正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Jeffery Epstein vs Roaring Kitty! What would give Steven Cohen, Loop Capital, Highbridge Capital, or any of the other Dumb Stormtroopers the confidence to short GameStop way more than 100%? Epstein had the whole financial system from end-to-end compromised, from Obama and his Loop capital to Goldman Sach's Partner,... show more
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![🚨NEW Joe Lonsdale on Harvard losing its tax exempt status: "Once the Supreme Court rules against them and they ignore it, and once they're very clearly violating civil rights, maybe they should also lose their tax exempt status." Andrew Ross Sorkin: You started a university. Joe Lonsdale: We did [University of Austin] Andrew: And I'm curious about your reaction to what's going on at Harvard. I'm curious about your reaction to what the administration is thinking about in terms grants, not just grant money, but also a tax exempt status... Joe: Bob Jones University lost their tax exempt status for civil rights violations in the 1980s. And it probably makes sense, they were discriminating against black people. I don't think that's right. I don't think discriminating against Asians or Jews is right either, especially when the Supreme Court tells you not to. ...Listen, Harvard has required courses that say that being against affirmative action and being against reverse racism is white supremacy. I disagree with Harvard's required courses on that. I think you should be able to debate these things. But once the Supreme Court rules against them and they ignore it, and once they're very clearly violating civil rights, maybe they should also lose their tax exempt status the same way Bob Jones did. Andrew: Right. Let me ask you a different question, which relates to this. And I actually don't disagree with you, but except for this, it seems to me that had the, you know, had the administration sent Harvard a letter saying, look, we're taking grants away and removing your tax exempt status until you can properly remedy the discrimination as it relates to anti-Semitism and other things. ...The letter that they sent was very different. The letter that they sent, if you really read it, effectively, would put Harvard under control of the administration. I mean, it goes through who they're hiring, how the applicants are put into the school, all of those things for what is ostensibly a private university, now a private university that gets benefits from from the government...Tell me what you think of that. Joe: So what happens when someone has clearly broken the law is they very often will then make a settlement. And if you look at how the Department of Education and accreditation and works today, it's very clear that I think it defines way too much. And so the Department of Education is used to being able to kind of make settlements...I don't think what this administration is doing there is very different than how a lot of other accreditors work. Now, I would prefer accreditors had a lot less power, but given that they did break the law, and given that they do need to make a settlement, this is not that unusual... ...the requests are not unreasonable. I understand why you're uncomfortable with it. I'm uncomfortable in general with how much power we give the Department of Education over colleges.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1920512036720529455/amplify_video_thumb/1920511153718919168/img/NE3d02dQrB8FYr8b.jpg)
![Catherine Austin Fitts on how psychopaths are able to run the world "people who have no empathy are really good at... organizing for self-benefit" "[So] you have... 3 to 5% sort of psychopath[s] [at the top], [and then] 20 to 25% who are making a lot of money helping them" "then you have the other 60 to 70% [of the population] who can't fathom what's going on. And what the others are doing, what the smaller groups are doing, drives them crazy. And they become neurotic" This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on June 3, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's a wonderful book called Political Ponerology. Have you ever read it? Okay, so, the, the description of the book is as follows. It was a psychologist who had been a young man during Hitler in Poland. And after the war then Stalin came in and he was at university and he and a group of colleagues decided, you know, because they'd been so traumatized by all this tyranny, they said, we're going to study the intersection of psychopathy with politics. "And that's ponerology, the study of psychopathy mixed— And here's what they— And they wrote the book, he said, three times, tried to get it out from behind the Iron Curtain and then, failed, had to destroy it. And then when he finally got out after '89, he wrote it from memory. "And here's what it said. And what he said was that most people are born with empathy and they can't fathom not only that other people don't have empathy, but that the people who have no empathy are really good at getting together and organizing for self-benefit. "So the people with no empathy are much more effective at conspiracies than the people with empathy. Okay? "So anyway, what he said was about 20 to 25% of the population who are competent at running things are willing to work for the people who don't have empathy as long as they get paid well. "And if you look at the history of America, the way we've gotten here is a lot of people got paid a lot of money, whether with their stocks and bonds or whether their job helping the people who have no empathy do all the evil doing. "I mean, you know that because if you look at what's going on in medicine, you can see it clearly. "So what happens is you have the 3 to 5% sort of psychopathic, then you have the 20 to 25% who are making a lot of money helping them. And then you have the other 60 to 70% who can't fathom what's going on. And what the others are doing, what the smaller groups are doing drives them crazy. And they become neurotic. "They become neurotic about the food, they become neurotic about the healthcare, they become neurotic about programmable money. And until they finally come to understand, you're dealing with psychopathic and you're dealing with people who will help the psychopaths for money. "And what he said was once people could fathom what was going on, suddenly they started being effective."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2063055849552216317/amplify_video_thumb/2063052175866249216/img/Ee9lnTHxA5xNsk08.jpg)
![Catherine Austin Fitts: "Is... Epstein the father of programmable money? Of course, the answer [is] yes. Although he was an agent for what is described... as the Rothschild Network... [and re:] Bitcoin, [I] have been saying this is a prototype to create CBDC and digital money." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from the Children's Health Defense series Financial Rebellion (Children’s Health Defense) posted to Rumble on March 5, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's a new commentary at Solari called Is Jeffrey Epstein the Father of Programmable Money? Of course, the answer being yes, although he was an agent for what is described, I think very correctly as the— As the Rothschild Network. "So in America, many people say Rothschild. I was brought up, using the European Rothschild, but same network. And, the commentary at Solari points you to a series done by a writer, writing anonymously, anonymously under the name of ESC, ESC, as in Escape, and what our commentary does is it points you to all the posts from January 30th on, and in my opinion, this is the single best, after Whitney Webb, this is the single best description of the Epstein Network and the governance of the Epstein Network. "And the goal of the Epstein Network. If you study what Epstein was doing, he was, in my opinion, laundering money, including money coming out of the United States government. That's not what ESC focuses on. What he's focusing on is how Epstein reinvested that money as the equivalent of venture capitalist and philanthropist, seeding the development of programmable money. And seeding people, both in academia and business, in all aspects of life, building and operating the different pieces you need to prototype and create digital money, including Bitcoin. "So Carolyn and I, since the beginning of Bitcoin, have been saying, this is a prototype to create CBDC and digital money. And, you know, there's a wonderful group of freedom fighters in that community who've been very, I would say very negative towards us is the only way I can describe it. And I just had one of the top luminaries of that whole world write me and say, oh, my God, you were right. Will you be in our documentary? Like, thank you, Houston. We have contact. "Anyway, so ESC has done a marvelous job. I can't recommend it. Just read everything from January 30th on, and he describes how Epstein developed and ran this and sort of built a prototyping. And then, as Whitney Webb has told us, you know, once that all got institutionalized, you don't need Epstein anymore, particularly when you got FASAB 56, which we've talked about many times. "And so, you know, out Epstein goes because now we've institutionalized. And that's why, you know, Whitney will talk about Palantir as part of the now institutional capacity of what, you know, Epstein is a venture capitalist or philanthropist, helped seed and get started. But now it's being institutionalized. "And the important thing to think of is this is like a booster rocket. After the booster rocket gets you to a certain point and you can institutionalize, then you just eject the booster rocket and keep on going. And if you look at the, the, you know, if you look at the investment network, which are basically the equity pool around the central banks. "So I'll just talk about it as the people who control the central banks. Once you've got the central banks ready to implement digital assets and stablecoins as programmable money, you don't need Epstein. You can let it go. "And if you look at the lot of scandal of getting rid of the booster rocket, they're talking about the very lurid parts of Epstein, but they're not talking about the control grid and how to stop it with this exception. And I think this is why this substack series is so exceptional. And if you really want to understand what Epstein was up to, but more importantly what the structure that managed and controlled Epstein, whether it was the intelligence agencies or the investment money in and around the central banks that wants total digital control. "So Epstein was building the control grid, you know, prototyping, distributed ledgers was all part of that. He put a lot of money into mind control because the neuro warfare is a very, very important part of it."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2029751236510278106/amplify_video_thumb/2029748943412940801/img/wEv4kp2KnHTQy9yx.jpg)
