Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 JUST IN: Greg Gutfeld drops TRUTH NUKE on the Left making Alex Pretti out as a hero — then video surfaces showing him viciously AMBUSHING police "The video demystifies the aura of the protester. It tears away the heroic portrayal that the media often does with protesters." "If... Pretti had been arrested, the trajectory of his life would have been markedly different. He would have been alive." "Pretti's family has a very good civil case of negligence against the city. By not cooperating with ICE, their son is dead. That is not on ICE. That is Jacob Frey and Tim Waltz!" "No cops there to stop it because the mayor told them to ignore the protocol! Think about the long-term cost of that short-term feel-good virtue signal that allowed Jacob Frey to feel like a hero for a week and two people died because he wanted to feel good. Talk about how selfish that is." "The more you see this, the more America sees this, the better America is, because you're going to reduce the number of tragedies by demystifying the romance of this action." "The media presents an entirely opposite view of protesters. That is the protester going home alone, sad and depressed, going out again and doing the same thing, going home, going out." "They are troubled, SAD people. I said it about Good's family, and I'll say it about Pretti's family. They didn't want their relative there. If you could talk somebody out of it, you would!" "This video is the REALITY of the people swayed into these moral panics. Angry, aggressive, infantile, child-like, unstable, looking for trouble and tragically finding it." GregGutfeldshow more

Eric Daugherty

906,073 subscribers

52,751 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This might be the single most important take on everything happening in Minnesota right now. Listen closely. After watching the new video of Pretti assaulting ICE agents, GregGutfeld rejects the idea that the footage proves nothing. He says it proves a lot, including that Pretti would still be alive today if Mayor Jacob Frey hadn’t refused police protection for ICE. GUTFELD: “I’m not going to be suckered in by this stupid take where ‘the video in no way supports the shooting of Pretti weeks later.’ That is mid-level wiT analysis.” “Right? The video is merely proving the point, that this was a planned, ongoing mission to create violent chaos, which increases the risk for things that happen, terrible outcomes that involve Pretti.” “What was missing in that video was the police.” “You saw the spitting. You saw the destroying of property. But there was no cops there to stop it because the mayor told them to ignore the protocol.” “Think about the long-term costs of that short-term, feel-good virtue signal, that allowed Jacob Frey to feel like a hero for a week, and two people died because he wanted to feel good. Talk about how selfish that is.” “If Pretti had been arrested, the trajectory of his life would have been markedly different. He would’ve been alive.” “Again, as I said about Mrs. Good’s death, miss good’s death, these families, Pretti’s family has a very good civil case of negligence against this city, by not cooperating with ICE, their son is dead.” “That is not on ICE That is Jacob Frey and Tim Walz.” “At this point you are looking at 12 figure lawsuits from any family that wishes to go forward.” “I think the video is really important. Not for this case, but for, I guess the American psyche in general, because not only does it show you context, it demystifies the aura of the protester.” “It tears away the heroic portrayal that the media often does with protesters. They did this during the summer of love, that they made sure to keep you from seeing the looting and the fires and stuff. They needed to show the anguished faces of the people.” “This also happened, and I’ll get to it in a second with the pro-Hamas supporters.” “What you saw in that video was the reality, the mindset of people that are swayed into these moral panics.”

This might be the single most important take on everything happening in Minnesota right now. Listen closely. After watching the new video of Pretti assaulting ICE agents, GregGutfeld rejects the idea that the footage proves nothing. He says it proves a lot, including that Pretti would still be alive today if Mayor Jacob Frey hadn’t refused police protection for ICE. GUTFELD: “I’m not going to be suckered in by this stupid take where ‘the video in no way supports the shooting of Pretti weeks later.’ That is mid-level wiT analysis.” “Right? The video is merely proving the point, that this was a planned, ongoing mission to create violent chaos, which increases the risk for things that happen, terrible outcomes that involve Pretti.” “What was missing in that video was the police.” “You saw the spitting. You saw the destroying of property. But there was no cops there to stop it because the mayor told them to ignore the protocol.” “Think about the long-term costs of that short-term, feel-good virtue signal, that allowed Jacob Frey to feel like a hero for a week, and two people died because he wanted to feel good. Talk about how selfish that is.” “If Pretti had been arrested, the trajectory of his life would have been markedly different. He would’ve been alive.” “Again, as I said about Mrs. Good’s death, miss good’s death, these families, Pretti’s family has a very good civil case of negligence against this city, by not cooperating with ICE, their son is dead.” “That is not on ICE That is Jacob Frey and Tim Walz.” “At this point you are looking at 12 figure lawsuits from any family that wishes to go forward.” “I think the video is really important. Not for this case, but for, I guess the American psyche in general, because not only does it show you context, it demystifies the aura of the protester.” “It tears away the heroic portrayal that the media often does with protesters. They did this during the summer of love, that they made sure to keep you from seeing the looting and the fires and stuff. They needed to show the anguished faces of the people.” “This also happened, and I’ll get to it in a second with the pro-Hamas supporters.” “What you saw in that video was the reality, the mindset of people that are swayed into these moral panics.”

Overton

96,122 views • 7 months ago

🔥 GREG GUTFELD: “I’m not going to be suckered in by this stupid take where ‘the video no way supports the shooting of Pretti weeks later’.” “What was missing in that video was the Police. You saw the spitting, the destroying of property. There were no cops there to stop it because the Mayor told them to ignore the protocol. If Pretti had been arrested, the trajectory of his life would have been markedly different. He would have been alive,” adds GregGutfeld.

🔥 GREG GUTFELD: “I’m not going to be suckered in by this stupid take where ‘the video no way supports the shooting of Pretti weeks later’.” “What was missing in that video was the Police. You saw the spitting, the destroying of property. There were no cops there to stop it because the Mayor told them to ignore the protocol. If Pretti had been arrested, the trajectory of his life would have been markedly different. He would have been alive,” adds GregGutfeld.

TV News Now

94,927 views • 7 months ago

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Kevin Tanaka

10,256 views • 4 months ago

“The President has exactly two choices. He can pay Iran to open the Strait, or he can suffer the indignity of continuing this quagmire longer and longer. And because I listen to the Scott Jennings radio show religiously, I know that the White House has no intention of paying them to open up the Strait. A senior administration official told Scott Jennings exclusively, you should check it out, that they’re only going to pay them at the end of the process, not at the beginning of the process. The Iranians, by the way, are not going to go for that.” “That means this deal that they’ve been bragging about, which usually they brag about right before the markets open. It’s usually right before the markets open that there’s a lot of good news, and then somehow the markets go up. And then over the course of a couple of days, we find out that it was all BS. It turns out that that’s all BS because what’s going to happen is that they’re not going to want to strike this horrible deal, according to Scott Jennings’s top level sources. And that means that the deal is not going to be struck, and the war is going to go on, quite sadly, actually.”

“The President has exactly two choices. He can pay Iran to open the Strait, or he can suffer the indignity of continuing this quagmire longer and longer. And because I listen to the Scott Jennings radio show religiously, I know that the White House has no intention of paying them to open up the Strait. A senior administration official told Scott Jennings exclusively, you should check it out, that they’re only going to pay them at the end of the process, not at the beginning of the process. The Iranians, by the way, are not going to go for that.” “That means this deal that they’ve been bragging about, which usually they brag about right before the markets open. It’s usually right before the markets open that there’s a lot of good news, and then somehow the markets go up. And then over the course of a couple of days, we find out that it was all BS. It turns out that that’s all BS because what’s going to happen is that they’re not going to want to strike this horrible deal, according to Scott Jennings’s top level sources. And that means that the deal is not going to be struck, and the war is going to go on, quite sadly, actually.”

Josh Rogin

595,654 views • 3 months ago

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

MichaelDPUK 💜🦎

12,815 views • 1 month ago

CIA “Democracy doesn’t mean a thing” “The principle of government by the people, for the people, of the people, that is just silly” Philip Agee, CIA Agent “In the CIA, we didn't give a hoot about democracy. I mean, it was fine if a government was elected and would cooperate with us, but if it didn't, then democracy didn't mean a thing to us. And I don't think it means a thing today. The true goal of the United States government is control. And they feel that if the United States did not control the governments of Latin America, then somebody else would. And the principle of government by the people, for the people of the people, that is just. That's just silly.”

CIA “Democracy doesn’t mean a thing” “The principle of government by the people, for the people, of the people, that is just silly” Philip Agee, CIA Agent “In the CIA, we didn't give a hoot about democracy. I mean, it was fine if a government was elected and would cooperate with us, but if it didn't, then democracy didn't mean a thing to us. And I don't think it means a thing today. The true goal of the United States government is control. And they feel that if the United States did not control the governments of Latin America, then somebody else would. And the principle of government by the people, for the people of the people, that is just. That's just silly.”

Wall Street Apes

161,228 views • 1 year ago

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”

RedWave Press

864,210 views • 4 months ago

Tom Homan drops the mic on CNN’s Jake Tapper after he attempted to frame ICE as doing things “differently” under the Trump administration. “The laws are EXACTLY the same…If they don’t like what ICE is doing, CHANGE the law.” TAPPER: “Well, I think some of the issues that they’ve raised have to do with ways that ICE is doing its job differently now than they were doing it, even in the first Trump administration…” HOMAN: “The laws are exactly the same. Let’s talk about the masks.” “You don’t see ICE wearing masks inside the airports because they’re not on the street arresting criminals. You got the agitators who cross the line and threaten ICE agents.” “The same people in the Democratic Congress that want ICE to take off the masks are the same people who say ICE is going to shoot people inside airports. I mean, you can’t have it both ways!” “So if you want ICE to take the masks off, the threat level has to decrease. It’s an 8,000% increase in threats against ICE officers. And that’s because a lot of the rhetoric coming from the Hill.” “Stop calling ICE Nazis and racists. Stop saying they’re going to shoot people inside airports. That’s going to drive the threat level down. And we can talk about masks.” “So, you know, we got to work together on this, but ICE is doing the same thing they’ve done during the 40 years I’ve been doing it. Again, they’re enforcing the laws that they enacted. If they don’t like it, change the law.” “The law hasn’t changed. The difference is, under the last four years of Joe Biden, they weren’t enforcing the law. Now ICE is actually enforcing the law, doing their job, and they don’t like it. If they don’t like what ICE is doing, change the law.”

Tom Homan drops the mic on CNN’s Jake Tapper after he attempted to frame ICE as doing things “differently” under the Trump administration. “The laws are EXACTLY the same…If they don’t like what ICE is doing, CHANGE the law.” TAPPER: “Well, I think some of the issues that they’ve raised have to do with ways that ICE is doing its job differently now than they were doing it, even in the first Trump administration…” HOMAN: “The laws are exactly the same. Let’s talk about the masks.” “You don’t see ICE wearing masks inside the airports because they’re not on the street arresting criminals. You got the agitators who cross the line and threaten ICE agents.” “The same people in the Democratic Congress that want ICE to take off the masks are the same people who say ICE is going to shoot people inside airports. I mean, you can’t have it both ways!” “So if you want ICE to take the masks off, the threat level has to decrease. It’s an 8,000% increase in threats against ICE officers. And that’s because a lot of the rhetoric coming from the Hill.” “Stop calling ICE Nazis and racists. Stop saying they’re going to shoot people inside airports. That’s going to drive the threat level down. And we can talk about masks.” “So, you know, we got to work together on this, but ICE is doing the same thing they’ve done during the 40 years I’ve been doing it. Again, they’re enforcing the laws that they enacted. If they don’t like it, change the law.” “The law hasn’t changed. The difference is, under the last four years of Joe Biden, they weren’t enforcing the law. Now ICE is actually enforcing the law, doing their job, and they don’t like it. If they don’t like what ICE is doing, change the law.”

Overton

73,510 views • 5 months ago

Steven Kuhn shares a powerful message about how is wife (who is Ukrainian) and her family feel about him exposing the truth about Ukraine! “They are glad I’m speaking out because they know what’s really happening. They know that what the media tells you, what the politicians tell you, isn’t the whole truth. They know that Zelenskyy allowed this war to start, that he took an already corrupt gov’t and made it much worse. They know their home is gone forever and the people in power…they don’t care. So when people ask me, how does your wife feel about this Steven? The answer is simple. She supports me because she actually knows what’s happening. Her family sees it first hand. And unlike the screaming, virtue-signaling, Ukrainian flag-waving activists they take it in stride. They just want it to end, whatever it takes, they just want to go home. You know who doesn’t like me speaking out? The people who need you blind, the ones making billions off this war. The ones who profit while families, like my wife’s, are left with nothing. The activists who make a career out of outrage. I don’t speak out for me - I speak out because millions of Ukrainians, like my wife’s family, CAN’T. I don’t need a flag in my bio, I don’t need to scream slogans. I listen to the people actually living through it. And if that pisses you off maybe it’s time you ask yourself - why does the truth make you so damn angry? Why is anything that doesn’t fit your personal bias a threat to you? Most of you have never been to Ukraine, never will. And when the media stops telling you to care you’ll move on just like you always do. So give it a rest, will you? Think of the people who actually have skin in the game & support them! And by the way, Russians want peace too. Most civilians on both sides - they just want peace. That’s it. Simple.”

Steven Kuhn shares a powerful message about how is wife (who is Ukrainian) and her family feel about him exposing the truth about Ukraine! “They are glad I’m speaking out because they know what’s really happening. They know that what the media tells you, what the politicians tell you, isn’t the whole truth. They know that Zelenskyy allowed this war to start, that he took an already corrupt gov’t and made it much worse. They know their home is gone forever and the people in power…they don’t care. So when people ask me, how does your wife feel about this Steven? The answer is simple. She supports me because she actually knows what’s happening. Her family sees it first hand. And unlike the screaming, virtue-signaling, Ukrainian flag-waving activists they take it in stride. They just want it to end, whatever it takes, they just want to go home. You know who doesn’t like me speaking out? The people who need you blind, the ones making billions off this war. The ones who profit while families, like my wife’s, are left with nothing. The activists who make a career out of outrage. I don’t speak out for me - I speak out because millions of Ukrainians, like my wife’s family, CAN’T. I don’t need a flag in my bio, I don’t need to scream slogans. I listen to the people actually living through it. And if that pisses you off maybe it’s time you ask yourself - why does the truth make you so damn angry? Why is anything that doesn’t fit your personal bias a threat to you? Most of you have never been to Ukraine, never will. And when the media stops telling you to care you’ll move on just like you always do. So give it a rest, will you? Think of the people who actually have skin in the game & support them! And by the way, Russians want peace too. Most civilians on both sides - they just want peace. That’s it. Simple.”

Sequencer

826,149 views • 1 year ago

“What you all don’t understand about the Portland thing is that this is huge. Donald Trump is going to use this as an example, with the full force of the National Guard. He wants this on TV, he wants it in the newspapers, he wants it on all the Social Media, and he is going to make an example, whether it’s Antifa or any other group that is found out that they are attacking ICE Agents; and he’s going to make an example of them…”

“What you all don’t understand about the Portland thing is that this is huge. Donald Trump is going to use this as an example, with the full force of the National Guard. He wants this on TV, he wants it in the newspapers, he wants it on all the Social Media, and he is going to make an example, whether it’s Antifa or any other group that is found out that they are attacking ICE Agents; and he’s going to make an example of them…”

Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾

722,657 views • 11 months ago

Tulsi Gabbard just called out CNN as the propaganda arm of the intelligence community. Wow. This is a must watch video. Tulsi: "They are exposing themselves essentially by making this indirect threat, using their propaganda arm through CNN that they’ve used over and over again to reveal their hand, that their loyalty is not at all to America, it is not to the American people or the Constitution, it is to themselves." "These are exactly the kinds of people that we need to root out." "I have to tell you, one of the byproducts of what I saw today is because of this immediate action of transparency and accountability." "I have people within the intelligence community reaching out to me personally and directly saying 'Hey, you need to know about this, you need to look over here.'" "People are stepping forward because they are all on board with the mission to clean house and refocus on our core mission of serving the American people."

Tulsi Gabbard just called out CNN as the propaganda arm of the intelligence community. Wow. This is a must watch video. Tulsi: "They are exposing themselves essentially by making this indirect threat, using their propaganda arm through CNN that they’ve used over and over again to reveal their hand, that their loyalty is not at all to America, it is not to the American people or the Constitution, it is to themselves." "These are exactly the kinds of people that we need to root out." "I have to tell you, one of the byproducts of what I saw today is because of this immediate action of transparency and accountability." "I have people within the intelligence community reaching out to me personally and directly saying 'Hey, you need to know about this, you need to look over here.'" "People are stepping forward because they are all on board with the mission to clean house and refocus on our core mission of serving the American people."

Gunther Eagleman™

15,167,991 views • 1 year ago

$ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”$

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,627 views • 5 months ago

Rogin: It looks very likely that we're about to restart bombing of Iran. And there are a lot of reports out there that this is about to happen. And what that means is that all of the problems, not just with the US economy, with the economy of every country in the world, are about to get worse. And it means that the Iran war is going to go much longer than otherwise anticipated. And that is a disaster not just for Americans, but for all people. And then if you think about the effects on energy and then manufacturing, and then rates will continue to go up, and then inflation, it's a it's a calamity for the world economy with no strategy whatsoever.

Rogin: It looks very likely that we're about to restart bombing of Iran. And there are a lot of reports out there that this is about to happen. And what that means is that all of the problems, not just with the US economy, with the economy of every country in the world, are about to get worse. And it means that the Iran war is going to go much longer than otherwise anticipated. And that is a disaster not just for Americans, but for all people. And then if you think about the effects on energy and then manufacturing, and then rates will continue to go up, and then inflation, it's a it's a calamity for the world economy with no strategy whatsoever.

Acyn

74,258 views • 3 months ago

Americans are becoming wide awake “Dearborn, Michigan is the perfect case study about why Islam is not compatible with American society or civilization at large. Did Dearborn become a beacon of light and hope? Is it full of charity and people looking out for one another in peace and coexistence and, oh my gosh, the amount of doctors and lawyers? No. Dearborn, Michigan is absolutely disgusting. It is filled with crime, it is filled with poverty, and it is filled with American citizens being told that if they do not want to bow down to the Islamization of America, then they need to get the hell out, even being told that by their own politicians. They feel like Islam can rule over everything there, right? They loudly play their call to prayer and if you have a problem with it, despite the fact that it legally breaks city ordinance with how loud it is, then you're told to leave and that you need to be quiet and that you just need to submit to their way of living. If you think that this is a coincidence, if you think that they have any intention of stopping there, then you are deluding yourself. These people are extremely violent. They don't want open discourse. They don't want open dialogue about religion. They do not see you as an equal, and girls who do not wear hijabs there or who do not dress in their definition of modesty are oftentimes harassed for it. They even went so far as to try to stop people from being able to walk their dogs because they see dogs as unclean animals. This is absolutely disgusting and I hope the American people start to wake up and realize what's actually going on over there.”

Americans are becoming wide awake “Dearborn, Michigan is the perfect case study about why Islam is not compatible with American society or civilization at large. Did Dearborn become a beacon of light and hope? Is it full of charity and people looking out for one another in peace and coexistence and, oh my gosh, the amount of doctors and lawyers? No. Dearborn, Michigan is absolutely disgusting. It is filled with crime, it is filled with poverty, and it is filled with American citizens being told that if they do not want to bow down to the Islamization of America, then they need to get the hell out, even being told that by their own politicians. They feel like Islam can rule over everything there, right? They loudly play their call to prayer and if you have a problem with it, despite the fact that it legally breaks city ordinance with how loud it is, then you're told to leave and that you need to be quiet and that you just need to submit to their way of living. If you think that this is a coincidence, if you think that they have any intention of stopping there, then you are deluding yourself. These people are extremely violent. They don't want open discourse. They don't want open dialogue about religion. They do not see you as an equal, and girls who do not wear hijabs there or who do not dress in their definition of modesty are oftentimes harassed for it. They even went so far as to try to stop people from being able to walk their dogs because they see dogs as unclean animals. This is absolutely disgusting and I hope the American people start to wake up and realize what's actually going on over there.”

Wall Street Apes

75,386 views • 9 months ago

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Kirk Rollins

30,483 views • 2 months ago

They killed our son Scott Adams “At some point, there'll be a healthy number of Democrats who realized that they were on the side of killing an innocent man, and then they're going to find out that he was nothing like they thought. And this will be one of the biggest mistakes of humanity. It's one thing to kill somebody because you're going to get something out of it. This was not that. This is killing somebody and getting the opposite of whatever it was you wanted, because you're gonna get a lot of that. You're gonna get a lot, and it's gonna be the opposite of whatever you thought you wanted, but it's because you killed the wrong guy.” King John the Exuberant - "Mornin' Merica!"

They killed our son Scott Adams “At some point, there'll be a healthy number of Democrats who realized that they were on the side of killing an innocent man, and then they're going to find out that he was nothing like they thought. And this will be one of the biggest mistakes of humanity. It's one thing to kill somebody because you're going to get something out of it. This was not that. This is killing somebody and getting the opposite of whatever it was you wanted, because you're gonna get a lot of that. You're gonna get a lot, and it's gonna be the opposite of whatever you thought you wanted, but it's because you killed the wrong guy.” King John the Exuberant - "Mornin' Merica!"

jay plemons

773,445 views • 11 months ago

NEW: Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey addresses the investigation into the fraud scandal in his state: MAYOR FREY: “More could have been done. More can be done. And I think it makes it really clear that this is not about clamping down on fraud — these ICE arrests we’re seeing in our city — when the people that have been investigating the fraud just walked out of the U.S. attorney’s office." “The people that have been investigating and prosecuting this fraud in the Trump administration at the U.S. Attorney’s office said, you know what? What is happening isn’t right. It’s not fair… and they all walked out." “And so, again, this ain’t about clamping down on fraud when the investigators themselves just left.” | FOX & Friends

NEW: Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey addresses the investigation into the fraud scandal in his state: MAYOR FREY: “More could have been done. More can be done. And I think it makes it really clear that this is not about clamping down on fraud — these ICE arrests we’re seeing in our city — when the people that have been investigating the fraud just walked out of the U.S. attorney’s office." “The people that have been investigating and prosecuting this fraud in the Trump administration at the U.S. Attorney’s office said, you know what? What is happening isn’t right. It’s not fair… and they all walked out." “And so, again, this ain’t about clamping down on fraud when the investigators themselves just left.” | FOX & Friends

Fox News

112,723 views • 7 months ago

ELON: ORDINARY CITIZENS VERY OFTEN KNOW MORE THAN JOURNALISTS “I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often, when I see an article about something that I know a lot about, and I read the article, they get a lot wrong. It's the best interpretation of someone who doesn't really understand what's going on in the industry, has only a few facts to play with, and has to come up with an article. It's not going to hit the bullseye. If you read an article about something you know about, how accurate is that article? Now, imagine that that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation of what's going on, but not an exact situation. If somebody is actually an expert in the field, and was actually there and then writes about their experience of being actually there, I think that actually that's, in a lot of cases, going to be better than a journalist because the journalist wasn't there.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

ELON: ORDINARY CITIZENS VERY OFTEN KNOW MORE THAN JOURNALISTS “I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often, when I see an article about something that I know a lot about, and I read the article, they get a lot wrong. It's the best interpretation of someone who doesn't really understand what's going on in the industry, has only a few facts to play with, and has to come up with an article. It's not going to hit the bullseye. If you read an article about something you know about, how accurate is that article? Now, imagine that that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation of what's going on, but not an exact situation. If somebody is actually an expert in the field, and was actually there and then writes about their experience of being actually there, I think that actually that's, in a lot of cases, going to be better than a journalist because the journalist wasn't there.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

Mario Nawfal

8,733,042 views • 1 year ago

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”

Johannes Maria

32,866 views • 9 months ago

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,378 views • 3 years ago