Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Juno News interviewed Barry Neufeld, a former B.C. school trustee ordered to pay $750K for speaking out against gender ideology. He continues to oppose youth gender transitions, calling them "child abuse" and "a crazy idea that’s ruining a lot of lives."

16,175 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BC school trustee resigns after shocking ‘woke’ Human Rights Tribunal ruling: Drea Humphrey Former Chilliwack trustee and MLA Laurie Throness says the $750,000 decision against Barry Neufeld for “transpeople denialism” leaves him and other elected officials at risk of serious consequences for speaking out about gender ideology and SOGI 123 in schools. In the wake of British Columbia’s concerning Human Rights Tribunal decision ordering former Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld to pay $750,000 to the Chilliwack Teachers’ Association over his refusal to bow to gender ideology in schools, another prominent voice in the same community has stepped down. Laurie Throness, a former B.C. MLA, who had been serving as a trustee on the Chilliwack Board of Education, has resigned from his position, citing serious concerns about the impact the ruling could have on public discourse and the freedom to serve constituents. He believes the decision makes it dangerous for elected officials to address parental rights concerns about gender ideology in schools, in particular those tied to the province’s controversial Sexual Orientation Gender Identity (SOGI 123) program. During our interview, Throness argued that the ruling risks discouraging trustees and other public figures from raising concerns about sensitive topics for fear of facing similar legal consequences — consequences that he, as a homeowner and provider, can’t risk. In protest, Throness’ resignation also serves as a pathway for him to have more freedom to bring to light concerns he has about SOGI 123.

Rebel News

12,077 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Human rights lawyer says Neufeld decision signals troubling expansion of hate speech standards Human rights lawyer, Hatim Kheir, argues the B.C. tribunal’s finding that distinguishing biological sex from gender identity constitutes hate speech reflects a broader shift in how human rights law defines harm and limits debate. Constitutional and human rights lawyer, Hatim Kheir, says the recent ruling against former Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld highlights the expansive powers of human rights tribunals. Human rights commissions are like quasi-judicial bodies that do not operate under the same procedural safeguards as traditional courts. The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal ordered Neufeld to pay $750,000 after concluding that his public comments distinguishing biological sex from gender identity amounted to hate speech and created a “poisoned” environment. Kheir acknowledged that the tribunal cited Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence establishing a high threshold for hatred, requiring extreme detestation or vilification. However, he said the tribunal’s application of that standard represents a notable development in what qualifies as hate speech. According to the ruling, separating gender identity from biological sex constitutes an “existential denial” of transgender people. The tribunal found that asserting the two are not equivalent effectively erases transgender individuals and contributes to the promotion of hatred, rendering Neufeld’s remarks discriminatory under human rights law. This reasoning narrows the space for public debate on gender identity policy and signals a broader interpretation of hate speech within human rights proceedings, with potential implications for freedom of expression in Canada.

Rebel News

11,148 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад