正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Jeff Booth, Nick & Jack explain how there is ZERO risk of quantum attack on Bitcoin This is mind blowing 🤯

271,713 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

nic carter 的头像
nic carter7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh we need to make podcast equipment way more expensive

David Seroy 🏔️ 的头像
David Seroy 🏔️7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh If you want high quality education about quantum's risk to bitcoin, don't watch this.

Hunter Beast 🕯️ 的头像
Hunter Beast 🕯️7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Is bro unaware of the Planck time? Is continuous time the new continuous bytes? Was he making a coherent argument that I'm just too regarded to understand?

Sovereign Retard/ XBT 的头像
Sovereign Retard/ XBT7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Quantum is not a risk to bitcoin Shitcoin core & shitcoin core devs are the real risks for bitcoin. BIP110 is the make or break moment for the monetary property of the bitcoin.

Walker⚡️ 的头像
Walker⚡️7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Shitcoin VCs selling quantum FUD are NOT going to like this one…

Will Foxley 的头像
Will Foxley7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh If you’re in the replies wondering wtf they were talking about you should come to @OPNEXT2026 and actually listen to bitcoin developers working on quantum

Ian Smith 的头像
Ian Smith7 个月前

"all physics relies on continuous time" - does that mean that quanta don't exist? That we cannot perceive individual molecules? This is sloppy "time staking" and "physics" doesn't "believe" anything. Physics is *demonstrated* to behave in some ways, and other ways, simultaneously. The top Quantum Computer has 3000 qubits by QuEra. You guys need to learn more than you talk.

Jesse Myers 的头像
Jesse Myers7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh

Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW 的头像
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Read this for systematic debunking. I'm all for the connection of physics and Bitcoin but not like this.

0x3639 的头像
0x36397 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh It's mind blowing because they are just stringing together words that make no sense.

J0Y 的头像
J0Y7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Saying "quantized" fifty times doesn't make you right. Public keys exist in the same form of time in which we humans exist and are vulnerable to quantum attack.

tomuky.eth 的头像
tomuky.eth7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh what… the… hell…

Dr. Hugh Bitt 的头像
Dr. Hugh Bitt7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh So wrong. It’s getting closer:

Dr. Chris Dark 的头像
Dr. Chris Dark7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh This clip is embarrassing, the guy proposing this has no clue what he is talking about My sauce is my PhD in Physics Physicist have long considered Planck time to be the most discreet time period, and its about 10^-44 or so seconds Which has been discussed for nearly 100 years

Rich Lassiter, MD 🟠 ₿itcoin 的头像
Rich Lassiter, MD 🟠 ₿itcoin7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Yeah, that didn’t make sense. The ‘risk’ that people like Nic Carter are measuring is that the $ value will go down if a Quantum actor dumps on the market. The protocol isn’t at risk, just the value. I think this is what they meant, but I don’t think they said it.

spunj 的头像
spunj7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Me thinks they underestimate quantum.

ncsmokymtns 的头像
ncsmokymtns7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Were all listeners offered LSD or only the speakers?

Joseph 的头像
Joseph7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Yall need an actual professional to speak on this. @Joseph_Kearney

Bible Numerics 的头像
Bible Numerics7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh @grok explain this video to me like I'm 5 years old

Bitcoin Beast 的头像
Bitcoin Beast7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Don't see how it's relevant, you will still be able to break the cryptography, derive private keys from public that is. Now you would need to do that individually but still must be fixed

N8 的头像
N87 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh This was word salad. Jeff and Preston, distance yourself from these toolbags.

Alchemist Jones 的头像
Alchemist Jones7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Yeah hence why Satoshi called it a time chain!

Chris Whodl 的头像
Chris Whodl7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh This sounds like stoner nonsense.

Andy Steinway 的头像
Andy Steinway7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh If you mean mind blowingly inept, then yes. I think the quantum computing threat to Bitcoin is way overblown (particularly over the next decade. It quite possibly will never scale to being commercial), but this is a nonsensical take.

Tim 🌽 的头像
Tim 🌽7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Why are three other people nodding along with this nonsense? It's the emperor's new clothes, people are too scared of looking dumb to say anything

Jakob 的头像
Jakob7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Cope harder

Money Messiah 的头像
Money Messiah7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Jesus Christ….quantum might not even work due to the incorrect assumption that time is divisible and re-orgable. Bitcoin, if it is infact the correct representation of time. That it’s linear and incorruptible. Quantum will not be able to exist. Mother of God @JeffBooth

Dirk van Haaster 的头像
Dirk van Haaster7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Bitcoin is very robust, but quantum is still a long term consideration, not a solved non issue

Etherean 的头像
Etherean7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh I watched 6m of it, my thoughts: - obviously didn't listen to the whole talk, this could have been just a spit balling theoretically inclined convo, sure thats fun. - the concern to Bitcoin from quantum is that every hack would be rendered useless. BTC could be stolen anytime

JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! 的头像
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零!7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh Low-effort content!

The Sat Stacker Show 🔶 的头像
The Sat Stacker Show 🔶7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh @grok gonna need you on this one big dog

PakoVM 的头像
PakoVM7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh How do I get my 9 minutes and 22 seconds back?

Kristian 的头像
Kristian7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh What is this nonsense?

haha 的头像
haha7 个月前

@JeffBooth @PrestonPysh This is such kaka

相关视频