Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

jina-embeddings-v5-omni is here! Our first universal embedding model for text, images, audio, and video. Available in two sizes: small (1.57B, 1024-dim, 32K context) and nano (0.95B, 768-dim, 8K context). Both support Matryoshka truncation down to 32 dimensions. v5-omni is back-compatible: if you already use jina-embeddings-v5-text-small/nano, the existing text indexes...

136,129 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

15 Comments

Jina AI's profile picture
Jina AI4 months ago

Pareto frontier of all open-weight omni embedding models (supporting text, image, audio, and video). jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small (1.57B) matches the average score of LCO-7B (8.93B) while using 5.7x fewer parameters. jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nano (0.95B) outperforms LanguageBind (1.14B) by +8.9 points.

Jina AI's profile picture
Jina AI4 months ago

Per-task performance across 13 task types. Gold stars mark tasks where jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small beats the best open-weight baseline (3-9x larger). Wins: image classification (68.55 vs 64.30), image clustering (84.57 vs 83.24), audio classification (55.89 vs 53.39). Main gaps: video retrieval (27.82 vs 58.73) and compositional/VQA (44.23 vs 53.40).

Jina AI's profile picture
Jina AI4 months ago

v5-omni keeps the v5-text backbone completely frozen and adds pretrained vision and audio encoders connected through small trainable projectors: - Vision: Qwen3.5 vision encoders with 2x2 spatial merge. We freeze everything except the final projection layer (fc_vision_2), which we replace with a randomly initialized layer mapping into the text backbone's hidden dimension. - Audio: Qwen2.5-Omni encoder. A single randomly initialized fc_audio layer projects the 1280-dimensional output into the text backbone. - Video: Handled as a sequence of visual frames, optionally preceded by an extracted audio segment.

Jina AI's profile picture
Jina AI4 months ago

Today v5-omni is available on Elastic Inference Service, HuggingFace and Jina API. Learn more about v5-omni from links below. 🤗: arXiv: blog:

Hudson Gouge's profile picture
Hudson Gouge4 months ago

You guys haven’t made small (<100M) models in quite some time. I’d love to see a small variant of your v5 text models.

luca's profile picture
luca4 months ago

this is great, how does it compare with cohere embed 4?

Yogin Patel's profile picture
Yogin Patel4 months ago

@MichelIvan92347 any benchmark available from official end against bms3?

Connor's profile picture
Connor4 months ago

id say multimodal retrieval only becomes boring enough to use when it fits existing infra. same vector space + matryoshka dims is the kind of unsexy detail that makes adoption much easier, im a big fan

𝐍𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐞 𝐀𝐢's profile picture
𝐍𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐞 𝐀𝐢4 months ago

Interesting check your dm

Wes Higbee's profile picture
Wes Higbee21 days ago

🤤

Benedict's profile picture
Benedict4 months ago

Awesome, I’ve been waiting for someone to do this

Victoria Blake's profile picture
Victoria Blake2 months ago

This is a big step toward truly universal embeddings. Native support for text, images, audio, and video in a single model opens up exciting possibilities for multimodal AI applications. 🔥

validate.qa's profile picture
validate.qa4 months ago

v5 omni covers text to video clean. matryoshka down to 32 dims keeps it efficient for rag stacks

FastFix AI's profile picture
FastFix AI11 days ago

tab complete spoiled me

alexchen's profile picture
alexchen4 months ago

Great, thank you.

Related Videos

New short course Multimodal RAG: Chat with Videos, developed with Intel and taught by vasudevlal! In this course, you’ll work with LLaVA (Large Language and Vision Assistant), a Large Vision Language Model (LVLM) that can process both images and text. For example, given an image of a person doing a handstand on a skateboard at the beach, LLaVA doesn't just caption the scene, it’s able to predict possible outcomes, like the person losing balance or falling off. By understanding not just what's in a video frame, but what might happen next, your application can provide more insightful answers to questions about video. You'll build a full multimodal RAG pipeline that can chat about video content: - Use the BridgeTower model to create joint text-image embeddings in a 512-dimensional multimodal semantic space. - Learn video processing techniques to extract keyframes, generate transcripts using Whisper, and create captions. - Use the LanceDB vector database to store and retrieve high-dimensional multimodal embeddings. - Integrate the LLaVA model, combining CLIP's (Contrastive Language Image Pretraining) vision transformer with Llama, for advanced visual-textual reasoning. Your final system will ingest video data, generate embeddings for frames and text, perform similarity searches for relevant content, and use the retrieved multimodal context to inform LVLM-based response generation. The result is a system capable of answering nuanced questions about video content, effectively chatting about the video it has processed. Please sign up here!

Andrew Ng

107,967 views • 2 years ago

If you're building a PDF RAG pipeline: Should you be using OCR and 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹 methods, or just 𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 using late interaction models? This paper says the answer might actually be 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩. My colleagues at Weaviate released IRPAPERS, a benchmark comparing 𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 and 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 retrieval over 3,230 pages from 166 scientific papers. The setup: Take the same PDFs and process them two ways. For text, run OCR with GPT-4.1 and embed with Arctic 2.0 + BM25 hybrid search. For images, embed raw page images with ColModernVBERT multi-vector embeddings. Test both on 180 needle-in-the-haystack questions. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀: Text edges out images at the top rank: 46% vs 43% Recall@1 But images match or exceed text at deeper recall: 93% vs 91% Recall@20 But text and image based methods actually fail on 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘁 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴. At Recall@1: • 22 queries succeed with text but fail with images • 18 queries succeed with images but fail with text This complementarity is what makes 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗦𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 work. By fusing scores from both text and image retrieval, they achieved: • 49% Recall@1 (beating either modality alone) • 81% Recall@5 • 95% Recall@20 More in the video below 🔽 Dataset: Paper: Code:

Victoria Slocum

44,176 views • 5 months ago