Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Jordan Peterson: Climate science is "an appalling scam". "We're essentially in a CO2 drought by historical standards... We were almost at the point where the plants were going to start to die." "Now they have been increasing... The major consequences is that the planet is 20% greener than it... show more

Wide Awake Media

845,072 subscribers

1,510,781 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

Wide Awake Media2 years ago

Full interview:

Wide Awake Media2 years ago

CO2 is plant food, not "pollution". Retweet if you agree! T-shirt/hoodie available here: Use discount code TWITTER15 for 15% off your order!

🏴‍☠️ False Flag 🏴‍☠️2 years ago

Geoengenering is the cause of climate change. Not you driving to work, drinking coffee, using a wood stove, or cows farting. the world is run by eugenicists obsessed with overpopulation. Climate propaganda is a eugenics program. It's not about controlling the climate. It's about controlling YOU. they want everything to be electric(not just cars), so that they can turn it off when you have a bad social credit score because you stated the truth about something online. wake up, before we are all crushed beneath the new dystopian order.

Bret Weingart2 years ago

Anyone making it to the 60’s has to acknowledge that most of the world has been scammed many times during their lifetime. It’s a continuous process and the government is often involved whether conscious of the situation or not.

Crypto Medium2 years ago

#ClimateScam

AntiCensorship2 years ago

What about Trudeau?

WeAreNarrative2 years ago

Climate catastrophism long ago became a belief system, a secular religion* that defies all science, even the mainstream let alone anything sceptical. And it's driving the harmful & irrational millenarian dream of Net Zero. *for proof that climate catastrophism is a secular religion, follow the link in my profile; paperback and free PDF.

Cregg Lund2 years ago

You'd think a smart guy like Jordan would know what the C02 problem is. More plants mean healthier planet, healthier people. Can't have that, Mr Doctor.

Related Videos

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "It is so stupidly ridiculous to say that a 1.5° Celsius increase in global atmospheric temperature is going to be a disaster. As a matter of fact, it will open up vast areas of farmland that were too cold before." "In the Eocene Thermal Maximum, the temperature was at least five to seven degrees Celsius warmer than it is now, maybe even more. And at the same time CO2 was going in the exact opposite direction... There is no clear relationship." Credit: Patrick Moore Dr Jordan B Peterson

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "It is so stupidly ridiculous to say that a 1.5° Celsius increase in global atmospheric temperature is going to be a disaster. As a matter of fact, it will open up vast areas of farmland that were too cold before." "In the Eocene Thermal Maximum, the temperature was at least five to seven degrees Celsius warmer than it is now, maybe even more. And at the same time CO2 was going in the exact opposite direction... There is no clear relationship." Credit: Patrick Moore Dr Jordan B Peterson

Wide Awake Media

214,780 views • 2 years ago

"We're in a bit of a CO2 famine now." Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look over geological history, it's been much higher than now most of the time." "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So it's just a complete distortion of the truth to call it a pollutant. It's not a pollutant at all." "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make a buck in demonising CO2, and that's what's happened." "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because the plants grow so much better with more CO2."

"We're in a bit of a CO2 famine now." Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look over geological history, it's been much higher than now most of the time." "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So it's just a complete distortion of the truth to call it a pollutant. It's not a pollutant at all." "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make a buck in demonising CO2, and that's what's happened." "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because the plants grow so much better with more CO2."

Wide Awake Media

194,419 views • 1 year ago

The truth about carbon‼️ "We are in a kind of CO2 famine at the moment"‼️ Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look at geological history, most of the time it has been much higher than now"‼️ "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So calling it a pollutant is a complete distortion of the truth. It is not a pollutant at all"‼️ "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make money by demonizing CO2, and that's what happened" "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because plants grow much better with more CO2"‼️🙏👇 Credit 👇👇

The truth about carbon‼️ "We are in a kind of CO2 famine at the moment"‼️ Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look at geological history, most of the time it has been much higher than now"‼️ "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So calling it a pollutant is a complete distortion of the truth. It is not a pollutant at all"‼️ "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make money by demonizing CO2, and that's what happened" "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because plants grow much better with more CO2"‼️🙏👇 Credit 👇👇

Sophia Dahl

14,402 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false." "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth." Credit: Patrick Moore Cristian 🇯🇵🇮🇹

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false." "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth." Credit: Patrick Moore Cristian 🇯🇵🇮🇹

Wide Awake Media

1,151,910 views • 2 years ago

Jordan Peterson says a famous US program proved you cannot give kids a lasting IQ boost, even with early enrichment "there was a huge program in the United States started in the 1960s which was supported by conservatives and liberals alike called Head Start" "the kids who went to Head Start did do better than their age matched and socioeconomic matched peers who didn't go to Head Start, but the differences disappeared by grade five or grade six" "so there was no improvement in cognitive function" "that was really saddening... because it was a good hypothesis. Like the idea that you could get a leap ahead early seems so obvious that you'd think it was incontrovertible. It just happens not to be true" If you're new here, follow Toan Truong for the sharpest lessons from the world's best minds. — Jordan B Peterson ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ), clinical psychologist, on Jordan B Peterson's ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ) Answer the Call

Jordan Peterson says a famous US program proved you cannot give kids a lasting IQ boost, even with early enrichment "there was a huge program in the United States started in the 1960s which was supported by conservatives and liberals alike called Head Start" "the kids who went to Head Start did do better than their age matched and socioeconomic matched peers who didn't go to Head Start, but the differences disappeared by grade five or grade six" "so there was no improvement in cognitive function" "that was really saddening... because it was a good hypothesis. Like the idea that you could get a leap ahead early seems so obvious that you'd think it was incontrovertible. It just happens not to be true" If you're new here, follow Toan Truong for the sharpest lessons from the world's best minds. — Jordan B Peterson ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ), clinical psychologist, on Jordan B Peterson's ( Dr Jordan B Peterson ) Answer the Call

Toan Truong

181,355 views • 19 days ago

Jordan Peterson: 'This is the Worst Scandal I've Ever Heard Of' on UK Child Abuse Cover-Up “They didn't just ignore it, it's worse than that. They ignored it and tortured the people who brought it to light…” – Dr Jordan B Peterson

Jordan Peterson: 'This is the Worst Scandal I've Ever Heard Of' on UK Child Abuse Cover-Up “They didn't just ignore it, it's worse than that. They ignored it and tortured the people who brought it to light…” – Dr Jordan B Peterson

RiftTV

750,308 views • 1 year ago

The earth is greening. Satellite records show global leaf area has increased by more than 18% in just four decades. The biggest gains are in China and India, and also across North America. CO2 fertilization is a major driver. Carbon dioxide is plant food and one of the basic inputs for life. Plants use CO2 to grow. More CO2 means stronger growth. That is why commercial greenhouses raise CO2 levels to 1,500 parts per million - because it boosts yields. Global crop yields have risen exponentially since 1960. Famine deaths have collapsed even as the world population doubled. That is the part the doom narrative skips. The gas they call an "emergency" is helping feed the biosphere. The planet is greener.

The earth is greening. Satellite records show global leaf area has increased by more than 18% in just four decades. The biggest gains are in China and India, and also across North America. CO2 fertilization is a major driver. Carbon dioxide is plant food and one of the basic inputs for life. Plants use CO2 to grow. More CO2 means stronger growth. That is why commercial greenhouses raise CO2 levels to 1,500 parts per million - because it boosts yields. Global crop yields have risen exponentially since 1960. Famine deaths have collapsed even as the world population doubled. That is the part the doom narrative skips. The gas they call an "emergency" is helping feed the biosphere. The planet is greener.

Electroverse

11,009 views • 2 months ago

The UN says climate change will destroy harvests and cause global food shortages. But this isn't backed up by the data. For one, the planet is greener than ever. NASA satellites show global vegetation up 15% since the 1980s, thanks almost entirely to higher CO2. And as for food production, the world is posting record highs year after year across every staple. "We inject CO2 into greenhouses for a reason," says Linnea Lucan from the Heartland Institute, "because it helps plants grow." CO2 isn't killing crops, it's feeding them.

The UN says climate change will destroy harvests and cause global food shortages. But this isn't backed up by the data. For one, the planet is greener than ever. NASA satellites show global vegetation up 15% since the 1980s, thanks almost entirely to higher CO2. And as for food production, the world is posting record highs year after year across every staple. "We inject CO2 into greenhouses for a reason," says Linnea Lucan from the Heartland Institute, "because it helps plants grow." CO2 isn't killing crops, it's feeding them.

Electroverse

13,298 views • 4 months ago

Jordan Peterson: The globalist C40 Cities agenda is "literally pursuing an agenda that includes no more than three articles of clothing per citizen per year, a 95% [reduction] in private car ownership... one short-haul flight per person every three years." "And then overall, although this isn't directly from the C40, the fundamental goal of something approximating an 85% reduction in Western living standards—which is the calculation of the green, virtuous, globalist utopians as to what's necessary in order for us to inhabit a green planet." "The bloody radical leftists are 100% willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to... their green agenda." Credit: Dr Jordan B Peterson

Jordan Peterson: The globalist C40 Cities agenda is "literally pursuing an agenda that includes no more than three articles of clothing per citizen per year, a 95% [reduction] in private car ownership... one short-haul flight per person every three years." "And then overall, although this isn't directly from the C40, the fundamental goal of something approximating an 85% reduction in Western living standards—which is the calculation of the green, virtuous, globalist utopians as to what's necessary in order for us to inhabit a green planet." "The bloody radical leftists are 100% willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to... their green agenda." Credit: Dr Jordan B Peterson

Wide Awake Media

680,948 views • 2 years ago

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

Electroverse

31,215 views • 2 months ago

POILIEVRE: "A good secret to success in politics is to find out exactly what Andrew Coyne thinks and do exactly the opposite. So, the fact that he had a meltdown suggests that I was on the right track." 😂💥

POILIEVRE: "A good secret to success in politics is to find out exactly what Andrew Coyne thinks and do exactly the opposite. So, the fact that he had a meltdown suggests that I was on the right track." 😂💥

Kat Kanada

52,708 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk on Starship: "If there are historians in the future, they will look back at Starship and say it was one of the most profound things that ever happened. The degree to which a Starship is a revolutionary technology is not well understood in the world. It's the first time that there's been any rocket design where full and rapid reusability is possible. This is the first design where success is in the set of possible outcomes. There were a lot of performance improvements for v3 so it made sense to go to v3, there's like 10,000 different changes between v2 and v3. There just aren't very many things that are in the top 10 of the evolution of life. So if there were to be a catastrophe on one of the planets, the other planet would survive and no AI was used to create it."

Elon Musk on Starship: "If there are historians in the future, they will look back at Starship and say it was one of the most profound things that ever happened. The degree to which a Starship is a revolutionary technology is not well understood in the world. It's the first time that there's been any rocket design where full and rapid reusability is possible. This is the first design where success is in the set of possible outcomes. There were a lot of performance improvements for v3 so it made sense to go to v3, there's like 10,000 different changes between v2 and v3. There just aren't very many things that are in the top 10 of the evolution of life. So if there were to be a catastrophe on one of the planets, the other planet would survive and no AI was used to create it."

DogeDesigner

489,406 views • 7 months ago

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

27,231 views • 3 months ago

From the recent The Free Press God debate between me and Ross Douthat (Ross Douthat): Question from attendee: Doesn't the history of 20th century Marxism show us where rational materialism leads? And shouldn't you, as a student of history, have seen where this worship of rationality would lead? Me: Well, you're assuming that Marxism was rational. Attendee: It was the worship of rationality, putting human presuppositions about right and wrong before the teachings of God. Me: If we judge an ideology by its effects, there are reasons to think that the precepts of Marxism were the opposite of rational. Namely, they led to disasters, but people held them anyway, so it was the opposite of the ideal of falsifiability. And they led to both economic and humanitarian disasters, so on rational grounds, we can see that Marxism was mistaken. So the failure of Marxism does not cast doubt on the value of rationality. It is precisely because we can evaluate it on rational grounds that we can identify what was wrong with it. Likewise, the horrors of the 20th century due to Nazism were not because Nazism was rational, quite the opposite. It had a number of obviously mistaken and monstrous beliefs, and it is by the lights of rationality combined with concern with human well-being that we can judge it as having been a disaster. I don't think that our problem now is that we have too much empathy. I think that the allegation that we're suffering from toxic empathy is mistaken. That too much empathy is the least of our problems. If I were to single out some of the things in Christian tradition that I think are worth keeping, then empathy, compassion, forgiveness, forswearing revenge, all of those are good things because they can also be defended on rational grounds.

From the recent The Free Press God debate between me and Ross Douthat (Ross Douthat): Question from attendee: Doesn't the history of 20th century Marxism show us where rational materialism leads? And shouldn't you, as a student of history, have seen where this worship of rationality would lead? Me: Well, you're assuming that Marxism was rational. Attendee: It was the worship of rationality, putting human presuppositions about right and wrong before the teachings of God. Me: If we judge an ideology by its effects, there are reasons to think that the precepts of Marxism were the opposite of rational. Namely, they led to disasters, but people held them anyway, so it was the opposite of the ideal of falsifiability. And they led to both economic and humanitarian disasters, so on rational grounds, we can see that Marxism was mistaken. So the failure of Marxism does not cast doubt on the value of rationality. It is precisely because we can evaluate it on rational grounds that we can identify what was wrong with it. Likewise, the horrors of the 20th century due to Nazism were not because Nazism was rational, quite the opposite. It had a number of obviously mistaken and monstrous beliefs, and it is by the lights of rationality combined with concern with human well-being that we can judge it as having been a disaster. I don't think that our problem now is that we have too much empathy. I think that the allegation that we're suffering from toxic empathy is mistaken. That too much empathy is the least of our problems. If I were to single out some of the things in Christian tradition that I think are worth keeping, then empathy, compassion, forgiveness, forswearing revenge, all of those are good things because they can also be defended on rational grounds.

Steven Pinker

41,917 views • 4 months ago

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”

Curtis Houck

11,692 views • 1 year ago

“Their answer is call me a climate change denier, try to smear me. But they can't answer the argument of, ‘look at the full context benefits and side effects of what's good for human flourishing.’” With Dr Jordan B Peterson

“Their answer is call me a climate change denier, try to smear me. But they can't answer the argument of, ‘look at the full context benefits and side effects of what's good for human flourishing.’” With Dr Jordan B Peterson

Alex Epstein

173,502 views • 3 years ago

The "climate change" movement is a smokescreen for the degrowth movement. "They used to say, we're against population growth and we're against technology—but that didn't go over well. So then they said, we're just against climate change." With Dr Jordan B Peterson

The "climate change" movement is a smokescreen for the degrowth movement. "They used to say, we're against population growth and we're against technology—but that didn't go over well. So then they said, we're just against climate change." With Dr Jordan B Peterson

Alex Epstein

52,164 views • 1 year ago

Jordan Peterson: Climate models are "about as valid as the models that scientists used to predict Covid death outcomes, which tended to overestimate the mortality probability by a factor of about 10. They're not accurate." "A computer model is a hypothesis, not data. It's a guess." "On top of the climate models, there are even more radically unstable economic models saying that the consequences of climate change will be catastrophic if you look 100 years into the future." "Nobody can make an economic bet 100 years into the future. Period." "It's preposterous." Credit: Dr Jordan B Peterson Theo Von

Jordan Peterson: Climate models are "about as valid as the models that scientists used to predict Covid death outcomes, which tended to overestimate the mortality probability by a factor of about 10. They're not accurate." "A computer model is a hypothesis, not data. It's a guess." "On top of the climate models, there are even more radically unstable economic models saying that the consequences of climate change will be catastrophic if you look 100 years into the future." "Nobody can make an economic bet 100 years into the future. Period." "It's preposterous." Credit: Dr Jordan B Peterson Theo Von

Wide Awake Media

58,929 views • 11 months ago