↓

Damir Akaza

213,713 views • 1 month ago

Jeff Bezos says bureaucracy as we know it won’t exist in 5 years In a fascinating conversation, Jeff Bezos talks with Francis Suarez, the Mayor of Miami, and completely dismantles the idea of traditional bureaucracy with a bold and surprisingly simple AI vision. 🤖 The vision: building permits in seconds Bezos outlines how AI could transform the entire permitting process: •Today: Getting a building permit takes months, even though the answer is almost always “yes.” People are just forced to wait. •Tomorrow: An AI reads the plans, knows every regulation, and gives a decision in about 10 seconds. •Smart feedback: If the answer is “no,” the AI instantly lists the exact changes needed to turn it into a “yes.” 💰 Why time really is money From an entrepreneur’s perspective, the cost of delay is absurd: •Large construction projects in Miami are multi-billion-dollar investments. •Interest and running costs alone can hit $200,000–$400,000 per day. •Every day an application sits on a desk literally burns money and patience. 🤝 The deal that didn’t happen •Suarez immediately calls it a “$100 billion idea” and jokingly tries to recruit Bezos to build it together. •Bezos laughs and declines. He says he’s too busy and sees this as a massive opportunity for startups to solve the problem for cities worldwide. The takeaway is hard to ignore: This isn’t about faster paperwork. It’s about removing friction from society itself. Once AI handles decisions that are already rule-based, bureaucracy stops being a bottleneck. My take: systems that exist purely because “that’s how it’s always been done” are living on borrowed time. Five years might even be generous.
2:12

Jeff Bezos says bureaucracy as we know it won’t exist in 5 years In a fascinating conversation, Jeff Bezos talks with Francis Suarez, the Mayor of Miami, and completely dismantles the idea of traditional bureaucracy with a bold and surprisingly simple AI vision. 🤖 The vision: building permits in seconds Bezos outlines how AI could transform the entire permitting process: •Today: Getting a building permit takes months, even though the answer is almost always “yes.” People are just forced to wait. •Tomorrow: An AI reads the plans, knows every regulation, and gives a decision in about 10 seconds. •Smart feedback: If the answer is “no,” the AI instantly lists the exact changes needed to turn it into a “yes.” 💰 Why time really is money From an entrepreneur’s perspective, the cost of delay is absurd: •Large construction projects in Miami are multi-billion-dollar investments. •Interest and running costs alone can hit $200,000–$400,000 per day. •Every day an application sits on a desk literally burns money and patience. 🤝 The deal that didn’t happen •Suarez immediately calls it a “$100 billion idea” and jokingly tries to recruit Bezos to build it together. •Bezos laughs and declines. He says he’s too busy and sees this as a massive opportunity for startups to solve the problem for cities worldwide. The takeaway is hard to ignore: This isn’t about faster paperwork. It’s about removing friction from society itself. Once AI handles decisions that are already rule-based, bureaucracy stops being a bottleneck. My take: systems that exist purely because “that’s how it’s always been done” are living on borrowed time. Five years might even be generous.

VraserX e/acc

82,312 views • 6 months ago

Those calling this an “AI bubble” assume monetization efforts will not offset the capital being invested. What if the opposite happens after the initial monetization gap - revenue accelerates, profits begin to scale, and the market reprices AI companies dramatically higher. I shared my thoughts last week in my interview with Charles V Payne on why the biggest risk to investors is not that AI is in a bubble - but rather the opportunity cost of missing out. $NVDA
9:01

Those calling this an “AI bubble” assume monetization efforts will not offset the capital being invested. What if the opposite happens after the initial monetization gap - revenue accelerates, profits begin to scale, and the market reprices AI companies dramatically higher. I shared my thoughts last week in my interview with Charles V Payne on why the biggest risk to investors is not that AI is in a bubble - but rather the opportunity cost of missing out. $NVDA

Beth Kindig

67,388 views • 8 months ago

Bill Gates just settled the biggest debate in Silicon Valley. Is AI a bubble? Yes. And it doesn’t matter. Gates: “If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands, that they went to look back and said, what the heck, there was nothing there… No, that’s not where we are.” There are two kinds of bubbles in history. The tulip craze. And the dot-com crash. Tulips left nothing. The internet left everything. Gates: “In the end something very profound happened. The world was very different.” AI is following the dot-com playbook exactly. Irrational capital. Frenzied competition. Companies burning money faster than they can build business models. And underneath all of it, a technology that is changing everything. Permanently. Gates: “AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime.” Not the internet. Not the smartphone. Not cloud computing. The biggest. Ever. In his lifetime. Gates: “Some of them will commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive. Or they’ll buy a generation of chips and won’t have captured all their value before the next one comes along.” Billions are being set on fire right now. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the frenzy is moving faster than the business models can catch up. The winners of the dot-com era weren’t the ones who spent the most. They were the ones who survived long enough for the dust to settle. But here’s the part nobody wants to hear. Gates: “If you want to be a tech company, you don’t get to say no. You know, let’s check out of this race.” Sitting out isn’t safety. It’s a slower death. The risk of investing blindly is losing capital. The risk of not investing is losing the company. Gates: “Absolutely. There are a ton of these investments that will be dead ends.” Some of these companies will be wiped out. Not because AI isn’t real. Because they chased the hype without the foundation to survive the correction. The technology is not the bubble. The valuations are the bubble. And like every bubble before it, when it corrects, what remains will be more valuable than what existed before the frenzy started. You don’t win this era by spending the most. You win by surviving long enough to be one of the ones left standing.
1:38

Bill Gates just settled the biggest debate in Silicon Valley. Is AI a bubble? Yes. And it doesn’t matter. Gates: “If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands, that they went to look back and said, what the heck, there was nothing there… No, that’s not where we are.” There are two kinds of bubbles in history. The tulip craze. And the dot-com crash. Tulips left nothing. The internet left everything. Gates: “In the end something very profound happened. The world was very different.” AI is following the dot-com playbook exactly. Irrational capital. Frenzied competition. Companies burning money faster than they can build business models. And underneath all of it, a technology that is changing everything. Permanently. Gates: “AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime.” Not the internet. Not the smartphone. Not cloud computing. The biggest. Ever. In his lifetime. Gates: “Some of them will commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive. Or they’ll buy a generation of chips and won’t have captured all their value before the next one comes along.” Billions are being set on fire right now. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the frenzy is moving faster than the business models can catch up. The winners of the dot-com era weren’t the ones who spent the most. They were the ones who survived long enough for the dust to settle. But here’s the part nobody wants to hear. Gates: “If you want to be a tech company, you don’t get to say no. You know, let’s check out of this race.” Sitting out isn’t safety. It’s a slower death. The risk of investing blindly is losing capital. The risk of not investing is losing the company. Gates: “Absolutely. There are a ton of these investments that will be dead ends.” Some of these companies will be wiped out. Not because AI isn’t real. Because they chased the hype without the foundation to survive the correction. The technology is not the bubble. The valuations are the bubble. And like every bubble before it, when it corrects, what remains will be more valuable than what existed before the frenzy started. You don’t win this era by spending the most. You win by surviving long enough to be one of the ones left standing.

Dustin

253,759 views • 5 months ago

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”
3:13

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”

Jawwwn

695,479 views • 6 months ago

Aswath Damodaran on AI bubble: “Dot-com was an equity bubble. AI is becoming an infrastructure debt bubble.” In the 1990s, many internet companies raised money, built websites, burned cash, and disappeared. When the bust came, shareholders got wiped out. AI is different, because this boom is not just apps and pitch decks. It is data centers, GPUs, power contracts, fiber, leases, project finance, and private credit. The numbers are wild: ↳ Goldman Sachs estimates hyperscalers may spend ~$5.3T on AI/data center capex from 2025–2030 ↳ Morgan Stanley estimates ~$2.9T in global data center construction from 2025–2028 ↳ Top hyperscalers are projected to spend ~$600B in 2026 alone, with roughly 75% tied to AI infrastructure Dot-com asked investors to believe in traffic. AI is now asking lenders to believe in utilization. If demand keeps compounding, the buildout looks genius. But if demand disappoints, the problem is not just “stocks go down.” It becomes stranded capacity. Refinancing pressure. Private credit stress. Defaults. AI may end up becoming the defining technology platform of our lifetime. But the bubble risk is not where most people are looking.
1:40

Aswath Damodaran on AI bubble: “Dot-com was an equity bubble. AI is becoming an infrastructure debt bubble.” In the 1990s, many internet companies raised money, built websites, burned cash, and disappeared. When the bust came, shareholders got wiped out. AI is different, because this boom is not just apps and pitch decks. It is data centers, GPUs, power contracts, fiber, leases, project finance, and private credit. The numbers are wild: ↳ Goldman Sachs estimates hyperscalers may spend ~$5.3T on AI/data center capex from 2025–2030 ↳ Morgan Stanley estimates ~$2.9T in global data center construction from 2025–2028 ↳ Top hyperscalers are projected to spend ~$600B in 2026 alone, with roughly 75% tied to AI infrastructure Dot-com asked investors to believe in traffic. AI is now asking lenders to believe in utilization. If demand keeps compounding, the buildout looks genius. But if demand disappoints, the problem is not just “stocks go down.” It becomes stranded capacity. Refinancing pressure. Private credit stress. Defaults. AI may end up becoming the defining technology platform of our lifetime. But the bubble risk is not where most people are looking.

Linas Beliūnas

41,946 views • 1 month ago

We all know AI is the future of technology. But almost nobody will OWN the technology shaping that future. The AI race is already underway. Billions are being invested. Companies are moving fast. AI is already reshaping entire industries. But when all this value gets created…Who actually benefits? Right now, mostly a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. We don’t think that’s fair. If AI is being built on the data, behavior, and contributions of ordinary people… Then ordinary people should share in the value it creates. That’s exactly what we’re building at Action Model: A future where AI is owned by the people, not just the few at the top.
0:25

We all know AI is the future of technology. But almost nobody will OWN the technology shaping that future. The AI race is already underway. Billions are being invested. Companies are moving fast. AI is already reshaping entire industries. But when all this value gets created…Who actually benefits? Right now, mostly a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. We don’t think that’s fair. If AI is being built on the data, behavior, and contributions of ordinary people… Then ordinary people should share in the value it creates. That’s exactly what we’re building at Action Model: A future where AI is owned by the people, not just the few at the top.

Action Model

21,134 views • 2 months ago

I don’t agree with everything Robert Kiyosaki says. But on AI, he’s right. The AI boom is the next systemic bubble ,and it will be bigger than 2008. AI wasn’t funded with equity. It was funded with leverage, structured cash flows, and fragile collateral assumptions. That’s why capital is already shifting into #GOLD and #Silver. This isn’t fear, it’s positioning. When the AI credit structure cracks, the response won’t be just rate cuts. It will be massive QE. And QE at that scale doesn’t lift risk assets it accelerates the flight to hard money. I’m already tracking the fractures in real time. 2026 is when this accelerates violently.
1:01

I don’t agree with everything Robert Kiyosaki says. But on AI, he’s right. The AI boom is the next systemic bubble ,and it will be bigger than 2008. AI wasn’t funded with equity. It was funded with leverage, structured cash flows, and fragile collateral assumptions. That’s why capital is already shifting into #GOLD and #Silver. This isn’t fear, it’s positioning. When the AI credit structure cracks, the response won’t be just rate cuts. It will be massive QE. And QE at that scale doesn’t lift risk assets it accelerates the flight to hard money. I’m already tracking the fractures in real time. 2026 is when this accelerates violently.

Macro Liquidity by Sunil Reddy

113,211 views • 7 months ago