Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

JOHN KENNEDY ON THE SAVE ACT: "THE PROBLEM IS THE VOTES AREN'T THERE" LindellTV's Alison Steinberg asked John Kennedy: "President Trump has now called for the SAVE America Act to be included in both FISA and the Pentagon reconciliation bill. What's the path forward, and how do we get...

62,592 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Senator John Kennedy just went toe-to-toe with CBS’ Margaret Brennan after she claimed the SAVE America Act would “hurt faith” in America’s elections. Kennedy argued the legislation would do the EXACT opposite. BRENNAN: “The SAVE Act, as you know, or even some version of it, is highly partisan, highly controversial.” “Bigger picture, isn’t it going to hurt faith in our election process if a Republican-only policy to change how elections are run is rammed through 100 days…less than 100 days out from the election?” KENNEDY: “No.” “In my opinion, for both sides to have credibility in our elections, we need to do two things and only two things.” “Number one, you have to prove you are who you say you are in order to register to vote and to vote.” “And number two, however you decide to vote, that’s up to the states. We need to go back to having an election day, not an election month.” “We’ve got to know the results of elections that night or shortly thereafter, if it’s close.” “That, to me, is what the SAVE Act is all about.” “And I think we can pass it. And I think we can craft it in a way to survive a birdbath, but we’re not going to know if we don’t try!” BRENNAN: “Grants, in other words, to states to incentivize. Not requirements for states to action…that’s your version.” KENNEDY: “That’s not the only thing.” “I’ve been contacted by some really smart people about a way to do it in addition to the grants. I’m not saying it will work. But you’re not going to know unless you try.”

Overton

153,371 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Speaker Johnson uses logic and facts to battle CNN's Manu Raju, who claims Republicans only want election integrity because they "lost" in the California mayoral race: Raju: "The President keeps saying that there's election fraud in the California mayoral's race. Is what evidence is there to prove that?" Johnson: "You tell me, Manu. They are counting votes WEEKS after the election. We have entire nation's with huge populations—like India—that can count their votes in 24-48 hours." Raju: "So you're saying it's rigged, like the President?" Johnson: "I'm not saying it's rigged; I'm saying it stinks to high Heaven, and everybody knows that. Let's remove the appearance of impropriety...Let's have votes on an election the day of the election...I think California is playing around with us." Raju: "But what evidence is there to prove theirs is rigged?" Johnson: "Some of these efforts are so diabolical and so far upstream it is impossible to prove. But I think everybody knows instinctively something is wrong here, and that's a concern. We need people to believe in the integrity of our election system; it is critical to maintain a constitutional republic. We're going to keep working to pass the SAVE America Act...and 70% of Democrats understand that's necessary. We have to have free and fair elections-" Raju: "Aren't you all just saying that because you've lost the election, because the Republicans did not win in this, this is why you're hearing that?" Johnson: "I'm saying that every leader of all parties should demand election integrity, and if somebody is opposing that, you should look at their motives." How does this even remotely constitute journalism, CNN? Raju repeatedly interrupted Speaker Johnson and tried to put words in his mouth, then made it very clear he's biased against Republicans with his reporting. 🤡

Julia 🇺🇸

162,356 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce