Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Joseph made a full length video supporting Hidma which might be the root cause of attracting UAPA case against him. Check this out. “If you kill one Hidma, 100 Hidmas will be born.” - Joseph S/o Daniel. Govt looks like they went according to a plan. Initially they filed...

16,969 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”

Wall Street Apes

514,459 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

VIDEO | Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh on NALSAR controversy, says, "BCI chairman is behaving like the BCI is his personal property. Whenever he issues an order, letter or direction, he does not even refer to under which provision of the Act or regulation he's making such kind of an order... The resolution, the order which was passed was wholly illegal. And in fact, some people had also approached me, and we were about to mention the matter in the morning. A writ petition also was to be filed. And I'm 100% sure it would have been stayed by the Supreme Court. Probably he got a hint of that and he started withdrawing in phases. First, he withdrew partially, then NALSAR passed a resolution on whether they can do such an inquiry or not, which is also permissible, and they will consider it in the executive committee. So he realised that they may ultimately say that they will not do even that inquiry which he said should happen in the second letter. So at night, he tweeted that he will withdraw completely. He has to understand that he is the chairman of the regulator of the entire legal profession. He has to set the right standards for the youngsters to follow. I am not trying to, for once, even suggest that what the children did with regard to not protesting against the CJI coming for the convocation. But that is their right under the Constitution. They may be ill-advised, they may be, you know, not doing the right thing. They may be justified also..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

71,961 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat