.JJ Redick clarifies his comments on First Take yesterday about the officiating in the Kings vs. Warriors series

@jj_redick Nice try at an attempt to back track! Lame. We all knew what you meant. Too late JJ.

@jj_redick Warriors get away with illegal screens every possession

@jj_redick Dawg you was going IN on us like it was personal. I’m still confused why you were so emotional.

@jj_redick Okay cool so you clarify your statement to say that the Warriors are soft and can’t play through contact? I would think that would be something that would trigger a fan base, unless they already know that about their team. Kings have played without the whistle for years now…🤷🏼‍♂️

@jj_redick I mean that’s just not true. You purposefully only pointed out fouls committed by the kings. The sabonis push in the back has nothing to do with off ball movement. Yet you decided to highlight that. Saying you didn’t imply the refs were favoring the kings is simply untrue imo.

@jj_redick You know they’re grabbing Keegan and Huerter off the ball as well right ?

@jj_redick Before the playoffs everyone said that the playoffs are much more physical so that favored the warriors. Now that the kings are winning the narrative changes to the reason kings are winning is because the style of officiating favors the kings. Stop changing the narrative.

@jj_redick But arent the refs supposed to let more go because it’s playoffs? Warriors tried playing super physical game 1, which caught the kings by surprise. Game 2, kings were physical af and now it’s an issue?

@jj_redick I thought the Kings were supposed to struggle with the physicality of the playoffs? Somehow now they are benefitting?

@jj_redick The other thing people are missing is that you’re playing a character on ESPN. None of it is real and no one actually believes their takes. It’s all good brother JJ. Light the beam!