Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Jensen Huang explained how blocking China from Nvidia does not anymore means blocking China from AI. If you don’t give your competitor the best chips, they will lag behind. This is how export control stories go. China is not waiting at the door of American computer systems anymore. Huawei’s...

721,711 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

30 Comments

Teng Yan's profile picture
Teng Yan2 months ago

jensen’s right that the valve framing is dead. china isn’t waiting on H100s. we now have two intelligence stacks with different binding constraints. ban nvidia and you accelerate huawei demand, even though you don’t erase the need for domestic HBM, power, packaging, talent, and apps to clear on their own clocks. china blocked from AI was always the wrong scoreboard. our real miss is pricing that second stack as if it were just nvidia-minus.

Rohan Paul's profile picture
Rohan Paul2 months ago

💯

Shane's profile picture
Shane2 months ago

I think people put too much weight on US silicon being that much better than Chinese. Yea China might be behind now, but what are they at? 20nm tech? 14nm tech? That tech is enough when you are talking about massive data centres and you have hundreds of coal fired power stations to run it all. If you can just add more racks to a system what is 5nm tech and 3nm tech really achieving? And the thing is, China will be making their own FABs soon to produce sub 10nm chips. They will likely just rip CUDA off and build cheaper less efficient data centres using China built CUDA copies. The difference will be USA uses 1gw while China uses 1.5gw for the same compute, what is the extra 500mw when you have the most energy in the world, plus Australia selling you coal.

Paulo Gaspar's profile picture
Paulo Gaspar2 months ago

1 year ago I saw predictions about this from Dylan Patel and Nathan Lambert at a Lex Friedman podcast... and China was just even faster than expected!

Rohan Paul's profile picture
Rohan Paul2 months ago

Yes, the speed should continue to increase from here.

Matt White's profile picture
Matt White2 months ago

Unfortunately for Nvidia the ship has sailed @rohanpaul_ai . Beijing invested heavily in the silicon sector. I just returned from WAIC where there were more accelerator and silicon providers than I could count. Pre-CHIPS act it was Huawei and a handful of others. China will be fully vertical from rare earth minerals to manufactured cutting edge accelerators in mass production within 18-24 months.

Dianna Harris's profile picture
Dianna Harris2 months ago

Export controls made sense for protecting frontier AI but keeping lower-tier chips blocked now risks handing China a permanent domestic market. If US technology disappears from global AI ecosystems, America loses influence not just sales.

urphin's profile picture
urphin2 months ago

Boomers are convinced that China's sole edge is cheap labor, and that it must steal every technology out there because "Chinese can't innovate," apparently. More surprises are coming their way.

xyoob's profile picture
xyoob2 months ago

It's been over 50 years & the West is still spewing the red wave propaganda USSR isn't even a thing anymore China's building it's nation through trades & manufacturing uplifting their people Only the WEST still thinks of wars

Johnnie.A.Lot.of.Numbers's profile picture
Johnnie.A.Lot.of.Numbers2 months ago

It’s fate perhaps that successive US administrations refuse to listen to one of their best tech insider/leader and follow their Cold War era political instincts instead…many empires collapsed from strategic mistakes like this…

Magik Insight's profile picture
Magik Insight2 months ago

Banning China from US chips just encouraged China to make their own chips (and stop buying from US companies). Its a bit like shutting down oil going through the Strait of Hormuz didn't stop China's industrial growth. China just invested in high energy density batteries so they don't need oil as much. Given the shift in focus, China will build space based energy generation and send it down to their high energy density battery farms in warehouses. China responds to competition by investing in China.

Origin's profile picture
Origin2 months ago

Been saying this for a while. If China builds the GPU capability it needs, Nvidia doesn’t just lose a customer, it also gains a serious competitor in the global market.

Sam's profile picture
Sam2 months ago

🫂

Bhaktavaschal Samal's profile picture
Bhaktavaschal Samal2 months ago

I'm not on the same page with Huang or you Rohan 😄 China would be moving ahead, chips or no chips! They have done it in manufacturing where you need to assemble efficient manufacturing pipeline and hordes of skilled labour! In ai you need a few outstanding guys!

安澜's profile picture
安澜2 months ago

美国对外宣称自己是自由市场,结果美国他是最封闭的市场,然后整天说中国市场不够开放😂😂😂

Thế Hệ Mới Việt Nam's profile picture
Thế Hệ Mới Việt Nam2 months ago

Mình thấy chính sách cấm vận còn đẩy nhanh việc thế hệ trẻ Trung Quốc đổ vào lĩnh vực ai thay vì chọn con đường ổn định truyền thống.

NftyNinja's profile picture
NftyNinja2 months ago

This is the US Gov's failure to lay out the harsh truth to the entire nation, allowing a nation of false comfort and complacency for too long.

Jack C Crawford's profile picture
Jack C Crawford2 months ago

Damn right.

Jeremy's profile picture
Jeremy2 months ago

Jensen did seem to right here. Even if you argued that not giving Nvidia chips to China would’ve slowed them down, we can see now it didn’t matter much as China has further closed the gap to US frontier labs by only a few months. And now, China has probably also further reduced its reliance on US tech infra. We’ve essentially forced them to vertically integrate and focus on long term strategy.

Ching Hon's profile picture
Ching Hon2 months ago

You can't just block China from one aspect and expect it won't adapt.

AM Gbadebo's profile picture
AM Gbadebo2 months ago

I said this 👇 a year ago about #Huawei.

SkySnark's profile picture
SkySnark2 months ago

But is ok if its refined rare earth minerals? Lots of words being written to describe something everyone keeps trying to look at in a vacuum

Daniel's profile picture
Daniel2 months ago

Leftist nazi unions of America have made sure that our education lags China. So how will we compete? I guess we will have to sanction and bomb them.

Yaman's profile picture
Yaman2 months ago

Nah, it would work on any other countries but just not China. Block or not, China will find a way.

Hots's profile picture
Hots2 months ago

The talent shortage in the US is a huge problem right now - we're just burning through the skills we had left over from before, and new technologies are being updated far too slowly!

Gargeya's profile picture
Gargeya2 months ago

The mistrust that the US have seeded in countries all across globe especially choking their most valuable company: Nvidia is just poorly calculatee. I mean it might turn out to be the dumbest move a competitor in the lead can do for ticking off the already laser focused adversary (chinese government), who are well known for their relatively lower drag in plan to execution strategy.

Joe's profile picture
Joe2 months ago

That video looks like AI generated, particularly the voice. That doesn’t like a real voice

jack hornet's profile picture
jack hornet2 months ago

China does not produce any truly original AI technology , none of it. This guy wants to hand over our technology just to boost NVIDIA's profits.

@Aakash's profile picture
@Aakash2 months ago

🎯⚡

Fox's profile picture
Fox2 months ago

Sure... and Huang has no financial stake in selling to China.....

Related Videos

Jensen Huang pushes back on common misconceptions about China's tech capabilities, arguing the West is dangerously underestimating its competitor. He challenges three narratives he's heard: "They could never build AI chips. China can't manufacture. If there's one thing they could do is manufacture. And they're years behind us? Come on. They're nanoseconds behind us." Jensen explains why China is such a formidable competitor, starting with talent and work ethic: "Don't forget that China has some of the best entrepreneurs in the world because they came from some of the best STEM schools in the world. They're the most hungry in the world." He references the infamous "996" culture (9am to 9pm, 6 days a week) and notes that China is producing the most AI engineers in the world. Beyond talent, Jensen highlights a structural advantage most people overlook: "They are very lightly regulated, right? Less regulated, ironically, than we are in a capitalist system." He pushes back on the assumption that central governance means top-down control: "The genius of China was distributed economic systems. All of these 33 provinces and all the mayors… has driven enormous amount of internal competition, internal economic vibrancy." The result, Jensen argues, is a country that is "creative, hungry, fast-moving, underregulated." Looking ahead, Jensen says he takes China's stated goal of being an open market at face value: "What's in the best interest of China is for foreign companies to invest in China, compete in China… and they would also like to come out of China and participate around the world." For Jensen, the American tech industry is a national treasure, and the answer is simple: "Why would we not allow this industry to go compete for its survival?"

Big Brain AI

41,991 views • 7 months ago

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.

Dustin

10,925 views • 5 months ago

Jensen Huang just told you who is winning the most important race on Earth. For fifty years, America held an unchallenged monopoly on the future. We built the transistor. We launched the internet. We wrote the source code for the modern world. Then the man who builds the physical backbone of every AI system on the planet read the score out loud. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are Chinese.” Half the minds building what comes next are not ours. Huang: “70% of last year’s AI patents are published by China.” Seven out of every ten blueprints for the next era are being written in Mandarin. Huang: “Nine out of the ten top science and technology schools in the world are now in China.” The talent pipeline did not slow down. It reversed direction. Huang: “We used to lead most of them; now they lead most of them. This has completely flipped in the last half to a decade.” Fifty years of American intellectual supremacy. Inverted in less than ten. This is not a rivalry between OpenAI and DeepSeek. This is not a stock ticker or a quarterly earnings call. This is the largest transfer of civilizational power in the modern era. And it is happening while the West drafts safety frameworks and fills out compliance paperwork. Huang: “They have a large population of highly qualified students. They work incredibly hard. This is a country with an enormous might.” China does not treat AI like a product category. They treat it as the single variable that decides who writes the rules for the next century. The West keeps asking what AI should be allowed to do. China keeps asking how fast they can build it. That gap is not philosophical. It is existential. This is not a left fight. This is not a right fight. This is a survival fight. And right now, America is not fighting it like one. The nation that controls the talent controls the research. The nation that controls the research controls the models. The nation that controls the models does not ask permission. It sets the terms. History never remembers the civilization with the better safety committee. It remembers the one that refused to stop building.

Dustin

57,802 views • 5 months ago