Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Jesus wasn’t a real guy”

614,270 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

33 Yorum

Iggy the Hateful profil fotoğrafı
Iggy the Hateful5 ay önce

25k known manuscripts. One wonders how many were lost to the persecutions of christians.

TheToweringOtakunt profil fotoğrafı
TheToweringOtakunt5 ay önce

There are entire wars which are accepted without question to have happened in the ancient world based on like two fragmentary manuscripts and people still argue about this.

Reason profil fotoğrafı
Reason5 ay önce

Most scholars agree Jesus was a real 1st-century Jewish preacher who was crucified under Pontius Pilate and who sparked a movement that became Christianity. Of course, this doesn't mean god exists or the supernatural claims of Christianity are true.

biggo buggo profil fotoğrafı
biggo buggo5 ay önce

The vast majority of these manuscripts are translation fragments of the gospels into other languages. The actual number of independent sources are 30, of which about half are non biblical. Given this is the same number of sources for Caesar, we can be fairly confident that Jesus/

nineanon profil fotoğrafı
nineanon5 ay önce

The funniest part is even among atheist historians and scholars this is considered basically a conspiracy theory. Literally every reputable source agrees that Jesus was real and lived in 1st century Judea. Mythicism is a joke even among people who don't believe in Jesus' divinity

Ray (of sunshine!) 🪷 profil fotoğrafı
Ray (of sunshine!) 🪷5 ay önce

it isnt 25k different sources. Its 25k fragments of the gospel (if i remember correctly) Theres about 30 documents that prove His existence, which is still pretty good

The Skullman 💀 profil fotoğrafı
The Skullman 💀5 ay önce

Marxist are fucking dumb cunts. There are no cleaner words to describe them.

Darkinin profil fotoğrafı
Darkinin5 ay önce

I was in middle school or high school the first time I heard somebody say that Jesus wasn't real. I felt like someone had just said that Chuck Norris isn't real.

meursault profil fotoğrafı
meursault5 ay önce

most of the new testament was written by people who never met jesus, lets not be biased now. not saying he didn't exist, but not every source holds the same historical/scientific value.

American Colonization Society profil fotoğrafı
American Colonization Society5 ay önce

All those great conquerors had firsthand sources writing about them and chronicling their exploits. Nobody who ever met Jesus wrote about him, (except fake sources like the forged letter from Pontius Pilate)

Gary Farnsworth profil fotoğrafı
Gary Farnsworth5 ay önce

There is no irrefutable evidence that the jewsus existed. Actually, there is more evidence that he didn't.

ModestContemplations profil fotoğrafı
ModestContemplations5 ay önce

Dogs bark. Cats meow. Marxists lie.

Max Prestige Aryan 🇺🇦 profil fotoğrafı
Max Prestige Aryan 🇺🇦5 ay önce

The others weren’t claiming miracles and divinity

goku profil fotoğrafı
goku5 ay önce

jesus was obviously real but he never came back from the dead or walked on water and bullshit like that

Michael Paulkovich ⚛️ @michaelpaulkovich (bsky) profil fotoğrafı
Michael Paulkovich ⚛️ @michaelpaulkovich (bsky)5 ay önce

Jesus was a real DUMB guy.

Freedom Fighter profil fotoğrafı
Freedom Fighter5 ay önce

Muslims Love Jesus peace be upon him, its the Stupidity of Christians that makes Jesus look bad

duckduckpoo profil fotoğrafı
duckduckpoo5 ay önce

Difference is Genghis Khan was written about by multiple eyewitnesses from non-overlapping civilizations during his lifetime Meanwhile, the earliest records of Jesus were written over 2 decades as Jesus' supposed death. The only similar case is Alexander who is also didn't exist

The Adam-God Guy profil fotoğrafı
The Adam-God Guy5 ay önce

This is an incredibly stupid argument. This is so dumb. If you earnestly believe there's more evidence that Jesus existed than Genghis Khan, then giving you literacy was a waste of resources.

niro profil fotoğrafı
niro5 ay önce

those who say christianity is real, and they have proof are just liars the point of religion is faith, not proof

Huge Huge profil fotoğrafı
Huge Huge5 ay önce

This is so deceptive and dishonest. It counts the number of origenal documents we have of Alexander, Cesar, and Ghengis (and probably understates them). It doesnt count copies. But for Jesus it does count copies. 1/2

palharri profil fotoğrafı
palharri5 ay önce

The fact a man called Jesus walked, preached and was crucified are historic facts. Whether he was God is a matter of faith there is no evidence he arose from the tomb but there is no evidence of his dead body either

イスバント𐰚𐰈𐰺𐱁𐰀𐱃 🇮🇷 profil fotoğrafı
イスバント𐰚𐰈𐰺𐱁𐰀𐱃 🇮🇷5 ay önce

1. DNA across different countries and Empires were changed because of him. The soviet suppression in MN was so bad that they had to keep people from going to Darkhan because of him 2. His father's skeleton has been found, cities are named after him 3. Worldly influence.

Chance Spiffy! 🟦⬜🟩 profil fotoğrafı
Chance Spiffy! 🟦⬜🟩5 ay önce

True, he was not.

doublebaggins profil fotoğrafı
doublebaggins5 ay önce

Bro, the only person that saw that did you come back to life was a hysterical insane Jewish woman just one woman that’s it think about that that’s what you base your religion on the account of a hysterical jewess.

Erichasalime🐨 profil fotoğrafı
Erichasalime🐨5 ay önce

can you study how romans shared there manuscripts like the culture around book sharing. also the illiad has way more doesn't mean it happend. it was shared cause it was a religous and cultural movement like the illiad hope it clears it up.

MooMan profil fotoğrafı
MooMan5 ay önce

Archaeology exists so don't be a fucking retard please ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

Rhettorical profil fotoğrafı
Rhettorical5 ay önce

You're counting the 25000 different manuscripts of the new testament as different pieces of evidence? It's the same book. If I have proof of something and write it down again I don't have 2 proofs.

nyx profil fotoğrafı
nyx5 ay önce

what is a "manuscript"

⚛️Lord Mathew Randall⚛️ profil fotoğrafı
⚛️Lord Mathew Randall⚛️5 ay önce

The historical Jesus was a real man or multiple real men. That one man or multiple men named Jesus helped to create the narrative in the gospels. The "biblical Jesus" never existed as the new testament says he did.

GreydMiyu profil fotoğrafı
GreydMiyu5 ay önce

Guys! Guys! By this logic Batman is REAL!

E.Gad ネコ-ゲン 13th Gen 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
E.Gad ネコ-ゲン 13th Gen 🇺🇸5 ay önce

Wasn't real and Jewish. The real magical aspect of his mythos.

Wolfetone profil fotoğrafı
Wolfetone5 ay önce

@Judaschu Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords. No Judeo-Masonic ritual of the Killing of the King, be it in York or Yucatan, will EVER unseat Him

Nox Prime profil fotoğrafı
Nox Prime5 ay önce

More than 16 million can be traced down back to Genghis Khan, he left a legacy that is most likely never going to die unlike anyone else in the video, but just like anyone else, there is proof of their existence other than just manuscripts while Jesus' only proof is the bible.

Benzer Videolar

But wasn’t Jesus a Jew?
3:13

Sensitive content

But wasn’t Jesus a Jew?

Sarauniya of Kaduna

53,652 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce