Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Joseph Scott Morgan walks through how a complete autopsy dissection actually works. Then he explains why he does not like partial autopsies — and why a partial autopsy in the Kirk case is more misleading than no autopsy at all. Then he addresses the question that has been building... show more

Julian Dorey

182,056 subscribers

29,992 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Baron Coleman & Top Forensics Expert Confront the Charlie Kirk Case. Baron Coleman has been investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination longer and more rigorously than anyone in the public sphere. For the first time he sat down in a studio with Joseph Scott Morgan — a career forensic pathologist — to go through the evidence together. Morgan explains the difference between a medical examiner and a coroner. He notes there are not many forensic pathologists out there. And Coleman explains where his questions actually started: He did not raise doubts about the official narrative until he watched ballistics experts online recreate the shot — and found what the recreation showed was inconsistent with the official account. This is where that conversation begins. Baron Coleman JoScot

Baron Coleman & Top Forensics Expert Confront the Charlie Kirk Case. Baron Coleman has been investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination longer and more rigorously than anyone in the public sphere. For the first time he sat down in a studio with Joseph Scott Morgan — a career forensic pathologist — to go through the evidence together. Morgan explains the difference between a medical examiner and a coroner. He notes there are not many forensic pathologists out there. And Coleman explains where his questions actually started: He did not raise doubts about the official narrative until he watched ballistics experts online recreate the shot — and found what the recreation showed was inconsistent with the official account. This is where that conversation begins. Baron Coleman JoScot

Julian Dorey

58,718 views • 14 days ago

Erika Krik is Wearing a Repaired Version of the Necklace That Was Never Collected as Evidence... Kirk was wearing a necklace when he was shot. It was never collected as evidence. Erika Kirk is now publicly wearing a repaired version of it. The microphone from the stage is preserved in a glass case in her possession. Charlie Kirk's chair — which would have contained blood deposition evidence showing trajectory and wound sequence — was apparently never formally collected. Joseph Scott Morgan's assessment: "Everything there has evidentary value. It should have all been collected." Baron Coleman JoScot

Erika Krik is Wearing a Repaired Version of the Necklace That Was Never Collected as Evidence... Kirk was wearing a necklace when he was shot. It was never collected as evidence. Erika Kirk is now publicly wearing a repaired version of it. The microphone from the stage is preserved in a glass case in her possession. Charlie Kirk's chair — which would have contained blood deposition evidence showing trajectory and wound sequence — was apparently never formally collected. Joseph Scott Morgan's assessment: "Everything there has evidentary value. It should have all been collected." Baron Coleman JoScot

Julian Dorey

198,361 views • 11 days ago

🚨 “CHARLIE KIRK DID HAVE AN AUTOPSY” 🚨 Candace Owens drops new confirmation: “I have also learned...I’ve been told... that Charlie did indeed have an autopsy. That has been confirmed. An autopsy did take place.” “The coroner in this case was brand spanking new.” After weeks of confusion and conflicting reports, the truth finally surfaces. So if the autopsy really happened…why did the dispatch calls say otherwise?

HustleBitch

801,669 views • 10 months ago

ON THE CHARLIE KIRK "AUTOPSY" Now that a body armor ricochet has been definitively eliminated, the conventional "straight-on shot" narrative demands we now believe that Charlie Kirk's magic neck magically stopped another magic bullet. As you contemplate Andrew Kolvet's Superman explanation of Charlie's death, just remember: ▪️JFK's autopsy was botched & the results were tampered with. ▪️RFK's autopsy results were ignored. ▪️MLK's autopsy covered up the exact cause of his death. Maybe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie the way they say he did, a .30-06 shot that Charlie's neck miraculously stopped. And if it's proven to my satisfaction some day that that's the case, then I'll accept it. But today is not that day. In the meantime, learn how MLK Jr. actually died and how they lied to you about it:

ON THE CHARLIE KIRK "AUTOPSY" Now that a body armor ricochet has been definitively eliminated, the conventional "straight-on shot" narrative demands we now believe that Charlie Kirk's magic neck magically stopped another magic bullet. As you contemplate Andrew Kolvet's Superman explanation of Charlie's death, just remember: ▪️JFK's autopsy was botched & the results were tampered with. ▪️RFK's autopsy results were ignored. ▪️MLK's autopsy covered up the exact cause of his death. Maybe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie the way they say he did, a .30-06 shot that Charlie's neck miraculously stopped. And if it's proven to my satisfaction some day that that's the case, then I'll accept it. But today is not that day. In the meantime, learn how MLK Jr. actually died and how they lied to you about it:

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

219,539 views • 11 months ago

Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security says there was 100% an autopsy performed and Charlie Kirk had a “Pulse” in the Emergency Room He says he didn’t want everyone to think there was a JFK-like “conspiracy” and wanted the Autopsy report asap. He said JD Vance called in and asked what they needed — An autopsy report asap he said. Clip Full Show

Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security says there was 100% an autopsy performed and Charlie Kirk had a “Pulse” in the Emergency Room He says he didn’t want everyone to think there was a JFK-like “conspiracy” and wanted the Autopsy report asap. He said JD Vance called in and asked what they needed — An autopsy report asap he said. Clip Full Show

MJTruthUltra

9,540,229 views • 9 months ago

Korea built a no-fault vaccine compensation program that requires autopsy data to attribute cause of death. So they actually did the autopsies. What they found: multiple deaths that were only linked to the vaccine at autopsy. Without the autopsy, the connection would never have been made. The United States has no equivalent system. No autopsies. No attribution. No data. — Dr. Anish Koka

Korea built a no-fault vaccine compensation program that requires autopsy data to attribute cause of death. So they actually did the autopsies. What they found: multiple deaths that were only linked to the vaccine at autopsy. Without the autopsy, the connection would never have been made. The United States has no equivalent system. No autopsies. No attribution. No data. — Dr. Anish Koka

The Doctor’s Lounge Podcast

17,002 views • 1 month ago

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

The SCIF

830,405 views • 11 months ago

Watching this a second time and I really love this question Baron asks Joseph about what the funeral director would have noticed and documented regarding important pieces of evidence from Charlie’s body that would have been kept from the autopsy. I have to wonder what inspired Baron Coleman to ask this particular question. 👀

Watching this a second time and I really love this question Baron asks Joseph about what the funeral director would have noticed and documented regarding important pieces of evidence from Charlie’s body that would have been kept from the autopsy. I have to wonder what inspired Baron Coleman to ask this particular question. 👀

Jillian Faith

48,859 views • 14 days ago

🚨 THEY JUST ADMITTED IT: "NO AUTOPSY" 🚨 LISTEN CLOSELY to the dispatch audio: “He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital.” No autopsy. Signed off inside the hospital. A political assassination. A homicide. An active investigation. Charlie Kirk's body was evidence. Especially in a case this questionable. What don’t they want the public to know??

🚨 THEY JUST ADMITTED IT: "NO AUTOPSY" 🚨 LISTEN CLOSELY to the dispatch audio: “He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital.” No autopsy. Signed off inside the hospital. A political assassination. A homicide. An active investigation. Charlie Kirk's body was evidence. Especially in a case this questionable. What don’t they want the public to know??

HustleBitch

6,525,825 views • 11 months ago

By state law in Utah a hospital is required to perform an autopsy during any homicide investigation. How was your not an autopsy done in the assassination of Charlie Kirk and a doctor was able to sign off on this who is this doctor and who authorize this. Why was JD Vance at the hospital?

By state law in Utah a hospital is required to perform an autopsy during any homicide investigation. How was your not an autopsy done in the assassination of Charlie Kirk and a doctor was able to sign off on this who is this doctor and who authorize this. Why was JD Vance at the hospital?

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

4,213,353 views • 11 months ago

But wasn’t a 2nd autopsy done by a professional that said Epstein was murdered and not suicided? Yea. But who did that autopsy and who hired him? Michael Baden did the autopsy. He is Jewish. He has a history of doing second opinion autopsies, and in my view his opinion is designed to distract from the main narrative, but still lead you off track from the truth. For example he re-examined the JFK autopsy evidence in 1973. What did he determine? That Oswald shot JFK from the back as described in the Warren report. Total nonsense. Viewed this way, you could be looking at a false dichotomy where people are arguing that Epstein hung himself, or was killed, and no one looks at the possibility that he’s alive… 🧵 7/15

But wasn’t a 2nd autopsy done by a professional that said Epstein was murdered and not suicided? Yea. But who did that autopsy and who hired him? Michael Baden did the autopsy. He is Jewish. He has a history of doing second opinion autopsies, and in my view his opinion is designed to distract from the main narrative, but still lead you off track from the truth. For example he re-examined the JFK autopsy evidence in 1973. What did he determine? That Oswald shot JFK from the back as described in the Warren report. Total nonsense. Viewed this way, you could be looking at a false dichotomy where people are arguing that Epstein hung himself, or was killed, and no one looks at the possibility that he’s alive… 🧵 7/15

Uncommon Sense

554,187 views • 1 year ago

NO AUTOPSY performed on CHARLIE KIRK? What's really going on here? "He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital." But there was a surgeon who worked on Kirk after the shooting. WHY would there be NO AUTOPSY? With all the new evidence that has been coming out, NOW you know why. If you still believe that there isn't foul play involved in this assassination and a cover up then you might be the fool yourself. In this video you will also here the original description of the shooter. Kirk's producer Andrew Kolvet stated that a surgeon who worked on Kirk said the bullet "absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round." "'It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,'" Kolvet said the doctor told him. "His bone was so healthy and the density was so impressive that he’s like the man of steel." There are many questions surrounding Charlie's entire team and security as well. They way they acting and many being connected to outside forces. Especially with a large amount of money COMING IN and GOING OUT and Charlie did not know where it was really coming from and is the reason he started his own DOGE audit team. Not too long later, he was assassinated. This is JFK all over again and we can not let that happen. This is our chance to find the truth and rid this country of its bad actors in it. cc: HustleBitch

NO AUTOPSY performed on CHARLIE KIRK? What's really going on here? "He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital." But there was a surgeon who worked on Kirk after the shooting. WHY would there be NO AUTOPSY? With all the new evidence that has been coming out, NOW you know why. If you still believe that there isn't foul play involved in this assassination and a cover up then you might be the fool yourself. In this video you will also here the original description of the shooter. Kirk's producer Andrew Kolvet stated that a surgeon who worked on Kirk said the bullet "absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round." "'It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,'" Kolvet said the doctor told him. "His bone was so healthy and the density was so impressive that he’s like the man of steel." There are many questions surrounding Charlie's entire team and security as well. They way they acting and many being connected to outside forces. Especially with a large amount of money COMING IN and GOING OUT and Charlie did not know where it was really coming from and is the reason he started his own DOGE audit team. Not too long later, he was assassinated. This is JFK all over again and we can not let that happen. This is our chance to find the truth and rid this country of its bad actors in it. cc: HustleBitch

The SCIF

19,972 views • 10 months ago

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION BOMBSHELL REPORT!!!🚨 Ballistics Prove Kirk WAS NOT Shot With A .30-06! If An Autopsy Was Not Performed Or Is Not Released, And The Bullet That They Claim To Have In Evidence Is Not Produced To The Public, Then We Know That The Official Story Concerning Charlie Kirk's Assassination Is A Lie! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia Joins Alex Jones To Break Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation!

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION BOMBSHELL REPORT!!!🚨 Ballistics Prove Kirk WAS NOT Shot With A .30-06! If An Autopsy Was Not Performed Or Is Not Released, And The Bullet That They Claim To Have In Evidence Is Not Produced To The Public, Then We Know That The Official Story Concerning Charlie Kirk's Assassination Is A Lie! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia Joins Alex Jones To Break Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation!

Alex Jones

522,428 views • 11 months ago

🚨Baron Coleman breaks down why Fort Huachuca is relevant in the Charlie Kirk investigation: What Mitch Snow said he saw, and why TPUSA’s position on it has holes you could drive a truck through. If you’re just catching up on the Charlie Kirk investigation — start here. Essential viewing.

🚨Baron Coleman breaks down why Fort Huachuca is relevant in the Charlie Kirk investigation: What Mitch Snow said he saw, and why TPUSA’s position on it has holes you could drive a truck through. If you’re just catching up on the Charlie Kirk investigation — start here. Essential viewing.

Grace Ashford

25,702 views • 1 month ago

Jack Posobiec invokes Scripture to deliver a powerful comparison between how Charlie Kirk died...and how Moses died. “We will never, ever let the left, the media or the Democrats forget the name of Charlie Kirk!” Then came a moment that ignited the crowd: “The Bible tells us that on his last day, Moses climbed to the top of the mountain, and he looked across the River Jordan and he saw the Promised Land.” “He led the people there, but he did not cross himself, for he was taken, and he died on that mountain.” “And he was brought to God’s kingdom.” “On his last day, Charlie Kirk was on the top of a mountain. And Charlie Kirk led us there. And Charlie Kirk has brought us to the Promised Land.”

Jack Posobiec invokes Scripture to deliver a powerful comparison between how Charlie Kirk died...and how Moses died. “We will never, ever let the left, the media or the Democrats forget the name of Charlie Kirk!” Then came a moment that ignited the crowd: “The Bible tells us that on his last day, Moses climbed to the top of the mountain, and he looked across the River Jordan and he saw the Promised Land.” “He led the people there, but he did not cross himself, for he was taken, and he died on that mountain.” “And he was brought to God’s kingdom.” “On his last day, Charlie Kirk was on the top of a mountain. And Charlie Kirk led us there. And Charlie Kirk has brought us to the Promised Land.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

102,749 views • 11 months ago

‼️👀No Autopsy: Audio claiming that there was no autopsy done on Charlie Kirk. Stating that the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Utah Law says: “In Utah, when a person is murdered (a death by violence), the law mandates that an autopsy must be done if the medical examiner deems it necessary or the prosecutor requests it. To refuse or omit one in a homicide case is illegal under Utah Code § 26-4-6. If true, there is a massive coverup going on. Here is the problem. The case against the shooter is already lost. There is no credible evidence to substantiate a conviction. If No Autopsy Is Done Procedural Violation: Failing to perform an autopsy in such a case could itself be a violation of law, potentially subjecting officials to administrative or even legal challenges. Prosecution Problems: Without an autopsy, the cause and manner of death are not medically certified. Evidence like bullet trajectory, wound analysis, toxicology, and time of death may be missing. This weakens or even cripples the ability to prove homicide beyond a reasonable doubt. In Utah, not doing an autopsy in a murder case is both legally improper and practically devastating to prosecution. If one wasn’t done in the Charlie Kirk assassination, it’s an enormous red flag H/t: HustleBitch

‼️👀No Autopsy: Audio claiming that there was no autopsy done on Charlie Kirk. Stating that the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Utah Law says: “In Utah, when a person is murdered (a death by violence), the law mandates that an autopsy must be done if the medical examiner deems it necessary or the prosecutor requests it. To refuse or omit one in a homicide case is illegal under Utah Code § 26-4-6. If true, there is a massive coverup going on. Here is the problem. The case against the shooter is already lost. There is no credible evidence to substantiate a conviction. If No Autopsy Is Done Procedural Violation: Failing to perform an autopsy in such a case could itself be a violation of law, potentially subjecting officials to administrative or even legal challenges. Prosecution Problems: Without an autopsy, the cause and manner of death are not medically certified. Evidence like bullet trajectory, wound analysis, toxicology, and time of death may be missing. This weakens or even cripples the ability to prove homicide beyond a reasonable doubt. In Utah, not doing an autopsy in a murder case is both legally improper and practically devastating to prosecution. If one wasn’t done in the Charlie Kirk assassination, it’s an enormous red flag H/t: HustleBitch

Joshua Reid | Redpills.tv

182,704 views • 11 months ago

There is no better investigator on the Charlie Kirk case from a legal standpoint than Baron Coleman. Here he puts us in the shoes of Tyler Robinson, and it’s on the money. NOT GUILTY!

There is no better investigator on the Charlie Kirk case from a legal standpoint than Baron Coleman. Here he puts us in the shoes of Tyler Robinson, and it’s on the money. NOT GUILTY!

Honest Ash

123,001 views • 1 month ago

🚨BIZARRE: The Autopsy Lie —First No Autopsy, Now a “Fake” Autopsy Report? 🧐Two Conflicting Stories About Charlie Kirk’s Death That Both REEK of a COVER-UP! This is insane. First we were told there was NO AUTOPSY —that Erica Kirk simply signed the death certificate and Charlie’s body was rushed out. Now new reports claim an autopsy WAS performed and even list shocking details of a 30-06 rifle wound. Two completely opposite stories. Two completely opposite timelines. And the FBI + media? Dead silent. 📝 If there really was no autopsy, that’s illegal under Utah law for a violent homicide. 📝 If there was an autopsy, the “official” report doesn’t match the surgeon’s statement about where the bullet traveled or the lack of an exit wound. None of it adds up. Why is the high-quality footage from that night hidden? Why won’t they release the full autopsy or the ballistics report? These are the only two things we need to solve the case — and they’re the only two things we’re NOT getting. Watch this video by Nathan Cornacchia and Alex Jones and see the evidence yourself. The inconsistencies are insane. This is either the sloppiest investigation ever or a full-on cover-up. I'll drop the FULL VIDEO in the COMMENTS Below, I highly suggest you all go watch it as there is a lot more i had to cut out for time. Also make sure to FOLLOW him on X and Youtube and go give his video a LIKE. 👀 Watch. Share. Save. ⚠️ Don’t let this story disappear.

🚨BIZARRE: The Autopsy Lie —First No Autopsy, Now a “Fake” Autopsy Report? 🧐Two Conflicting Stories About Charlie Kirk’s Death That Both REEK of a COVER-UP! This is insane. First we were told there was NO AUTOPSY —that Erica Kirk simply signed the death certificate and Charlie’s body was rushed out. Now new reports claim an autopsy WAS performed and even list shocking details of a 30-06 rifle wound. Two completely opposite stories. Two completely opposite timelines. And the FBI + media? Dead silent. 📝 If there really was no autopsy, that’s illegal under Utah law for a violent homicide. 📝 If there was an autopsy, the “official” report doesn’t match the surgeon’s statement about where the bullet traveled or the lack of an exit wound. None of it adds up. Why is the high-quality footage from that night hidden? Why won’t they release the full autopsy or the ballistics report? These are the only two things we need to solve the case — and they’re the only two things we’re NOT getting. Watch this video by Nathan Cornacchia and Alex Jones and see the evidence yourself. The inconsistencies are insane. This is either the sloppiest investigation ever or a full-on cover-up. I'll drop the FULL VIDEO in the COMMENTS Below, I highly suggest you all go watch it as there is a lot more i had to cut out for time. Also make sure to FOLLOW him on X and Youtube and go give his video a LIKE. 👀 Watch. Share. Save. ⚠️ Don’t let this story disappear.

Project Constitution

23,783 views • 10 months ago

BANNON: In Dec at AMFest, on that stage for the first time, President Trump told that audience that because of what Charlie Kirk brought and the intensity he carried, he ran for office again. He knew the 2020 election was stolen, and if we let that go, we were not going to have a republic. That is the power of what Charlie Kirk built. Charlie Kirk was a warrior to the end.

BANNON: In Dec at AMFest, on that stage for the first time, President Trump told that audience that because of what Charlie Kirk brought and the intensity he carried, he ran for office again. He knew the 2020 election was stolen, and if we let that go, we were not going to have a republic. That is the power of what Charlie Kirk built. Charlie Kirk was a warrior to the end.

Bannon’s WarRoom

46,496 views • 11 months ago

Objective Analysis of the Charlie Kirk .30-06 Ballistics Joseph Scott Morgan, a highly experienced Medicolegal Death Investigator, joins Julian Dorey for a full examination of the Charlie Kirk ballistics. He addresses the absence of an exit wound, the physics behind the shirt movement, and has interesting things to say about the "exploding mic". Go watch the full video:

Objective Analysis of the Charlie Kirk .30-06 Ballistics Joseph Scott Morgan, a highly experienced Medicolegal Death Investigator, joins Julian Dorey for a full examination of the Charlie Kirk ballistics. He addresses the absence of an exit wound, the physics behind the shirt movement, and has interesting things to say about the "exploding mic". Go watch the full video:

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

19,942 views • 26 days ago