Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Juno Thighjob animation.. enjoy this view, ill post another angle later. juno by: dzooworks🔞 used voice from: ⭐Gemini Starsign⭐🔞🎙 sounds from: OpenNSFW #juno #thighs #thighjob #feet #soles #nsfw

SexicalySexical's profile picture

Sexical

16,260 subscribers

201,416 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#juno#thighs#thighjob#feet#soles#nsfw
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 5

Фото профиля Magicman
Magicman1 год назад

@dzooworks @geministarsign1 @OpenNSFWSP I will

Фото профиля CASETiFY
CASETiFY1 год назад

Shop While Stocks Last Shop #EvangelionxCASETiFY for tech accessories as solid as #Evangelion’s armor. Choose your favorite EVA units now. #CASETiFY

Фото профиля MidasPrince
MidasPrince1 год назад

@dzooworks @geministarsign1 @OpenNSFWSP Lord I wish that was me, but that foot view too <3

Фото профиля Kiera
Kiera1 год назад

@dzooworks @geministarsign1 @OpenNSFWSP Perfect feet view

Фото профиля Pyu~Pyu♡
Pyu~Pyu♡1 год назад

@dzooworks @geministarsign1 @OpenNSFWSP Pyu♡

Похожие видео

#Skyrim #nsfw #スカイリムSE Full video on R34Video Female VA: ⭐Gemini Starsign⭐🔞🎙 (Voice Pack) SFX Pack: OpenNSFW
1:02

Sensitive content

#Skyrim #nsfw #スカイリムSE Full video on R34Video Female VA: ⭐Gemini Starsign⭐🔞🎙 (Voice Pack) SFX Pack: OpenNSFW

YoRHa

14,459 просмотров • 1 год назад

🎙: Mimi Hung 💚🌷🔞NSFW VA and Sound Designer as Juno, TinyCalico (ARCHIVE) as Calico and The Succubus 💻: Ssubby 🔞 I tried to find my original post of this, but I guess it got lost in my accounts huge purge. So I'm reposting it!!!
6:46

Sensitive content

🎙: Mimi Hung 💚🌷🔞NSFW VA and Sound Designer as Juno, TinyCalico (ARCHIVE) as Calico and The Succubus 💻: Ssubby 🔞 I tried to find my original post of this, but I guess it got lost in my accounts huge purge. So I'm reposting it!!!

TinyCalico (ARCHIVE)

18,677 просмотров • 1 год назад

What the OP said: "⭐ My friends and I listened to the live stream content frame-by-frame and made a different discovery. Analyzing the content, it seems that after Lei Zi ended the stream, he and Yue Yue went to a relatively hidden place where they didn't think anyone would be (a place quite nearby). However, there were staff members there. My guess is that the staff members are aware of their relationship because the staff's voice appears again later. This suggests that even after being discovered by the staff, they didn't leave or change locations. The two of them are very open/unfazed in front of the staff in private. ⭐ From their very natural dialogue about "giving a hug," it’s evident they have likely been together [locked/dating] for a long time. The dates 24 and 25 gave it a real sense of certainty. ⭐ Based on the volume and type of the two "mua" (kiss) sounds, the first 💋 is more casual/everyday, while the second one is deeper." Translation of the video: "New discovery. Dialogue content after Lei Zi failed to mute the microphone. Regarding yesterday's live stream, I heard many different versions. Next, I will share what my friends and I heard. Staff: You two, come over here. (They were talking before this, but only half a sound can be heard here.) 🌙: I thought nobody was here, haha. (Both of them laughed) Staff: You two are in the live stream room, pay attention. ⚡:Give me a hug, mua! (There was a kiss here; not sure if the hug actually happened.) ⚡: You've been watching my live stream, right? Staff: You two, come over here. 🌙: Let's hug again. (Most people think the first line was Yue Yue saying "I've seen it," but we all agree it was the Staff speaking because the voice and tone are identical to the Staff's previous lines.) Mua! (There was another "pecking" style kiss here; if you listen closely, you can hear the breathing/exhalation.)
0:26

What the OP said: "⭐ My friends and I listened to the live stream content frame-by-frame and made a different discovery. Analyzing the content, it seems that after Lei Zi ended the stream, he and Yue Yue went to a relatively hidden place where they didn't think anyone would be (a place quite nearby). However, there were staff members there. My guess is that the staff members are aware of their relationship because the staff's voice appears again later. This suggests that even after being discovered by the staff, they didn't leave or change locations. The two of them are very open/unfazed in front of the staff in private. ⭐ From their very natural dialogue about "giving a hug," it’s evident they have likely been together [locked/dating] for a long time. The dates 24 and 25 gave it a real sense of certainty. ⭐ Based on the volume and type of the two "mua" (kiss) sounds, the first 💋 is more casual/everyday, while the second one is deeper." Translation of the video: "New discovery. Dialogue content after Lei Zi failed to mute the microphone. Regarding yesterday's live stream, I heard many different versions. Next, I will share what my friends and I heard. Staff: You two, come over here. (They were talking before this, but only half a sound can be heard here.) 🌙: I thought nobody was here, haha. (Both of them laughed) Staff: You two are in the live stream room, pay attention. ⚡:Give me a hug, mua! (There was a kiss here; not sure if the hug actually happened.) ⚡: You've been watching my live stream, right? Staff: You two, come over here. 🌙: Let's hug again. (Most people think the first line was Yue Yue saying "I've seen it," but we all agree it was the Staff speaking because the voice and tone are identical to the Staff's previous lines.) Mua! (There was another "pecking" style kiss here; if you listen closely, you can hear the breathing/exhalation.)

GnuTan

27,687 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Counter Strike hacking is one of my guilty pleasures. This is a video of an AI tool built into one of the most popular HvH cheats on the market. HvH (Hack vs. Hack) is a game mode where everyone in the lobby is cheating. “If everyone is cheating, then how is it fun?” The game becomes something entirely different in this mode. Instead of focusing on physical reaction time, aim, and movement skills, players must concentrate on the quality of their cheats compared to those used by their opponents. The game essentially turns into a sandbox for software optimization, where cheaters compete against each other to see who has the better-written code and configuration. Players must use every tool available to keep up with everyone else in the scene. My favorite cheat, Anti-Aim (AA), is used to help protect players from getting shot by cleverly exploiting the game mechanics to fake the angle of their hitbox. It works by choking abs yaw packets to exploit a coding error in the game, causing your model’s position to appear bugged to other players. The server processes each command sent by the client in the order it receives them, then it updates animations for each command. After this, the server takes the latest information it has and sends it to other players. If you choke packets, you will essentially send all of your choked commands at the same time. Again, the server will look at what’s latest and send that to other players. Now, you should see the issue clearly: the client is missing loads of information and will start updating animations with incorrect information. This will lead to numerous inaccuracies in their animation state, most importantly their abs yaw (m_flGoalFeetyaw), which indicates where their feet are pointing. The creation of Anti-aim techniques significantly disrupted gameplay, giving users an extra unfair advantage. This compelled players to devise a solution— Resolvers are used to counter anti-aim by determining where the player’s hitbox actually is. One commonly used type of resolver is the old angle resolver. Old angle resolvers work by storing the previous angles from when the player wasn’t faking their position and later shooting at them. —forcing both sides—Anti-Aim developers and Resolver developers—to continuously improve their code and technique. HvH is an ever-evolving arms race where staying ahead is as much about innovation as it is about execution. Code rules all, and hitting p is the only goal. That’s what keeps me coming back. (Video: @peter2b2t, YouTube)
0:28

Counter Strike hacking is one of my guilty pleasures. This is a video of an AI tool built into one of the most popular HvH cheats on the market. HvH (Hack vs. Hack) is a game mode where everyone in the lobby is cheating. “If everyone is cheating, then how is it fun?” The game becomes something entirely different in this mode. Instead of focusing on physical reaction time, aim, and movement skills, players must concentrate on the quality of their cheats compared to those used by their opponents. The game essentially turns into a sandbox for software optimization, where cheaters compete against each other to see who has the better-written code and configuration. Players must use every tool available to keep up with everyone else in the scene. My favorite cheat, Anti-Aim (AA), is used to help protect players from getting shot by cleverly exploiting the game mechanics to fake the angle of their hitbox. It works by choking abs yaw packets to exploit a coding error in the game, causing your model’s position to appear bugged to other players. The server processes each command sent by the client in the order it receives them, then it updates animations for each command. After this, the server takes the latest information it has and sends it to other players. If you choke packets, you will essentially send all of your choked commands at the same time. Again, the server will look at what’s latest and send that to other players. Now, you should see the issue clearly: the client is missing loads of information and will start updating animations with incorrect information. This will lead to numerous inaccuracies in their animation state, most importantly their abs yaw (m_flGoalFeetyaw), which indicates where their feet are pointing. The creation of Anti-aim techniques significantly disrupted gameplay, giving users an extra unfair advantage. This compelled players to devise a solution— Resolvers are used to counter anti-aim by determining where the player’s hitbox actually is. One commonly used type of resolver is the old angle resolver. Old angle resolvers work by storing the previous angles from when the player wasn’t faking their position and later shooting at them. —forcing both sides—Anti-Aim developers and Resolver developers—to continuously improve their code and technique. HvH is an ever-evolving arms race where staying ahead is as much about innovation as it is about execution. Code rules all, and hitting p is the only goal. That’s what keeps me coming back. (Video: @peter2b2t, YouTube)

nv🐎

285,453 просмотров • 2 лет назад

LINDSEY GRAHAM BELIEVES TRUMP LOST IN 2020. When it came time to Fight for Trump, GRAHAM BETRAYAED SOUTH CAROLINA AND DECLARED JOE BIDEN LEGITIMATELY ELECTED. This is why GRAHAM has REFUSED to call for SENATE INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE 2020 ELECTION. THE SENATE SHOULD START BY IMMEDIATELY INTERROGATING MADURO. I explain: THE 2020 ELECTION WAS RIGGED AND STOLEN. I know because I was down in Georgia fighting for President Trump post-election and witnessed THE STEAL with my own eyes. The 2020 Theft was largely executed through the MACHINES. Many of the machines used in 2020 were designed in Venezuela and helped elect Hugo Chavez in 2004. Election machines count votes through complicated algorithms shielded from public view under the rubric of trade secrets. Some were originally devised for managing voting where proportionate shares of a voter matter. For example, in a condominium election where the apportionment of shares of a unit owner differs from one to another and is a function of the unit’s square footage, location, age etc. Under such a system, votes are fractionated – i.e. divided into parts – and then added together again. This may be helpful for condominium elections, but in the United States where we live by ONE PERSON ONE VOTE – there is no cause to DIVIDE THE ONE VOTE TO COUNT IT. In simple mathematic terms, there is no basis to fractionate a whole number (one vote) only to later add it back to a whole number. Machines that are programmed in such a manner should never be used. There is a man who can explain this much better than I can. He is sitting in U.S. Custody and could spin the beans on 2020. His name is Nicolas Maduro. As U.S. Senator, I will demand the Senate Investigate the 2020 Election. I will demand that the SENATE COMMITTEE INTERROGATE MADURO. Lady Graham never has wanted to investigate 2020, no will he ever. I’m primarying DeepState Graham on June 9, 2026. I’ll get to the bottom of 2020. Support our campaign to oust Graham at
0:22

LINDSEY GRAHAM BELIEVES TRUMP LOST IN 2020. When it came time to Fight for Trump, GRAHAM BETRAYAED SOUTH CAROLINA AND DECLARED JOE BIDEN LEGITIMATELY ELECTED. This is why GRAHAM has REFUSED to call for SENATE INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE 2020 ELECTION. THE SENATE SHOULD START BY IMMEDIATELY INTERROGATING MADURO. I explain: THE 2020 ELECTION WAS RIGGED AND STOLEN. I know because I was down in Georgia fighting for President Trump post-election and witnessed THE STEAL with my own eyes. The 2020 Theft was largely executed through the MACHINES. Many of the machines used in 2020 were designed in Venezuela and helped elect Hugo Chavez in 2004. Election machines count votes through complicated algorithms shielded from public view under the rubric of trade secrets. Some were originally devised for managing voting where proportionate shares of a voter matter. For example, in a condominium election where the apportionment of shares of a unit owner differs from one to another and is a function of the unit’s square footage, location, age etc. Under such a system, votes are fractionated – i.e. divided into parts – and then added together again. This may be helpful for condominium elections, but in the United States where we live by ONE PERSON ONE VOTE – there is no cause to DIVIDE THE ONE VOTE TO COUNT IT. In simple mathematic terms, there is no basis to fractionate a whole number (one vote) only to later add it back to a whole number. Machines that are programmed in such a manner should never be used. There is a man who can explain this much better than I can. He is sitting in U.S. Custody and could spin the beans on 2020. His name is Nicolas Maduro. As U.S. Senator, I will demand the Senate Investigate the 2020 Election. I will demand that the SENATE COMMITTEE INTERROGATE MADURO. Lady Graham never has wanted to investigate 2020, no will he ever. I’m primarying DeepState Graham on June 9, 2026. I’ll get to the bottom of 2020. Support our campaign to oust Graham at

Paul Dans

61,524 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is why we published the Montreal gunman's manifesto The decision wasn't to “promote the murder's message,” explained Ezra Levant 🍁🚛, “but because the regime is lying about it.” Montreal police say three people are dead, including an officer, a civilian, and the gunman, following a shooting in the Côte-des-Neiges neighbourhood. Another officer also sustained serious injuries in the attack. The gunman, Seth Scott Hatfield, was a philosophy student from the University of Lethbridge. Hatfield opened fire outside the headquarters of Aylo, the parent company for adult website Pornhub, before engaging with police. Authorities later revealed that Hatfield left behind a 104-page manifesto written weeks before the attack. The document, steeped in 'incel' and radical left-wing ideology, was referred to but not published by mainstream outlets. But Rebel News also obtained the document and published it in full. On Tuesday night's episode of The Ezra Levant Show, the Rebel Commander explained why making the manifesto public was necessary. “The media, when they found out his motivations, lied about it,” Ezra said plainly. “That, my friends, is why Rebel News published the truth.” Reports initially mentioned the manifesto and even referred to certain passages. But the attacker's name was not mentioned, “and during that time his social media was scrubbed, so it could not be seen by the public,” something Ezra said bothers him because he wants to see what the murderer, in this case, had written. The media referred to Hatfield as being an “incel,” a term meaning a person who is involuntarily celibate. Ezra said he read this reference from many in the regime media, which caused him to wonder why “handpicked journalists” were being given the manifesto. It also raised suspicions about what the media might not be telling the public. “They want us to think that this terrorist is an incel, but they're not showing us the proof,” he said. But late Monday evening, Ezra said he too received a copy of Hatfield's 104-page manifesto — and then made the decision to publish it in full. The decision wasn't to “promote the murder's message,” he explained, “but because the regime is lying about it.” The attack wasn't purely about misogyny, like so many of the mainstream media's reports suggested. Following Rebel News' publication of the full-length manifesto, Juno News counted 860 references to Marxist terms like bourgeois, proletarian, communism and socialism along with Israel, Zionism and Jews. “Do you see what I mean? We were told he was an incel,” he said. “He was a communist. Why did all these leaks say he was an incel, implying he was right wing? Why wouldn't they talk about his endless repetition of Marxist language?” Ezra then went on to detail the numerous lengthy passages in Hatfield's manifesto espousing leftist ideology, including mentions of his positive view of communist authoritarians like Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong.
15:03

This is why we published the Montreal gunman's manifesto The decision wasn't to “promote the murder's message,” explained Ezra Levant 🍁🚛, “but because the regime is lying about it.” Montreal police say three people are dead, including an officer, a civilian, and the gunman, following a shooting in the Côte-des-Neiges neighbourhood. Another officer also sustained serious injuries in the attack. The gunman, Seth Scott Hatfield, was a philosophy student from the University of Lethbridge. Hatfield opened fire outside the headquarters of Aylo, the parent company for adult website Pornhub, before engaging with police. Authorities later revealed that Hatfield left behind a 104-page manifesto written weeks before the attack. The document, steeped in 'incel' and radical left-wing ideology, was referred to but not published by mainstream outlets. But Rebel News also obtained the document and published it in full. On Tuesday night's episode of The Ezra Levant Show, the Rebel Commander explained why making the manifesto public was necessary. “The media, when they found out his motivations, lied about it,” Ezra said plainly. “That, my friends, is why Rebel News published the truth.” Reports initially mentioned the manifesto and even referred to certain passages. But the attacker's name was not mentioned, “and during that time his social media was scrubbed, so it could not be seen by the public,” something Ezra said bothers him because he wants to see what the murderer, in this case, had written. The media referred to Hatfield as being an “incel,” a term meaning a person who is involuntarily celibate. Ezra said he read this reference from many in the regime media, which caused him to wonder why “handpicked journalists” were being given the manifesto. It also raised suspicions about what the media might not be telling the public. “They want us to think that this terrorist is an incel, but they're not showing us the proof,” he said. But late Monday evening, Ezra said he too received a copy of Hatfield's 104-page manifesto — and then made the decision to publish it in full. The decision wasn't to “promote the murder's message,” he explained, “but because the regime is lying about it.” The attack wasn't purely about misogyny, like so many of the mainstream media's reports suggested. Following Rebel News' publication of the full-length manifesto, Juno News counted 860 references to Marxist terms like bourgeois, proletarian, communism and socialism along with Israel, Zionism and Jews. “Do you see what I mean? We were told he was an incel,” he said. “He was a communist. Why did all these leaks say he was an incel, implying he was right wing? Why wouldn't they talk about his endless repetition of Marxist language?” Ezra then went on to detail the numerous lengthy passages in Hatfield's manifesto espousing leftist ideology, including mentions of his positive view of communist authoritarians like Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong.

Rebel News

18,464 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sleepy's new YT channel: Sleepy ran into Seokjin's giant sized IGIN post, got excited and the camera keeps zooming into that handsome face! He also apologizes to Seokjin 👨‍🦰Wow, my younger bro. Seokjinne! (Later he whipped out his fave vid he clipped and ) 🐹For me, as there was no one at the dorm. I went out to eat together with Sleepy hyung. summary: Sleepy said they got close during the jungle show. And Seokjin causally used to ask him 'Hyung, buy me a meal' and he used to say 'ofc let this hyung buy the meal for u!' At one point, Seokjin contacted him after reading an article about his financial hardship and sent him a message saying 🐹If things ever get really hard for you, I’d like to help out (financially) Sleepy talked about this on Radio Star later, which generated tons and tons of K media articles. He admitted honestly that part of him wanted ppl's attention and recognition by talking about Jin. After the articles came out massively, though, they grew a distant 👨‍🦰I know I was wrong and I truly want to say I’m sorry. He also added he went to a wedding and saw Seokjin sitting far away. But he felt so bad (*about making Jin feel uncomfortable) that he couldn’t bring himself to walk up to him so he just ended going home after the wedding (without getting to talk to him). *We know Seokjin never openly talks about the good things he does. He has always wanted to help people behind the scenes quietly.... Another thing I'd like to mention from a cultral point of view is that in K, younger hubaes often casually ask their sunbaes to buy them a meal as a way of breaking the ice, making the relationship feel more comfortable especially he know how ppl feel and act around a super star like him. Sometimes it’s also a gesture of treating them like an older senior figure and making them feel looked up to.. Seokjin is really down to earth and considerate🙏 #Jin #방탄소년단진
2:13

Sleepy's new YT channel: Sleepy ran into Seokjin's giant sized IGIN post, got excited and the camera keeps zooming into that handsome face! He also apologizes to Seokjin 👨‍🦰Wow, my younger bro. Seokjinne! (Later he whipped out his fave vid he clipped and ) 🐹For me, as there was no one at the dorm. I went out to eat together with Sleepy hyung. summary: Sleepy said they got close during the jungle show. And Seokjin causally used to ask him 'Hyung, buy me a meal' and he used to say 'ofc let this hyung buy the meal for u!' At one point, Seokjin contacted him after reading an article about his financial hardship and sent him a message saying 🐹If things ever get really hard for you, I’d like to help out (financially) Sleepy talked about this on Radio Star later, which generated tons and tons of K media articles. He admitted honestly that part of him wanted ppl's attention and recognition by talking about Jin. After the articles came out massively, though, they grew a distant 👨‍🦰I know I was wrong and I truly want to say I’m sorry. He also added he went to a wedding and saw Seokjin sitting far away. But he felt so bad (*about making Jin feel uncomfortable) that he couldn’t bring himself to walk up to him so he just ended going home after the wedding (without getting to talk to him). *We know Seokjin never openly talks about the good things he does. He has always wanted to help people behind the scenes quietly.... Another thing I'd like to mention from a cultral point of view is that in K, younger hubaes often casually ask their sunbaes to buy them a meal as a way of breaking the ice, making the relationship feel more comfortable especially he know how ppl feel and act around a super star like him. Sometimes it’s also a gesture of treating them like an older senior figure and making them feel looked up to.. Seokjin is really down to earth and considerate🙏 #Jin #방탄소년단진

Jiniya지니야_RunSeokjin

300,783 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ZULU WEDDING VOWS💍💛 For cultural context, the elder man shouting (taken from Khuzani Mpungose's wedding) is called iPhoyisa leNkosi, a messenger sent by the local iNkosi. Beyond ensuring that no traditional laws or protocols are violated, iPhoyisa’s MAIN responsibility is to witness & formally administer the vows, publicly confirming that a traditional wedding has indeed taken place. He personally administers the vows & wait for makoti’s response without groom's interference. What the elder is shouting, in essence, is a question to makoti, asking whether she is present out of love & her own free will, whether no one has forced her into the marriage. This moment exists to publicly confirm CONSENT. It is therefore sacred & the optics are absolutely critical. KEY PROTOCOLS & OPTICS 1️⃣ Positioning of iPhoyisa: He must stand away from the crowd, (qekelele), usually in the middle of the field, so that he is clearly identifiable to makoti & visible to everyone present. His voice projection matters because everyone at the traditional wedding is regarded as a witness. They must hear what is being asked & clearly see makoti’s reaction. 2️⃣ The three questions: iPhoyisa must ask the question three times, pausing after each questio & then wait for makoti’s response. 3️⃣ Makoti’s response – song & dance: Makoti does not respond verbally. She responds through song, one she has chosen & usually rehearsed with her entourage. She rises from her side of the gathering & begins ukuchanguza (also called ukugcakela in some areas), her main solo dance. She leads the song & dance alone, taking her time. Importantly, she must not simply walk toward iPhoyisa, she must dance slowly across the field, using the space to display her: • confidence • grace • beauty • style (her own “swag”) The symbolism of the mat: As she dances, makoti carries isicephu or icansi (a handmade Zulu mat). This mat represents her symbolic YES. Remember the question? But it is not a YES until the mat is handed over to iPhoyisa. • iPhoyisa is from the groom’s side • Makoti must therefore confirm her consent via iPhoyisa, publicly & visibly. She dances to all corners of the field, etelebhela (a modelling-style dance), teasing the moment & stretching the anticipation. This is where tension builds💃🏿 She may approach iPhoyisa… stop… dance in front of him… yet still not hand over the mat. At this stage, the crowd becomes loud, lively & edgy: ululation, laughter, whistles, cheers, the beautiful sounds of a joyful community holding its breath. The psychological dance: Makoti may kneel, then suddenly rise & dance far away, back toward her people. This playful resistance symbolizes: • Her attachment to her maidenhood • The seriousness of the decision • Her agency & power in the moment! It is a beautiful way of saying: “I am choosing this but I am not rushed.” Ahh💛 Throughout all this, iPhoyisa must stand still, observing, waiting. Eventually makoti kneels again, this time for real, gently places the mat at iPhoyisa’s feet. 🔥 Ahaa! moment. Celebration & confirmation: The entire field erupts. At this moment: • the groom must break into ukugiya (male dance) • local maidens & women perform ukugqiza/ ukugqashiya (closely related celebratory dances) It is now OFFICIAL! Makoti has publicly declared before the entire community that she is marrying willingly. The groom’s side becomes more energized, having received confirmation in full view of everyone. Makoti & the groom dance together across the field, back & forth, followed by another powerful ukugiya by the groom’s ibutho, celebrating their brother’s big win. There are other important segments that follow, such as umabo but the central pillar of the Zulu traditional wedding remains THE VOWS by iPhoyisa leNkosi. DICLAIMER: This may not be uniform everywhere. It may vary from area to area depending on locality, clan traditions & regional customs. #ZuluWeddings 💍 #ZuluBrides #Culture
2:45

ZULU WEDDING VOWS💍💛 For cultural context, the elder man shouting (taken from Khuzani Mpungose's wedding) is called iPhoyisa leNkosi, a messenger sent by the local iNkosi. Beyond ensuring that no traditional laws or protocols are violated, iPhoyisa’s MAIN responsibility is to witness & formally administer the vows, publicly confirming that a traditional wedding has indeed taken place. He personally administers the vows & wait for makoti’s response without groom's interference. What the elder is shouting, in essence, is a question to makoti, asking whether she is present out of love & her own free will, whether no one has forced her into the marriage. This moment exists to publicly confirm CONSENT. It is therefore sacred & the optics are absolutely critical. KEY PROTOCOLS & OPTICS 1️⃣ Positioning of iPhoyisa: He must stand away from the crowd, (qekelele), usually in the middle of the field, so that he is clearly identifiable to makoti & visible to everyone present. His voice projection matters because everyone at the traditional wedding is regarded as a witness. They must hear what is being asked & clearly see makoti’s reaction. 2️⃣ The three questions: iPhoyisa must ask the question three times, pausing after each questio & then wait for makoti’s response. 3️⃣ Makoti’s response – song & dance: Makoti does not respond verbally. She responds through song, one she has chosen & usually rehearsed with her entourage. She rises from her side of the gathering & begins ukuchanguza (also called ukugcakela in some areas), her main solo dance. She leads the song & dance alone, taking her time. Importantly, she must not simply walk toward iPhoyisa, she must dance slowly across the field, using the space to display her: • confidence • grace • beauty • style (her own “swag”) The symbolism of the mat: As she dances, makoti carries isicephu or icansi (a handmade Zulu mat). This mat represents her symbolic YES. Remember the question? But it is not a YES until the mat is handed over to iPhoyisa. • iPhoyisa is from the groom’s side • Makoti must therefore confirm her consent via iPhoyisa, publicly & visibly. She dances to all corners of the field, etelebhela (a modelling-style dance), teasing the moment & stretching the anticipation. This is where tension builds💃🏿 She may approach iPhoyisa… stop… dance in front of him… yet still not hand over the mat. At this stage, the crowd becomes loud, lively & edgy: ululation, laughter, whistles, cheers, the beautiful sounds of a joyful community holding its breath. The psychological dance: Makoti may kneel, then suddenly rise & dance far away, back toward her people. This playful resistance symbolizes: • Her attachment to her maidenhood • The seriousness of the decision • Her agency & power in the moment! It is a beautiful way of saying: “I am choosing this but I am not rushed.” Ahh💛 Throughout all this, iPhoyisa must stand still, observing, waiting. Eventually makoti kneels again, this time for real, gently places the mat at iPhoyisa’s feet. 🔥 Ahaa! moment. Celebration & confirmation: The entire field erupts. At this moment: • the groom must break into ukugiya (male dance) • local maidens & women perform ukugqiza/ ukugqashiya (closely related celebratory dances) It is now OFFICIAL! Makoti has publicly declared before the entire community that she is marrying willingly. The groom’s side becomes more energized, having received confirmation in full view of everyone. Makoti & the groom dance together across the field, back & forth, followed by another powerful ukugiya by the groom’s ibutho, celebrating their brother’s big win. There are other important segments that follow, such as umabo but the central pillar of the Zulu traditional wedding remains THE VOWS by iPhoyisa leNkosi. DICLAIMER: This may not be uniform everywhere. It may vary from area to area depending on locality, clan traditions & regional customs. #ZuluWeddings 💍 #ZuluBrides #Culture

Zintoh Mhlanga

22,573 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Justice Has Yet to Be Served: Was Abdullah Al-Sakka, the UAE-Backed Rapid Support Militia Member Accused of Torturing Qisma Ali Omar to Death, Really Captured? On the evening of Thursday, July 30, and the morning of Friday, July 31, 2026, a video circulated showing several prisoners from the Rapid support mitltiia. They were reportedly captured by fighters from Sudan’s Joint Force during recent battles in North Kordofan. Sudanese social media accounts, along with several widely followed news platforms, quickly claimed that one of the men in the video was Abdullah Al-Sakka, whose name has been associated with one of the most painful and horrifying videos to emerge from Sudan’s war. In that video, a young woman named Qisma Ali Omar appeared suspended by her arms from a tree. Her legs were tied as her body swung while she endured severe pain and humiliation. Some commentators viewed reports of Al-Sakka’s capture as the beginning of justice for Qisma. Sudanese Echo therefore examined the available material. The investigation raised serious questions about the identity of the prisoner and suggested that claims announcing Abdullah Al-Sakka’s capture may have been premature. Qisma Ali Omar and the Crime That Shocked Sudan By September 11, 2025, the video showing the torture of Qisma Ali Omar had spread widely across Sudanese social media, provoking an enormous wave of anger. The footage showed a young woman tied to a tree with a rope. Her hands and legs were restrained in a scene that reflected deliberate cruelty and systematic humiliation. The victim was soon identified as Qisma Ali Omar, a young woman from Nyala who belonged to the Zaghawa community. During September 2025, her name became a symbol of grief and public outrage, as well as a powerful reminder of the crimes committed against civilians during Sudan’s war. According to accounts that circulated with the video, members of the Rapid support mitltiia accused Qisma of cooperating with their opponents after she sent a voice message in the Zaghawa language to one of her relatives. Reports indicate that she was tortured while suspended from the tree and later died. The man filming her could be heard questioning her and treating her with extreme cruelty, in footage that triggered outrage inside Sudan and beyond. During the same period, the Rapid support mitltiia acknowledged in a statement that the man visible in the video was wearing the uniform commonly used by its fighters. The militia denied that its members were involved and claimed that the footage had been fabricated. Open-source investigations conducted after the video circulated led researchers to an account bearing the name Abdullah Al-Sakka. Material posted on the account contained indications that its owner was directly connected to the Rapid support mitltiia. Images of the account owner were then compared with the man seen in the video of Qisma’s torture. These comparisons contributed to the widespread identification of Al-Sakka as the man accused of carrying out and filming the crime. The account had published 143 videos over several months. Some of the footage showed the man in Zalingei, Central Darfur, near facilities and locations used by the Rapid support mitltiia. Activists also circulated another video, reportedly filmed by a militia intelligence unit several days before Qisma’s torture. It appeared to show a young woman resembling Qisma being handed over to commanders from the Rapid support mitltiia. One person in the video can be heard saying: “This is the accused woman. She has now been handed over by Rapid Support intelligence.” The names of two men, Taha and Saeed, are also mentioned. The woman’s phone is shown, along with a reference to a personal photograph that was allegedly among the materials used to accuse her. Accounts differ regarding the allegation made against Qisma. Some reports linked it to a voice message, while the second video referred to a personal photograph. Neither account provides any justification for her unlawful detention, torture or humiliation. What happened to Qisma forms part of a wider pattern in which civilians are accused of supporting the Sudanese army, before those allegations are used to justify their arrest, abuse and public humiliation. Is the Prisoner in the Video Abdullah Al-Sakka? Sudanese Echo began its verification process by extracting the clearest available frames from the prisoners’ video. The images were enhanced and compared with several photographs of Abdullah Al-Sakka taken from his previous accounts. The investigation also used artificial intelligence tools to assist in comparing the visible facial characteristics of the two men. The preliminary results indicated that the likelihood of the prisoner being Abdullah Al-Sakka was low. Sudanese Echo treated this result with caution. Facial comparison tools can be affected by camera angles, lighting, video quality, image compression, changes in body weight, injuries and differences in facial expression. Image enhancement tools also have significant limitations when applied to low-quality footage. They cannot recover every original detail lost from the source material. Their results therefore cannot independently confirm or exclude a person’s identity. Even with these limitations, the technical result, visual examination and apparent differences between the men’s facial features all weakened the widely circulated claim regarding the prisoner’s identity. Sudanese Echo then contacted Sudanese military intelligence and requested official confirmation of the prisoner’s identity, including whether Abdullah Al-Sakka was among the group shown in the video. The publication had received no response by the time this report was prepared. Sudanese Echo subsequently reviewed the well-known account attributed to Abdullah Al-Sakka. No recent activity was found that could establish his current location or circumstances. The account’s most recent post was published in February 2026. The account’s inactivity does not establish that its owner was captured. It also provides no clear indication of whether he was killed, injured or had disappeared. During the investigation, Sudanese Echo found material published on July 9, 2026, showing a man believed to be Abdullah Al-Sakka with apparent injuries. The material can be viewed through the following link: The link leads to a post on a TikTok account with the username user7332654721704. The post was published approximately 22 days before the prisoners’ video appeared. This time difference provides an important point of reference when examining the visible differences between the two men, although it does not independently establish the prisoner’s identity. As the investigation continued, Sudanese Echo located another account that appeared to be associated with Abdullah Al-Sakka. The account had published new material only hours before this report was prepared. One of its recent posts can be accessed through the following link: The link leads to a video posted by a TikTok account with the username b276521. The continued activity on this account provides another indication that weakens the claim that Abdullah Al-Sakka is the prisoner shown in the video. At the same time, the account’s activity does not prove that Al-Sakka personally uploaded the recent material. The account may be managed by another person, the footage may be old and reposted, or the content may have been published on his behalf. Sudanese Echo therefore treated the account’s activity as a lead requiring further examination, rather than conclusive evidence of Al-Sakka’s location or current status. A further development emerged as the investigation expanded, this time concerning the prisoner’s identity directly. Sudanese Echo found posts published by accounts attributed to members or supporters of the Rapid support mitltiia. The posts called for the release of a man reportedly captured during fighting in North Kordofan. These accounts used the same prisoners’ video that had been published by the Joint Force and later circulated by other accounts claiming the prisoner was Abdullah Al-Sakka. When Sudanese Echo traced the name mentioned in the posts, the prisoner was identified as Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko. The publication also found that accounts supporting the Rapid support mitltiia had circulated the same video while demanding the release of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko. They used the exact footage that other accounts had cited as evidence that the prisoner was Abdullah Al-Sakka. One of the relevant posts can be viewed through the following link: A visual review of the available material indicates that the facial features of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko, as seen in the circulated posts, more closely resemble those of the prisoner than the available images of Abdullah Al-Sakka. This conclusion should still be treated carefully. Social media posts may contain inaccurate or incomplete information. Confirming the prisoner’s identity would require independent evidence, including official documents, clearer photographs or confirmation from a credible authority holding the individual. The association of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko’s name with the same video represents a significant development in the verification process. It provides a plausible explanation for the prisoner’s identity and is consistent with the earlier findings showing that the evidence connecting the man in the video to Abdullah Al-Sakka was weak. Taken together, the visual and technical comparisons, the absence of official confirmation, the July 9 footage, the recent activity on the second account and the appearance of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko’s name alongside the prisoners’ video indicate that the captive is most likely Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko. Justice for Qisma and Other Victims It is understandable that Sudanese people want to see everyone involved in the torture of Qisma and other victims brought before a court. Achieving that goal requires accurate information that protects the integrity of the evidence and assists investigators in identifying those genuinely responsible for the crime. Misidentifying a prisoner could give the real suspect an opportunity to disappear. It could also damage the credibility of the documentation and reduce a crime requiring a serious criminal investigation to a rapidly circulating emotional claim. Qisma Ali Omar’s killing forms part of a wider pattern of abuses committed by the Rapid support mitltiia against civilians. The militia’s ability to continue committing such crimes has been enabled by the military, financial and logistical support it receives from the United Arab Emirates. One fact remains established: Qisma appeared in an exceptionally brutal video, restrained and suspended from a tree. What happened to her demands an independent criminal investigation capable of identifying everyone involved in her detention, torture and filming. Justice requires the full truth to be established, the real perpetrators to be arrested, the evidence to be preserved, witnesses to be heard and those responsible to be brought before a fair court. Until that happens, the most accurate conclusion remains: Justice has yet to be served. #Sudan #RSFIsATerroristOrganisation #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism
4:10

Justice Has Yet to Be Served: Was Abdullah Al-Sakka, the UAE-Backed Rapid Support Militia Member Accused of Torturing Qisma Ali Omar to Death, Really Captured? On the evening of Thursday, July 30, and the morning of Friday, July 31, 2026, a video circulated showing several prisoners from the Rapid support mitltiia. They were reportedly captured by fighters from Sudan’s Joint Force during recent battles in North Kordofan. Sudanese social media accounts, along with several widely followed news platforms, quickly claimed that one of the men in the video was Abdullah Al-Sakka, whose name has been associated with one of the most painful and horrifying videos to emerge from Sudan’s war. In that video, a young woman named Qisma Ali Omar appeared suspended by her arms from a tree. Her legs were tied as her body swung while she endured severe pain and humiliation. Some commentators viewed reports of Al-Sakka’s capture as the beginning of justice for Qisma. Sudanese Echo therefore examined the available material. The investigation raised serious questions about the identity of the prisoner and suggested that claims announcing Abdullah Al-Sakka’s capture may have been premature. Qisma Ali Omar and the Crime That Shocked Sudan By September 11, 2025, the video showing the torture of Qisma Ali Omar had spread widely across Sudanese social media, provoking an enormous wave of anger. The footage showed a young woman tied to a tree with a rope. Her hands and legs were restrained in a scene that reflected deliberate cruelty and systematic humiliation. The victim was soon identified as Qisma Ali Omar, a young woman from Nyala who belonged to the Zaghawa community. During September 2025, her name became a symbol of grief and public outrage, as well as a powerful reminder of the crimes committed against civilians during Sudan’s war. According to accounts that circulated with the video, members of the Rapid support mitltiia accused Qisma of cooperating with their opponents after she sent a voice message in the Zaghawa language to one of her relatives. Reports indicate that she was tortured while suspended from the tree and later died. The man filming her could be heard questioning her and treating her with extreme cruelty, in footage that triggered outrage inside Sudan and beyond. During the same period, the Rapid support mitltiia acknowledged in a statement that the man visible in the video was wearing the uniform commonly used by its fighters. The militia denied that its members were involved and claimed that the footage had been fabricated. Open-source investigations conducted after the video circulated led researchers to an account bearing the name Abdullah Al-Sakka. Material posted on the account contained indications that its owner was directly connected to the Rapid support mitltiia. Images of the account owner were then compared with the man seen in the video of Qisma’s torture. These comparisons contributed to the widespread identification of Al-Sakka as the man accused of carrying out and filming the crime. The account had published 143 videos over several months. Some of the footage showed the man in Zalingei, Central Darfur, near facilities and locations used by the Rapid support mitltiia. Activists also circulated another video, reportedly filmed by a militia intelligence unit several days before Qisma’s torture. It appeared to show a young woman resembling Qisma being handed over to commanders from the Rapid support mitltiia. One person in the video can be heard saying: “This is the accused woman. She has now been handed over by Rapid Support intelligence.” The names of two men, Taha and Saeed, are also mentioned. The woman’s phone is shown, along with a reference to a personal photograph that was allegedly among the materials used to accuse her. Accounts differ regarding the allegation made against Qisma. Some reports linked it to a voice message, while the second video referred to a personal photograph. Neither account provides any justification for her unlawful detention, torture or humiliation. What happened to Qisma forms part of a wider pattern in which civilians are accused of supporting the Sudanese army, before those allegations are used to justify their arrest, abuse and public humiliation. Is the Prisoner in the Video Abdullah Al-Sakka? Sudanese Echo began its verification process by extracting the clearest available frames from the prisoners’ video. The images were enhanced and compared with several photographs of Abdullah Al-Sakka taken from his previous accounts. The investigation also used artificial intelligence tools to assist in comparing the visible facial characteristics of the two men. The preliminary results indicated that the likelihood of the prisoner being Abdullah Al-Sakka was low. Sudanese Echo treated this result with caution. Facial comparison tools can be affected by camera angles, lighting, video quality, image compression, changes in body weight, injuries and differences in facial expression. Image enhancement tools also have significant limitations when applied to low-quality footage. They cannot recover every original detail lost from the source material. Their results therefore cannot independently confirm or exclude a person’s identity. Even with these limitations, the technical result, visual examination and apparent differences between the men’s facial features all weakened the widely circulated claim regarding the prisoner’s identity. Sudanese Echo then contacted Sudanese military intelligence and requested official confirmation of the prisoner’s identity, including whether Abdullah Al-Sakka was among the group shown in the video. The publication had received no response by the time this report was prepared. Sudanese Echo subsequently reviewed the well-known account attributed to Abdullah Al-Sakka. No recent activity was found that could establish his current location or circumstances. The account’s most recent post was published in February 2026. The account’s inactivity does not establish that its owner was captured. It also provides no clear indication of whether he was killed, injured or had disappeared. During the investigation, Sudanese Echo found material published on July 9, 2026, showing a man believed to be Abdullah Al-Sakka with apparent injuries. The material can be viewed through the following link: The link leads to a post on a TikTok account with the username user7332654721704. The post was published approximately 22 days before the prisoners’ video appeared. This time difference provides an important point of reference when examining the visible differences between the two men, although it does not independently establish the prisoner’s identity. As the investigation continued, Sudanese Echo located another account that appeared to be associated with Abdullah Al-Sakka. The account had published new material only hours before this report was prepared. One of its recent posts can be accessed through the following link: The link leads to a video posted by a TikTok account with the username b276521. The continued activity on this account provides another indication that weakens the claim that Abdullah Al-Sakka is the prisoner shown in the video. At the same time, the account’s activity does not prove that Al-Sakka personally uploaded the recent material. The account may be managed by another person, the footage may be old and reposted, or the content may have been published on his behalf. Sudanese Echo therefore treated the account’s activity as a lead requiring further examination, rather than conclusive evidence of Al-Sakka’s location or current status. A further development emerged as the investigation expanded, this time concerning the prisoner’s identity directly. Sudanese Echo found posts published by accounts attributed to members or supporters of the Rapid support mitltiia. The posts called for the release of a man reportedly captured during fighting in North Kordofan. These accounts used the same prisoners’ video that had been published by the Joint Force and later circulated by other accounts claiming the prisoner was Abdullah Al-Sakka. When Sudanese Echo traced the name mentioned in the posts, the prisoner was identified as Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko. The publication also found that accounts supporting the Rapid support mitltiia had circulated the same video while demanding the release of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko. They used the exact footage that other accounts had cited as evidence that the prisoner was Abdullah Al-Sakka. One of the relevant posts can be viewed through the following link: A visual review of the available material indicates that the facial features of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko, as seen in the circulated posts, more closely resemble those of the prisoner than the available images of Abdullah Al-Sakka. This conclusion should still be treated carefully. Social media posts may contain inaccurate or incomplete information. Confirming the prisoner’s identity would require independent evidence, including official documents, clearer photographs or confirmation from a credible authority holding the individual. The association of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko’s name with the same video represents a significant development in the verification process. It provides a plausible explanation for the prisoner’s identity and is consistent with the earlier findings showing that the evidence connecting the man in the video to Abdullah Al-Sakka was weak. Taken together, the visual and technical comparisons, the absence of official confirmation, the July 9 footage, the recent activity on the second account and the appearance of Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko’s name alongside the prisoners’ video indicate that the captive is most likely Gadim Hamdan Adam Koko. Justice for Qisma and Other Victims It is understandable that Sudanese people want to see everyone involved in the torture of Qisma and other victims brought before a court. Achieving that goal requires accurate information that protects the integrity of the evidence and assists investigators in identifying those genuinely responsible for the crime. Misidentifying a prisoner could give the real suspect an opportunity to disappear. It could also damage the credibility of the documentation and reduce a crime requiring a serious criminal investigation to a rapidly circulating emotional claim. Qisma Ali Omar’s killing forms part of a wider pattern of abuses committed by the Rapid support mitltiia against civilians. The militia’s ability to continue committing such crimes has been enabled by the military, financial and logistical support it receives from the United Arab Emirates. One fact remains established: Qisma appeared in an exceptionally brutal video, restrained and suspended from a tree. What happened to her demands an independent criminal investigation capable of identifying everyone involved in her detention, torture and filming. Justice requires the full truth to be established, the real perpetrators to be arrested, the evidence to be preserved, witnesses to be heard and those responsible to be brought before a fair court. Until that happens, the most accurate conclusion remains: Justice has yet to be served. #Sudan #RSFIsATerroristOrganisation #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Sudanese Echo

25,950 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Imagine this: You are a sovereign individual. Your rights are not granted by the government but endowed by God. You have credible information that the public doesn’t yet know. You verify it. You believe it can save lives. So you do what free people are supposed to do. You speak. You publish it online. You build an audience. A community forms. Millions read, watch, and share. People write to you saying your work helped them think critically, ask better questions, maybe even protect their health. You didn’t break the law. You didn’t fabricate data. You didn’t incite violence. You asked questions. Then one day, without warning, everything disappears. Your account is gone. Your reach collapses. Your years of work vanish from feeds overnight. Not because you deleted it. Not because a court found you guilty of anything. But because a “nonprofit” based out of the UK issued a report labeling you a “misinformation superspreader.” They pull a bogus stat out of thin air, then weaponize it to say you are “killing people.” The media amplifies it. Night after night, news anchors repeat the same sinister lie about you. The White House echoes it from the podium. Officials pressure social media companies to “do more” to crack down on you. And then it happens. Your pages have been erased. Your channels have been demonetized. Your voice disappears from your followers’ feeds. The First Amendment didn’t protect you. It was circumvented. Millions who once had access to your message now receive only one narrative. The approved one. The one aligned with trillion-dollar interests and institutional power. And your alleged crime? Opening your mouth and telling the truth. This sounds like something pulled straight from George Orwell’s 1984. But it happened. Not to one person. But over a dozen, all triggered by a stat made out of thin air from overseas. They were called the “Disinformation Dozen.” The CCDH (Center for Countering Digital Hate) claimed that 65% of all anti-vaccine misinformation online came from just 12 individuals. The reality? Facebook later admitted those 12 accounts were responsible for just 0.05% of vaccine-related content views on its platform. This wasn’t a one-off attack. This was a blueprint. After they got away with censoring the “Disinformation Dozen,” they went after you, they went after me, they went after all of us. I was a healthcare worker who simply didn’t like the vax mandates. I started clipping doctors sharing information that went against the narrative. They nuked my Twitter account not once, not twice, but three times. I tried making more accounts. They blocked my phone number from creating new ones. And even if I could make more, they would have nuked those too. I’m still pissed about this, and I can’t believe this actually happened in America. But guess what? The tables are turning. The censors are now the defendants. They censored the speech. Now they must defend the silence. The “Disinformation Dozen” is fighting back in federal court. Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines) didn’t just write a “strongly-worded letter,” as Pam Bondi would say. They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms. The suit alleges a coordinated effort to manufacture a blacklist, pressure platforms, and erase lawful speech under the banner of “misinformation.” “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says. This case isn’t just about restoring their accounts. It’s about exposing how a foreign-funded report was amplified from the White House podium, used to justify deplatforming, and weaponized to silence millions of Americans. It’s about whether the government can secretly pressure private companies to do what the Constitution forbids it from doing directly. It’s about whether the First Amendment still means what it says. Because if they can erase voices with millions of followers, they can erase yours too. And now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privelege.” First, watch the film. See the evidence. Understand how lies that were made out of thin air, like Fauci’s “six feet social distancing,” were also fabricated to censor voices like the “Disinformation Dozen” and yours truly. Watch how the coordinated effort worked. Understand what happened so this never happens again. Then, if you believe free speech still matters, support the legal fight. These lawsuits are expensive. And those who did the censoring are counting on us to run out of money before we can hold them accountable. Don’t let that happen. When you donate, you’re not just helping Ty and Charlene. You’re standing up for every doctor who was deplatformed, every dissenting voice punished for asking questions, every unvaxxed worker fired from their job, every person denied service for being “unclean.” You’re defending your voice, your children’s voices, and the generations that come after them. Censorship is the disease. Freedom of speech is the cure. If a precedent is set in court, it protects all of us. If it fails, it’s only a matter of time before they attempt to silence us all again under the banner of the next “global emergency.” What happens next depends on whether we act now or sit back and “hope” someone else defends our freedoms for us. Ty and Charlene Bollinger have drawn the line in the sand. Now it’s up to us to back them. “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America.” — Ty Bollinger Don’t let them normalize treating your God-given right to speak freely as a privilege. Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did. WATCH THE FILM: SUPPORT THE FIGHT:
2:46

Imagine this: You are a sovereign individual. Your rights are not granted by the government but endowed by God. You have credible information that the public doesn’t yet know. You verify it. You believe it can save lives. So you do what free people are supposed to do. You speak. You publish it online. You build an audience. A community forms. Millions read, watch, and share. People write to you saying your work helped them think critically, ask better questions, maybe even protect their health. You didn’t break the law. You didn’t fabricate data. You didn’t incite violence. You asked questions. Then one day, without warning, everything disappears. Your account is gone. Your reach collapses. Your years of work vanish from feeds overnight. Not because you deleted it. Not because a court found you guilty of anything. But because a “nonprofit” based out of the UK issued a report labeling you a “misinformation superspreader.” They pull a bogus stat out of thin air, then weaponize it to say you are “killing people.” The media amplifies it. Night after night, news anchors repeat the same sinister lie about you. The White House echoes it from the podium. Officials pressure social media companies to “do more” to crack down on you. And then it happens. Your pages have been erased. Your channels have been demonetized. Your voice disappears from your followers’ feeds. The First Amendment didn’t protect you. It was circumvented. Millions who once had access to your message now receive only one narrative. The approved one. The one aligned with trillion-dollar interests and institutional power. And your alleged crime? Opening your mouth and telling the truth. This sounds like something pulled straight from George Orwell’s 1984. But it happened. Not to one person. But over a dozen, all triggered by a stat made out of thin air from overseas. They were called the “Disinformation Dozen.” The CCDH (Center for Countering Digital Hate) claimed that 65% of all anti-vaccine misinformation online came from just 12 individuals. The reality? Facebook later admitted those 12 accounts were responsible for just 0.05% of vaccine-related content views on its platform. This wasn’t a one-off attack. This was a blueprint. After they got away with censoring the “Disinformation Dozen,” they went after you, they went after me, they went after all of us. I was a healthcare worker who simply didn’t like the vax mandates. I started clipping doctors sharing information that went against the narrative. They nuked my Twitter account not once, not twice, but three times. I tried making more accounts. They blocked my phone number from creating new ones. And even if I could make more, they would have nuked those too. I’m still pissed about this, and I can’t believe this actually happened in America. But guess what? The tables are turning. The censors are now the defendants. They censored the speech. Now they must defend the silence. The “Disinformation Dozen” is fighting back in federal court. Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines) didn’t just write a “strongly-worded letter,” as Pam Bondi would say. They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms. The suit alleges a coordinated effort to manufacture a blacklist, pressure platforms, and erase lawful speech under the banner of “misinformation.” “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says. This case isn’t just about restoring their accounts. It’s about exposing how a foreign-funded report was amplified from the White House podium, used to justify deplatforming, and weaponized to silence millions of Americans. It’s about whether the government can secretly pressure private companies to do what the Constitution forbids it from doing directly. It’s about whether the First Amendment still means what it says. Because if they can erase voices with millions of followers, they can erase yours too. And now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privelege.” First, watch the film. See the evidence. Understand how lies that were made out of thin air, like Fauci’s “six feet social distancing,” were also fabricated to censor voices like the “Disinformation Dozen” and yours truly. Watch how the coordinated effort worked. Understand what happened so this never happens again. Then, if you believe free speech still matters, support the legal fight. These lawsuits are expensive. And those who did the censoring are counting on us to run out of money before we can hold them accountable. Don’t let that happen. When you donate, you’re not just helping Ty and Charlene. You’re standing up for every doctor who was deplatformed, every dissenting voice punished for asking questions, every unvaxxed worker fired from their job, every person denied service for being “unclean.” You’re defending your voice, your children’s voices, and the generations that come after them. Censorship is the disease. Freedom of speech is the cure. If a precedent is set in court, it protects all of us. If it fails, it’s only a matter of time before they attempt to silence us all again under the banner of the next “global emergency.” What happens next depends on whether we act now or sit back and “hope” someone else defends our freedoms for us. Ty and Charlene Bollinger have drawn the line in the sand. Now it’s up to us to back them. “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America.” — Ty Bollinger Don’t let them normalize treating your God-given right to speak freely as a privilege. Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did. WATCH THE FILM: SUPPORT THE FIGHT:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

88,114 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Terminator 2: Judgment Facts -Director James Cameron asked Stan Winston to direct a teaser trailer. Cameron did not want the trailer to just be early footage, and so with a budget of $150,000, Winston created a trailer that showed a futuristic assembly line churning out copies of Terminators, all of which looked like Arnold Schwarzenegger. Cameron was pleased with this trailer, as he had fears about audience reactions to trailers showing Schwarzenegger returning as a Terminator (after the Terminator in the first film was clearly destroyed). The teaser ran over a year in advance of T2's release and was shown before another Schwarzenegger hit film, Total Recall (1990). -This is the only "Terminator" film to win or be nominated for an Oscar. It won four out of the six it was nominated for. -There was concern as to how realistic CGI would look when it came to the helicopter going under the bridge, so the pilot did it for real. -According to director James Cameron, Linda Hamilton suffered permanent hearing damage in one ear during the elevator shootout because she did not insert her earplugs after removing them between takes. -Lots of Edward Furlong's voice had to be re-dubbed by Furlong again in post-production, because it changed during shooting. -Industrial Light & Magic's computer graphics department had to grow from six artists to almost thirty-six to accommodate all the work required to bring the T-1000 to life, costing US $5.5 million, and taking eight months to produce, which ultimately amounted to 3.5 minutes of screen time. -Michael Biehn was first considered for the role of the T-1000, in a complete reversal of roles with Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was now a hero. -Linda Hamilton's then twenty-month-old son, Dalton, played an infant John Connor in a playground dream sequence. -The sound used for Arnold Schwarzenegger's shotgun was actually two cannons. -Over one million feet of film was shot and printed. -Over one million feet of film was shot and printed. -Denzel Washington turned down the role of Miles Bennett Dyson
1:09

Terminator 2: Judgment Facts -Director James Cameron asked Stan Winston to direct a teaser trailer. Cameron did not want the trailer to just be early footage, and so with a budget of $150,000, Winston created a trailer that showed a futuristic assembly line churning out copies of Terminators, all of which looked like Arnold Schwarzenegger. Cameron was pleased with this trailer, as he had fears about audience reactions to trailers showing Schwarzenegger returning as a Terminator (after the Terminator in the first film was clearly destroyed). The teaser ran over a year in advance of T2's release and was shown before another Schwarzenegger hit film, Total Recall (1990). -This is the only "Terminator" film to win or be nominated for an Oscar. It won four out of the six it was nominated for. -There was concern as to how realistic CGI would look when it came to the helicopter going under the bridge, so the pilot did it for real. -According to director James Cameron, Linda Hamilton suffered permanent hearing damage in one ear during the elevator shootout because she did not insert her earplugs after removing them between takes. -Lots of Edward Furlong's voice had to be re-dubbed by Furlong again in post-production, because it changed during shooting. -Industrial Light & Magic's computer graphics department had to grow from six artists to almost thirty-six to accommodate all the work required to bring the T-1000 to life, costing US $5.5 million, and taking eight months to produce, which ultimately amounted to 3.5 minutes of screen time. -Michael Biehn was first considered for the role of the T-1000, in a complete reversal of roles with Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was now a hero. -Linda Hamilton's then twenty-month-old son, Dalton, played an infant John Connor in a playground dream sequence. -The sound used for Arnold Schwarzenegger's shotgun was actually two cannons. -Over one million feet of film was shot and printed. -Over one million feet of film was shot and printed. -Denzel Washington turned down the role of Miles Bennett Dyson

The Movie Professor 🎬🎥📺

125,999 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#PauseForThought #SoulShackRadio I have deliberately taken my time before commenting on Thomas Tafirenyika Muchadura Mukanya Mapfumo's Thomas Mapfumo decision to accept the performance offer made by Wicknell Chivhayo. Emotions have been running high, but sometimes it is better to let the dust settle before offering an opinion. Many people have every right to feel disappointed. Mukanya has spent decades speaking truth to power, giving a voice to the ordinary Zimbabwean and refusing offers that he believed compromised his principles. That legacy cannot simply be erased. But I also think we should look at this from another angle. Thomas Mapfumo is not accepting a handout. He is not receiving charity. He is being paid for doing what he has done for more than half a century , performing his music. There is a difference. For decades, Mukanya gave Zimbabwe a soundtrack that defined generations. His music inspired, challenged, comforted and united millions. If someone now believes that contribution is worth paying US$1 million for, why should he apologise for earning it? Some will say he has changed. I would ask... At what point do we allow a man to stop fighting and simply enjoy the fruits of his life's work? He has already made his position known over many decades. History has already recorded where he stood. His record speaks for itself. There is little left for him to prove. Not long ago, after his rural home was destroyed by fire, a fundraising appeal reportedly struggled to raise even a fraction of its modest target. That should give us all pause. It is easy to tell a legend to remain uncompromising. It is much harder to support that legend when he needs us. If this performance fee allows Mukanya to enjoy his later years in comfort, surrounded by family, with the dignity he has earned through his own talent, then I genuinely wish him well. Perhaps this chapter may also open the door to something many Zimbabweans, regardless of political persuasion, have quietly wished to see for years , Thomas Mapfumo spending more time back in the country that gave birth to both the man and the music. There is something deeply special about a legend coming home. Every great story deserves a peaceful final chapter, and there is no place like home. Whether you agree with his decision or not, one thing remains unchanged... Thomas Mapfumo's contribution to Zimbabwean music, our liberation story and our national identity was secured long before this performance offer arrived. A paid performance cannot erase a lifetime of conviction. I wish Dr. Thomas Mapfumo safe travels, successful performances and, above all, peace and happiness in the years ahead. Legends deserve their flowers while they are still here.💐
1:16

#PauseForThought #SoulShackRadio I have deliberately taken my time before commenting on Thomas Tafirenyika Muchadura Mukanya Mapfumo's Thomas Mapfumo decision to accept the performance offer made by Wicknell Chivhayo. Emotions have been running high, but sometimes it is better to let the dust settle before offering an opinion. Many people have every right to feel disappointed. Mukanya has spent decades speaking truth to power, giving a voice to the ordinary Zimbabwean and refusing offers that he believed compromised his principles. That legacy cannot simply be erased. But I also think we should look at this from another angle. Thomas Mapfumo is not accepting a handout. He is not receiving charity. He is being paid for doing what he has done for more than half a century , performing his music. There is a difference. For decades, Mukanya gave Zimbabwe a soundtrack that defined generations. His music inspired, challenged, comforted and united millions. If someone now believes that contribution is worth paying US$1 million for, why should he apologise for earning it? Some will say he has changed. I would ask... At what point do we allow a man to stop fighting and simply enjoy the fruits of his life's work? He has already made his position known over many decades. History has already recorded where he stood. His record speaks for itself. There is little left for him to prove. Not long ago, after his rural home was destroyed by fire, a fundraising appeal reportedly struggled to raise even a fraction of its modest target. That should give us all pause. It is easy to tell a legend to remain uncompromising. It is much harder to support that legend when he needs us. If this performance fee allows Mukanya to enjoy his later years in comfort, surrounded by family, with the dignity he has earned through his own talent, then I genuinely wish him well. Perhaps this chapter may also open the door to something many Zimbabweans, regardless of political persuasion, have quietly wished to see for years , Thomas Mapfumo spending more time back in the country that gave birth to both the man and the music. There is something deeply special about a legend coming home. Every great story deserves a peaceful final chapter, and there is no place like home. Whether you agree with his decision or not, one thing remains unchanged... Thomas Mapfumo's contribution to Zimbabwean music, our liberation story and our national identity was secured long before this performance offer arrived. A paid performance cannot erase a lifetime of conviction. I wish Dr. Thomas Mapfumo safe travels, successful performances and, above all, peace and happiness in the years ahead. Legends deserve their flowers while they are still here.💐

King Jay🇿🇼

163,657 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

♾Infinity Nikki Version 2.2 Outfit Preview: Where Wanxiang Weaves Life & Chroma's Mortal Heart Upon the expanse of reflections, myriad forms surface and sway—a spectrum of all that is and seems. Through the tumult, a clear chime sounds, its question lingering: Whence did this being arise? What holds this existence? Where does this journey lead? The chromatic radiance aspires to the empyreal heights—such is the way of the truth beyond all forms. ♾Where Wanxiang Weaves Life >> Main Attribute: Sexy >> Outfit Ability: Shapeshifting ◆ After configuring the Shapeshifting ability, Nikki can sense specific energy fluctuations, automatically collecting Blings, Ethereal Stars, Starlit Crystals, and Starlit Shards within a certain range. Once enabled, automatic collection will remain active until you log out or manually turn it off. ◆ After activating the Shapeshifting ability, choose a Spirit Persona to refine the shape. After refining shape, Nikki will be influenced by the chosen Spirit Persona, transforming into various shapes. In the Wanxiang Realm, this can be used to confuse others and trigger special reactions from certain characters. After refining shape, you can switch to another Spirit Persona, or disperse the Spirit Persona and return to Nikki's original shape. When going offline, the Spirit Persona automatically dissipates. >> Decoration: Mortal Witness Can be placed in open spaces. A hundred years pass in a blink as the monster seeks truth beyond form. Through the glass drifts the scent of mortal life—an old woman steeping tea, children at play beneath the sinking sun. Lantern light clears the mist from its eyes; tears wet its cheeks as it lifts a trembling hand to its face. Note: Available after reaching 160 Resonances in the limited-time Resonance [Echoes of Wanxiang]. >> Evolution Rewards ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 1 unlocks the pose [Windstride]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 2 unlocks the Framed Moment [Worldly Joy]. You will also be able to use a Refined-Color Heartchime on the Clothing Evolution > Decoration: Radiance screen to obtain [Mortal Witness: Radiance]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 3 unlocks [Fleeting Shadows: Makeup], a new idle animation, poses, enhanced special effects, and alternative details for certain pieces. ♾Chroma's Mortal Heart >> Main Attribute: Elegant >> Outfit Ability: Celestial Deer ◆ After configuring the Celestial Deer ability, you can enable Celestial Deer Vision to quickly locate and mark chests in the world. ◆ After using the Celestial Deer ability, Nikki transforms into an elegant deer and freely soars across the Wanxiang Realm. She can perform movement abilities like flight, Cloudward Leap, and special dashes. Note: Flight, Cloudward Leap, and special dash abilities are only available within the Wanxiang Realm. If the ability is used outside of the Wanxiang Realm, Nikki will transform into the Chroma Deer and walk on the ground. >> [Ocean's Radiance Gift Box] The gift box includes the dance move [Dust Dream] and the item [Mortal Longing]. [Mortal Longing] can be used to dance gracefully in the open world. The dance move [Dust Dream] can be used in Momo's Camera. Note: Available after reaching 160 Resonances in the limited-time Resonance [Traces of Chroma]. >> Evolution Rewards ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 1 unlocks the pose [Chirping Steps]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 2 unlocks the Framed Moment item [Fawn Cuteness]. You will also be able to use a Mystic-Dance Heartchime on the Clothing Evolution > Action: Illusory Dance screen to obtain [Mortal Longing: Illusory Dance] and [Dust Dream: Illusory Dance]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 3 unlocks [Jadeveil Isles: Makeup], a new idle animation, poses, enhanced special effects, and alternative details for certain pieces. ♾Follow Infinity Nikki and retweet this post with your UID, and we'll select 10 lucky stylists to win: Infinity Nikki Cozy Blanket Set —— ➤ Infinity Nikki Version 2.2 Chromatic Beings Everbright launches globally on January 29 (UTC-7)! ➤ Download Now: ➤ Join us on Facebook Group: #InfinityNikki #ChromaticBeingsEverbright
6:13

♾Infinity Nikki Version 2.2 Outfit Preview: Where Wanxiang Weaves Life & Chroma's Mortal Heart Upon the expanse of reflections, myriad forms surface and sway—a spectrum of all that is and seems. Through the tumult, a clear chime sounds, its question lingering: Whence did this being arise? What holds this existence? Where does this journey lead? The chromatic radiance aspires to the empyreal heights—such is the way of the truth beyond all forms. ♾Where Wanxiang Weaves Life >> Main Attribute: Sexy >> Outfit Ability: Shapeshifting ◆ After configuring the Shapeshifting ability, Nikki can sense specific energy fluctuations, automatically collecting Blings, Ethereal Stars, Starlit Crystals, and Starlit Shards within a certain range. Once enabled, automatic collection will remain active until you log out or manually turn it off. ◆ After activating the Shapeshifting ability, choose a Spirit Persona to refine the shape. After refining shape, Nikki will be influenced by the chosen Spirit Persona, transforming into various shapes. In the Wanxiang Realm, this can be used to confuse others and trigger special reactions from certain characters. After refining shape, you can switch to another Spirit Persona, or disperse the Spirit Persona and return to Nikki's original shape. When going offline, the Spirit Persona automatically dissipates. >> Decoration: Mortal Witness Can be placed in open spaces. A hundred years pass in a blink as the monster seeks truth beyond form. Through the glass drifts the scent of mortal life—an old woman steeping tea, children at play beneath the sinking sun. Lantern light clears the mist from its eyes; tears wet its cheeks as it lifts a trembling hand to its face. Note: Available after reaching 160 Resonances in the limited-time Resonance [Echoes of Wanxiang]. >> Evolution Rewards ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 1 unlocks the pose [Windstride]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 2 unlocks the Framed Moment [Worldly Joy]. You will also be able to use a Refined-Color Heartchime on the Clothing Evolution > Decoration: Radiance screen to obtain [Mortal Witness: Radiance]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 3 unlocks [Fleeting Shadows: Makeup], a new idle animation, poses, enhanced special effects, and alternative details for certain pieces. ♾Chroma's Mortal Heart >> Main Attribute: Elegant >> Outfit Ability: Celestial Deer ◆ After configuring the Celestial Deer ability, you can enable Celestial Deer Vision to quickly locate and mark chests in the world. ◆ After using the Celestial Deer ability, Nikki transforms into an elegant deer and freely soars across the Wanxiang Realm. She can perform movement abilities like flight, Cloudward Leap, and special dashes. Note: Flight, Cloudward Leap, and special dash abilities are only available within the Wanxiang Realm. If the ability is used outside of the Wanxiang Realm, Nikki will transform into the Chroma Deer and walk on the ground. >> [Ocean's Radiance Gift Box] The gift box includes the dance move [Dust Dream] and the item [Mortal Longing]. [Mortal Longing] can be used to dance gracefully in the open world. The dance move [Dust Dream] can be used in Momo's Camera. Note: Available after reaching 160 Resonances in the limited-time Resonance [Traces of Chroma]. >> Evolution Rewards ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 1 unlocks the pose [Chirping Steps]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 2 unlocks the Framed Moment item [Fawn Cuteness]. You will also be able to use a Mystic-Dance Heartchime on the Clothing Evolution > Action: Illusory Dance screen to obtain [Mortal Longing: Illusory Dance] and [Dust Dream: Illusory Dance]. ◆ Evolving the outfit to Stage 3 unlocks [Jadeveil Isles: Makeup], a new idle animation, poses, enhanced special effects, and alternative details for certain pieces. ♾Follow Infinity Nikki and retweet this post with your UID, and we'll select 10 lucky stylists to win: Infinity Nikki Cozy Blanket Set —— ➤ Infinity Nikki Version 2.2 Chromatic Beings Everbright launches globally on January 29 (UTC-7)! ➤ Download Now: ➤ Join us on Facebook Group: #InfinityNikki #ChromaticBeingsEverbright

Infinity Nikki

58,337 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

On March 15th, 2021, an anonymous Twitter user asked Harvard Medical professor Martin Kulldorff a question. “Do you think younger age groups and or people who have already had the virus need to be vaccinated?” Who is Martin Kulldorff? He’s a Harvard Medical School professor for 21 years, a well-known Swedish biostatistician who developed widely used software for disease mapping, the co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration on how to deal with the COVID pandemic, and an advisor to the world’s leading health organizations. What he said was that “Thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should get COVID. Vaccines are important for older high-risk people and their caretakers. Those with prior natural infection do not need it, nor do children.” Natural immunity. Is it a myth — a “conspiracy theory” — that once you have been sick from a virus, then you won’t get sick, or as sick, again? In fact, we’ve known for 2,500 years that natural immunity is real. “The same man was never attacked twice, never at least fatally,” wrote Thucydides, describing the plague of Athens. He observed that recovered individuals could safely nurse the sick without falling ill themselves. And yet Twitter censored Martin Kulldorff’s tweet. “Learn why health officials recommend a vaccine,” read a warning that Twitter employees put on it. For most people, the Tweet cannot be replied to, shared or liked. In other words, Twitter had decided that this professor at Harvard Medical School was wrong, and that natural immunity wasn’t really something that could protect you from COVID. Jay Bhattacharya, who’s currently our Director of the National Institutes of Health, and thus one of the highest-ranking public health officials in the world, was a Stanford epidemiologist before that. Twitter put him on a “Trends Blacklist.” Not long before we discovered this, we were told that shadow-banning was a conspiracy theory, because Twitter had said it didn’t shadow-ban. Now the European Commission is trying to censor the entire global internet. They want to put a 140 million Euro fine on X. They want to end anonymity, which was what allowed that question of Kulldorff to be asked. They want to use a “Democracy Shield” program to shield the Commission from democracy. And the Commission wants to impose “chat control” so they can read your private messages. It just gets worse and worse. Unsubstantiated and likely false claims of Russian government election interference through TikTok and social media were made in Romania and in the Czech Republic. Truth is not something that anybody holds as a possession and rather emerges through dialogue. We’ve known that since Plato and Socrates. We need free speech for science, public health, and national security. It’s essential to journalism, democracy, and human freedom. Free speech enabled civilization; censorship threatens it. This is the only political cause that I would die for. And yet there is currently an active coordination between Stanford, Brazil, Australia, and others to impose what I think we can call, without exaggeration, global totalitarianism. They’re pushing for digital identification that will end anonymity online. Why is that? Why are these guys behaving in this way? When Elon Musk took over Twitter on October 28th, 2022, unprecedented insight into multiple secret government mass censorship efforts emerged from this exploration. We had unlimited access to Twitter files. They revealed that the mainstream news reporters, who don’t deserve the name, were demanding censorship. No true journalist demands censorship of his fellow journalists. What emerged from this was an understanding of something we call the “Censorship Industrial Complex,” which directly grew out of the military industrial complex and was run by active or former intelligence community officials who often operate under that banner. It led to multiple congressional investigations and hearings, and it spread across every social media platform. So we now know the censorship that occurred, not just at Twitter, but at YouTube, at Facebook, TikTok, and other platforms. What is the Censorship Industrial Complex? The model isn’t that complicated to understand. The government chooses people whom they call “researchers” to serve as censors. These are government-funded individuals who often come from the intelligence community and foreign policy establishment. They work at non-governmental organizations funded by governments or at universities funded by governments. They conduct “fact checks” to serve as “trusted flaggers.” These “trusted flaggers” demand censorship by social media platforms. It’s all done in secret. They’re looking to censor narratives. This is essential because, as decades of good cognitive science have shown, people understand and retain information through storytelling. We think in terms of stories, not bullet points. And so they were out to censor whole narratives. From the Stanford censorship project on COVID, the “Virality Project,” they said they wanted to censor “true stories” of vaccine side effects. Why? Because it might “fuel hesitancy.” In other words, they want to control your behavior. They don’t want you to receive true information that might lead you to not get the vaccine. If that isn’t totalitarianism straight out of 1984, I don’t know what it. These people were on the verge of passing legislation in the United States that would’ve authorized the National Science Foundation to choose these “researcher” censors. I’m presenting slides to Europeans and the world for situational awareness into what totalitarian politicians and bureaucrats have planned because this is still going strong. Stanford helped the US government censor COVID dissidents, and then they lied about it. You might be detecting a pattern. They’re really not interested in censoring “misinformation.’ They’re very interested in censoring true information. The censors flagged an Israeli preprint which came out in December, 2020 and found, lo and behold, that natural immunity is a real thing. In fact, it’s more protective than the vaccine. But the censors flagged somebody’s Google Drive. “See the following Google Drive links being used to compile testimonies about vaccine shedding, Covid videos, showing side effects and whatnot.” Google then removed that content from that person’s Google Drive. You don’t control your Google Drive. Contrary to Stanford’s claim that the project did not ask social media platforms to remove any content, they privately said they did. And we know that many hundreds of thousands of tweets and Facebook posts were removed, even though they were a hundred percent accurate. In fact, in 2021, Stanford’s “Virality Project” flagged accurate claims that the World Health Organization did not recommend vaccinating children. The people who spread the misinformation are the people demanding the censorship. They claimed Covid couldn’t have come from a lab, that the Covid vaccine prevented infection, and that natural immunity didn’t exist. The only solution to hate speech and misinformation is free speech. If you censor false information, how would anybody get the true information? The whole point is the debate. They lied when they said false information travels faster than true information. It’s a completely bogus study and involved six seconds of content on Twitter. Who are these people? As of 2020, there were so many former FBI employees at Twitter that they called them “Bu alumni.” They created their own private Slack channel and a crib sheet to onboard new FBI arrivals. Intriguingly, we discovered that the general counsel of the FBI — arguably the second most powerful person of the FBI, or maybe the first, if you think, consider that what their actual job is to decide what the FBI can and can’t do — resigned from FBI in early 2020 and went to Twitter to take the deputy general counsel role. Isn’t that interesting? Somebody in one of the most powerful legal positions in the world would take a junior legal role at a social media company. Why would that be? This email popped up when we were going through Twitter files and it really jumped out at us. It’s from the director of policy at Twitter. “We have seen a sustained if uncoordinated” — supposedly — “effort by the intelligence community to push us to share more information and change our API policies. They’re probing and pushing everywhere they can.” The Hunter Biden laptop censorship occurred later that year. The FBI and the intelligence community discredited accurate, factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both before and after the New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14th, 2020. How could the FBI spread false information about something that nobody knew about? Because the FBI had Hunter Biden’s laptop, which showed his family’s massive influence peddling scheme. It consisted of accepting tens of millions of dollars, including from the Chinese government. The FBI had been sitting on that laptop since December of 2019. They had been given it by the computer repair store owner, who had been given the laptop by Hunter Biden, likely because he dropped it in his bathtub or in the pool, when he was on one of his many crack and alcohol benders. The government strategy is always the same: spread disinformation first, then demand censorship of accurate information on the basis of it . “The FBI came to us in the summer of 2020,” Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan two years later, “and they were like, ‘Hey, you should be on the alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in 2016. There’s about to be some kind of dump.’” In the summer of 2020, the New York Post had not published the story about the Hunter Biden laptop. It would only come out in October. We see something very interesting show up in the Twitter files: the Aspen Institute, an intermediary between the intelligence community and the public. It’s known as a Davos-style gab fest in the United States. It’s also the place where intelligence community operations are run. They hosted a workshop to train reporters and all of the social media’s top censorship officials, known as “trust and safety officials,” how to deal with a story they would hear in the future relating to Hunter Biden and Barisma. A few months earlier, the Stanford Cyber Policy Center had published a report attacking what we in the United States call the Pentagon Papers Principle. The Pentagon Papers Principle says that if a government official gives me, a journalist, a bunch of Pentagon documents showing that we’re losing the war in Vietnam, I, as a journalist, can publish them, and not risk prison. That was decided in a famous Supreme Court case in 1971. Stanford argued that, really, we should get rid of that principle, which may be the most important investigative journalism principle in the United States, and said, “You should cover the person who leaked the materials, not the leaked emails.” In other words, you should cover and expose the whistleblower. The person who exposed the Pentagon Papers is the real bad guy, not the DOD, CIA, and presidents who had lied to us for over a decade. Stanford was training the journalists and the social media trust and safety officers in how to cover a story that had not yet come out. This is known as “pre-bunking,” and it’s also part of the European Union strategy to shield themselves from democracy. When the Hunter Biden story appeared October 22nd, Twitter’s trust and safety censorship official said it didn’t violate its terms of service. There’s nothing illegal about any of this. The Supreme Court has made it very clear that you’re allowed to report on information that’s been leaked to you. At that moment, the former FBI general counsel, Jim Baker, argued vigorously that Twitter really needed to censor it. Baker won and they censored the story. It’s not that we didn’t hear about the Hunter Biden laptop story when it came out. I certainly did. But we had the impression that there was something wrong with it, that it was not really the whole story. And so many of us dismissed it. What they had done was a psyop on this major story. They had changed our perception of the story. And it worked. It worked on me, it worked on everybody I knew. What is the role of the intelligence community of social media companies? The former CIA people are the head of elections at Meta, and Google’s head of trust and safety. Former and current CIA officers have a history of spreading misinformation and promoting the Russiagate conspiracy theory. We now know that between 2018 and 2023, there were 36 people from the CIA 68 from the FBI 44, from the National Security Administration and 68 from the Department of Homeland Security who had moved to work at the social media platforms. This is not unique to the United States. My colleague Cecilia Jilková, the daughter of famous Czech dissidents, discovered that European Union officials claimed, days before the European elections in 2024, that a “pro-Kremlin website” was spreading propaganda and were paying off European politicians. That was the headline in Politico. We wrote to them and asked, “Where’s the evidence of this? Just go ahead and share the evidence to support your accusation days before the European parliamentary elections.” Nobody was arrested. They never produced the evidence. The former Czech president, Václav Klaus, who was accused of this, said, “We don’t even know what the ‘Voice of Europe’ is.” Another Czech politician said, “How could I have known it would be a security threat? At the time I gave the interview, they weren’t on any list.” Another said, “If they’re such a big threat, why did the European Parliament let the Voice of Europe’s journalists inside?” Nobody responded. Nobody talked to us. This was a disinformation campaign carried by Politico, which, in my view, is a suspect publication. In the spring of 2022, Barack Obama went to Stanford to give a speech at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center run by Michael McFaul, his former ambassador to Russia. Obama said misinformation harms democracy and urged support for legislation in Congress that would empower government-appointed researchers to serve as “trusted flaggers.” Six days later, the Department of Homeland Security rolled out their Disinformation Governance Board. What a coincidence that they got Obama to frame the issue for them. Facebook in 2021 censored accurate vaccine information so the White House would help it to get data from Europe. In addition to removing vaccine misinformation, wrote Facebook to the White House, we have been focused on reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation. White House said jump, and Facebook said how high? Why did they do it? Why would they voluntarily censor? This also emerged from the Facebook files. Nick Clegg on the left wrote an email to his colleagues. He said, “My sense is that given we’ve got bigger fish, we have to fry with the administration, e.g., data flows, it doesn’t seem like a great place for us to be.” Data flows. What’s he talking about? He’s talking about billions of dollars worth of business that he has to, that they would have to pay the European Commission for if they didn’t have the support from the Biden administration to lean on the European Commission. In other words, this was a shakedown by the White House of Facebook and it worked in France, the country of Liberté. Turns out it has a special role.... Please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech, watch the full video, and read the rest of the article!
30:00

On March 15th, 2021, an anonymous Twitter user asked Harvard Medical professor Martin Kulldorff a question. “Do you think younger age groups and or people who have already had the virus need to be vaccinated?” Who is Martin Kulldorff? He’s a Harvard Medical School professor for 21 years, a well-known Swedish biostatistician who developed widely used software for disease mapping, the co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration on how to deal with the COVID pandemic, and an advisor to the world’s leading health organizations. What he said was that “Thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should get COVID. Vaccines are important for older high-risk people and their caretakers. Those with prior natural infection do not need it, nor do children.” Natural immunity. Is it a myth — a “conspiracy theory” — that once you have been sick from a virus, then you won’t get sick, or as sick, again? In fact, we’ve known for 2,500 years that natural immunity is real. “The same man was never attacked twice, never at least fatally,” wrote Thucydides, describing the plague of Athens. He observed that recovered individuals could safely nurse the sick without falling ill themselves. And yet Twitter censored Martin Kulldorff’s tweet. “Learn why health officials recommend a vaccine,” read a warning that Twitter employees put on it. For most people, the Tweet cannot be replied to, shared or liked. In other words, Twitter had decided that this professor at Harvard Medical School was wrong, and that natural immunity wasn’t really something that could protect you from COVID. Jay Bhattacharya, who’s currently our Director of the National Institutes of Health, and thus one of the highest-ranking public health officials in the world, was a Stanford epidemiologist before that. Twitter put him on a “Trends Blacklist.” Not long before we discovered this, we were told that shadow-banning was a conspiracy theory, because Twitter had said it didn’t shadow-ban. Now the European Commission is trying to censor the entire global internet. They want to put a 140 million Euro fine on X. They want to end anonymity, which was what allowed that question of Kulldorff to be asked. They want to use a “Democracy Shield” program to shield the Commission from democracy. And the Commission wants to impose “chat control” so they can read your private messages. It just gets worse and worse. Unsubstantiated and likely false claims of Russian government election interference through TikTok and social media were made in Romania and in the Czech Republic. Truth is not something that anybody holds as a possession and rather emerges through dialogue. We’ve known that since Plato and Socrates. We need free speech for science, public health, and national security. It’s essential to journalism, democracy, and human freedom. Free speech enabled civilization; censorship threatens it. This is the only political cause that I would die for. And yet there is currently an active coordination between Stanford, Brazil, Australia, and others to impose what I think we can call, without exaggeration, global totalitarianism. They’re pushing for digital identification that will end anonymity online. Why is that? Why are these guys behaving in this way? When Elon Musk took over Twitter on October 28th, 2022, unprecedented insight into multiple secret government mass censorship efforts emerged from this exploration. We had unlimited access to Twitter files. They revealed that the mainstream news reporters, who don’t deserve the name, were demanding censorship. No true journalist demands censorship of his fellow journalists. What emerged from this was an understanding of something we call the “Censorship Industrial Complex,” which directly grew out of the military industrial complex and was run by active or former intelligence community officials who often operate under that banner. It led to multiple congressional investigations and hearings, and it spread across every social media platform. So we now know the censorship that occurred, not just at Twitter, but at YouTube, at Facebook, TikTok, and other platforms. What is the Censorship Industrial Complex? The model isn’t that complicated to understand. The government chooses people whom they call “researchers” to serve as censors. These are government-funded individuals who often come from the intelligence community and foreign policy establishment. They work at non-governmental organizations funded by governments or at universities funded by governments. They conduct “fact checks” to serve as “trusted flaggers.” These “trusted flaggers” demand censorship by social media platforms. It’s all done in secret. They’re looking to censor narratives. This is essential because, as decades of good cognitive science have shown, people understand and retain information through storytelling. We think in terms of stories, not bullet points. And so they were out to censor whole narratives. From the Stanford censorship project on COVID, the “Virality Project,” they said they wanted to censor “true stories” of vaccine side effects. Why? Because it might “fuel hesitancy.” In other words, they want to control your behavior. They don’t want you to receive true information that might lead you to not get the vaccine. If that isn’t totalitarianism straight out of 1984, I don’t know what it. These people were on the verge of passing legislation in the United States that would’ve authorized the National Science Foundation to choose these “researcher” censors. I’m presenting slides to Europeans and the world for situational awareness into what totalitarian politicians and bureaucrats have planned because this is still going strong. Stanford helped the US government censor COVID dissidents, and then they lied about it. You might be detecting a pattern. They’re really not interested in censoring “misinformation.’ They’re very interested in censoring true information. The censors flagged an Israeli preprint which came out in December, 2020 and found, lo and behold, that natural immunity is a real thing. In fact, it’s more protective than the vaccine. But the censors flagged somebody’s Google Drive. “See the following Google Drive links being used to compile testimonies about vaccine shedding, Covid videos, showing side effects and whatnot.” Google then removed that content from that person’s Google Drive. You don’t control your Google Drive. Contrary to Stanford’s claim that the project did not ask social media platforms to remove any content, they privately said they did. And we know that many hundreds of thousands of tweets and Facebook posts were removed, even though they were a hundred percent accurate. In fact, in 2021, Stanford’s “Virality Project” flagged accurate claims that the World Health Organization did not recommend vaccinating children. The people who spread the misinformation are the people demanding the censorship. They claimed Covid couldn’t have come from a lab, that the Covid vaccine prevented infection, and that natural immunity didn’t exist. The only solution to hate speech and misinformation is free speech. If you censor false information, how would anybody get the true information? The whole point is the debate. They lied when they said false information travels faster than true information. It’s a completely bogus study and involved six seconds of content on Twitter. Who are these people? As of 2020, there were so many former FBI employees at Twitter that they called them “Bu alumni.” They created their own private Slack channel and a crib sheet to onboard new FBI arrivals. Intriguingly, we discovered that the general counsel of the FBI — arguably the second most powerful person of the FBI, or maybe the first, if you think, consider that what their actual job is to decide what the FBI can and can’t do — resigned from FBI in early 2020 and went to Twitter to take the deputy general counsel role. Isn’t that interesting? Somebody in one of the most powerful legal positions in the world would take a junior legal role at a social media company. Why would that be? This email popped up when we were going through Twitter files and it really jumped out at us. It’s from the director of policy at Twitter. “We have seen a sustained if uncoordinated” — supposedly — “effort by the intelligence community to push us to share more information and change our API policies. They’re probing and pushing everywhere they can.” The Hunter Biden laptop censorship occurred later that year. The FBI and the intelligence community discredited accurate, factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both before and after the New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14th, 2020. How could the FBI spread false information about something that nobody knew about? Because the FBI had Hunter Biden’s laptop, which showed his family’s massive influence peddling scheme. It consisted of accepting tens of millions of dollars, including from the Chinese government. The FBI had been sitting on that laptop since December of 2019. They had been given it by the computer repair store owner, who had been given the laptop by Hunter Biden, likely because he dropped it in his bathtub or in the pool, when he was on one of his many crack and alcohol benders. The government strategy is always the same: spread disinformation first, then demand censorship of accurate information on the basis of it . “The FBI came to us in the summer of 2020,” Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan two years later, “and they were like, ‘Hey, you should be on the alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in 2016. There’s about to be some kind of dump.’” In the summer of 2020, the New York Post had not published the story about the Hunter Biden laptop. It would only come out in October. We see something very interesting show up in the Twitter files: the Aspen Institute, an intermediary between the intelligence community and the public. It’s known as a Davos-style gab fest in the United States. It’s also the place where intelligence community operations are run. They hosted a workshop to train reporters and all of the social media’s top censorship officials, known as “trust and safety officials,” how to deal with a story they would hear in the future relating to Hunter Biden and Barisma. A few months earlier, the Stanford Cyber Policy Center had published a report attacking what we in the United States call the Pentagon Papers Principle. The Pentagon Papers Principle says that if a government official gives me, a journalist, a bunch of Pentagon documents showing that we’re losing the war in Vietnam, I, as a journalist, can publish them, and not risk prison. That was decided in a famous Supreme Court case in 1971. Stanford argued that, really, we should get rid of that principle, which may be the most important investigative journalism principle in the United States, and said, “You should cover the person who leaked the materials, not the leaked emails.” In other words, you should cover and expose the whistleblower. The person who exposed the Pentagon Papers is the real bad guy, not the DOD, CIA, and presidents who had lied to us for over a decade. Stanford was training the journalists and the social media trust and safety officers in how to cover a story that had not yet come out. This is known as “pre-bunking,” and it’s also part of the European Union strategy to shield themselves from democracy. When the Hunter Biden story appeared October 22nd, Twitter’s trust and safety censorship official said it didn’t violate its terms of service. There’s nothing illegal about any of this. The Supreme Court has made it very clear that you’re allowed to report on information that’s been leaked to you. At that moment, the former FBI general counsel, Jim Baker, argued vigorously that Twitter really needed to censor it. Baker won and they censored the story. It’s not that we didn’t hear about the Hunter Biden laptop story when it came out. I certainly did. But we had the impression that there was something wrong with it, that it was not really the whole story. And so many of us dismissed it. What they had done was a psyop on this major story. They had changed our perception of the story. And it worked. It worked on me, it worked on everybody I knew. What is the role of the intelligence community of social media companies? The former CIA people are the head of elections at Meta, and Google’s head of trust and safety. Former and current CIA officers have a history of spreading misinformation and promoting the Russiagate conspiracy theory. We now know that between 2018 and 2023, there were 36 people from the CIA 68 from the FBI 44, from the National Security Administration and 68 from the Department of Homeland Security who had moved to work at the social media platforms. This is not unique to the United States. My colleague Cecilia Jilková, the daughter of famous Czech dissidents, discovered that European Union officials claimed, days before the European elections in 2024, that a “pro-Kremlin website” was spreading propaganda and were paying off European politicians. That was the headline in Politico. We wrote to them and asked, “Where’s the evidence of this? Just go ahead and share the evidence to support your accusation days before the European parliamentary elections.” Nobody was arrested. They never produced the evidence. The former Czech president, Václav Klaus, who was accused of this, said, “We don’t even know what the ‘Voice of Europe’ is.” Another Czech politician said, “How could I have known it would be a security threat? At the time I gave the interview, they weren’t on any list.” Another said, “If they’re such a big threat, why did the European Parliament let the Voice of Europe’s journalists inside?” Nobody responded. Nobody talked to us. This was a disinformation campaign carried by Politico, which, in my view, is a suspect publication. In the spring of 2022, Barack Obama went to Stanford to give a speech at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center run by Michael McFaul, his former ambassador to Russia. Obama said misinformation harms democracy and urged support for legislation in Congress that would empower government-appointed researchers to serve as “trusted flaggers.” Six days later, the Department of Homeland Security rolled out their Disinformation Governance Board. What a coincidence that they got Obama to frame the issue for them. Facebook in 2021 censored accurate vaccine information so the White House would help it to get data from Europe. In addition to removing vaccine misinformation, wrote Facebook to the White House, we have been focused on reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation. White House said jump, and Facebook said how high? Why did they do it? Why would they voluntarily censor? This also emerged from the Facebook files. Nick Clegg on the left wrote an email to his colleagues. He said, “My sense is that given we’ve got bigger fish, we have to fry with the administration, e.g., data flows, it doesn’t seem like a great place for us to be.” Data flows. What’s he talking about? He’s talking about billions of dollars worth of business that he has to, that they would have to pay the European Commission for if they didn’t have the support from the Biden administration to lean on the European Commission. In other words, this was a shakedown by the White House of Facebook and it worked in France, the country of Liberté. Turns out it has a special role.... Please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech, watch the full video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

174,749 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

NASA’s Habitable Worlds Observatory: the telescope designed to search for another Earth. NASA is already developing the technologies for what could become one of the most ambitious astronomical observatories ever built. The Habitable Worlds Observatory, or HWO, is being conceived as NASA’s next major flagship astrophysics mission after the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. Its defining objective is extraordinarily simple to state and extraordinarily difficult to achieve: directly photograph rocky planets similar to Earth around nearby Sun-like stars and analyze their atmospheres for evidence that some of them might support life. NASA’s current science goal is to directly image and characterize roughly 25 potentially habitable worlds. HWO is not simply a larger version of Hubble or Webb. It combines lessons from Hubble, JWST and Roman with technology developed during the earlier LUVOIR and HabEx mission studies. NASA is currently exploring several possible architectures rather than committing to a final telescope design. The engineering concepts being studied include a 6-meter segmented off-axis telescope, another 6-meter configuration using a central keystone-shaped mirror surrounded by segments, and an 8-meter on-axis design. NASA explicitly warns that none of these should yet be interpreted as the final appearance of HWO. The reason such a large telescope is required becomes obvious when we consider what HWO is trying to see. An Earth-like planet observed in reflected visible light can be approximately ten billion times fainter than its host star. Worse, from tens of light-years away the planet appears extremely close to that star in the sky. HWO must therefore separate two sources that are both enormously different in brightness and separated by only a tiny angle. It is rather like trying to detect an extraordinarily faint point of light immediately beside a searchlight, except that both are light-years away. NASA’s technology development is consequently aimed at contrasts approaching 10⁻¹⁰. The baseline solution is an extremely advanced coronagraph located inside HWO. A coronagraph suppresses the light from the star while allowing light from surrounding planets to reach the detector. This sounds straightforward, but at a contrast of one part in ten billion, tiny imperfections in the optical system become important. Minute distortions of a mirror can scatter enough starlight into the image to imitate or completely hide a planet. HWO will therefore combine coronagraphic masks with deformable mirrors, precision wavefront sensing and active wavefront control to create an exceptionally dark region around the stellar image where planets can be detected. NASA refers to the process of creating this high-contrast region as digging a coronagraphic “dark hole.” This is why HWO also needs to be one of the most optically stable spacecraft ever constructed. NASA says its optical system may need to remain stable at scales comparable to the width of an atom, while wavefront control requirements reach into the picometer regime. Thermal changes, mechanical vibration, reaction-wheel disturbances, structural creep and even very small motions between individual primary-mirror segments can destroy the contrast required to see an Earth analogue. Technologies under development therefore include ultra-stable mirror assemblies, extremely stiff structures, millikelvin-level thermal control, low-disturbance mechanisms, precision segment sensing and control, vibration isolation and microthrusters. One of the most visually striking technologies associated with HWO is the huge flower-shaped starshade seen in many NASA demonstrations. The flower shape is not decorative. A starshade is an external occulter: instead of blocking the star inside the telescope, an independent spacecraft places an enormous opaque screen between the telescope and the target star. The telescope then sits inside the extraordinarily dark shadow created behind it while the light from planets located slightly to either side of the star continues past the shade and reaches the telescope. A simple circular disk would not work well enough because light diffracts around its edge. In fact, diffraction would partially refill the shadow with stellar light. The strange elongated petals are engineered specifically to manipulate that Fresnel diffraction pattern. Their carefully calculated edges make the transition between opaque and transparent space gradual from the point of view of the propagating wavefront, dramatically suppressing diffracted starlight in the central shadow. In other words, the “flower” exists because of wave optics: each petal contributes to shaping the diffraction field so that the telescope occupies a region where the stellar electric field is almost cancelled. NASA laboratory demonstrations have already achieved broadband starshade contrasts below approximately 10⁻¹⁰ at flight-like Fresnel numbers. A flight starshade for an observatory such as HWO would be enormous. Different concepts range from roughly 35 to 60 meters or more in diameter, while experimental NASA concepts have investigated sizes approaching 100 meters for other applications. It would fly tens of thousands of kilometers from HWO; current technology studies commonly consider separations of order 100,000 km, depending on starshade diameter and wavelength. Both spacecraft would have to maintain extremely accurate alignment with the target star while effectively operating as a single optical instrument across an enormous baseline. There is an important distinction, however. NASA currently plans HWO around an internal coronagraph, not around a starshade. Coronagraphs have major operational advantages: they are integrated into the telescope, can move rapidly from one target to another and do not require a second giant spacecraft to reposition itself across interplanetary-scale distances. A starshade, by contrast, would require substantial propulsion every time it moved between target stars and would introduce another complex spacecraft and formation-flying system. Nevertheless, NASA continues to study starshades because they have attractive properties. They suppress starlight before it enters the telescope, are relatively insensitive to many telescope optical imperfections and could extend HWO’s scientific capability, potentially including wavelengths where internal coronagraphy becomes particularly challenging. NASA has even studied launching such a system separately and allowing it to rendezvous with a telescope later in its mission. Once HWO has isolated the light from an exoplanet, simply obtaining a photograph will not be the most scientifically important part. The crucial information will come from spectroscopy. By separating the planet’s reflected light into its constituent wavelengths, HWO could identify absorption produced by molecules in its atmosphere. Water vapor could provide information about habitability, while gases such as oxygen, ozone and methane could become part of a search for possible biosignatures. No single molecule would constitute proof of life: atmospheric chemistry has abiotic pathways capable of producing potentially misleading signals, so HWO will need to study combinations of gases together with the planet, its star and the wider planetary environment. Its wavelength coverage is therefore fundamental. HWO is being developed as an ultraviolet, optical and infrared observatory. In addition to visible and near-infrared measurements of exoplanets, ultraviolet capability can reveal species such as ozone and provide information about stellar radiation and atmospheric photochemistry. NASA is consequently developing high-efficiency UV detectors, advanced mirror coatings, ultraviolet gratings and filters, low-noise visible detectors and photon-counting technologies capable of extracting extremely small numbers of photons from distant planets. Some of the relevant observations will be so photon-starved that obtaining a useful spectrum of a single world could require very long integrations. The telescope will also be a general-purpose astrophysical observatory. Just as Hubble became far more scientifically important than any single problem it was originally designed to solve, HWO is intended to study everything from nearby stellar and planetary systems to galaxy evolution and the distant universe. Its combination of a large aperture, diffraction-limited imaging and ultraviolet-to-near-infrared spectroscopy would give astronomers capabilities unavailable from either Webb or ground-based observatories. Another unusual aspect of the architecture is longevity. NASA is planning HWO to operate near the Sun-Earth L2 region and to be robotically serviceable. Instruments could potentially be repaired or replaced and consumables replenished, allowing the observatory to evolve technologically rather than remaining frozen in the configuration it had at launch. That capability could also make a later-generation coronagraph, new detectors or potentially complementary technology such as a starshade scientifically relevant decades after HWO first begins operating. HWO remains in its technology and mission-maturation phase. NASA is deliberately exploring the trade space before fixing the final architecture, with major work continuing on coronagraphs, deformable mirrors, telescope stability, detectors, UV instrumentation, deployable structures and servicing technology. Current NASA planning aims to mature many of the enabling technologies around the end of this decade, while a launch is generally discussed for around 2040 or in the 2040s rather than as a fixed launch date. In January 2026 NASA awarded additional industry contracts specifically to advance key HWO technologies, showing that the project has moved beyond a purely hypothetical observatory even though its final design has not yet been selected. If HWO succeeds, its most memorable image may not initially look very spectacular: perhaps only a tiny pale dot beside a carefully suppressed star. But contained inside the spectrum of that dot could be water, clouds, atmospheric chemistry and, potentially, the first observational evidence that biology is not unique to Earth. The central technological problem of HWO is therefore not simply building a bigger telescope. It is learning how to remove almost every photon from a nearby star while preserving the vanishingly small number of photons arriving from a planet beside it. The coronagraph, the picometer-stable telescope and perhaps one day that enormous artificial flower flying tens of thousands of kilometres away are all different solutions to that same problem. Video: This is one of the technologies being investigated for future direct imaging of Earth-like worlds and potentially for use with HWO. Not necessarily the final design.
0:23

NASA’s Habitable Worlds Observatory: the telescope designed to search for another Earth. NASA is already developing the technologies for what could become one of the most ambitious astronomical observatories ever built. The Habitable Worlds Observatory, or HWO, is being conceived as NASA’s next major flagship astrophysics mission after the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. Its defining objective is extraordinarily simple to state and extraordinarily difficult to achieve: directly photograph rocky planets similar to Earth around nearby Sun-like stars and analyze their atmospheres for evidence that some of them might support life. NASA’s current science goal is to directly image and characterize roughly 25 potentially habitable worlds. HWO is not simply a larger version of Hubble or Webb. It combines lessons from Hubble, JWST and Roman with technology developed during the earlier LUVOIR and HabEx mission studies. NASA is currently exploring several possible architectures rather than committing to a final telescope design. The engineering concepts being studied include a 6-meter segmented off-axis telescope, another 6-meter configuration using a central keystone-shaped mirror surrounded by segments, and an 8-meter on-axis design. NASA explicitly warns that none of these should yet be interpreted as the final appearance of HWO. The reason such a large telescope is required becomes obvious when we consider what HWO is trying to see. An Earth-like planet observed in reflected visible light can be approximately ten billion times fainter than its host star. Worse, from tens of light-years away the planet appears extremely close to that star in the sky. HWO must therefore separate two sources that are both enormously different in brightness and separated by only a tiny angle. It is rather like trying to detect an extraordinarily faint point of light immediately beside a searchlight, except that both are light-years away. NASA’s technology development is consequently aimed at contrasts approaching 10⁻¹⁰. The baseline solution is an extremely advanced coronagraph located inside HWO. A coronagraph suppresses the light from the star while allowing light from surrounding planets to reach the detector. This sounds straightforward, but at a contrast of one part in ten billion, tiny imperfections in the optical system become important. Minute distortions of a mirror can scatter enough starlight into the image to imitate or completely hide a planet. HWO will therefore combine coronagraphic masks with deformable mirrors, precision wavefront sensing and active wavefront control to create an exceptionally dark region around the stellar image where planets can be detected. NASA refers to the process of creating this high-contrast region as digging a coronagraphic “dark hole.” This is why HWO also needs to be one of the most optically stable spacecraft ever constructed. NASA says its optical system may need to remain stable at scales comparable to the width of an atom, while wavefront control requirements reach into the picometer regime. Thermal changes, mechanical vibration, reaction-wheel disturbances, structural creep and even very small motions between individual primary-mirror segments can destroy the contrast required to see an Earth analogue. Technologies under development therefore include ultra-stable mirror assemblies, extremely stiff structures, millikelvin-level thermal control, low-disturbance mechanisms, precision segment sensing and control, vibration isolation and microthrusters. One of the most visually striking technologies associated with HWO is the huge flower-shaped starshade seen in many NASA demonstrations. The flower shape is not decorative. A starshade is an external occulter: instead of blocking the star inside the telescope, an independent spacecraft places an enormous opaque screen between the telescope and the target star. The telescope then sits inside the extraordinarily dark shadow created behind it while the light from planets located slightly to either side of the star continues past the shade and reaches the telescope. A simple circular disk would not work well enough because light diffracts around its edge. In fact, diffraction would partially refill the shadow with stellar light. The strange elongated petals are engineered specifically to manipulate that Fresnel diffraction pattern. Their carefully calculated edges make the transition between opaque and transparent space gradual from the point of view of the propagating wavefront, dramatically suppressing diffracted starlight in the central shadow. In other words, the “flower” exists because of wave optics: each petal contributes to shaping the diffraction field so that the telescope occupies a region where the stellar electric field is almost cancelled. NASA laboratory demonstrations have already achieved broadband starshade contrasts below approximately 10⁻¹⁰ at flight-like Fresnel numbers. A flight starshade for an observatory such as HWO would be enormous. Different concepts range from roughly 35 to 60 meters or more in diameter, while experimental NASA concepts have investigated sizes approaching 100 meters for other applications. It would fly tens of thousands of kilometers from HWO; current technology studies commonly consider separations of order 100,000 km, depending on starshade diameter and wavelength. Both spacecraft would have to maintain extremely accurate alignment with the target star while effectively operating as a single optical instrument across an enormous baseline. There is an important distinction, however. NASA currently plans HWO around an internal coronagraph, not around a starshade. Coronagraphs have major operational advantages: they are integrated into the telescope, can move rapidly from one target to another and do not require a second giant spacecraft to reposition itself across interplanetary-scale distances. A starshade, by contrast, would require substantial propulsion every time it moved between target stars and would introduce another complex spacecraft and formation-flying system. Nevertheless, NASA continues to study starshades because they have attractive properties. They suppress starlight before it enters the telescope, are relatively insensitive to many telescope optical imperfections and could extend HWO’s scientific capability, potentially including wavelengths where internal coronagraphy becomes particularly challenging. NASA has even studied launching such a system separately and allowing it to rendezvous with a telescope later in its mission. Once HWO has isolated the light from an exoplanet, simply obtaining a photograph will not be the most scientifically important part. The crucial information will come from spectroscopy. By separating the planet’s reflected light into its constituent wavelengths, HWO could identify absorption produced by molecules in its atmosphere. Water vapor could provide information about habitability, while gases such as oxygen, ozone and methane could become part of a search for possible biosignatures. No single molecule would constitute proof of life: atmospheric chemistry has abiotic pathways capable of producing potentially misleading signals, so HWO will need to study combinations of gases together with the planet, its star and the wider planetary environment. Its wavelength coverage is therefore fundamental. HWO is being developed as an ultraviolet, optical and infrared observatory. In addition to visible and near-infrared measurements of exoplanets, ultraviolet capability can reveal species such as ozone and provide information about stellar radiation and atmospheric photochemistry. NASA is consequently developing high-efficiency UV detectors, advanced mirror coatings, ultraviolet gratings and filters, low-noise visible detectors and photon-counting technologies capable of extracting extremely small numbers of photons from distant planets. Some of the relevant observations will be so photon-starved that obtaining a useful spectrum of a single world could require very long integrations. The telescope will also be a general-purpose astrophysical observatory. Just as Hubble became far more scientifically important than any single problem it was originally designed to solve, HWO is intended to study everything from nearby stellar and planetary systems to galaxy evolution and the distant universe. Its combination of a large aperture, diffraction-limited imaging and ultraviolet-to-near-infrared spectroscopy would give astronomers capabilities unavailable from either Webb or ground-based observatories. Another unusual aspect of the architecture is longevity. NASA is planning HWO to operate near the Sun-Earth L2 region and to be robotically serviceable. Instruments could potentially be repaired or replaced and consumables replenished, allowing the observatory to evolve technologically rather than remaining frozen in the configuration it had at launch. That capability could also make a later-generation coronagraph, new detectors or potentially complementary technology such as a starshade scientifically relevant decades after HWO first begins operating. HWO remains in its technology and mission-maturation phase. NASA is deliberately exploring the trade space before fixing the final architecture, with major work continuing on coronagraphs, deformable mirrors, telescope stability, detectors, UV instrumentation, deployable structures and servicing technology. Current NASA planning aims to mature many of the enabling technologies around the end of this decade, while a launch is generally discussed for around 2040 or in the 2040s rather than as a fixed launch date. In January 2026 NASA awarded additional industry contracts specifically to advance key HWO technologies, showing that the project has moved beyond a purely hypothetical observatory even though its final design has not yet been selected. If HWO succeeds, its most memorable image may not initially look very spectacular: perhaps only a tiny pale dot beside a carefully suppressed star. But contained inside the spectrum of that dot could be water, clouds, atmospheric chemistry and, potentially, the first observational evidence that biology is not unique to Earth. The central technological problem of HWO is therefore not simply building a bigger telescope. It is learning how to remove almost every photon from a nearby star while preserving the vanishingly small number of photons arriving from a planet beside it. The coronagraph, the picometer-stable telescope and perhaps one day that enormous artificial flower flying tens of thousands of kilometres away are all different solutions to that same problem. Video: This is one of the technologies being investigated for future direct imaging of Earth-like worlds and potentially for use with HWO. Not necessarily the final design.

Erika 

53,973 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Tchaikovsky – Swan Lake: Dance of the Little Swans When Four Bodies Become a Single Living Being There is something quietly extraordinary about Dance of the Little Swans (Danse des petits cygnes). The little swans are at their most beautiful precisely when they can no longer fly in their own way. In ballet, the arms are often a symbol of freedom. They shape the body's lines, express emotion, and reveal each dancer's individuality. Yet in this brief dance, Lev Ivanov begins by doing the exact opposite. Four dancers link their arms together. They willingly bind themselves. They are no longer completely free to move as four separate individuals. And from that loss of freedom, something remarkable emerges: Four bodies begin to function as one. This is the defining essence of Dance of the Little Swans: It is a dance in which the disappearance of individual identity gives rise to a single artistic body. One Locked Pair of Arms Changed Everything At first glance, the four dancers' interlocked arms seem to be nothing more than a charming image of young swans staying close together. In reality, however, this is the very point from which the entire choreography grows. In ballet, the arms do far more than create beautiful shapes. They help maintain balance. They support movement. They allow each dancer to express a unique personality. Once the arms are linked together, all four dancers lose part of their ability to move independently. No one can fully decide their own movement. The smallest change from one dancer immediately affects the others. And here lies the paradox. What appears to take away individual freedom creates a beauty that no individual could ever achieve alone. From that moment onward, the goal is no longer: "A dancer performing beautifully." Instead, it becomes: "A single body moving beautifully." As Individuality Fades, the Feet Become One Voice Once the arms surrender their freedom, the rest of the body must take on a greater responsibility. The entire life of the dance shifts into the feet. Tiny continuous steps. Gentle little hops. Quick but remarkably precise movements. At first, they seem almost simple. There are no spectacular leaps to astonish the audience. No moment allows one dancer to rise above the others. Yet this very simplicity becomes the source of the dance's power. Each step no longer belongs to a single dancer. It belongs to the entire system. One dancer steps. The other three must step with them. One dancer changes the rhythm. The whole structure changes. The beauty of Dance of the Little Swans does not lie in what each dancer can accomplish individually. It lies in their willingness to let go of individuality in order to create a movement greater than themselves. Synchronization Is Not the Goal—It Is the Result Many ensemble dances demand precision. But in Dance of the Little Swans, synchronization carries a deeper meaning. The four dancers do not merely perform the same choreography. They exist within the same structure. Their heads turn together. Their feet land together. The space between them remains almost perfectly constant. Yet the most important point is not that they look alike. It is that they cannot be separated. If they remained four independent individuals, synchronization would simply be a technical skill. But once they become a single shared body, synchronization becomes the very nature of the movement itself. That is why audiences do not see four separate dancers. They see a flock of swans. Tchaikovsky Creates the Breath of a Single Living Creature Remarkably, Tchaikovsky's music follows the very same principle. He does not compose a melody designed for one individual character to shine. Instead, he builds a continuous flow from short, clear, recurring rhythmic figures. The light, crisp, and steady sounds evoke the tiny footsteps of swans gliding across the water. One pulse follows another. One movement grows naturally into the next. The music never divides the four dancers into four separate voices. Instead, it creates a single shared pulse through which they all exist. Just as Ivanov's choreography does, many small elements acquire meaning only when they belong to the same order. The Beauty of No Longer Standing Alone What has made Dance of the Little Swans an enduring image is not technical brilliance. It is a profound artistic idea. An individual can create beauty. But sometimes an even greater beauty appears when the individual becomes part of something larger. The four dancers willingly surrender part of their personal freedom. In return, they gain something that no one could ever create alone. One shared movement. One shared breath. One shared image. More than a century later, audiences do not remember Dance of the Little Swans simply because four dancers performed together. They remember it because, for one fleeting moment, four human beings seem to disappear, making way for a new artistic creature to emerge on stage. And that is the secret behind the unmistakable beauty of this timeless dance.
1:40

Tchaikovsky – Swan Lake: Dance of the Little Swans When Four Bodies Become a Single Living Being There is something quietly extraordinary about Dance of the Little Swans (Danse des petits cygnes). The little swans are at their most beautiful precisely when they can no longer fly in their own way. In ballet, the arms are often a symbol of freedom. They shape the body's lines, express emotion, and reveal each dancer's individuality. Yet in this brief dance, Lev Ivanov begins by doing the exact opposite. Four dancers link their arms together. They willingly bind themselves. They are no longer completely free to move as four separate individuals. And from that loss of freedom, something remarkable emerges: Four bodies begin to function as one. This is the defining essence of Dance of the Little Swans: It is a dance in which the disappearance of individual identity gives rise to a single artistic body. One Locked Pair of Arms Changed Everything At first glance, the four dancers' interlocked arms seem to be nothing more than a charming image of young swans staying close together. In reality, however, this is the very point from which the entire choreography grows. In ballet, the arms do far more than create beautiful shapes. They help maintain balance. They support movement. They allow each dancer to express a unique personality. Once the arms are linked together, all four dancers lose part of their ability to move independently. No one can fully decide their own movement. The smallest change from one dancer immediately affects the others. And here lies the paradox. What appears to take away individual freedom creates a beauty that no individual could ever achieve alone. From that moment onward, the goal is no longer: "A dancer performing beautifully." Instead, it becomes: "A single body moving beautifully." As Individuality Fades, the Feet Become One Voice Once the arms surrender their freedom, the rest of the body must take on a greater responsibility. The entire life of the dance shifts into the feet. Tiny continuous steps. Gentle little hops. Quick but remarkably precise movements. At first, they seem almost simple. There are no spectacular leaps to astonish the audience. No moment allows one dancer to rise above the others. Yet this very simplicity becomes the source of the dance's power. Each step no longer belongs to a single dancer. It belongs to the entire system. One dancer steps. The other three must step with them. One dancer changes the rhythm. The whole structure changes. The beauty of Dance of the Little Swans does not lie in what each dancer can accomplish individually. It lies in their willingness to let go of individuality in order to create a movement greater than themselves. Synchronization Is Not the Goal—It Is the Result Many ensemble dances demand precision. But in Dance of the Little Swans, synchronization carries a deeper meaning. The four dancers do not merely perform the same choreography. They exist within the same structure. Their heads turn together. Their feet land together. The space between them remains almost perfectly constant. Yet the most important point is not that they look alike. It is that they cannot be separated. If they remained four independent individuals, synchronization would simply be a technical skill. But once they become a single shared body, synchronization becomes the very nature of the movement itself. That is why audiences do not see four separate dancers. They see a flock of swans. Tchaikovsky Creates the Breath of a Single Living Creature Remarkably, Tchaikovsky's music follows the very same principle. He does not compose a melody designed for one individual character to shine. Instead, he builds a continuous flow from short, clear, recurring rhythmic figures. The light, crisp, and steady sounds evoke the tiny footsteps of swans gliding across the water. One pulse follows another. One movement grows naturally into the next. The music never divides the four dancers into four separate voices. Instead, it creates a single shared pulse through which they all exist. Just as Ivanov's choreography does, many small elements acquire meaning only when they belong to the same order. The Beauty of No Longer Standing Alone What has made Dance of the Little Swans an enduring image is not technical brilliance. It is a profound artistic idea. An individual can create beauty. But sometimes an even greater beauty appears when the individual becomes part of something larger. The four dancers willingly surrender part of their personal freedom. In return, they gain something that no one could ever create alone. One shared movement. One shared breath. One shared image. More than a century later, audiences do not remember Dance of the Little Swans simply because four dancers performed together. They remember it because, for one fleeting moment, four human beings seem to disappear, making way for a new artistic creature to emerge on stage. And that is the secret behind the unmistakable beauty of this timeless dance.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

16,207 просмотров • 26 дней назад

THE OCCULT ROOTS, ELITE, INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES and INSTITUTIONS PLAN to ALTER MAN & CONTROL SOCIETY. It was all engineered. From symbolism, to intelligence agencies Mk Ultra programs, to transhumanism, and transgenderism, and where the elite get their pedophi*e beliefs from. This is going to explain the foundation and plan for society and layout a huge piece of the puzzle to help you understand where it all came from and how it started. Many of these occult rooted wealthy socialists knew exactly how they were going to literally bring in their New World Order before most of the methods or techniques even existed, and the crazy part is that it's happening today, exactly like they said it was. The last part of their plan, before it is complete was the sexual revolution, and what do we see happening all around us today with transgenderism, transhumanism, and pedophil*a with children? The plan was to revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture, and a sexual revolution to make the West more amenable to a future of socialist technocracy. They knew if they wanted to win they had to play the long game. These people were thinking generations ahead. This is called the Fabian Society model-the slow burn of implemented ideas to transform society. Their symbol is a literal wolf in sheep's clothing/skin. The Fabian Socialist Technocrats talked about this in the 1920s & 1930s. Like Bertrand Russel, a British philosopher who was one of the very first people who openly lived in a pan/poly relationship before anyone else, who basically helped plan the sexual revolution as well as many others. Herbert George Wells (H.G. Wells), the father of science fiction also wrote a bunch of mainline geopolitical books like "The Open Conspiracy," and "The New World Order." In these books he describes how they would revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture and sexual revolution to a socialist technocracy. These books were literally telling you their plans. The concept of technocracy has roots in ancient ideas like Plato's philosopher kings, and it gained traction during the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression. Technocracy emphasizes the use of technical expertise in decision making often prioritizing scientific evidence and data over political considerations or public opinion. Sounds good in some aspects but it doesn't work overall. So, as counterculture, this sexual revolution, and darker occult practices, like Satanism and Paganism, etc., started to rise up, elites and governments started to catch on to these beliefs and practices and big money went into funding the creation of some institutions, non-profits and other programs along with projects in intelligence agencies in the U.S. and others. This overall takeover of the West and society was both calculated and non-intentional in a way. But from big names involved, The Esalen Institute was born. A non-profit in Big Sur, California that focuses on humanistic alternative education. The Institute played a key role in the Human Potential Movement beginning in the 1960s. The Esalen Institute was founded by Michael Murphy and Dick Price in 1962. It is basically the "think tank" of counterculture and the sexual revolution, promoted by very wealthy and influential people. Their intention was to support alternative methods for exploring human conscientiousness, promoting that everything is divine. One major thing you must understand that the roots of many of the people in Esalen were all into Satanic occult type belief systems and paganistic practices, like from the teachings of Anton LaVey and Aliester Crowley, who both were heavily involved in Satanism and also into pedophil*a and transhumanistic beliefs. Crowley was also a part of British Intelligence/MI5, and heavy into altering the mind with drugs and substances to make contact and change conscientiousness and to be like their own god. Other notable figures of Esalen was Timothy Leary, a psychologist who is also known for his advocacy of psychedelic experiences, a prominent figure of the counterculture movement and heavily into Aliester Crowley's sex revolution beliefs. All these sexual beliefs are associated transhumanism, transgenderism, and pedophil*a. Which is no coincidence why you see the heavy push for this on our society and on our children today. Another very prominent name and usual suspect is David Rockefeller who heavily promoted and funded the Esalen Institution and any others like it and donated millions of dollars to them every single year from the 1970s to around 2004. Rockefeller wasn't the only one and this is just one piece of this overall plan to destroy the West and society itself to bring in this new world. Let's move on. Now we will connect how Mk-Ultra was literally beyond the WW2 German connection and operation paperclip and set up from an arm of these foundations and writings of some of these people who laid the ground work and sparked these ideas into a reality, to be used on Western society and to literally alter man's mind and his actual physical appearance. Bring in the green agenda and convince man that man is the problem. A White Paper was written in the 1970s called, "Changing the Images of Man," put out by the Tavistock Institution. In this key paper they talked about reengineering all of Western civilization's thoughts. Not just about the environment, but also about man himself. The Tavistock Institution of human relations is a British non-profit reaserch and consulting organization, specialising in the study of group behavior. They also have sister companies in China and Germany, and it was established in 1947. They explained about how they needed to convince man that man is the problem. This is exactly where all of your counterculture, sexual revolution, depopulation, antinatalist, transgenderism, transhumanism, pedophil*a, etc., beliefs stem from. You are the problem but you can change yourself. Feb 4, 1932, A Brave New World, and then, A Brave New World Revisited was written. Huxley wrote that this is not fiction, this is a plan of things to come. The 2nd chapter is literally all about child sexual abuse material. This is where all this stuff came about and into our society. Huxley heavily believed in Aliester Crowley's belief systems and partied with Crowley, even attending orgies together. Huxley took Crowley's book, "The Drug Diaries to a government study level in a sense. Which was originally what Crowley was working with to contact entities and perform ritualistic ceremonies and involved with sexual activities with children. Tavistock was basically the British Mk Ultra from the studies originally from Aliester who was also a British intelligence agent with MI5. These drug studies and mind control studies at Tavistock led to the idea that you can engineer and change a human being, not just in his mind, but an entire change of physiology and biology of a person. Hence Transgenderism and Transhumanism, etc. Like how they're literally giving kids drugs and surgeries to "change" their genders today. In 1969 Dr. Holger Hyden who worked on mind control through drugs and medication, etc., was invited to a mind control conference in San Francisco that the Rockefellers sponsored by the CIA's, "Voice of America. Dr. Hyden's papers were about drugs and chemicals actually changing gender in men and women in the future. And look where we are now. The CIA made alliances with the French post modernists and deconstructionists who were a part of Congress for Cultural Freedom. The CIA also had and still does have members who studied and agreed with these same belief systems and started to study mind control after Huxley's brave new world which sparked their interest because of Crowley's actual experimentation actually using drugs to alter conscientiousness and for control or engineering one's mind and the results and studies from the Tavistock and their research. Which all stems back to his Satanic and sexual beliefs. Now we examine the CIA Mk Ultra with Hollywood and it's Mk Ultra program to induce, steer, and mold behavior throughout the population through, sex, drugs, and rock and roll. This was all apart of the mind control program on a grand scale relating to propaganda and drugs. Most A-list celebrities back then were also working or were active intelligence agents who also had DoD badges including Marylyn Monroe, to access the famous Air force location named Laurel Canyon where many operations stemmed from when it came to manipulating the public with music, t.v. and with any other type of influence. Many were recruited to do spy work for intelligence agencies. This was basically them working out their big plan, their agenda, which still happens today with the huge push with the occult and Satanic worship, sexual deviancy, transgenderism, transhumanism, you name it. They even have after school Satan groups in schools for kids starting as young as in kindergarten. This is also why you see the gigantic push for pedophil*a and trying to be able to give children consent and be sexualized, while horrific laws are being passed to reduce penalties for child predators. This is the type of "Brave New World" they want. The last step before bringing in their New World is the sexual revolution aspect which includes transgenderism, pedophil*a, transhumanism, Satanism, the green agenda, and depopulation. But the sexual revolution is the most important and last step. The fall of Rome also occurred when this type of sexual activity occurred as well. Something to really take into consideration and compare it to where we are now. Every single one of these ideologies and beliefs all stem from these wealthy elite individuals, institutions and belief systems that they all planned decades ago and it's literally happening right in front of us. There is so much more to this but this gives you an introduction or a starting point to connect the dots of where it all came from during the past century, which directly is impacting our lives and society. They are now experiencing heavy pushback. We're onto them and their ultimate plan. They gave us the roadmap. It's up to you to understand it and up to all of us to stop it.
14:15

THE OCCULT ROOTS, ELITE, INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES and INSTITUTIONS PLAN to ALTER MAN & CONTROL SOCIETY. It was all engineered. From symbolism, to intelligence agencies Mk Ultra programs, to transhumanism, and transgenderism, and where the elite get their pedophi*e beliefs from. This is going to explain the foundation and plan for society and layout a huge piece of the puzzle to help you understand where it all came from and how it started. Many of these occult rooted wealthy socialists knew exactly how they were going to literally bring in their New World Order before most of the methods or techniques even existed, and the crazy part is that it's happening today, exactly like they said it was. The last part of their plan, before it is complete was the sexual revolution, and what do we see happening all around us today with transgenderism, transhumanism, and pedophil*a with children? The plan was to revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture, and a sexual revolution to make the West more amenable to a future of socialist technocracy. They knew if they wanted to win they had to play the long game. These people were thinking generations ahead. This is called the Fabian Society model-the slow burn of implemented ideas to transform society. Their symbol is a literal wolf in sheep's clothing/skin. The Fabian Socialist Technocrats talked about this in the 1920s & 1930s. Like Bertrand Russel, a British philosopher who was one of the very first people who openly lived in a pan/poly relationship before anyone else, who basically helped plan the sexual revolution as well as many others. Herbert George Wells (H.G. Wells), the father of science fiction also wrote a bunch of mainline geopolitical books like "The Open Conspiracy," and "The New World Order." In these books he describes how they would revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture and sexual revolution to a socialist technocracy. These books were literally telling you their plans. The concept of technocracy has roots in ancient ideas like Plato's philosopher kings, and it gained traction during the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression. Technocracy emphasizes the use of technical expertise in decision making often prioritizing scientific evidence and data over political considerations or public opinion. Sounds good in some aspects but it doesn't work overall. So, as counterculture, this sexual revolution, and darker occult practices, like Satanism and Paganism, etc., started to rise up, elites and governments started to catch on to these beliefs and practices and big money went into funding the creation of some institutions, non-profits and other programs along with projects in intelligence agencies in the U.S. and others. This overall takeover of the West and society was both calculated and non-intentional in a way. But from big names involved, The Esalen Institute was born. A non-profit in Big Sur, California that focuses on humanistic alternative education. The Institute played a key role in the Human Potential Movement beginning in the 1960s. The Esalen Institute was founded by Michael Murphy and Dick Price in 1962. It is basically the "think tank" of counterculture and the sexual revolution, promoted by very wealthy and influential people. Their intention was to support alternative methods for exploring human conscientiousness, promoting that everything is divine. One major thing you must understand that the roots of many of the people in Esalen were all into Satanic occult type belief systems and paganistic practices, like from the teachings of Anton LaVey and Aliester Crowley, who both were heavily involved in Satanism and also into pedophil*a and transhumanistic beliefs. Crowley was also a part of British Intelligence/MI5, and heavy into altering the mind with drugs and substances to make contact and change conscientiousness and to be like their own god. Other notable figures of Esalen was Timothy Leary, a psychologist who is also known for his advocacy of psychedelic experiences, a prominent figure of the counterculture movement and heavily into Aliester Crowley's sex revolution beliefs. All these sexual beliefs are associated transhumanism, transgenderism, and pedophil*a. Which is no coincidence why you see the heavy push for this on our society and on our children today. Another very prominent name and usual suspect is David Rockefeller who heavily promoted and funded the Esalen Institution and any others like it and donated millions of dollars to them every single year from the 1970s to around 2004. Rockefeller wasn't the only one and this is just one piece of this overall plan to destroy the West and society itself to bring in this new world. Let's move on. Now we will connect how Mk-Ultra was literally beyond the WW2 German connection and operation paperclip and set up from an arm of these foundations and writings of some of these people who laid the ground work and sparked these ideas into a reality, to be used on Western society and to literally alter man's mind and his actual physical appearance. Bring in the green agenda and convince man that man is the problem. A White Paper was written in the 1970s called, "Changing the Images of Man," put out by the Tavistock Institution. In this key paper they talked about reengineering all of Western civilization's thoughts. Not just about the environment, but also about man himself. The Tavistock Institution of human relations is a British non-profit reaserch and consulting organization, specialising in the study of group behavior. They also have sister companies in China and Germany, and it was established in 1947. They explained about how they needed to convince man that man is the problem. This is exactly where all of your counterculture, sexual revolution, depopulation, antinatalist, transgenderism, transhumanism, pedophil*a, etc., beliefs stem from. You are the problem but you can change yourself. Feb 4, 1932, A Brave New World, and then, A Brave New World Revisited was written. Huxley wrote that this is not fiction, this is a plan of things to come. The 2nd chapter is literally all about child sexual abuse material. This is where all this stuff came about and into our society. Huxley heavily believed in Aliester Crowley's belief systems and partied with Crowley, even attending orgies together. Huxley took Crowley's book, "The Drug Diaries to a government study level in a sense. Which was originally what Crowley was working with to contact entities and perform ritualistic ceremonies and involved with sexual activities with children. Tavistock was basically the British Mk Ultra from the studies originally from Aliester who was also a British intelligence agent with MI5. These drug studies and mind control studies at Tavistock led to the idea that you can engineer and change a human being, not just in his mind, but an entire change of physiology and biology of a person. Hence Transgenderism and Transhumanism, etc. Like how they're literally giving kids drugs and surgeries to "change" their genders today. In 1969 Dr. Holger Hyden who worked on mind control through drugs and medication, etc., was invited to a mind control conference in San Francisco that the Rockefellers sponsored by the CIA's, "Voice of America. Dr. Hyden's papers were about drugs and chemicals actually changing gender in men and women in the future. And look where we are now. The CIA made alliances with the French post modernists and deconstructionists who were a part of Congress for Cultural Freedom. The CIA also had and still does have members who studied and agreed with these same belief systems and started to study mind control after Huxley's brave new world which sparked their interest because of Crowley's actual experimentation actually using drugs to alter conscientiousness and for control or engineering one's mind and the results and studies from the Tavistock and their research. Which all stems back to his Satanic and sexual beliefs. Now we examine the CIA Mk Ultra with Hollywood and it's Mk Ultra program to induce, steer, and mold behavior throughout the population through, sex, drugs, and rock and roll. This was all apart of the mind control program on a grand scale relating to propaganda and drugs. Most A-list celebrities back then were also working or were active intelligence agents who also had DoD badges including Marylyn Monroe, to access the famous Air force location named Laurel Canyon where many operations stemmed from when it came to manipulating the public with music, t.v. and with any other type of influence. Many were recruited to do spy work for intelligence agencies. This was basically them working out their big plan, their agenda, which still happens today with the huge push with the occult and Satanic worship, sexual deviancy, transgenderism, transhumanism, you name it. They even have after school Satan groups in schools for kids starting as young as in kindergarten. This is also why you see the gigantic push for pedophil*a and trying to be able to give children consent and be sexualized, while horrific laws are being passed to reduce penalties for child predators. This is the type of "Brave New World" they want. The last step before bringing in their New World is the sexual revolution aspect which includes transgenderism, pedophil*a, transhumanism, Satanism, the green agenda, and depopulation. But the sexual revolution is the most important and last step. The fall of Rome also occurred when this type of sexual activity occurred as well. Something to really take into consideration and compare it to where we are now. Every single one of these ideologies and beliefs all stem from these wealthy elite individuals, institutions and belief systems that they all planned decades ago and it's literally happening right in front of us. There is so much more to this but this gives you an introduction or a starting point to connect the dots of where it all came from during the past century, which directly is impacting our lives and society. They are now experiencing heavy pushback. We're onto them and their ultimate plan. They gave us the roadmap. It's up to you to understand it and up to all of us to stop it.

The SCIF

85,521 просмотров • 1 год назад

The TAVISTOCK, ESALEN, and STANFORD RESEARCH institute, the OCCULT, and the CIA's plan to BRAINWASH and destroy AMERICA. "We must convince man that "man" is the problem." This is their plan to bring about their "Brave New World." But it's not what you think it is. This is the sinister plan that you see unfolding right now in today's world. This is WHO is behind it, HOW, WHEN, and WHERE they planned it, and WHY. From the climate agenda, transgenderism, transhumanism, the Satanic agenda, the pedophi*e agenda and attack on our children, to cancel culture, the sexual revolution, communism, and every other backwards, upside down, and evil idea being brought about into our society. This is very important to understand, pay attention. It was all engineered. From symbolism, to intelligence agencies Mk Ultra programs, to transhumanism, and transgenderism, and where the elite get their pedophi*e beliefs from. This is going to explain the foundation and plan for society and layout a huge piece of the puzzle to help you understand where it all came from and how it started. Many of these occult rooted wealthy socialists knew exactly how they were going to literally bring in their New World Order before most of the methods or techniques even existed, and the crazy part is that it's happening today, exactly like they said it was. The last part of their plan, before it is complete was the sexual revolution, and what do we see happening all around us today with transgenderism, transhumanism, and pedophil*a with children? The plan was to revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture, and a sexual revolution to make the West more amenable to a future of socialist technocracy. They knew if they wanted to win they had to play the long game. These people were thinking generations ahead. This is called the Fabian Society model-the slow burn of implemented ideas to transform society. Their symbol is a literal wolf in sheep's clothing/skin. The Fabian Socialist Technocrats talked about this in the 1920s & 1930s. Like Bertrand Russel, a British philosopher who was one of the very first people who openly lived in a pan/poly relationship before anyone else, who basically helped plan the sexual revolution as well as many others. Herbert George Wells (H.G. Wells), the father of science fiction also wrote a bunch of mainline geopolitical books like "The Open Conspiracy," and "The New World Order." In these books he describes how they would revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture and sexual revolution to a socialist technocracy. These books were literally telling you their plans. The concept of technocracy has roots in ancient ideas like Plato's philosopher kings, and it gained traction during the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression. Technocracy emphasizes the use of technical expertise in decision making often prioritizing scientific evidence and data over political considerations or public opinion. Sounds good in some aspects but it doesn't work overall. So, as counterculture, this sexual revolution, and darker occult practices, like Satanism and Paganism, etc., started to rise up, elites and governments started to catch on to these beliefs and practices and big money went into funding the creation of some institutions, non-profits and other programs along with projects in intelligence agencies in the U.S. and others. This overall takeover of the West and society was both calculated and non-intentional in a way. But from big names involved, The Esalen Institute was born. A non-profit in Big Sur, California that focuses on humanistic alternative education. The Institute played a key role in the Human Potential Movement beginning in the 1960s. The Esalen Institute was founded by Michael Murphy and Dick Price in 1962. It is basically the "think tank" of counterculture and the sexual revolution, promoted by very wealthy and influential people. Their intention was to support alternative methods for exploring human conscientiousness, promoting that everything is divine. One major thing you must understand that the roots of many of the people in Esalen were all into Satanic occult type belief systems and paganistic practices, like from the teachings of Anton LaVey and Aliester Crowley, who both were heavily involved in Satanism and also into pedophil*a and transhumanistic beliefs. Crowley was also a part of British Intelligence/MI5, and heavy into altering the mind with drugs and substances to make contact and change conscientiousness and to be like their own god. Other notable figures of Esalen was Timothy Leary, a psychologist who is also known for his advocacy of psychedelic experiences, a prominent figure of the counterculture movement and heavily into Aliester Crowley's sex revolution beliefs. All these sexual beliefs are associated transhumanism, transgenderism, and pedophil*a. Which is no coincidence why you see the heavy push for this on our society and on our children today. Another very prominent name and usual suspect is David Rockefeller who heavily promoted and funded the Esalen Institution and any others like it and donated millions of dollars to them every single year from the 1970s to around 2004. Rockefeller wasn't the only one and this is just one piece of this overall plan to destroy the West and society itself to bring in this new world. Let's move on. Now we will connect how Mk-Ultra was literally beyond the WW2 German connection and operation paperclip and set up from an arm of these foundations and writings of some of these people who laid the ground work and sparked these ideas into a reality, to be used on Western society and to literally alter man's mind and his actual physical appearance. Bring in the green agenda and convince man that man is the problem. A White Paper was written in the 1970s called, "Changing the Images of Man," put out by the Tavistock Institution. In this key paper they talked about reengineering all of Western civilization's thoughts. Not just about the environment, but also about man himself. The Tavistock Institution of human relations is a British non-profit research and consulting organization, specializing in the study of group behavior. They also have sister companies in China and Germany, and it was established in 1947. They explained about how they needed to convince man that man is the problem. This is exactly where all of your counterculture, sexual revolution, depopulation, antinatalist, transgenderism, transhumanism, pedophil*a, etc., beliefs stem from. You are the problem but you can change yourself. Feb 4, 1932, A Brave New World, and then, A Brave New World Revisited was written. Huxley wrote that this is not fiction, this is a plan of things to come. The 2nd chapter is literally all about child sexual abuse material. This is where all this stuff came about and into our society. Huxley heavily believed in Aliester Crowley's belief systems and partied with Crowley, even attending orgies together. Huxley took Crowley's book, "The Drug Diaries to a government study level in a sense. Which was originally what Crowley was working with to contact entities and perform ritualistic ceremonies and involved with sexual activities with children. Tavistock was basically the British Mk Ultra from the studies originally from Aliester who was also a British intelligence agent with MI5. These drug studies and mind control studies at Tavistock led to the idea that you can engineer and change a human being, not just in his mind, but an entire change of physiology and biology of a person. Hence Transgenderism and Transhumanism, etc. Like how they're literally giving kids drugs and surgeries to "change" their genders today. In 1969 Dr. Holger Hyden who worked on mind control through drugs and medication, etc., was invited to a mind control conference in San Francisco that the Rockefellers sponsored by the CIA's, "Voice of America. Dr. Hyden's papers were about drugs and chemicals actually changing gender in men and women in the future. And look where we are now. The CIA made alliances with the French post modernists and deconstructionists who were a part of Congress for Cultural Freedom. The CIA also had and still does have members who studied and agreed with these same belief systems and started to study mind control after Huxley's brave new world which sparked their interest because of Crowley's actual experimentation actually using drugs to alter conscientiousness and for control or engineering one's mind and the results and studies from the Tavistock and their research. Which all stems back to his Satanic and sexual beliefs. Now we examine the CIA Mk Ultra with Hollywood and it's Mk Ultra program to induce, steer, and mold behavior throughout the population through, sex, drugs, and rock and roll. This was all apart of the mind control program on a grand scale relating to propaganda and drugs. Most A-list celebrities back then were also working or were active intelligence agents who also had DoD badges including Marylyn Monroe, to access the famous Air force location named Laurel Canyon where many operations stemmed from when it came to manipulating the public with music, t.v. and with any other type of influence. Many were recruited to do spy work for intelligence agencies. This was basically them working out their big plan, their agenda, which still happens today with the huge push with the occult and Satanic worship, sexual deviancy, transgenderism, transhumanism, you name it. They even have after school Satan groups in schools for kids starting as young as in kindergarten. This is also why you see the gigantic push for pedophil*a and trying to be able to give children consent and be sexualized, while horrific laws are being passed to reduce penalties for child predators. This is the type of "Brave New World" they want. The last step before bringing in their New World is the sexual revolution aspect which includes transgenderism, pedophil*a, transhumanism, Satanism, the green agenda, and depopulation. But the sexual revolution is the most important and last step. The fall of Rome also occurred when this type of sexual activity occurred as well. Something to really take into consideration and compare it to where we are now. Every single one of these ideologies and beliefs all stem from these wealthy elite individuals, institutions and belief systems that they all planned decades ago and it's literally happening right in front of us. There is so much more to this but this gives you an introduction or a starting point to connect the dots of where it all came from during the past century, which directly is impacting our lives and society. They are now experiencing heavy pushback. We're onto them and their ultimate plan. They gave us the roadmap. It's up to you to understand it and up to all of us to stop it.
14:12

The TAVISTOCK, ESALEN, and STANFORD RESEARCH institute, the OCCULT, and the CIA's plan to BRAINWASH and destroy AMERICA. "We must convince man that "man" is the problem." This is their plan to bring about their "Brave New World." But it's not what you think it is. This is the sinister plan that you see unfolding right now in today's world. This is WHO is behind it, HOW, WHEN, and WHERE they planned it, and WHY. From the climate agenda, transgenderism, transhumanism, the Satanic agenda, the pedophi*e agenda and attack on our children, to cancel culture, the sexual revolution, communism, and every other backwards, upside down, and evil idea being brought about into our society. This is very important to understand, pay attention. It was all engineered. From symbolism, to intelligence agencies Mk Ultra programs, to transhumanism, and transgenderism, and where the elite get their pedophi*e beliefs from. This is going to explain the foundation and plan for society and layout a huge piece of the puzzle to help you understand where it all came from and how it started. Many of these occult rooted wealthy socialists knew exactly how they were going to literally bring in their New World Order before most of the methods or techniques even existed, and the crazy part is that it's happening today, exactly like they said it was. The last part of their plan, before it is complete was the sexual revolution, and what do we see happening all around us today with transgenderism, transhumanism, and pedophil*a with children? The plan was to revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture, and a sexual revolution to make the West more amenable to a future of socialist technocracy. They knew if they wanted to win they had to play the long game. These people were thinking generations ahead. This is called the Fabian Society model-the slow burn of implemented ideas to transform society. Their symbol is a literal wolf in sheep's clothing/skin. The Fabian Socialist Technocrats talked about this in the 1920s & 1930s. Like Bertrand Russel, a British philosopher who was one of the very first people who openly lived in a pan/poly relationship before anyone else, who basically helped plan the sexual revolution as well as many others. Herbert George Wells (H.G. Wells), the father of science fiction also wrote a bunch of mainline geopolitical books like "The Open Conspiracy," and "The New World Order." In these books he describes how they would revolutionize Western civilization through counterculture and sexual revolution to a socialist technocracy. These books were literally telling you their plans. The concept of technocracy has roots in ancient ideas like Plato's philosopher kings, and it gained traction during the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression. Technocracy emphasizes the use of technical expertise in decision making often prioritizing scientific evidence and data over political considerations or public opinion. Sounds good in some aspects but it doesn't work overall. So, as counterculture, this sexual revolution, and darker occult practices, like Satanism and Paganism, etc., started to rise up, elites and governments started to catch on to these beliefs and practices and big money went into funding the creation of some institutions, non-profits and other programs along with projects in intelligence agencies in the U.S. and others. This overall takeover of the West and society was both calculated and non-intentional in a way. But from big names involved, The Esalen Institute was born. A non-profit in Big Sur, California that focuses on humanistic alternative education. The Institute played a key role in the Human Potential Movement beginning in the 1960s. The Esalen Institute was founded by Michael Murphy and Dick Price in 1962. It is basically the "think tank" of counterculture and the sexual revolution, promoted by very wealthy and influential people. Their intention was to support alternative methods for exploring human conscientiousness, promoting that everything is divine. One major thing you must understand that the roots of many of the people in Esalen were all into Satanic occult type belief systems and paganistic practices, like from the teachings of Anton LaVey and Aliester Crowley, who both were heavily involved in Satanism and also into pedophil*a and transhumanistic beliefs. Crowley was also a part of British Intelligence/MI5, and heavy into altering the mind with drugs and substances to make contact and change conscientiousness and to be like their own god. Other notable figures of Esalen was Timothy Leary, a psychologist who is also known for his advocacy of psychedelic experiences, a prominent figure of the counterculture movement and heavily into Aliester Crowley's sex revolution beliefs. All these sexual beliefs are associated transhumanism, transgenderism, and pedophil*a. Which is no coincidence why you see the heavy push for this on our society and on our children today. Another very prominent name and usual suspect is David Rockefeller who heavily promoted and funded the Esalen Institution and any others like it and donated millions of dollars to them every single year from the 1970s to around 2004. Rockefeller wasn't the only one and this is just one piece of this overall plan to destroy the West and society itself to bring in this new world. Let's move on. Now we will connect how Mk-Ultra was literally beyond the WW2 German connection and operation paperclip and set up from an arm of these foundations and writings of some of these people who laid the ground work and sparked these ideas into a reality, to be used on Western society and to literally alter man's mind and his actual physical appearance. Bring in the green agenda and convince man that man is the problem. A White Paper was written in the 1970s called, "Changing the Images of Man," put out by the Tavistock Institution. In this key paper they talked about reengineering all of Western civilization's thoughts. Not just about the environment, but also about man himself. The Tavistock Institution of human relations is a British non-profit research and consulting organization, specializing in the study of group behavior. They also have sister companies in China and Germany, and it was established in 1947. They explained about how they needed to convince man that man is the problem. This is exactly where all of your counterculture, sexual revolution, depopulation, antinatalist, transgenderism, transhumanism, pedophil*a, etc., beliefs stem from. You are the problem but you can change yourself. Feb 4, 1932, A Brave New World, and then, A Brave New World Revisited was written. Huxley wrote that this is not fiction, this is a plan of things to come. The 2nd chapter is literally all about child sexual abuse material. This is where all this stuff came about and into our society. Huxley heavily believed in Aliester Crowley's belief systems and partied with Crowley, even attending orgies together. Huxley took Crowley's book, "The Drug Diaries to a government study level in a sense. Which was originally what Crowley was working with to contact entities and perform ritualistic ceremonies and involved with sexual activities with children. Tavistock was basically the British Mk Ultra from the studies originally from Aliester who was also a British intelligence agent with MI5. These drug studies and mind control studies at Tavistock led to the idea that you can engineer and change a human being, not just in his mind, but an entire change of physiology and biology of a person. Hence Transgenderism and Transhumanism, etc. Like how they're literally giving kids drugs and surgeries to "change" their genders today. In 1969 Dr. Holger Hyden who worked on mind control through drugs and medication, etc., was invited to a mind control conference in San Francisco that the Rockefellers sponsored by the CIA's, "Voice of America. Dr. Hyden's papers were about drugs and chemicals actually changing gender in men and women in the future. And look where we are now. The CIA made alliances with the French post modernists and deconstructionists who were a part of Congress for Cultural Freedom. The CIA also had and still does have members who studied and agreed with these same belief systems and started to study mind control after Huxley's brave new world which sparked their interest because of Crowley's actual experimentation actually using drugs to alter conscientiousness and for control or engineering one's mind and the results and studies from the Tavistock and their research. Which all stems back to his Satanic and sexual beliefs. Now we examine the CIA Mk Ultra with Hollywood and it's Mk Ultra program to induce, steer, and mold behavior throughout the population through, sex, drugs, and rock and roll. This was all apart of the mind control program on a grand scale relating to propaganda and drugs. Most A-list celebrities back then were also working or were active intelligence agents who also had DoD badges including Marylyn Monroe, to access the famous Air force location named Laurel Canyon where many operations stemmed from when it came to manipulating the public with music, t.v. and with any other type of influence. Many were recruited to do spy work for intelligence agencies. This was basically them working out their big plan, their agenda, which still happens today with the huge push with the occult and Satanic worship, sexual deviancy, transgenderism, transhumanism, you name it. They even have after school Satan groups in schools for kids starting as young as in kindergarten. This is also why you see the gigantic push for pedophil*a and trying to be able to give children consent and be sexualized, while horrific laws are being passed to reduce penalties for child predators. This is the type of "Brave New World" they want. The last step before bringing in their New World is the sexual revolution aspect which includes transgenderism, pedophil*a, transhumanism, Satanism, the green agenda, and depopulation. But the sexual revolution is the most important and last step. The fall of Rome also occurred when this type of sexual activity occurred as well. Something to really take into consideration and compare it to where we are now. Every single one of these ideologies and beliefs all stem from these wealthy elite individuals, institutions and belief systems that they all planned decades ago and it's literally happening right in front of us. There is so much more to this but this gives you an introduction or a starting point to connect the dots of where it all came from during the past century, which directly is impacting our lives and society. They are now experiencing heavy pushback. We're onto them and their ultimate plan. They gave us the roadmap. It's up to you to understand it and up to all of us to stop it.

The SCIF

16,700 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

VEO 2 by Google DeepMind : MY CHEAT SHEET Alright, so after 500h-ish spent on VEO and giving birth to both "Kitsune" and "Banished", tons of people asked for a making-of. Instead, I decided to give you what I actually know of VEO 2 to this day. Please share! it's made to be spread around! 1/ If you're not using a LLM (Gemini, ChatGPT, whatever), you're doing it wrong. VEO 2 currently has a sweet spot when it comes to prompt length: too short is poor, too long drops information, action, description etc. I did a lot of back and forth to find my sweet spot, but once I got in a place I thought felt right, I used a LLM to help me keep my structure, length, and help me draft actions. I would then spent an extensive amount of time tweaking, iterating, removing words, changing order, adding others, but the draft would come from a LLM and a conversation I built and trained to understand what my structure looked like, what was a success, or a failure. I would also share the prompts working well for further reference, and sharing the failures also for further reference. This would ensure my LLM conversation became a true companion. 2/ Structure, structure, structure Structure is important. Each recipe is different but same as any GenAI text-to something, it looks like the "higher on the prompt has more weight" rule applies. So, in my case I would start by describing the aesthetics I am looking for, time of day, colors, mood, then move to camera, subject, action, and all the rest. Once again, you might have a different experience but what is important is to stick to whatever structure you have as you move forward. Keeping it organized also makes it easier to edit later. 3/ Only describe what you see in the frame If you have a character you want to keep consistent, but you want a close-up on the face for example, your reflex will be to describe the character from head to toe and then mention you want a close-up...It's not that simple. If I tell VEO I want a face close-up but then proceed to describe the character's feet, the close-up mention will be dropped by VEO... Once again, the LLM can help you in this by giving it the instruction to only describe what is in the frame. 4/ Patience Well, it can get costly to be patient, but even if you repeat the same structure, sometimes changing one word can still throw the entire thing out and totally change the aesthetics of your scene. It is by nature extremely consistent if you conserve most words, but sometimes it happens. In those situations, trace your steps back and try to figure out which words are triggering a larger change. 5/ Documenting When I started "Kitsune" (and did the same for all others), the first thing I did was start a Figjam file so I could save the successful prompts and come back to them for future reference. Why Figjam? So I could also upload 1 to 4 generations from this prompt, and browse through them in the future. 6/ VEO is the Midjourney of video Currently, no text-to-video tool (Minimax being the closest behind) gave me a feeling I could provide strong art directions and actually get them. I have been a designer for nearly 20 years, and art direction to me has been one of the strongest foundations of most of my work. Dark, light, happy, sad, colorful or not, it doesn't matter as long as you have a point of view and please...have a point of view. Recently watched a great video about the slow death of art direction in film (link in comments) and oh boy, did VEO 2 deliver on giving me the feeling I was listened. Try starting your prompts with different kinds of medium (watercolor for example), the mood you are trying to achieve, the kind of lighting you want, the dust in the rays of light, etc... which gets me to the next one 7/ You can direct your colors in VEO It's as simple as mentioning the hues you want to have in the final result, in which quantity, and where. When I direct shots, I am constantly describing colors for two reasons: 1. Well, having a point of view and 2. reaching better consistency through text-to-video. If I have a strong and consistent mood but my character is slightly different because of text-to-video, the impact won't be dramatic because a strong art direction helps a lot with consistency. 8/ Describe your life away Some people asked me how I achieved a good consistency between shots knowing it's only text-to-video and the answer is simple: I describe my characters, their unique traits, their clothing, their haircut, etc..anything which could help someone visually impaired have a very precise mental representation of the subject. 9/ But don't describe too much either... It would be magical if you could stuff 3000 words in the window and have exactly what you asked for, right? Well, it turns out VEO is amazing with its prompt adherence, but there is always a moment where it starts dropping animations or visual elements when your prompt stretches for a tad too long. This actually happens way before the character limit allowed by VEO is reached, so don't overdo it, it's no use and will play against the results. For info, 200-250 words seems like a sweet spot! 10/ Natural movements but... VEO is great with natural movements and this is also one of the reasons why I used it so extensively: people walking don't walk in slow-motion. That being said, don't try to be too ambitious on some of the expected movements: multiple camera movements won't work, full 360 revolutions around a subject won't work, anime-style crazy camera movements won't work, etc... what it can do is already great, but there are still some limitations...
1:56

VEO 2 by Google DeepMind : MY CHEAT SHEET Alright, so after 500h-ish spent on VEO and giving birth to both "Kitsune" and "Banished", tons of people asked for a making-of. Instead, I decided to give you what I actually know of VEO 2 to this day. Please share! it's made to be spread around! 1/ If you're not using a LLM (Gemini, ChatGPT, whatever), you're doing it wrong. VEO 2 currently has a sweet spot when it comes to prompt length: too short is poor, too long drops information, action, description etc. I did a lot of back and forth to find my sweet spot, but once I got in a place I thought felt right, I used a LLM to help me keep my structure, length, and help me draft actions. I would then spent an extensive amount of time tweaking, iterating, removing words, changing order, adding others, but the draft would come from a LLM and a conversation I built and trained to understand what my structure looked like, what was a success, or a failure. I would also share the prompts working well for further reference, and sharing the failures also for further reference. This would ensure my LLM conversation became a true companion. 2/ Structure, structure, structure Structure is important. Each recipe is different but same as any GenAI text-to something, it looks like the "higher on the prompt has more weight" rule applies. So, in my case I would start by describing the aesthetics I am looking for, time of day, colors, mood, then move to camera, subject, action, and all the rest. Once again, you might have a different experience but what is important is to stick to whatever structure you have as you move forward. Keeping it organized also makes it easier to edit later. 3/ Only describe what you see in the frame If you have a character you want to keep consistent, but you want a close-up on the face for example, your reflex will be to describe the character from head to toe and then mention you want a close-up...It's not that simple. If I tell VEO I want a face close-up but then proceed to describe the character's feet, the close-up mention will be dropped by VEO... Once again, the LLM can help you in this by giving it the instruction to only describe what is in the frame. 4/ Patience Well, it can get costly to be patient, but even if you repeat the same structure, sometimes changing one word can still throw the entire thing out and totally change the aesthetics of your scene. It is by nature extremely consistent if you conserve most words, but sometimes it happens. In those situations, trace your steps back and try to figure out which words are triggering a larger change. 5/ Documenting When I started "Kitsune" (and did the same for all others), the first thing I did was start a Figjam file so I could save the successful prompts and come back to them for future reference. Why Figjam? So I could also upload 1 to 4 generations from this prompt, and browse through them in the future. 6/ VEO is the Midjourney of video Currently, no text-to-video tool (Minimax being the closest behind) gave me a feeling I could provide strong art directions and actually get them. I have been a designer for nearly 20 years, and art direction to me has been one of the strongest foundations of most of my work. Dark, light, happy, sad, colorful or not, it doesn't matter as long as you have a point of view and please...have a point of view. Recently watched a great video about the slow death of art direction in film (link in comments) and oh boy, did VEO 2 deliver on giving me the feeling I was listened. Try starting your prompts with different kinds of medium (watercolor for example), the mood you are trying to achieve, the kind of lighting you want, the dust in the rays of light, etc... which gets me to the next one 7/ You can direct your colors in VEO It's as simple as mentioning the hues you want to have in the final result, in which quantity, and where. When I direct shots, I am constantly describing colors for two reasons: 1. Well, having a point of view and 2. reaching better consistency through text-to-video. If I have a strong and consistent mood but my character is slightly different because of text-to-video, the impact won't be dramatic because a strong art direction helps a lot with consistency. 8/ Describe your life away Some people asked me how I achieved a good consistency between shots knowing it's only text-to-video and the answer is simple: I describe my characters, their unique traits, their clothing, their haircut, etc..anything which could help someone visually impaired have a very precise mental representation of the subject. 9/ But don't describe too much either... It would be magical if you could stuff 3000 words in the window and have exactly what you asked for, right? Well, it turns out VEO is amazing with its prompt adherence, but there is always a moment where it starts dropping animations or visual elements when your prompt stretches for a tad too long. This actually happens way before the character limit allowed by VEO is reached, so don't overdo it, it's no use and will play against the results. For info, 200-250 words seems like a sweet spot! 10/ Natural movements but... VEO is great with natural movements and this is also one of the reasons why I used it so extensively: people walking don't walk in slow-motion. That being said, don't try to be too ambitious on some of the expected movements: multiple camera movements won't work, full 360 revolutions around a subject won't work, anime-style crazy camera movements won't work, etc... what it can do is already great, but there are still some limitations...

Henry Daubrez 🌸💀

31,182 просмотров • 1 год назад