Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨JSTLK CALLS THE COPS ON DAN OVER STREAM OVERLAY?⁉️ JSTLK has declared it is now a CRIMINAL OFFENSE to use a stream overlay that mocks his embarrassing personal life and abusive misconduct he is also now displaying a pattern of menacing Dan and MrMouton with their personal information, attaching...

29,934 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

When it comes to Shaykh Ibn Baz, the Madkhalis do not dare criticize him or describe him as a Takfiri because they know very well that such accusations would discredit them in front of the people, and they would lose their followers. They cling to his name not out of love for his methodology but to rely on his scholarly authority and his prestige among the Muslims. If he did not have this status or did not hold significant weight in the scholarly arena, they would have declared him an innovator long ago. It is strange and even laughable that their scholars cling to this noble Shaykh and falsely claim that he adheres to their methodology in an attempt to use his name to justify their falsehood. This is despite the fact that his positions and statements completely contradict their methodology. To prove that the Shaykh does not have the same methodology as the Madkhaliah, let's review his Nur Ala Al-Darb series where it is well-known and widely recognized that the Shaykh does not require the fulfillment of conditions and removal of impediments or the establishment of proof when declaring takfir on those who fall into apparent acts of kufr. Rather, he declares them disbelievers outright and individually. This is evident from his ruling on a village in Egypt, where he declared takfir on the inhabitants who committed the kufri practices described by the questioner in the following clip. The translation of the Q&A can be found in the tweet below

أبو ميمون الأثري

24,999 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten