正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

José explains why open-source AI could favor inference providers. “It’s definitely bad for OpenAI and Anthropic, but it’s really good for the neoclouds and inference providers... More people get access to cheap intelligence, more stuff gets done.”

22,167 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

7 条评论

Delphi Digital 的头像
Delphi Digital2 个月前

Watch the full episode here.

Maria García 的头像
Maria García2 个月前

It seems like Delphi Digital is discussing Anthropic's recent issues and how they might impact the growth of AI-based projects!.

The AI Therapist 的头像
The AI Therapist2 个月前

Openai's margin was "we're the only ones with it." open-source erases that instantly. what's left to sell: inference speed. providers who own silicon just won the game

Qmatrix 的头像
Qmatrix2 个月前

open-source models still need specialist labeled data for scientific domains like molecular simulation. We route those tasks through domain experts for the quality attestation that inference providers rely on.

João Capital 的头像
João Capital2 个月前

a abertura de modelos como llama reduz o custo de inferencia em ate 80% e acelera a adoção por neoclouds como coreweave.

Crypto Hôm Nay 的头像
Crypto Hôm Nay2 个月前

Mở nguồn AI tốt cho nhà cung cấp inference.

RaoulDuke 的头像
RaoulDuke2 个月前

yeah this fits with more devs using decentralized inference options these days

相关视频