Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 Just in: 🇺🇸 BALDWIN: What constitutional authority lets the president deploy active-duty Marines to U.S. neighborhoods? HEGSETH: “The president has constitutional authority.” BALDWIN: “Cite the provision.” HEGSETH: “I’d have to pull up the specific provision.” They’re deploying troops on U.S. soil and can’t even name the clause they’re...

allenanalysis's profile picture

Brian Allen

196,485 subscribers

120,870 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЮморОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Jenelle V 🇺🇸
Jenelle V 🇺🇸1 год назад

“They’re deploying troops on U.S. soil and can’t even name the clause they’re using to justify it. That’s not strength. That’s constitutional improv with live ammunition.” Brilliant!

Фото профиля Kingstone Comics
Kingstone Comics1 год назад

“The U.S. Constitution” by U.S. Comics brings our founding document to life by describing the reasons behind each amendment and the rights those amendments protect for all Americans. Discover the 100-page graphic novel from U.S. Comics.

Фото профиля Paul Scanling
Paul Scanling1 год назад

Okay, but now that Hegseth has succesfully avoided answering the question, what will happen? Will he be asked to pull it up and answer anytime soon?

Фото профиля Gaas-cmb.nft
Gaas-cmb.nft1 год назад

It's right next to the provision about not putting ketchup on a hot dog. Come on, man!😎

Фото профиля Otther Stratton
Otther Stratton1 год назад

Pretty hard to defend the Constitution when you haven't read it due to daily bingeing

Фото профиля Patrick Strother
Patrick Strother1 год назад

Their incompetence makes them more dangerous.

Фото профиля Frank Klein
Frank Klein1 год назад

I smell Nuremberg style trials in our future.

Фото профиля America Is Under Attack!
America Is Under Attack!1 год назад

She should’ve told him to pull the provision up, we’ll wait.

Фото профиля Eloise Maughan
Eloise Maughan1 год назад

Hegseth is a dangerous joke

Похожие видео

Important. Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸: The president has the constitutional & statutory power and duty to protect our nation, INCLUDING REPELLING an INVASION. President Trump is WELL WITHIN his CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. Real America's Voice (RAV) Watch!
1:53

Important. Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸: The president has the constitutional & statutory power and duty to protect our nation, INCLUDING REPELLING an INVASION. President Trump is WELL WITHIN his CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. Real America's Voice (RAV) Watch!

NanLee Marie Carissimi

13,053 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Congress cannot sidestep the President on powers that belong solely to the Commander in Chief. President @realdonaldtrump acted well within his constitutional authority on the historic U.S. operation in Venezuela.
1:12

Congress cannot sidestep the President on powers that belong solely to the Commander in Chief. President @realdonaldtrump acted well within his constitutional authority on the historic U.S. operation in Venezuela.

Lindsey Graham

80,184 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump has ordered Pete Hegseth to deploy active duty troops to liberate “war ravaged Portland” following the city’s targeted, politically-motivated arrest of me “President Trump will END the RADICAL LEFT'S REIGN OF TERROR in Portland once and for all!” 🇺🇸
2:58

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump has ordered Pete Hegseth to deploy active duty troops to liberate “war ravaged Portland” following the city’s targeted, politically-motivated arrest of me “President Trump will END the RADICAL LEFT'S REIGN OF TERROR in Portland once and for all!” 🇺🇸

Nick Sortor

1,413,140 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.Rep. Pete Aguilar on National Guard deployment: "Invasion by a foreign nation, rebellion or dangerous rebellion against the authority of the government of the U.S. or the president is unable with regular forces to execute the laws of the U.S. Which authority is triggered here to justify the use?" Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth Hegseth: "I don't know, you just read it yourself. People can listen themselves, but it sounds like all three to me."
4:50

.Rep. Pete Aguilar on National Guard deployment: "Invasion by a foreign nation, rebellion or dangerous rebellion against the authority of the government of the U.S. or the president is unable with regular forces to execute the laws of the U.S. Which authority is triggered here to justify the use?" Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth Hegseth: "I don't know, you just read it yourself. People can listen themselves, but it sounds like all three to me."

CSPAN

11,903 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔥 HUGE WIN: the House joins the Senate in BLOCKING Democrats’ attempts to restrict President Trump’s combat operations in Iran. The U.S. Congress officially reaffirms the constitutional authority that President Donald J. Trump is carrying out to eliminate Tehran’s imminent threat to Americans.
0:22

🔥 HUGE WIN: the House joins the Senate in BLOCKING Democrats’ attempts to restrict President Trump’s combat operations in Iran. The U.S. Congress officially reaffirms the constitutional authority that President Donald J. Trump is carrying out to eliminate Tehran’s imminent threat to Americans.

House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority

27,012 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

'It's certainly not constitutional or legal... the president has zero authority under the Constitution to do what he's suggesting.' Republican elections lawyer Ben Ginsberg weighs in on Trump's call for the GOP to 'take over the voting' in 15 places.
2:04

'It's certainly not constitutional or legal... the president has zero authority under the Constitution to do what he's suggesting.' Republican elections lawyer Ben Ginsberg weighs in on Trump's call for the GOP to 'take over the voting' in 15 places.

The Lead CNN

189,223 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 SCOTT JENNINGS: JUDGES ARE CREATING A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS “There’s a difference between complying with the law and district court judges setting broad federal policy reserved for the President. We have a constitutional crisis caused by these judges. They’re not here to tell us how to spend money or set policy—that’s the President’s job. Judges should settle specific matters, not dictate governance. Vance is right, Trump has a point, and these judges just want to continue the lawfare against him.” Source: CNN Scott Jennings
1:03

🇺🇸 SCOTT JENNINGS: JUDGES ARE CREATING A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS “There’s a difference between complying with the law and district court judges setting broad federal policy reserved for the President. We have a constitutional crisis caused by these judges. They’re not here to tell us how to spend money or set policy—that’s the President’s job. Judges should settle specific matters, not dictate governance. Vance is right, Trump has a point, and these judges just want to continue the lawfare against him.” Source: CNN Scott Jennings

Mario Nawfal

1,054,926 просмотров • 1 год назад

Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi moved, and the 10th National Assembly adopted, an amendment to Clause 3 on the election of the President. The amendment replaces the earlier provision for the Speaker of Parliament to preside under Standing Orders alone, with a new provision that the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) shall conduct the election in accordance with both the electoral law and Parliament’s Standing Orders, thereby aligning the process with constitutional requirements.
1:15

Hon. Ziyambi Ziyambi moved, and the 10th National Assembly adopted, an amendment to Clause 3 on the election of the President. The amendment replaces the earlier provision for the Speaker of Parliament to preside under Standing Orders alone, with a new provision that the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) shall conduct the election in accordance with both the electoral law and Parliament’s Standing Orders, thereby aligning the process with constitutional requirements.

Nick Mangwana

15,258 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Rep. Liz Cheney: ‘Every president in our history has defended this orderly transfer of authority — except one. January 6, 2021, was the first time one American president refused his constitutional duty to transfer power peacefully to the next.’
0:51

Rep. Liz Cheney: ‘Every president in our history has defended this orderly transfer of authority — except one. January 6, 2021, was the first time one American president refused his constitutional duty to transfer power peacefully to the next.’

NowThis Impact

30,077 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Article II Vesting Clause: The executive power shall be vested in A President - singular And the President shall be the Commander In Chief Granting inherent authority to deploy troops, even without a formal declaration of war When limited, the President STILL holds full authority to conduct military operations without congressional authorization.
1:20

Article II Vesting Clause: The executive power shall be vested in A President - singular And the President shall be the Commander In Chief Granting inherent authority to deploy troops, even without a formal declaration of war When limited, the President STILL holds full authority to conduct military operations without congressional authorization.

David Khait

13,277 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

DHS SECRETARY KRISTI NOEM: "I discussed with the President this morning. We did discuss the Insurrection Act. He has the Constitutional authority to utilize that." Somebody check on Democrat officials in Minnesota...
0:26

DHS SECRETARY KRISTI NOEM: "I discussed with the President this morning. We did discuss the Insurrection Act. He has the Constitutional authority to utilize that." Somebody check on Democrat officials in Minnesota...

Benny Johnson

110,084 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

NEWS ALERT: Democrat Richard Blumenthal LIED in his questioning of OMB Director nominee Russ Vought when he claimed the Supreme Court had ruled in 1975 that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was constitutional. The Court did no such thing. In fact, the Court SPECIFICALLY wrote in Train v. New York City that “no issues as to the reach or coverage of the Impoundment Act are before us.” Why would Blumenthal lie about this and claim Russ Vought would “defy” a Supreme Court ruling that never happened?? As I have explained elsewhere, Train was confined to a specific statutory scheme at issue and did not address the President’s constitutional impoundment power—the constitutional issue was not even presented in that case. Russ Vought did a superb job in his testimony, including not backing down in his view that the President has the constitutional power to impound and that the ICA is unconstitutional. Blumenthal is flat out lying to claim that Russ’s view is in defiance of Train’s holding. The Supreme Court has NEVER ruled on the constitutionality of the ICA nor on the President’s constitutional power to impound funds. And we have 170 years of Presidents regularly using his impoundment authority to rein in wasteful or constitutionally problematic spending. Appropriations is a legislative act, the power of the purse. The spending power is an executive power and is vested in the President. Would it be constitutional for Congress to mandate that the President spend $100M to investigate and prosecute certain disfavored individuals? Of course it would not be constitutional and the President has the authority to refuse to spend those funds. Likewise, if Congress appropriated $100M to provide aid to a known terror state or international organization, the President has the constitutional authority (in fact duty) to refuse to do send those funds to this terror entity. There are limits to Congress’ authority to require the President to spend funds. The Impoundment Control Act is a terrible law. It turns history on its head by requiring a President to spend every dollar of an appropriation, even if the project can be done for less. It makes an appropriation a floor rather than a ceiling. The ICA is designed to shovel money out the door regardless of whether it’s necessary to a program, and it’s wildly irresponsible for our fiscal health.
0:22

NEWS ALERT: Democrat Richard Blumenthal LIED in his questioning of OMB Director nominee Russ Vought when he claimed the Supreme Court had ruled in 1975 that the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was constitutional. The Court did no such thing. In fact, the Court SPECIFICALLY wrote in Train v. New York City that “no issues as to the reach or coverage of the Impoundment Act are before us.” Why would Blumenthal lie about this and claim Russ Vought would “defy” a Supreme Court ruling that never happened?? As I have explained elsewhere, Train was confined to a specific statutory scheme at issue and did not address the President’s constitutional impoundment power—the constitutional issue was not even presented in that case. Russ Vought did a superb job in his testimony, including not backing down in his view that the President has the constitutional power to impound and that the ICA is unconstitutional. Blumenthal is flat out lying to claim that Russ’s view is in defiance of Train’s holding. The Supreme Court has NEVER ruled on the constitutionality of the ICA nor on the President’s constitutional power to impound funds. And we have 170 years of Presidents regularly using his impoundment authority to rein in wasteful or constitutionally problematic spending. Appropriations is a legislative act, the power of the purse. The spending power is an executive power and is vested in the President. Would it be constitutional for Congress to mandate that the President spend $100M to investigate and prosecute certain disfavored individuals? Of course it would not be constitutional and the President has the authority to refuse to spend those funds. Likewise, if Congress appropriated $100M to provide aid to a known terror state or international organization, the President has the constitutional authority (in fact duty) to refuse to do send those funds to this terror entity. There are limits to Congress’ authority to require the President to spend funds. The Impoundment Control Act is a terrible law. It turns history on its head by requiring a President to spend every dollar of an appropriation, even if the project can be done for less. It makes an appropriation a floor rather than a ceiling. The ICA is designed to shovel money out the door regardless of whether it’s necessary to a program, and it’s wildly irresponsible for our fiscal health.

Mark Paoletta

217,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

AOC: They can’t even name what they’re impeaching the President for… They have not even been able to name it. What are they investigating the President for? They don’t have an answer.
1:53

AOC: They can’t even name what they’re impeaching the President for… They have not even been able to name it. What are they investigating the President for? They don’t have an answer.

Acyn

739,917 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨🇺🇸 SEC. HEGSETH: BRAGG IS BACK! “There it is. Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of Defense, Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 113, I direct the Army to change the name of Fort Liberty, North Carolina, back to Fort Bragg. That’s right—Bragg is back.” Source: @SecDef
0:22

🚨🇺🇸 SEC. HEGSETH: BRAGG IS BACK! “There it is. Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of Defense, Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 113, I direct the Army to change the name of Fort Liberty, North Carolina, back to Fort Bragg. That’s right—Bragg is back.” Source: @SecDef

Mario Nawfal

203,029 просмотров • 1 год назад

Reporter: A number of military people have suggested the only way to open up the Strait of Hormuz will be for American troops to get involved in the fight. If it requires that step, should the president come to congress? Thune: Right now, the president is well within his authority even if you accept that war powers as being constitutional, you have 60 days…
1:00

Reporter: A number of military people have suggested the only way to open up the Strait of Hormuz will be for American troops to get involved in the fight. If it requires that step, should the president come to congress? Thune: Right now, the president is well within his authority even if you accept that war powers as being constitutional, you have 60 days…

Acyn

46,545 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Maher: “The president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest.” Schiff: “Totally vague.” Maher: “That’s from Obama about Libya.”
1:14

Maher: “The president had the constitutional authority to direct the use of military force because he could reasonably determine that such use of force was in the national interest.” Schiff: “Totally vague.” Maher: “That’s from Obama about Libya.”

Eyal Yakoby

2,884,757 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WATCH: U.S. Marines with 22nd MEU conduct live-fire training on USS San Antonio in the Caribbean in support of the #SOUTHCOM mission, Department of War 🇺🇸-directed ops, & President Donald J. Trump' priorities to disrupt illicit drug trafficking & protect the homeland. U.S. Marine Corps Forces, South U.S. Marines U.S. Navy Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
0:54

WATCH: U.S. Marines with 22nd MEU conduct live-fire training on USS San Antonio in the Caribbean in support of the #SOUTHCOM mission, Department of War 🇺🇸-directed ops, & President Donald J. Trump' priorities to disrupt illicit drug trafficking & protect the homeland. U.S. Marine Corps Forces, South U.S. Marines U.S. Navy Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

U.S. Southern Command

316,275 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

INGRAHAM: What do you say to those raising concerns that you want to impose martial law? PETE HEGSETH: The intention of this president is to establish law and order using legal and lawful and constitutional means
1:03

INGRAHAM: What do you say to those raising concerns that you want to impose martial law? PETE HEGSETH: The intention of this president is to establish law and order using legal and lawful and constitutional means

Aaron Rupar

47,789 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад