Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Just a reminder, and as a note for the historians and any journalists still interested, the whole AIRBORNE scandal at WHO was not that they were slow to recognise AIRBORNE transmission….. ….but that they conducted a coordinated and very deliberate campaign to specifically say that “NO COVID is not...

21,736 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Why has Maria quietly removed her NOT AIRBORNE tweet? Is she trying to remove evidence of her NOT AIRBORNE disinformation campaign to help lessen the likelihood that the history books will document this aspect of her role at WHO and the likelihood she will go down in history as having contributed to untold numbers of preventable deaths and avoidable human suffering? It seems she would like to portray herself in a more positive light, ironically more as a heroic fighter of disinformation, saving lives through accurate science based information and guidance. In the clips below, Maria describes below her role at WHO is to “turn science, to turn data, to turn knowledge into evidence based guidance, into strategies….” and to provide “facts” and “information” “to prevent infections, to save lives” 🤡🤡🤡 Now she quietly and with no explanation or apology, removes traces of the “COVID is NOT AIRBORNE” disinformation campaign from Twitter, and unilaterally decides to remove the word AIRBORNE from the vocabulary at WHO. She can never be remembered as an articulate and knowledgeable WHO leader who helped protect the public with “facts” and “saved lives”….. ….but more as a flawed individual with narcissistic traits that could not acknowledge her failings, who had no empathy for the millions that died and suffered unnecessarily, and who had no insight into the magnitude of the significance of her disinformation in misleading people and governments about was needed to prevent transmission and stay safe. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

John Johnston

28,209 views • 4 months ago

💥💥💥💥💥💥 Judge Jeanine Pirro US Attorney Pirro on Benghazi: PIRRO: “And Bakoush in particular, you know, there's one thing, Dan, that I'm going to share with you that I really haven't told anyone. And I don't know if you recall, but in 2012, we were all talking about Benghazi. And unfortunately, you know, the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and the other three operatives who were there, at the CIA, at the compound there. The truth is that we fought talking about whether or not it was a peaceful protest that went awry, or whether it was, you know, people just weren't there to burn down the embassy. And when I got into the office, I said, pull the Benghazi file. And so we pulled it and we had drones. Dan, we knew what was going on. And I looked at these drones. And it was clear to me, Dan, that there was no peaceful protest. There was no one who got there and said, you know, we object to the United States being here. These MOs, they're MFers, they came in with rocket-propelled grenades because they knew what they were going to do. And when they couldn't break into the Ambassador’s residence, they went out and they got fueled to burn him out. And I remember saying to the prosecutors in the room, Dan, well, the nation and Hillary Clinton, you know, were all fighting it was a peaceful protest. No, it wasn't. Yes, it was. No, it wasn't. We know for a fact that it was not a peaceful protest. The drones made it clear they came there to tear the place down.” Dan Bongino Catch The Dan Bongino Show EVERY WEEKDAY on Rumble 🏴‍☠️ at 10am ET

MAGA Kitty

203,970 views • 3 months ago