Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

"Jeff Bezos made changes to the Washington Post — we believe — although it's never been, you know, established as clear fact — to curry more favor with the president." CNN's Jake Tapper airs an unproven accusation saying "we believe" it to be true. Who is "we" Jake? Where...

14,194 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

31 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mike
Mikevor 12 Tagen

That’s how they think they can get away with broadcasting lie after lie after lie. They start with we believe or it’s been reported by so they can come back and say well we didn’t lie. We just reported the lie. This other one said, but we believed it to be true.

Profilbild von Godzilla
Godzillavor 12 Tagen

Jake had drawn some balls on Trumps head and he was mad Bezos erased them. Word is they were life sized for Jake so you couldn't see them anyway

Profilbild von Corey
Coreyvor 12 Tagen

@grok didn’t Jake tapper and cnn lose a defamation lawsuit in the last two years?

Profilbild von Annie
Annievor 12 Tagen

Keep digging that hole deeper, Jake. Moron. 🙄

Profilbild von jamiebeckett
jamiebeckettvor 12 Tagen

It’s a reminder of when they went through the, “if true” phase. If you’re not sure the reporting is true it’s not reporting. It’s just rumor. Has Journalism School fallen so far the professionals don’t know the basic tenets of the job?

Profilbild von Don Quéxotic
Don Quéxoticvor 12 Tagen

Credentials? We don' neeed no steenkheen credentials to invent bogus news

Profilbild von ToxicFan
ToxicFanvor 12 Tagen

It should be illegal for him to refer to himself as a reporter. Remember when he didn't report on Joe Biden's cognitive decline and then all the sudden said "Hey, Joe Biden is in cognitive decline why didn't anybody say anything about this ".

Profilbild von Erik
Erikvor 12 Tagen

If you watch CNNs X acct or their YouTube channel, they still have a couple thousand rabid supporters cheering Jake on. Of course, that doesn't compare to everybody else's numbers. But, apparently, it seems keep Jake happy. He's moved from arena's to the casino circuit.

Profilbild von J☀️ Arrow 🇺🇸🥇
J☀️ Arrow 🇺🇸🥇vor 12 Tagen

That’s a very solid factual report right there “we believe - although it is never, you know, established as a clear fact…”

Profilbild von Thomas J Pavlock
Thomas J Pavlockvor 12 Tagen

Tapper and facts? Just innuendo’s and rumors for Jake.

Profilbild von Dave Elliott
Dave Elliottvor 12 Tagen

Rubbish

Profilbild von C🇺🇸
C🇺🇸vor 11 Tagen

WTF is @jaketapper talking about .. Jeff Bezos agreed to buy The Washington Post on August 5, 2013, and the sale closed on October 1, 2013. He’s made huge changes from day one and yet the Washington Compost is still considered one of the most left wing rags in the country!

Profilbild von WesternCivilization1980
WesternCivilization1980vor 11 Tagen

He literally has zero proof of this but just says it

Profilbild von Richie Ross
Richie Rossvor 12 Tagen

Jooze believe a lot

Profilbild von Marcel STE-MARIE
Marcel STE-MARIEvor 12 Tagen

Call it what it is « fishing for information »🎣. Let us not go for the 'bait' and let them keep on 'trolling'.

Profilbild von BillHobson
BillHobsonvor 12 Tagen

In Tapper world, being less abjectly partisan for the left is kowtowing to Trump. 🙄

Profilbild von @BarbaraJosie
@BarbaraJosievor 12 Tagen

Jake is a joke.

Profilbild von Ron Pill
Ron Pillvor 12 Tagen

Fake Tapper on fake news CNN 😂😂😂

Profilbild von JA
JAvor 12 Tagen

"We" believe @jaketapper is an a55 clown of epic proportion.

Profilbild von Cornpop Jones
Cornpop Jonesvor 12 Tagen

I love how he creates Bezo’s thinking out of thin air and then critiques the thinking that he has no proof is even valid. Journalisming at its finest.

Profilbild von Long Duck Dong 🤣
Long Duck Dong 🤣vor 11 Tagen

This is why they are gone!

Profilbild von Jose Ortal
Jose Ortalvor 12 Tagen

1 of 2. Jeff Bezos: "Presidential endorsements do nothing to tip the scales of an election. No undecided voters in Pennsylvania are going to say, 'I’m going with Newspaper A’s endorsement.' None. What presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias. A...

Profilbild von Scomule98
Scomule98vor 11 Tagen

🤣😅😂

Profilbild von bernelle
bernellevor 12 Tagen

What baffles me is they will be let back in but they are allowed to cut off his speeches?They don’t air all of it because THEY say he is lying when he is is that legal?

Profilbild von Know Your Rates
Know Your Ratesvor 11 Tagen

They cant help themselves -- even after being banned from the White House, they still want to peddle fake news instead of real facts.

Profilbild von William Stym
William Stymvor 12 Tagen

Jake the fake liar

Profilbild von HenryJims
HenryJimsvor 11 Tagen

WAPO remains crap. Sentiment analysis is consistent as is consistent against Tapper. Tapper is a one trick parrot

Profilbild von Liberals Tears Clean My Guns
Liberals Tears Clean My Gunsvor 12 Tagen

It isbthe gerbil in his butthole. That's who we is.

Profilbild von Bob Patterson
Bob Pattersonvor 12 Tagen

Jake and the mouse in his pocket.

Profilbild von Youyoyotoo💯🔙
Youyoyotoo💯🔙vor 11 Tagen

"believe"... Yeah. Trusted jurist he is not.

Profilbild von VenomTexas
VenomTexasvor 12 Tagen

lol

Ähnliche Videos

"WE HAVE TO WIPE HIM OUT:" Ruben Gallego uses unsettling language to explain his support for tearing down the White House ballroom and Great Triumphal Arch, in conclusion of his warm tongue bath of an interview from Jake Tapper: JAKE TAPPER: President Trump is putting his mark on Washington, D.C., quite a bit, building a White House ballroom. He plans to build an arch, attempts to rename the Kennedy Center, the Reflecting Pool, and on and on and on. It seems clear to me that this is going to be a big issue for Democrats running for president in 2028. I know you haven't made a decision yet about whether or not you're going to run for president, but, if you do, would you advocate for tearing down the ballroom or tearing down the arch? RUBEN GALLEGO: I think I'd be advocating for almost all of that. You know, the real stain that this president has put on this country has been the fact that he eroded democracy, right? Let's start with January 6, the fact that, for the first time ever, a U.S. president attempted an actual coup. That right there is a reason why we should not have anything's name towards him. The fact that he has destroyed the institutions that have kept this government together through some of the hardest times and eroded, for example, our Department of Justice is another reason why we need to be taking down all these honorific situations or emblems of him. The fact that he wants to destroy the Kennedy Center, a man that contributed so much to this country, for -- to replace it with his name, who's done everything to destroy this country, is another reason why we have to make sure that we wipe him out. So this is not me trying to get to Donald Trump because I don't like Donald Trump. It's because of what Donald Trump has done to this country. And as somebody that visits a lot of my friends at Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery, the fact that we're going to have this ugly monstrosity in the view of this very sacred site... TAPPER: The arch, you mean. GALLEGO: Yeah, the arch -- is another reason why that needs to be taken care of, because, again, this man has done nothing but actually destroy the very fundamental things that these men and women have fought for, which is to save this country and continue this democracy. TAPPER: Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona, thanks for joining us this morning. GALLEGO: Thanks, Jake. TAPPER: We appreciate it.

Jorge Bonilla

13,517 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen