“JET FUEL CANT MELT STEEL BEAMS!”

It loses two thirds of its structural strength at about 600C Why does this dumb explanation persist?

In my experiences, it’s usually people who want to feel special by identifying as someone noticing patterns that they don’t understand and obsessive about conspiracy theories in most cases.

Anyone who has ever worked steel knows what a joke that argument is.

Such a classic video

Yup! I post it every year too

Even if you take every line of the accepted narrative about the Twin Towers as true, large questions remain about WTC 7 which completely collapsed, though the two buildings directly next to it on each side didn’t, and which housed a clandestine CIA Office that was not disclosed until after the fact. And a DoD Office. Oh and no one died owing to this collapse because no one went in to work that day apparently. We actually owe it to the victims to be scrutinizing.

It was well documented that fallen debris hit building 7 causing uncontrolled fires for HOURS. Like any tragedy there will be miscommunication in real time (like how it was first reported the towers were hit by a jet and not a commercial airplane).

This is true, however at higher temperatures steel becomes more ductile, which means it can no longer support the loads it was designed for, and will fail. Your argument is frankly silly. Signed, an actual engineer.

You must’ve not watched the video. 🤦🏾‍♂️😆😂

Find a job. Amen.

Cope.