Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Join me on my drive home while I break down the War Powers Act and a possible angle to argue the air strikes were constitutional, talk “peace through strength” vs. war is peace, and tell you why every war you like is not the American Revolution.

TRHLofficial's profile picture

The Redheaded libertarian

890,694 subscribers

49,069 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Scott Jennings receives an applause break from the Bill Maher audience for articulating the 'Peace and War' aspect of the 'Trump doctrine': Bill Maher: "There is a Trump doctrine now. Now we have the Trump doctrine, I think as much of a departure as any president has promulgated. Trump in Riyadh: "In the end the so called nation builders wrecked more nations than they built. Interventionists were intervening complex societies that they did not understand." Bill Maher: "His doctrine is 'You do you, we all love money'" Scott Jennings: "Something about the Republican doctrine that has been fascinating to me. We've always been war and peace, Trump has changed it to peace and war. He talks about peace more than he talks about war. They would much rather hear an American president talk about peace. 'Peace through strength' on that I think he's right. Putting peace ahead of war pretty popular among the American people." 'Peace through strength' or risk resting in peace.
3:26

Scott Jennings receives an applause break from the Bill Maher audience for articulating the 'Peace and War' aspect of the 'Trump doctrine': Bill Maher: "There is a Trump doctrine now. Now we have the Trump doctrine, I think as much of a departure as any president has promulgated. Trump in Riyadh: "In the end the so called nation builders wrecked more nations than they built. Interventionists were intervening complex societies that they did not understand." Bill Maher: "His doctrine is 'You do you, we all love money'" Scott Jennings: "Something about the Republican doctrine that has been fascinating to me. We've always been war and peace, Trump has changed it to peace and war. He talks about peace more than he talks about war. They would much rather hear an American president talk about peace. 'Peace through strength' on that I think he's right. Putting peace ahead of war pretty popular among the American people." 'Peace through strength' or risk resting in peace.

Eric Abbenante

392,824 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Trump thinks about peace and war instead of war and peace — and apparently Democrats don't like it. This is peace through STRENGTH and our strength is that we actually have a President who is capable of staying awake long enough to make deals in the Middle East.
1:12

President Trump thinks about peace and war instead of war and peace — and apparently Democrats don't like it. This is peace through STRENGTH and our strength is that we actually have a President who is capable of staying awake long enough to make deals in the Middle East.

Scott Jennings

144,702 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hegseth: The opposite of peace through strength is war through weakness. Wokeness, weakness and war, all specialties of Joe Biden and Lloyd Austin.
0:44

Hegseth: The opposite of peace through strength is war through weakness. Wokeness, weakness and war, all specialties of Joe Biden and Lloyd Austin.

Acyn

46,901 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
5:28

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

44,094 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
1:18

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

KARL: What do you say to Trump supporters who are worried that the US is involved in yet another war in the Middle East? JD VANCE: We are not interested in protracted conflicts in the Middle East, but there's a question about how do you achieve peace, and we believe the way you achieve peace is through strength (He's getting close to saying "war is peace" ... )
1:15

KARL: What do you say to Trump supporters who are worried that the US is involved in yet another war in the Middle East? JD VANCE: We are not interested in protracted conflicts in the Middle East, but there's a question about how do you achieve peace, and we believe the way you achieve peace is through strength (He's getting close to saying "war is peace" ... )

Aaron Rupar

149,447 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

REPORTER: "You changed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. Would you consider changing the name again to the Department of Peace?" SEC. HEGSETH: "It's a great question, actually. You go from defense to war because you want to be proactive about peace through strength." "When you fight a war the right way, the idea is on the other side, you bring about peace. That is what we'd like to see the most." "We are the guarantor of the safety and security, not just of our country, but of a lot of people in this world."
0:51

REPORTER: "You changed the Department of Defense to the Department of War. Would you consider changing the name again to the Department of Peace?" SEC. HEGSETH: "It's a great question, actually. You go from defense to war because you want to be proactive about peace through strength." "When you fight a war the right way, the idea is on the other side, you bring about peace. That is what we'd like to see the most." "We are the guarantor of the safety and security, not just of our country, but of a lot of people in this world."

Fox News

1,375,389 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Hegseth: "You go from 'defense' to 'war' because you want to be proactive about peace through strength. The one institution that should win the Nobel Peace Prize every single year is the United States military."
0:54

Hegseth: "You go from 'defense' to 'war' because you want to be proactive about peace through strength. The one institution that should win the Nobel Peace Prize every single year is the United States military."

Aaron Rupar

108,956 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Cory Mills : “Trump’s not just commander in chief—he’s negotiator in chief. Precision strikes ended Iran’s nuclear ambitions and brought a ceasefire. No war. No boots on the ground. Just constitutional leadership and peace through strength.”
1:06

.Cory Mills : “Trump’s not just commander in chief—he’s negotiator in chief. Precision strikes ended Iran’s nuclear ambitions and brought a ceasefire. No war. No boots on the ground. Just constitutional leadership and peace through strength.”

Laura Ingraham

106,818 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."
1:10

Speaker Johnson on the War Powers Resolution: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article II powers of the Commander-in-Chief. I think that's right."

Conservative War Machine

45,763 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Trump is showing the world what peace through strength looks like. No one is better suited to end this war quickly and honorably.
0:28

President Trump is showing the world what peace through strength looks like. No one is better suited to end this war quickly and honorably.

Lindsey Graham

43,177 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Ignoring Constitutional War Powers Is Haunting Us One man, starting a war of choice, is producing disaster. Meanwhile, the "representatives" of the American people (who do not support the war) are nowhere to be found.
3:48

Ignoring Constitutional War Powers Is Haunting Us One man, starting a war of choice, is producing disaster. Meanwhile, the "representatives" of the American people (who do not support the war) are nowhere to be found.

Ron Paul

28,792 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

June 12, 1987. President Reagan faced down the Soviet empire with one weapon: American strength. The wall came down, the Cold War ended, and peace followed. Strength keeps the peace. It always has!
0:37

June 12, 1987. President Reagan faced down the Soviet empire with one weapon: American strength. The wall came down, the Cold War ended, and peace followed. Strength keeps the peace. It always has!

House Republicans

115,258 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

America is now on the side of peace. Europe? Still recklessly pushing for war. The U.S. is negotiating for a ceasefire, while Brusselian elites scheme to prolong the conflict. They now talk of mandatory conscription, political witch hunts, and even a parallel NATO to march us into war - without limits, without red lines. Europe had its chance with the Minsk Agreement, and it failed. Europe lacks the strength to enforce peace. The answer is not more war, it’s backing those who can deliver peace. We support the leadership of President Donald J. Trump.
1:28

America is now on the side of peace. Europe? Still recklessly pushing for war. The U.S. is negotiating for a ceasefire, while Brusselian elites scheme to prolong the conflict. They now talk of mandatory conscription, political witch hunts, and even a parallel NATO to march us into war - without limits, without red lines. Europe had its chance with the Minsk Agreement, and it failed. Europe lacks the strength to enforce peace. The answer is not more war, it’s backing those who can deliver peace. We support the leadership of President Donald J. Trump.

Orbán Viktor

366,815 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SECRETARY OF WAR PETE HEGSETH: "This name change is not just about renaming, it's about RESTORING. Restoring the warrior ethos. Restoring victory and clarity as an instinct. Restoring intentionality to the use of force. Peace through strength, brought to you by the War Department. The War Department is gonna fight DECISIVELY, not endless conflicts. Gonna fight to win, not just NOT to lose. Violent effect, not politically correct. This War Department... just like America... IS BACK!"
1:26

SECRETARY OF WAR PETE HEGSETH: "This name change is not just about renaming, it's about RESTORING. Restoring the warrior ethos. Restoring victory and clarity as an instinct. Restoring intentionality to the use of force. Peace through strength, brought to you by the War Department. The War Department is gonna fight DECISIVELY, not endless conflicts. Gonna fight to win, not just NOT to lose. Violent effect, not politically correct. This War Department... just like America... IS BACK!"

Polymarket Intel

42,865 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

.Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby: I think President Donald J. Trump has demonstrated that he is prepared to use the military instrument—that's why he keeps referring to peace through STRENGTH... I do think he's used the peace and diplomacy abundantly... and he was willing to talk to the Islamic Republic.
0:38

.Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby: I think President Donald J. Trump has demonstrated that he is prepared to use the military instrument—that's why he keeps referring to peace through STRENGTH... I do think he's used the peace and diplomacy abundantly... and he was willing to talk to the Islamic Republic.

Rapid Response 47

54,827 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

You do not have to support extremism to question war. And you do not have to support war to oppose extremism. Many people reject both and simply want peace. Thoughts on A, B or C? A. When did peace become controversial? B. Why is it that the people calling for peace are often the ones accused of being dangerous? C. War always needs enemies. How many get created to justify it?
0:24

You do not have to support extremism to question war. And you do not have to support war to oppose extremism. Many people reject both and simply want peace. Thoughts on A, B or C? A. When did peace become controversial? B. Why is it that the people calling for peace are often the ones accused of being dangerous? C. War always needs enemies. How many get created to justify it?

iyah may

27,080 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Fact: the U.S. military’s might is unmatched. Fact: NATO is the strongest military Alliance on the planet. THIS is peace through strength. Russia’s recent demonstration of its nuclear-powered missile is irresponsible and yet again demonstrates Putin’s focus on war, not peace.
0:39

Fact: the U.S. military’s might is unmatched. Fact: NATO is the strongest military Alliance on the planet. THIS is peace through strength. Russia’s recent demonstration of its nuclear-powered missile is irresponsible and yet again demonstrates Putin’s focus on war, not peace.

U.S. Ambassador to NATO

23,919 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten