Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Joseph Chalom explains why the ETH burn thesis isn't broken: "Mainnet is being built for the volume coming from tokenization, stablecoins, and agentic. 3x throughput increases. Reduced gas fees." "If it grows incrementally, you won't trigger the burn in a way that drives ETH up. We believe the step-function... show more
171,424 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 12

@antiprosynth I’m getting tired, @KumaCapxbt step up

FT @joechalom @Sharplink

Huge amounts of ETHs would have to be burnt to increase a meaningful effect on scarcity. Increasing transaction fees to improve the staking yield would be much simpler, while having thre same effect.

The problem for Ethereum is that Bitcoin is going to capture all of that utility with ZKrollups. Then there is no reason for Ethereum to even exist.

Yea the thesis isn’t broken but $SBET value is! The asset is ETH, the liabilities are @joechalom @mandyzcamp @sheffieldreport @mcamarda0

@FigoETH Growth and adoption seem not as fast as needed. $300B is a very small proportion and growing to that hasn’t significantly added value. You need to see $3T next year and $30T in the following year to see this argument play out.

“IF”. That’s all these clowns have

Why do we care about the burn rate ? ETH could be valued by the TVL in it, the lvl of decentralisation.

shit for brains, literally. lol

バーン理論まだ生きてる

if that step function hits mainnet first l2s gonna feel like dialup

Chalom says ETH burn not broken. Mainnet built for tokenization stablecoin and agentic volume coming
