Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Johnson on Epstein Files: National security concerns…. It is incredibly dangerous to demand that officials or employees of the DOJ declassify materials that originated in other agencies and intelligence agencies.

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

766,509 subscribers

363,085 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Thomas Massie on why they’re withholding & redacting most of the Epstein files: “The files implicate billionaires & political donors that they’re trying to protect. Epstein also had close ties to our intelligence agencies & Israel's intelligence agencies.”
0:35

Thomas Massie on why they’re withholding & redacting most of the Epstein files: “The files implicate billionaires & political donors that they’re trying to protect. Epstein also had close ties to our intelligence agencies & Israel's intelligence agencies.”

Irlandarra

19,463 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

REPORT: Speaker Mike Johnson is already preparing Americans for the possibility that they’ll never see the Epstein files released in full, insisting that unredacted disclosure would endanger national security and expose agencies like the CIA and NSA. Critics argue that this is the same excuse used for decades to shield powerful people, and Johnson’s warning feels less like genuine caution and more like laying the groundwork for a cover-up. In his briefing, he claimed the DOJ “can’t” declassify material created by intelligence agencies and called it “dangerous” to force disclosure. His comment triggered immediate backlash from those who say the intelligence ties are precisely why the files must be released, not buried. Outrage grew when Johnson revealed he had already brought in Senator John Thune to stall the process in the Senate. Even Benny Johnson, usually supportive of GOP leadership, said he’s “sick of it,” warning that the public will not accept another political shield around the Epstein network. With every delay, the same question keeps getting louder: Who are they protecting? Watch the full report: 👇
7:27

REPORT: Speaker Mike Johnson is already preparing Americans for the possibility that they’ll never see the Epstein files released in full, insisting that unredacted disclosure would endanger national security and expose agencies like the CIA and NSA. Critics argue that this is the same excuse used for decades to shield powerful people, and Johnson’s warning feels less like genuine caution and more like laying the groundwork for a cover-up. In his briefing, he claimed the DOJ “can’t” declassify material created by intelligence agencies and called it “dangerous” to force disclosure. His comment triggered immediate backlash from those who say the intelligence ties are precisely why the files must be released, not buried. Outrage grew when Johnson revealed he had already brought in Senator John Thune to stall the process in the Senate. Even Benny Johnson, usually supportive of GOP leadership, said he’s “sick of it,” warning that the public will not accept another political shield around the Epstein network. With every delay, the same question keeps getting louder: Who are they protecting? Watch the full report: 👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

55,807 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I think one of the main reasons the Epstein files are not being released is because it would expose the other Epstein style trafficking networks that are currently being ran by our intelligence agencies.
3:53

I think one of the main reasons the Epstein files are not being released is because it would expose the other Epstein style trafficking networks that are currently being ran by our intelligence agencies.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

282,430 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Thomas Massie tonight says DOJ is citing laws that don’t apply to hide key parts of the Epstein files: “They’re still trying to protect billionaires, politically connected people, and trying to obscure the involvement of our own intelligence agencies.”
0:41

Thomas Massie tonight says DOJ is citing laws that don’t apply to hide key parts of the Epstein files: “They’re still trying to protect billionaires, politically connected people, and trying to obscure the involvement of our own intelligence agencies.”

Ron Filipkowski

527,532 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

CIA and other agencies often misuse classification laws to infringe upon the law and civil rights. We must stop this excessive classification and declassify everything that is not a significant national security concern.
1:46

CIA and other agencies often misuse classification laws to infringe upon the law and civil rights. We must stop this excessive classification and declassify everything that is not a significant national security concern.

John Kiriakou

359,704 просмотров • 1 год назад

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns. Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security?
0:59

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns. Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security?

Shadow of Ezra

9,691,254 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Why do you think Trump is working so hard to stop the Epstein files from coming out?” Thomas Massie: “These files implicate billionaires, friends of his, political donors... Epstein also had ties to our own intelligence agencies & Israel's intelligence agencies.”
0:34

“Why do you think Trump is working so hard to stop the Epstein files from coming out?” Thomas Massie: “These files implicate billionaires, friends of his, political donors... Epstein also had ties to our own intelligence agencies & Israel's intelligence agencies.”

The Resonance

59,094 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

A reporter asks Thomas Massie: "Why do you think [Trump] is working so hard not to get [the Epstein files] released?" Thomas Massie: "These files implicate billionaires and friends of his, and political donors that he's trying to protect." "Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies. That's why there's so much effort in trying to stop this." "And that's going to backfire on them."
0:35

A reporter asks Thomas Massie: "Why do you think [Trump] is working so hard not to get [the Epstein files] released?" Thomas Massie: "These files implicate billionaires and friends of his, and political donors that he's trying to protect." "Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies. That's why there's so much effort in trying to stop this." "And that's going to backfire on them."

Wide Awake Media

81,819 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Rachel Maddow, imploring the agencies that protect the United States of America to wake the fuck up about the dangerous national security threat that is Elon Musk. 😳👇
2:04

Rachel Maddow, imploring the agencies that protect the United States of America to wake the fuck up about the dangerous national security threat that is Elon Musk. 😳👇

Bill Madden

3,718,372 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 NEW: Congressman Thomas Massie says “I think Israel is influencing the Epstein File release. Israeli intelligence and our own CIA was wrapped up with Epstein. So, it will be embarrassing for our own intelligence agencies and Israel’s intelligence agencies for all that to come out.”
3:11

🚨 NEW: Congressman Thomas Massie says “I think Israel is influencing the Epstein File release. Israeli intelligence and our own CIA was wrapped up with Epstein. So, it will be embarrassing for our own intelligence agencies and Israel’s intelligence agencies for all that to come out.”

Drop Site

580,253 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns. Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security? Release The Epstein Island List This photo was taken by a rogue drone operation on Epstein Island
0:59

Sensitive content

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to national security concerns. Why do the Epstein files need to be redacted for national security? Release The Epstein Island List This photo was taken by a rogue drone operation on Epstein Island

S🇮🇳🇨🇳🇺🇸

61,221 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Mike Benz joins The Alex Marlow Show and argues the real concern in releasing the Epstein Files is the push for “national security redactions,” which he says hints at what Washington is truly afraid of: exposing the ties between Epstein and intelligence agencies. Where does this go next? The political fallout could be enormous...
2:15

.Mike Benz joins The Alex Marlow Show and argues the real concern in releasing the Epstein Files is the push for “national security redactions,” which he says hints at what Washington is truly afraid of: exposing the ties between Epstein and intelligence agencies. Where does this go next? The political fallout could be enormous...

Alex Marlow

26,062 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The Israelis operate as independent actors, serving only their interests; they are not anyone's friend. Suggests CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou. Was Jeffrey Epstein working solely on behalf of Israeli intelligence, or were other global agencies involved as well? John Kiriakou argues that releasing the Epstein files is essential to restoring transparency, accountability, and public trust in a system that many Americans no longer believe is telling them the full story.
3:58

The Israelis operate as independent actors, serving only their interests; they are not anyone's friend. Suggests CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou. Was Jeffrey Epstein working solely on behalf of Israeli intelligence, or were other global agencies involved as well? John Kiriakou argues that releasing the Epstein files is essential to restoring transparency, accountability, and public trust in a system that many Americans no longer believe is telling them the full story.

Redacted

15,565 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We are not against Pakistan's army, ISI, or MI. Every country has intelligence agencies, but they do not interfere in politics. We demand that the army and agencies not interfere in politics and must remain within the orbit of the constitution.
1:30

We are not against Pakistan's army, ISI, or MI. Every country has intelligence agencies, but they do not interfere in politics. We demand that the army and agencies not interfere in politics and must remain within the orbit of the constitution.

Mehmood Khan Achakzai

60,233 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard asserted that it is not the responsibility of US spy agencies to determine ‘what is and is not an imminent threat’ to the United States
1:28

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard asserted that it is not the responsibility of US spy agencies to determine ‘what is and is not an imminent threat’ to the United States

Reuters

146,888 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад