Jury Could Decide Racial Slurs Counted As Provocation In Chud The Builder Case | ChudTheBuilder

I have 0 sympathy for chud. You can’t go around intentionally trying to piss off random people and not expect the worst outcome. Then go around and blame the black community for “violence” Maybe just maybe. Be a civilized fucking person and you won’t have any problems

Carrying a giant can of bear mace + concealed firearm was a monumental tactical error by Chud. The moment the jury learns that he had a highly effective, non-lethal deterrent but shot instead, both "necessity" and "proportionality" claims are nuked.

People will listen to this whole video and say “WeLl WhAt aBoUt FrEeDom Of SpEeCh¿”

Here’s the problem with what ought to be. What ought to be is that some black dude comes up and calls me a cracker with a hard R. And I just go nuts on that non-swimmer and something bad happens to him. He’s on the hook for it.?????

Deeply insane to me how people are complaining that someone would dare fight another person for provoking them with slurs. How about be a normal person and stop trying to bait people into encounters. I’m convinced these accounts have to be bots

you are a fucking dickhead, he didnt use racial slurs to the person who assaulted him

Crazy how the “race baiter” content creator becomes the content himself. Chud the Builder didn’t have to bring this legal brouhaha upon himself. Let this be a lesson to people who never value freedom and peace of mind.

If it’s allowed then it’s more proof the courts are cooked and if the courts are cooked the whole system collapses.

The Tenn statute does say that words alone are generally not enough to meet provocation.

if dalton didn’t think that his conduct was provocative or that the slur itself was, then he would not have intentionally carried items that would protect him from retaliation due to said provocation. evidence that he believed it was is he enacted premeditated planning.

This is complete bullshit. He will be convicted and will further wreck any credibility in our legal system. They country can't survive as this keeps happening rapid fire. People are real fucking sick of each brown race having special immunity words that provoke them to commit violence.

These videos are all just weird ways of saying laws are irrelevant and judges and juries can do whatever they want. He either has the right or defend himself or doesn’t. Basing his outcome off the personal feelings of the 12 dumbest people they can find isn’t “justice”.

Except for the fact, there's no evidence that that's what happened in this case.

Since provocation can be used in Tennessee to disallow a self-defense justification, is that enough of a “government deprivation” to require that the standard of provocation be subject to constitutional (1st/5th/14th amendment) scrutiny? Could this end up being (albeit via a circuitous path) a “free speech” case after all?

So you’re saying that niggers weapon calling other niggers, nigger is OK, but it’s not OK for a white guy to call niggers nigger.

The strange thing is, Chud never used a racial slur or provoked his attacker. Ironically, his attacker insisted Chud call him a nigger. His attacker tried to provoke Chud and when his attempts at provoking Chud failed, he sucker punched him

The Chud and Shiloh cases are going to determine whether we have the right to defend our interests with words.

Question: Does that slur have to be said in the moment for it to be provocation. Or do past videos or internet content count too?

if I'm walking around looking for couples and I'm calling the girl a bitch and then call the man a bitch. I would expect their man to stand and try to fight me... You can't go around using fighting words and not expect to get in a fight. You have to respect people in public

This needs to go all the way up to the Supreme Court. Imagine not being able to defend oneself (legally) after insulting another person. This is antithetical to what we teach little children in school!

If being offended grants you amnesty to commit physical violence then this country is fuckin cooked. I can't believe you're pushing for that scenario.

You are such a disgusting, disgraceful man. Trying to normalize the notion that "of course" upon hearing a word a man gains license to assault and potentially kill another man. Like that isn't radical anti-Americanism. Shame on you.

See this is the problem I have with people that's trying to defend child It's like yeah I like this is a isolated incident This is not an isolated incident he been doing this too multiple people If this was the isolated incident by all means make the argument but this is not

Mr. Lawyer man, you should tell them why.

If that’s the case, then does that mean when a white person is called a cracker, it will give them the green light to commit violence?

Lol no no The KKK would march up and down the streets and we recognized that just bc some ppl say words you dont like, doesnt mean you are allowed to attack them

Sure it’s just a word. I get that. But how would you react if he walked up to you and your wife calling your wife a slut over and over and commenting on her “slutting out” because her outfit shows cleavage. And kept going and didn’t stop. You’re telling me yo do nothing?

What's the statistical probability there's a chud on the jury? We just need one patriot to get this man free.

this guy's an idiot... he wasn't doing a show or his normal shenanigans. he was at the courthouse for business. this guy was hunting him. his argument doesn't stand

I hope they don’t or I’m standing outside Saltine Manufacturers looking for trouble.

He is gonna get off because he was seeked out and what you are suggesting is he is bound by words that weren’t said at the present time. He could have found God and repented and said I’m not doing these videos anymore and I was wrong. You are saying you it’s ok to go after someone because they said racial words at another time to another person. So I think your argument is broken at the start my friend.

So the LAW no longer matters because black people get their feelings hurt? the counter argument to that is, so what , its a WORD , that doesn't give anyone a lawful justification to attack someone. Can white people attack blacks when they call whites cracker, or snow monkey?

You're not naive enough think the jury pool will be randomly selected, are you? No matter the facts of the case, all the State has to do to win is stack the jury with blacks; and they will.

It’s not about a word if chud would have just lived life nothing would have happened to him. Nothing was happening to him before he was getting fucked by a black women. For some reason his brain switched to being racist and found it exciting. The blood lust is crazy.

@Skeemin13 So in other words blacks can attack white people all they want but if a white person says a naughty word to them and they have to defend themselves because of it it's no longer self-defense that makes no f****** sense words don't equate to violence someone should teach the n*****