Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
🚨 Jim Humble’s explosive testimony! 👨🔬🔥 On CHLORINE DIOXIDE! The man who discovered MMS (Miracle Mineral Solution = Chlorine Dioxide) says it has cured 98% of all diseases he’s seen — malaria, cancer, AIDS, hepatitis, autism, and more! 🧪💪 It’s simple, costs just pennies per dose… but Big Pharma... show more
133,292 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![💥BOMBSHELL Former Abbot Labs chemist says EVERY "test" for viral disease is "fraudulent" "[Abbot, from HIV] all the way through SARS-CoV-2, [acknowledges in] the test documents... that they have no authentic virus to compare [to]" "The tests were always fraudulent" "The CDC knew that [AIDS] was not a contagious disease... the real physical symptoms that these people had was a result of chronic drug use and especially the nitrite inhalants" "[It was all] a pack of lies from day one. From day one." This clip of Dr. David Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries (including two years at Abbot Labs), published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, is taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess (Charles Kovess) et al. posted to Rumble on May 25, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "AIDS— Like I said, in 1982, the CDC understood AIDS, or GRID, gay-related immune deficiency, the real physical symptoms that these people had, was a result of chronic drug use and especially the nitrite inhalants, from, from the nightclub men. The CDC knew that it was not a contagious disease. "There's gay men that were using the drugs. They were using specific drugs, the nitrite inhalants, which caused the Kaposi sarcoma on their faces and everything? The only people that got Kaposi sarcoma were these gay men. Isn't that weird? This virus, this virus, this retrovirus knows you're gay. So it's going to cause Kaposi's sarcoma and not cause it in heterosexuals— "Let me tell you about the tests. The tests are bogus. Why couldn't they diagnose it clinically? They didn't. They always used tests. You couldn't do it clinically. They used antibody tests, the HIV test, the antibody test, Abbott, all the way through SARS-CoV-2, they acknowledge the test documents themselves that they have no authentic virus to compare their test against, to see... The tests were always fraudulent. HIV test, all of them. "There could be a disease. They just changed the name... [For example,] Cervical cancer. Cervical cancer was added to the list of AIDS-defining diseases, I think in 1993, because women obstinately refused to get AIDS. So they added cervical cancer. "[Then in] 1997, 1% of the new AIDS cases were women from cervical cancer because they still obstinately refused to get it. Kaposi's sarcoma was in gay men, not in IV drug— I mean, not in heterosexual men. It was not women. You know, it was the, the whole thing was bogus from the beginning. Those tests are bogus— "[It was all] a pack of lies from day one. From day one."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2059407384494350363/amplify_video_thumb/2059404429825396736/img/wJkvs_-1J6ngRxE_.jpg)
!["The data shows a depopulation event. So whether it was intentional or not, you can argue about it, but the outcome of the pandemic, and particularly the mRNA vaccines, has led to incredible amounts of excess mortality, and young people dying." Board-certified specialist in pulmonary diseases, internal medicine, and critical care medicine Dr. Pierre Kory (Pierre Kory, MD MPA) describes for Mark Bishofsky (TheTruthExpedition) how he believes that the evidence does show that the COVID operation (my term) was a "depopulation" effort. "The data does show a depopulation event. So whether it was intentional or not, you can argue about it. But the outcome of the pandemic and particularly the mRNA vaccines has led to incredible amounts of excess mortality, and young people dying," Kory says. The physician adds: "Let's say it wasn't willful, and it was just an harmless series of unfortunate decisions. We chose the spike protein as the antigen for the vaccine. It doesn't explain how there's been other vaccines released which caused so much harm, they were shut down and recalled. We had people, groups of awake citizens, studied citizens, groups of physicians all around the world who were screaming from the sidelines, from within weeks of the campaign, about the amount of damage and destruction and death they were seeing related to the vaccine. And yet everything was censored, everything was suppressed, and the machine kept going." "So whether it was started willfully or not, there's too many actions that they've taken to propel something which has caused immense amount of deaths," Kory adds. "At last check, the average or best predictor of how many people have died in the United States, just in the United States, is somewhere between 500,000 and a million people." Kory notes, "as of the first nine months of 2023, 158,000 more Americans died than would be predicted, than what is a normal rate. And that's more than all the combat losses since Vietnam including and since." Furthermore, Kory notes: "There's no discussion [about these deaths]. There's no congressional hearings...no recognition. I mean, life expectancy in the United States in a three-year period went from 79 to 76. Who has to die to have life expectancy go from 79 to 76? It's not old people. It's young people." Kory goes on to say: "It's not only that we've had excess mortality, but it's in the young and healthiest people of society. Ed Dowd's done these analyses. I've written extensively on this. The life insurance data doesn't lie. That's one thing you can't corrupt. Right? That's a massive industry that lives on their data. And if you look at their reports, you see these massive explosions in the deaths of some of the youngest and healthiest because it comes out of the group life insurance data, which is generally the Fortune 500 employed, major employers. These are the employed, the working employed...particularly white collar. I mean, that's the healthiest sector of society and always has been. And suddenly, they're dying in the third quarter of 2021 at rates that have never been described outside of wartime, and yet radio silence."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1862662899052736862/ext_tw_video_thumb/1862657878567399424/pu/img/M4d32XwE4ANW9qgG.jpg)
![Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "WE MUST STOP MESSENGER RNA AT ALL COSTS...IT'S NOT ONLY MAD, IT'S EVIL."🔥🔥 "The problem with [mRNA] is you have to stabilize it. And...they've never been able to significantly stabilize it...so it won't integrate and wreak havoc and self-replicate." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Charles Kovess (Charles Kovess) et al. during a recent discussion with Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International how not just the COVID injections, but any injections using the mRNA delivery platform, must be stopped "at all costs." Dalgleish, who has said elsewhere that he has seen an "explosion" of cancers among his patients since the rollout of the COVID injections, notes that the mRNA platform is "not only mad, [but also] evil." "I've spent 30 years designing vaccines, cancer, and HIV. And I've also been on the boards of major pharmaceutical, mid-range pharmaceutical, especially those involving vaccines, and more importantly... a company that calls itself the messenger RNA vaccine company. I was on that for five years, and I left seven years ago," Dalgleish says. "And I knew then that the problem with messenger RNA [is] you have to stabilize it. And after all these years, they've never been able to significantly stabilize it...so it won't integrate and wreak havoc and self replicate. Therein lies the problem." "The idea of giving it to cancer patients to try and interfere is one thing, and I could go along and support that 10, 20 years ago because I thought cancer vaccines were really important in gene therapy. That's what I was doing. In fact, I was on the editorial board of a journal called Gene Therapy. So I do know an awful lot of what they accuse me of not knowing what I'm talking about," Dalgleish adds. "But the idea that you'd give it to anybody other than a terminal cancer patient was never ever on." "And until this pandemic was thought up and created and masquerading as an emergency, they couldn't even [roll it out] for cancer treatment," Dalgleish notes. "So now we have...[England's Chief Medical Officer Chris] Whitty and Morris and all these people say, 'Ah, it's fantastic. We've got a great way of producing... rapid vaccines for new new viruses and things for children, what have you.' And that article I spoke about, it said that there would be no liability for Moderna and any of the companies with this." Dalgleish goes on to note: "They want to go for diseases like RSV and flu, what have you, for children and young adults. That is the equivalent of exposing children to radium, on the ground. Let's just see if it causes any problems in 10 or 20 years' time. It's not only mad, it's evil. And we must stop it. And I'll stop there because that is the big message I want to get across: We must stop messenger RNA at all costs."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1868365577904873548/ext_tw_video_thumb/1868359882874736640/pu/img/SF7PNfR5WT0ej8gZ.jpg)
![🔥🔥"All chronic diseases today, especially in people under, let's say, 50, are because of vaccines. It's not because of what you eat...We have to stay focused on the shots because that's how they poison us and our children."🔥🔥 (1/5) Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Michael Farris (Michael Farris) how it is LITERALLY NOT POSSIBLE TO VACCINATE people—against anything, for any reason. Latypova highlights the work of Nobel Prize winner—and eugenicist—Charles Richet, which showed conclusively that anytime a protein—of any type—is injected into a person's bloodstream, it primes their body for an anaphylactic reaction the next time they're injected with (or even, possibly, consume) that protein. Richet "quickly realized that you don't have to inject a toxin to produce [anaphylaxis]," Latypova says. "You can inject safe things like milk, like, corn, soy derivatives, albumins, gelatin. So anything that you think is safe to eat, if you inject it, a protein directly into the bloodstream, you can produce this effect." Latypova notes: "This is how people have lactose intolerance. All the peanut allergies are because of this. The Alpha-gal, this effect [meat allergies] it's another type of allergy that's because of the gelatin injections. And so there's a variety of different reactions. They all boil down to the same thing: You got injected with the protein directly into the bloodstream." "So all chronic diseases today, especially in people under, let's say, 50, are because of the vaccines. It's not because of what you eat," the retired pharma executive adds. She goes on to say: "To produce the same damage through food, you need decades, and you need really bad habits. And you sometimes you might not even get But with one shot of a newborn, you can produce this effect for life. So that's why I'm saying, all this debate about food, throw it out of the window doesn't matter. We have to stay focused on the shots because that's how they poison us and our children through this. The food effects are secondary." Furthermore, Latypova says that "the work of Charles Richet and his Nobel Prize definitively says that it's not possible to vaccinate. Vaccination is not possible. There are no safe vaccines." She adds: "You can't do it because we have this fundamental law of nature that works against it. You can't inject proteins directly into the bloodstream. And everybody denies it. The whole medical establishment denies that this exists, that this knowledge is available. They deny it. They call it different names. They give it different categories. They hide the data. They ban us everywhere. They say we're cranks and anti-vaxxers, and we're just crazy, and we're killing grandma. And so this whole establishment is working as one unit to suppress this information." This is why food is the new focus among the (usurped) freedom health movement, Latypova notes. "That's why they're telling you, 'Oh, it's food...you need to ban corn syrup ban dyes or you know? And that's why in California, they label everything with proposition 65 so that you think that everything around you causes cancer. And that's not true. Cancer is caused by injections through the same mechanism. So, anyway, so that's what I want people to understand. And I wrote several articles about it. I linked Richet's work...As I said, you can find his book and you can read about it and it will become extremely clear what's going on. And that's why, you know, it's so important to stay on the vaccines and not get into these diversions of, you know, let's ban different types of food."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1862187401755730398/ext_tw_video_thumb/1862180524132859904/pu/img/NolluvD6cQbrPgJ3.jpg)
![Ivermectin & Fenbendazole Cancer Secrets Revealed w/ Dr. William Makis Remarkable success stories are pouring in from people using Ivermectin and Fenbendazole to combat cancer. Mel Gibson dropped a bombshell on Joe Rogan’s podcast, revealing that three of his friends had “stage four cancer,” and now “all three of them don’t have cancer right now at all.” “And they had some serious stuff going on,” Gibson emphasized. Dr. William Makis, who treated one of Gibson’s friends, has been rigorously researching the anti-cancer potential of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole over the past two years. During that time, he discovered, “There are over 100 papers on the success of Ivermectin and cancer.” “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” Dr. Makis explained, noting that it targets the cells “that chemo can’t kill.” He added, “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to certain types of chemotherapy.” The benefits extend further. “It [Ivermectin] makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer,” he shared. Yet, research into these applications has been neglected. “Big Pharma has completely abandoned it. Ivermectin is off-patent. No one’s going to make money on it,” Dr. Makis pointed out. Taking action where others haven’t, Dr. Makis applied his findings to his practice. “I have over 1,000 cancer patients who are on either a combination of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole or Ivermectin and Mebendazole,” he shared. Some of his patients were “given a terminal diagnosis” but are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” “Patients, for example, who are taking combinations of chemo and Ivermectin or radiation and Ivermectin are seeing dramatic results that oncologists have never seen, that radiation oncologists have never seen,” Dr. Makis shared. “Tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, brain metastases disappearing.” “There are hundreds, if not thousands, of testimonials” documenting the success stories of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, Dr. Makis added, offering hope to patients seeking alternatives. He strongly believes that “the future of cancer care is in repurposed drugs.” For more information on the use of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole for cancer, follow Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) on 𝕏. --> MakisMD (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1878578096535683583/amplify_video_thumb/1878564688390189056/img/j__0WWkczsp4qTg3.jpg)
![Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "Every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine [to an infant], they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Apollo the Original (Apollo The Original) posted to YouTube on October 27, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've been telling moms not to get the hepatitis B vaccine. So many moms have been refusing that shot that they had to have a meeting at work. And they said the nurses are giving biased information because all these moms are refusing the hep B shot. I'm like, 'That's so beautiful to hear,' because that means I've been telling all these nurses about the hepatitis B, and a lot of the nurses are even trying to get out of it now, too, because they're uncomfortable giving it because I've been pounding it into their brain. You're a nurse. You should know... what you're putting into your patient's body, especially a newborn, especially if it's not safe. "And so a couple months ago, a family member complained and said that 'This nurse, Michelle, is giving biased information. She's giving misinformation. She's talking these mothers out of giving the hepatitis B vaccine. She told my my sister, that the only way your baby can get hepatitis B is if she has sex with someone who has hepatitis B.' And so my boss called me into her office, and she told me all that right now, the complaint. "I said, 'Yes, that's true.' And I think my boss was, like, expecting me to say, 'Oh, I didn't do that,' or something. And I was like, 'Yeah, that's true.' I said, 'You know, every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine, they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms.' And my boss looked at me, and she said, 'It's not about your beliefs, Michelle. It's about what's required of you per the institution.' "Every time a nurse gives that shot, they are chemically assaulting a baby. We were taught to do no harm. This is causing harm. And she said, again, 'I know you have your beliefs, Michelle, but you need to do what's required of you per the institution.' Does that not sound like follow the orders? ...She's a nurse, but of the entire women's floor, the labor and delivery floor, the antepartum and postpartum and all of women's health in there. She's the manager. The top one. And so she said, 'If you have questions, you can go to the head pediatrician and you can give her your information.' I said, 'Okay, I'll do that.' "I went to the head pediatrician and I told her exactly what I just told my boss. And she said, 'Oh, no, the aluminum in those shots isn't the same one on that paper that you just showed me. It's not a neurotoxin.' I'm sorry, but which aluminum is not a neurotoxin? I was so confused... They say it's a preservative... but it's a heavy metal. It doesn't belong in your body. It's a heavy metal. You don't need it in your brain. And to give 10 times the safe dose to every newborn that doesn't need it, it's craziness. I don't even have the words for this madness... It doesn't make sense. It will never make sense."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1983982930998530501/amplify_video_thumb/1983979514356178944/img/EENS8noT4yYtF3zA.jpg)