Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Jensen Huang: the solution to AI safety and alignment is more technology not less and so "we need technology to go faster, a lot faster"

132,614 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Tsarathustra's profile picture
Tsarathustra2 years ago

Source:

𝒫𝑒𝓇 𝒜𝓇𝓃𝑒𝓃𝑔 【🐧λ🦀⎈】's profile picture
𝒫𝑒𝓇 𝒜𝓇𝓃𝑒𝓃𝑔 【🐧λ🦀⎈】2 years ago

"The solution to AI safety and alignment is more Nvidia™️ GPU:s not less." 😉

Geoffrey Miller's profile picture
Geoffrey Miller2 years ago

Nobody who's read any serious work on AI safety would make this insane argument.

PauseAI ⏸'s profile picture
PauseAI ⏸2 years ago

Technology or innovation are not one-dimensional. Some technologies need to be accelerated, others should be slowed down. If we need cybersecurity to be protected from AI (which is true) we need to accelerate cybersecurity and slow down AI.

The Highly Automated Cat — e/acc ⏩'s profile picture
The Highly Automated Cat — e/acc ⏩2 years ago

like ripping off a bandage, it needs to be done quickly

Sarah Harkness AI+E🪷's profile picture
Sarah Harkness AI+E🪷2 years ago

I would actually tend to agree. Cyber sec is critical, and needs to be accessible for all. I like this within guard rails of consideration and diverse opinions more expert than I.

Tomatron Jones's profile picture
Tomatron Jones2 years ago

'The solution to AI safety is more technology' says the CEO of Nvidia, the foundational compute platform for all of AI, who definitely doesn't have a larger fortune to gain by pushing the tech faster. Yeah, right.

KJ ✨'s profile picture
KJ ✨2 years ago

Nvidia meanwhile accelerating

Pragmata Americana's profile picture
Pragmata Americana2 years ago

Man who loves his hammer, meets a nail.

Related Videos

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 views • 4 months ago