正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Just launched today our Carbon Fiber Textured Keycaps by Arbiter Studio!! This is how it looks. - Carbon Fiber Textured Keycaps - Arbiter Studio - Tofu 3.0 Case - KBD Fans - ARC60 PCBA Module - Arbiter Studio

Baron 李

1,629 subscribers

17,607 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Tofu60 3.0 x TENKO® - ARC 60 8K PCB Module Kit from Arbiter Studio ⚡Arbiter Studio Merging the high-end minimalism of the Tofu60 3.0 case with the raw performance of the Arbiter Studio TENKO® - ARC 60 8K PCB Module Kit. Thanks to the custom HE-compatible daughterboard and FPC cable, the possibilities for high-performance custom builds are now wide open. This isn't just a keyboard; it's a competitive edge wrapped in premium aluminum.

Tofu60 3.0 x TENKO® - ARC 60 8K PCB Module Kit from Arbiter Studio ⚡Arbiter Studio Merging the high-end minimalism of the Tofu60 3.0 case with the raw performance of the Arbiter Studio TENKO® - ARC 60 8K PCB Module Kit. Thanks to the custom HE-compatible daughterboard and FPC cable, the possibilities for high-performance custom builds are now wide open. This isn't just a keyboard; it's a competitive edge wrapped in premium aluminum.

KBDfans

15,460 次观看 • 6 个月前

Yapper just broke the record 👇 no VFX team no studio no real footage just one prompt in Yapper massive dragon flying between skyscrapers this is not a video this is a leak from another world This is what nobody is talking about. Spread it. Made by Kling 3.0 with Yapper

Yapper just broke the record 👇 no VFX team no studio no real footage just one prompt in Yapper massive dragon flying between skyscrapers this is not a video this is a leak from another world This is what nobody is talking about. Spread it. Made by Kling 3.0 with Yapper

Choya

66,825 次观看 • 3 个月前

Last day of our giveaway! Today we're giving away a Wacom Cintiq 16 to one winner!✨ Plus, today is the last day to save up to 60% on Clip Studio Paint Ver. 3.0! Just follow & repost this post to enter. Open to all! Ends Sept. 17 8:00 am GMT

Last day of our giveaway! Today we're giving away a Wacom Cintiq 16 to one winner!✨ Plus, today is the last day to save up to 60% on Clip Studio Paint Ver. 3.0! Just follow & repost this post to enter. Open to all! Ends Sept. 17 8:00 am GMT

CLIP STUDIO PAINT

126,726 次观看 • 1 年前

As you may have seen, the GitHub MCP registry is now LIVE! But how do you use it in Visual Studio Code? Checkout this video by thejetdev to see how you can access the MCP servers live in the registry today 👇

As you may have seen, the GitHub MCP registry is now LIVE! But how do you use it in Visual Studio Code? Checkout this video by thejetdev to see how you can access the MCP servers live in the registry today 👇

Visual Studio Code

18,566 次观看 • 11 个月前

The future of digital storytelling is officially here. Last night at our launch event, our VP Product presented this video, showcasing just how easy the creation process is with LTX Studio. If you have an idea, you can implement it into your story in just a few clicks.

The future of digital storytelling is officially here. Last night at our launch event, our VP Product presented this video, showcasing just how easy the creation process is with LTX Studio. If you have an idea, you can implement it into your story in just a few clicks.

LTX.io

22,661 次观看 • 2 年前

I have a major announcement! 🎉 Today, I'm launching NPM Studio for WebStorm and all JetBrains IDEs. This will change the way you work with NPM packages forever. I built NPM Studio for developers who want to get work done without wasting time in the terminal. It brings package management and npm scripts directly into your IDE so you can focus on building great products. This is our version 1.0.14, and it would make me the happiest person if you tried it out by searching for "NPM Studio" in your JetBrains IDE or by clicking this link: I really appreciate your support and look forward to hearing your feedback!

I have a major announcement! 🎉 Today, I'm launching NPM Studio for WebStorm and all JetBrains IDEs. This will change the way you work with NPM packages forever. I built NPM Studio for developers who want to get work done without wasting time in the terminal. It brings package management and npm scripts directly into your IDE so you can focus on building great products. This is our version 1.0.14, and it would make me the happiest person if you tried it out by searching for "NPM Studio" in your JetBrains IDE or by clicking this link: I really appreciate your support and look forward to hearing your feedback!

Ebenezer Don 🐘

16,240 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk says steel killed carbon fiber on Starship at one-fiftieth the cost. Carbon fiber was supposed to be the future of rocketry. Lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel. Trusted by every Formula 1 team. SpaceX picked it for Starship. "Particularly if you go for a high-strength specialized carbon fiber that can handle cryogenic oxygen, it's roughly 50 times the cost of steel." Then progress stalled. The autoclaves needed to cure the resin had to outsize every autoclave on Earth, and the team couldn't even produce a clean barrel section without wrinkles. Musk, watching the Mars timeline slip: "At this rate, we're never going to get to Mars. So we've got to think of something else." So he asked the question nobody at SpaceX had asked: "What about steel?" It became known as the **cryogenic stainless flip**. Musk, who had already shipped Falcon 9 in aluminum-lithium, broke with the textbook. "When you look at the material properties of stainless steel, full-hard, strain hardened stainless steel, at cryogenic temperature the strength to weight is actually similar to carbon fiber." Starship ran on cryogenic methane and oxygen. The airframe lived at temperatures that flipped steel ahead of carbon fiber. "You could smoke a cigar while welding stainless steel." After Musk made the call, steel weighed less than the carbon fiber version. Fifty times cheaper in raw material. Twice the heat tolerance. Half the heat shield mass. Musk, looking back: "In retrospect, we should have started with steel in the beginning. It was dumb not to do steel." What "obvious" material in your work is silently costing you the project? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I've made a free playbook on how to use and create your own mental models. This includes the same thinking strategies Feynman, Munger, and Musk built their careers on. Ttrusted by 5,000+ founders and investors. Grab your copy: — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

Elon Musk says steel killed carbon fiber on Starship at one-fiftieth the cost. Carbon fiber was supposed to be the future of rocketry. Lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel. Trusted by every Formula 1 team. SpaceX picked it for Starship. "Particularly if you go for a high-strength specialized carbon fiber that can handle cryogenic oxygen, it's roughly 50 times the cost of steel." Then progress stalled. The autoclaves needed to cure the resin had to outsize every autoclave on Earth, and the team couldn't even produce a clean barrel section without wrinkles. Musk, watching the Mars timeline slip: "At this rate, we're never going to get to Mars. So we've got to think of something else." So he asked the question nobody at SpaceX had asked: "What about steel?" It became known as the cryogenic stainless flip. Musk, who had already shipped Falcon 9 in aluminum-lithium, broke with the textbook. "When you look at the material properties of stainless steel, full-hard, strain hardened stainless steel, at cryogenic temperature the strength to weight is actually similar to carbon fiber." Starship ran on cryogenic methane and oxygen. The airframe lived at temperatures that flipped steel ahead of carbon fiber. "You could smoke a cigar while welding stainless steel." After Musk made the call, steel weighed less than the carbon fiber version. Fifty times cheaper in raw material. Twice the heat tolerance. Half the heat shield mass. Musk, looking back: "In retrospect, we should have started with steel in the beginning. It was dumb not to do steel." What "obvious" material in your work is silently costing you the project? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I've made a free playbook on how to use and create your own mental models. This includes the same thinking strategies Feynman, Munger, and Musk built their careers on. Ttrusted by 5,000+ founders and investors. Grab your copy: — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

829,800 次观看 • 3 个月前

Technological sovereignty isn't given. It's forged in carbon fiber. 🇮🇳 Every signature on the e200X-PT01 airframe carries one core conviction: the future of flight doesn't just belong on Indian soil, it must originate here. From the research labs of IIT Madras to our 60,000+ sq ft manufacturing hub, this 2.2-ton aircraft is 5 years of relentless execution: 🔹 10,000+ km of subscale flight testing logged 🔹 1st DGCA Design Organisation Approval for electric aircraft (May '23) 🔹 DGCA Type Certification application officially accepted (Dec '24) 🔹 2,200 kg full carbon-fiber composite airframe 🔹 Active ground testing underway in our GTV Hangar We aren't watching the skies change. We're building the wings taking us there. Happy 80th Independence Day! 🎆✈️ #TheePlaneCompany #PT01 #eVTOL #DeepTechIndia #MakeInIndia

Technological sovereignty isn't given. It's forged in carbon fiber. 🇮🇳 Every signature on the e200X-PT01 airframe carries one core conviction: the future of flight doesn't just belong on Indian soil, it must originate here. From the research labs of IIT Madras to our 60,000+ sq ft manufacturing hub, this 2.2-ton aircraft is 5 years of relentless execution: 🔹 10,000+ km of subscale flight testing logged 🔹 1st DGCA Design Organisation Approval for electric aircraft (May '23) 🔹 DGCA Type Certification application officially accepted (Dec '24) 🔹 2,200 kg full carbon-fiber composite airframe 🔹 Active ground testing underway in our GTV Hangar We aren't watching the skies change. We're building the wings taking us there. Happy 80th Independence Day! 🎆✈️ #TheePlaneCompany #PT01 #eVTOL #DeepTechIndia #MakeInIndia

The ePlane Company

75,032 次观看 • 14 天前

3. zhao lusi studio • the studio is constantly changing and hiring new staff (many new & younger staff have joined recently) • she acknowledges that the studio also has issues - sometimes they choose not to release content when the fans are unhappy because they are afraid they’ll get backlash or make the situation worse (lusi also feels ??? by this too bcs how can u not post just bcs u are scared of blacklash LOL, she will speak with them) • the studio handles issues one by one, if one aspect is not done well, they need to resolve that matter before moving to the next • they’ve actually filmed lots of content and materials but it’s still in the inventory bcs of point 2 😭😭 • they’ve filmed an asmr video in korea but not released yet~

3. zhao lusi studio • the studio is constantly changing and hiring new staff (many new & younger staff have joined recently) • she acknowledges that the studio also has issues - sometimes they choose not to release content when the fans are unhappy because they are afraid they’ll get backlash or make the situation worse (lusi also feels ??? by this too bcs how can u not post just bcs u are scared of blacklash LOL, she will speak with them) • the studio handles issues one by one, if one aspect is not done well, they need to resolve that matter before moving to the next • they’ve actually filmed lots of content and materials but it’s still in the inventory bcs of point 2 😭😭 • they’ve filmed an asmr video in korea but not released yet~

🐰

13,095 次观看 • 2 个月前

What is it actually like to build on Arc? At Arc Studio, early builders from Bu Finance, Dynamic, and Sequence (acq. by Polygon Labs) shared how they’re using Arc to power wallets, interoperability, and better UX for real applications. From embedded wallets to crosschain coordination, this is what’s being built on Arc today.

What is it actually like to build on Arc? At Arc Studio, early builders from Bu Finance, Dynamic, and Sequence (acq. by Polygon Labs) shared how they’re using Arc to power wallets, interoperability, and better UX for real applications. From embedded wallets to crosschain coordination, this is what’s being built on Arc today.

Arc

12,297 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is one of the more interesting cases I’ve heard for why we should put AI data centers in space. Yes, it would benefit a few billionaires, but it could also lessen the environmental toll on Earth. And we’re going to need to cut AI's carbon footprint in as many ways as we can. Space architect Ariel Ekblaw and I went deep on the opportunities—and many challenges—of building AI infrastructure in orbit. Watch our conversation here: Produced by Atlantic Re:think, The Atlantic's creative marketing studio, in collaboration with PwC.

This is one of the more interesting cases I’ve heard for why we should put AI data centers in space. Yes, it would benefit a few billionaires, but it could also lessen the environmental toll on Earth. And we’re going to need to cut AI's carbon footprint in as many ways as we can. Space architect Ariel Ekblaw and I went deep on the opportunities—and many challenges—of building AI infrastructure in orbit. Watch our conversation here: Produced by Atlantic Re:think, The Atlantic's creative marketing studio, in collaboration with PwC.

nxthompson

25,850 次观看 • 4 个月前

We created this 13 min episode in less than 2 weeks. We're about to enter a world where our favorite tv shows and movies don't take 4+ years to produce. Our favorite directors will us generative AI and hybrid production workflows to produce their next script, show or film faster. Today, Oscar-nominated director Neill Blomkamp released his first AI film: → NIGHTBORNE, a 13-min sci-fi film made on Seedance 2.0 → Made WITH real concept artists → Features the faces + voices of 32 real people [licensed + consented] → Launched Barley Studios, his new AI studio → Next up: a full AI feature AI is not replacing filmmakers, it's giving them the tools to create their ideas. Our third episode of The Arc is out now on Artlist TV! We created it entirely inside Artlist where we're deployed into the frozen brutality of 1876 Montana, FIVE must survive a lawless frontier of prisoners, bounty hunters and unforgiving wilderness. Along with ELI, a boy who reminds him of the son he's fighting to save. As bounty hunters close in, FIVE learns that in The Arc, survival is looking less like a reality. "The Arc" Created by: Darin Stewart Directed by : Darin Stewart Executive produced by: Simone Ferretti Produced by: BRIANA STEWART AI studio: Happy Monday x Yougenius Al prompt engineer: Darin Stewart Al artist: Mikey Rare Al artist: Edgar Daniel Post production studio: KDK studios Production studio: AFM AI Creator Studio Made entirely on: Artlist.io #aifilm #aifilmmaking #aivideo #generativeai #originalseries

We created this 13 min episode in less than 2 weeks. We're about to enter a world where our favorite tv shows and movies don't take 4+ years to produce. Our favorite directors will us generative AI and hybrid production workflows to produce their next script, show or film faster. Today, Oscar-nominated director Neill Blomkamp released his first AI film: → NIGHTBORNE, a 13-min sci-fi film made on Seedance 2.0 → Made WITH real concept artists → Features the faces + voices of 32 real people [licensed + consented] → Launched Barley Studios, his new AI studio → Next up: a full AI feature AI is not replacing filmmakers, it's giving them the tools to create their ideas. Our third episode of The Arc is out now on Artlist TV! We created it entirely inside Artlist where we're deployed into the frozen brutality of 1876 Montana, FIVE must survive a lawless frontier of prisoners, bounty hunters and unforgiving wilderness. Along with ELI, a boy who reminds him of the son he's fighting to save. As bounty hunters close in, FIVE learns that in The Arc, survival is looking less like a reality. "The Arc" Created by: Darin Stewart Directed by : Darin Stewart Executive produced by: Simone Ferretti Produced by: BRIANA STEWART AI studio: Happy Monday x Yougenius Al prompt engineer: Darin Stewart Al artist: Mikey Rare Al artist: Edgar Daniel Post production studio: KDK studios Production studio: AFM AI Creator Studio Made entirely on: Artlist.io #aifilm #aifilmmaking #aivideo #generativeai #originalseries

darin stewart

66,222 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is an ad. Even though it doesn’t look like one initially. We are already creating PHARMACIST ads. Our team crushed it with this one: - Our own studio setup with props to build diversity - A script that tackles more unaware customers, perfect for supplement products - An actor that is not speaking directly to the camera but acting as an authority around prenatal supplements Those are just 3 of the 50 reasons I can name to why our clients will scale with our studio formats in 2026. When they ask us what makes us different from other agencies… This is it. Our stealth creatives. You can’t do this in-house. And no other agency can replicate the following setup because they won’t spend it on you no matter how much you pay them. Drop any questions regarding this ad below and I’ll answer them ASAP.

This is an ad. Even though it doesn’t look like one initially. We are already creating PHARMACIST ads. Our team crushed it with this one: - Our own studio setup with props to build diversity - A script that tackles more unaware customers, perfect for supplement products - An actor that is not speaking directly to the camera but acting as an authority around prenatal supplements Those are just 3 of the 50 reasons I can name to why our clients will scale with our studio formats in 2026. When they ask us what makes us different from other agencies… This is it. Our stealth creatives. You can’t do this in-house. And no other agency can replicate the following setup because they won’t spend it on you no matter how much you pay them. Drop any questions regarding this ad below and I’ll answer them ASAP.

Bogdan | Ad Creatives for Meta & TikTok

10,588 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇮🇹 1981 Italian Grand Prix Lap 20 Car 7 🇬🇧 John Watson - McLaren MP4/1 Car 4 🇮🇹 Michele Alboreto - Tyrrell 010 John Watson’s accident at the 1981 Italian Grand Prix at Monza is widely remembered as one of the most significant turning points in Formula 1 history. It wasn't just a terrifying crash; it was the ultimate, real-world test that permanently changed how racing cars were built. On Lap 20 of the race, Watson lost control of his McLaren exiting the high-speed Second Lesmo bend. The car spun and struck the trackside barriers at roughly 140 mph (225 km/h). The violence of the impact was immense and it tore the engine and gearbox completely off the back of the car. The breakaway rear assembly bounced across the track and clipped Michele Alboreto’s Tyrrell, forcing him out of the race as well. To the absolute shock of the crowd and commentators, Watson opened his visor, unbuckled his harness, and walked away from the smoking, shattered wreckage entirely uninjured. Before the 1981 season, Formula 1 chassis were traditionally constructed from sheets of riveted or welded aluminum. However, for 1981, McLaren designer John Barnard introduced the McLaren MP4/1—the very first F1 car to feature a monocoque made entirely from carbon fiber composite material. The F1 paddock was deeply skeptical of this "mysterious black plastic." Many rival designers and team bosses openly criticized the move, confidently predicting that if a carbon fiber car suffered a major accident, the chassis would "crack like an egg" or disintegrate into a lethal cloud of sharp, black dust. Watson's crash proved the exact opposite. While the aluminum parts and engine mounts sheared off as intended to dissipate energy, the central carbon fiber tub enclosing Watson remained completely intact. It didn't shatter; it absorbed and deflected the massive load, acting as an impenetrable safety cell. Watson's survival at Monza effectively validated carbon fiber technology, establishing the blueprint for the modern carbon composite survival cells that continue to save drivers' lives in motorsport today. 🎥 Formula 1 John Watson McLaren Mastercard Formula 1 Team Autodromo Nazionale Monza #f1 #cars #accident #italy

🇮🇹 1981 Italian Grand Prix Lap 20 Car 7 🇬🇧 John Watson - McLaren MP4/1 Car 4 🇮🇹 Michele Alboreto - Tyrrell 010 John Watson’s accident at the 1981 Italian Grand Prix at Monza is widely remembered as one of the most significant turning points in Formula 1 history. It wasn't just a terrifying crash; it was the ultimate, real-world test that permanently changed how racing cars were built. On Lap 20 of the race, Watson lost control of his McLaren exiting the high-speed Second Lesmo bend. The car spun and struck the trackside barriers at roughly 140 mph (225 km/h). The violence of the impact was immense and it tore the engine and gearbox completely off the back of the car. The breakaway rear assembly bounced across the track and clipped Michele Alboreto’s Tyrrell, forcing him out of the race as well. To the absolute shock of the crowd and commentators, Watson opened his visor, unbuckled his harness, and walked away from the smoking, shattered wreckage entirely uninjured. Before the 1981 season, Formula 1 chassis were traditionally constructed from sheets of riveted or welded aluminum. However, for 1981, McLaren designer John Barnard introduced the McLaren MP4/1—the very first F1 car to feature a monocoque made entirely from carbon fiber composite material. The F1 paddock was deeply skeptical of this "mysterious black plastic." Many rival designers and team bosses openly criticized the move, confidently predicting that if a carbon fiber car suffered a major accident, the chassis would "crack like an egg" or disintegrate into a lethal cloud of sharp, black dust. Watson's crash proved the exact opposite. While the aluminum parts and engine mounts sheared off as intended to dissipate energy, the central carbon fiber tub enclosing Watson remained completely intact. It didn't shatter; it absorbed and deflected the massive load, acting as an impenetrable safety cell. Watson's survival at Monza effectively validated carbon fiber technology, establishing the blueprint for the modern carbon composite survival cells that continue to save drivers' lives in motorsport today. 🎥 Formula 1 John Watson McLaren Mastercard Formula 1 Team Autodromo Nazionale Monza #f1 #cars #accident #italy

WRCPAST

68,131 次观看 • 3 个月前

China just quietly broke one of the toughest monopolies in advanced materials. Beijing unveiled T1200 ultra-high-strength carbon fiber: thinner than a strand of hair, 10× stronger than steel, and now produced at hundred-ton scale. For decades, this grade was tightly controlled by Japan’s Toray/Teijin duopoly. Now China is the first country in the world to mass-produce it. This isn’t just a lab achievement, it enables real industries: • aerospace & rockets • humanoid robotics • EV lightweighting • wind turbine blades • high-end manufacturing • strategic defense applications When you can make your own “industrial bones,” you don’t fear sanctions — you outgrow them. Narratives said China copied. Materials like this show China is building.

China just quietly broke one of the toughest monopolies in advanced materials. Beijing unveiled T1200 ultra-high-strength carbon fiber: thinner than a strand of hair, 10× stronger than steel, and now produced at hundred-ton scale. For decades, this grade was tightly controlled by Japan’s Toray/Teijin duopoly. Now China is the first country in the world to mass-produce it. This isn’t just a lab achievement, it enables real industries: • aerospace & rockets • humanoid robotics • EV lightweighting • wind turbine blades • high-end manufacturing • strategic defense applications When you can make your own “industrial bones,” you don’t fear sanctions — you outgrow them. Narratives said China copied. Materials like this show China is building.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

253,758 次观看 • 5 个月前

The UK recently completed a trial of a carbon credit system that sets a daily allowance for each person—in effect, a limit on your ability to purchase food, clothing, goods, and travel as you have always done. The limit has been set at 20kg of carbon emissions per day, with food restricted to 2600g. Food manufacturers are cooperating by adding a carbon statement on their packaging to inform consumers how much of their allowance each product consumes. For example, a packet of cheese accounts for 1100g—almost half of your daily carbon allowance. Different foods have varying carbon rates. Root vegetables like potatoes and carrots are relatively low, while red meat incurs the highest charge – so high, in fact, that if you were to spend your entire daily food carbon allowance on red meat, it would buy you 30g of steak—just one mouthful. You may recall I mentioned this in a speech some time ago and was fact-checked. Well, fact-check this! Net zero is supported by the Liberal Party, the Labor Party, and the Nationals. Only One Nation stands firm in defending our agricultural sector from this insane push to control the food supply and hollow out the bush.

The UK recently completed a trial of a carbon credit system that sets a daily allowance for each person—in effect, a limit on your ability to purchase food, clothing, goods, and travel as you have always done. The limit has been set at 20kg of carbon emissions per day, with food restricted to 2600g. Food manufacturers are cooperating by adding a carbon statement on their packaging to inform consumers how much of their allowance each product consumes. For example, a packet of cheese accounts for 1100g—almost half of your daily carbon allowance. Different foods have varying carbon rates. Root vegetables like potatoes and carrots are relatively low, while red meat incurs the highest charge – so high, in fact, that if you were to spend your entire daily food carbon allowance on red meat, it would buy you 30g of steak—just one mouthful. You may recall I mentioned this in a speech some time ago and was fact-checked. Well, fact-check this! Net zero is supported by the Liberal Party, the Labor Party, and the Nationals. Only One Nation stands firm in defending our agricultural sector from this insane push to control the food supply and hollow out the bush.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

372,317 次观看 • 1 年前