Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

**Jerome Powell meets with a young Fed analyst** Powell: Start counting the interest rate change. Analyst: 4% — 4.5% — 5% Powell: Starting from 5% damnit! Analyst (stuttering): 5% — 5.5% — 6% **Powell slaps the analyst on the cheek** Powell: Was I cutting or was I raising? Analyst:...

329,646 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Trung Phan
Trung Phanvor 2 Jahren

Great detail on Whiplash is that it was produced by Blumhouse Productions, which got so good at doing horrors profitably (Paranomarl Activity, Get Out, The Purge), it started making dramas. I wrote about its VC-like business model here:

Profilbild von Trung Phan
Trung Phanvor 2 Jahren

That’s my speed

Profilbild von Prestige
Prestigevor 2 Jahren

Third Act. Jpow teaches the analyst to re-engage the money printer as the economy starts to crumble:

Profilbild von Trung Phan
Trung Phanvor 2 Jahren

hahahahahahahaha

Profilbild von tim
timvor 2 Jahren

i hate you and i love you because since youve shared the first clip of this a few days ago, ive become obsessed with whiplash again, reaffirming its goat status in my personal top 5 did you know it was first a short film?

Profilbild von Trung Phan
Trung Phanvor 2 Jahren

Damn! Never seen this. Getting JK to do the 18-min short is such a coup too. Damien a beast

Profilbild von Eduardo Mercado
Eduardo Mercadovor 2 Jahren

10/10

Profilbild von Trung Phan
Trung Phanvor 2 Jahren

Powell hyping himself up for this FOMC

Profilbild von Vijar Kohli
Vijar Kohlivor 2 Jahren

lol someone needs to nominate this script for an Oscar

Profilbild von Trung Phan
Trung Phanvor 2 Jahren

Only if JK Simmons performs it

Ähnliche Videos

David Sacks: Jerome Powell has been “intensely political” as Fed Chair Sacks: “Powell has been intensely political. I think Trump is right to be frustrated.” “Let's just go back through the history. In the summer of 2021, we got that 5% shock inflation print.” “And it was Powell who played along with Biden and Yellen that this was transitory.” “And that transitory narrative they used to basically avoid any change of policy for six months.” “Now, what was the importance of that timing?” “Well, Powell was renominated for a second term by Biden on November 22nd, 2021.” “So, in other words, he went along with this whole transitory narrative to get renominated, and then a week later on November 30th, he said it was time to retire the word transitory.” Jason: “ Do you think that was incompetence, or do you think that was political, Sacks?” Sacks: “ It was obviously political because think about it, if Powell had stood up and said, ‘No, I think Biden and Yellen are wrong, and this isn't transitory,’ it would've been contradicting the Biden Administration and it probably would've cost him getting renominated for a second term.” “And it caused an asset bubble in 2021, it caused the 9% inflation that we had the following year, and it caused the crash that we saw in 2022 and 2023.” “ Let me give you another one. Powell started the rate cutting cycle last fall with a 50 basis point cut right before the election shortly after Elizabeth Warren sent him a letter demanding a cut.” “ The bottom line here is Elizabeth Warren was saying that Powell needed to cut dramatically when inflation was at 2.5%.” “ Now, Elizabeth Warren is saying that Powell needs to stand up to Trump and not cut rates.” “So you can see the hypocrisy.”

The All-In Podcast

235,857 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

😳 ANGRY CLASH AS POWELL ACCUSES REID OF TAKING HER OUT OF CONTEXT! 😡 Education Secretary Lucy Powell had a right go at Susanna Reid on Good Morning Britain after being asked about her “out of context” comments on the border. Powell had said we can’t stop everything. Reid pressed her on it. How can you claim the border is secure when you admit you’re helpless to stop every crossing, and two boats have just found a new route and arrived undetected? Powell did not like that at all. Visibly annoyed, she accused Reid of taking her words out of context. Reid asked how, when the context was the boats. Exactly. How on earth is that out of context? It’s simple and self-explanatory. She clearly regrets saying it. Fine. Just say so. Don’t blame the interviewer for quoting you accurately. Reid: “Do you stand by your statement you can’t stop everything all of the time, and what signal do you think that gives to the smugglers and the gangs?” Powell: “You’re just taking that completely out of context!” Reid asked: “What context did you mean?” Powell didn’t answer, because she can’t. She just fell back on the usual lines: “We are clamping down on small boat crossings” and “We have to keep ahead of the gangs who are constantly changing their business models.” Then she sniped: “You can take part of a sentence out of context if you want.” Reid fired straight back: “It was within the context of stopping the boats, wasn’t it?” Powell: “Which we are stopping.” Reid: “Two boats have just found a new route.” Of course Powell never explained the context. She said what she said, and she meant it. We all know this is difficult, especially when boats start appearing from different stretches of the French coast. Just be honest. Don’t try to gaslight people.

J Stewart

83,081 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen