正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Just some information that may be useful seeing it laid out. Elizabeth Lane’s major appearances/interviews regarding the Charlie Kirk case: Tucker Carlson — Oct. 9, 2025 (Lane herself said Kiriakou introduced her to Tucker) Julian Dorey — Nov. 14, 2025 (Dorey had said during the Elizabeth Lane interview that...

213,248 次观看 • 16 天前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

Ana Escobar 的头像
Ana Escobar16 天前

i do think some important context as well has been that John K has been publicly asking the white house for a pardon for a long time. I dont know how access to that is determined. i know the pardon brokers have been in the news lately. just a data point.

Em 的头像
Em16 天前

Thank you! 💕

Em 的头像
Em16 天前

& @AnaEscobarShow, guess who was searched shortly thereafter?

PTS 的头像
PTS16 天前

Great info, Em!!!! 🔥

Lorrie HalfDeafwithMS 的头像
Lorrie HalfDeafwithMS16 天前

😳 I’ve never seen this I need to go find full episode ty for posting this Em

Terry Tut 的头像
Terry Tut16 天前

Well what do you know? Connections connections

Ash Nose 的头像
Ash Nose16 天前

John is sus AF. I lost everything for him when he tried to sell the arabs with box cutters 9/11 story

Gresai 的头像
Gresai16 天前

@addsszz Kiriakou is still on payroll pushing assets out into the podcast world 🤫

Broc 的头像
Broc16 天前

NOW I understand why E. Lane (or ChatGPT) wrote that very detailed essay on Erika Kirk being a psychopath. She was trying to gain not only trust, but CREDIBILITY as a "good people reader." "I called out Erika being untrustworthy, so trust me when I call out Mitch Snow, too!"

Keyboard Crusader 🕈 的头像
Keyboard Crusader 🕈16 天前

alex also viciously attacked candace for absolutely no reason. what a sleaze bag. i used to follow his work but he went downhill

MrsDorough 的头像
MrsDorough16 天前

I love her, but she should have finished the episode before making up her mind wouldn’t you think?

Wallace 的头像
Wallace16 天前

@AnaEscobarShow 😨

Jess Lee 的头像
Jess Lee16 天前

Im definitely thinking wig 😅

RealCoachCobra 的头像
RealCoachCobra16 天前

Nice work! She's falling off daily and for good reason. She's a slimeball "journalist" but underneath all of the plastiv surgery and makeup She's hideous inside and out

MadWorld_1984 的头像
MadWorld_198416 天前

Mitch is part of it too. They were sent to divide and I think they're both working together and doing their job very well. The chaos started when they both came on the scene. It's not an accident.

A_wAsTeD_TaLeNT 的头像
A_wAsTeD_TaLeNT16 天前

@addsszz @Know_More_News has been pointing this out for a while. This is not just a Jew thing it's a Russia slop op.

@CFX 的头像
@CFX16 天前

Kiriakou's jail sentence was kayfabe.

Raven 的头像
Raven16 天前

You can see on the Candace interview when Ana starts talking about a dream SHE had about CK in which CK tells Ana that "the same people that killed JFK" killed him... Candace's demeanor changes. She's quiet and you can see on her face she doesn't believe Ana, and is clocking her right then.

wendz 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇵🇸🇱🇧🇾🇪 的头像
wendz 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇵🇸🇱🇧🇾🇪16 天前

I couldn’t finish her interview with @RealCandaceO It was so sycophantic, fake, shallow, cringe 🤢

JamestheCatholic 的头像
JamestheCatholic16 天前

John K cannot be trusted.

Lumina Boats 的头像
Lumina Boats16 天前

That entire list may have the same boss TBH.

Get Crunk 的头像
Get Crunk16 天前

Pretty sure it’s Tom Simon of Simoninvestigations

b pete 的头像
b pete16 天前

She is correct about one thing. Mitch Snow is lying through his teeth.

CJB 💫💥 的头像
CJB 💫💥16 天前

🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷

Shallom, Nigga 的头像
Shallom, Nigga16 天前

Is this the week's new hasbara? Elizabeth Lane = evil? Anything but dropping the act and releasing the files lol

MidwestMissy 的头像
MidwestMissy16 天前

@grok why is everyone having an issue with Elizabeth Lane

justme 的头像
justme16 天前

@Ft_Banana_Snow She doesn’t even bring anything to the table- like just to put things simply. What the fuck has she brought to the table?

Pamela A Everett Goodman 的头像
Pamela A Everett Goodman16 天前

A new age bs artist came on scene in 2020 named Jason Shurka. She was affiliated with him, anyone who’s affiliated with Unifyd is bad news imo. Anti/ jab lockdowners should know this. Apparently you people don’t

Reframed 的头像
Reframed16 天前

Wig? Hair moves uniformly. No scalp line.

Bruhh 的头像
Bruhh16 天前

This would be very weird if Gary was right

CJB 💫💥 的头像
CJB 💫💥16 天前

Perhaps it is this guy or not 🤷🤷🤷 👇👇👇👇👇👇 Simon Parkes is most likely the figure you have in mind connecting to UNIFYD TV and fringe intelligence/whistleblower circles. ​Here is how the key figures and threads cross paths: ​John Kiriakou: The former CIA analyst and case officer known for blowing the whistle on the agency's use of waterboarding against al-Qaeda detainees (leading to his prosecution under the Espionage Act). In recent years, he transitioned into independent media commentary, authoring books, hosting podcasts, and occasionally appearing on alternative or conspiratorial media networks, including hosting content on UNIFYD TV (founded by Jason Shurka, known heavily for promoting "Energy Enhancement System" or EESystem tech and esoteric/disclosure narratives). ​Simon Parkes: A former British local town councillor turned prominent conspiracy theorist, self-described extraterrestrial experiencer, and founder of the Connecting Consciousness network. Parkes frequently features across the same alternative-media ecosystem—appearing on UNIFYD TV, collaborating with Jason Shurka, and claiming insider knowledge from "shadow" or military intelligence sources. ​Simon Shack: Another figure in fringe "media fakery" circles (known for the September Clues forum), though Parkes is far more prominent within UNIFYD's specific lineup of disclosure and consciousness programming.

Bingo 的头像
Bingo16 天前

We all need to not forget the one that started it all, which was the redacted podcast, which is no longer able to be found.

Nicole M 32 的头像
Nicole M 3216 天前

I want to say I’m shocked about this info, but unfortunately I’m not. She sure fooled a ton of us.

Vitviggs 的头像
Vitviggs16 天前

She looks like another Maria Machado trying to convince with CIA body language tactics some folks that she's the chosen one

相关视频

Tucker Carlson Drops Opening Monologue About Alex Jones: We have a ruling class in the United States defined by its hatreds. Not its loves, not its hopes, but by its hatreds. They hate all kinds of people, large groups of people: the deplorables, the bitter clingers, America's entire blue-collar population, the unfashionable people. They're hated by the people who run our country. But no one is hated more by them than a man called Alex Jones. Alex Jones is the single-most-censored man in all American history. He was the first media figure in our history to be completely erased in one day. Deplatformed. Alex Jones was deplatformed before it was a common term. And not just deplatformed — sued, attacked. They attempted to criminally charge him. What did Alex Jones do wrong? Alex Jones didn't rape anybody. He didn't loot Macy's. He didn't burn a police station. He didn't invent a fake cryptocurrency and loot pension funds. He didn't start a pointless war that made this country poorer and more disorganized. He didn't open the southern border. No. Alex Jones had opinions that deeply rattled the people who run America. In fact, rattled a lot of us. And I'll just confess that I first heard of Alex Jones when he questioned the official story behind 9/11. And I, speaking for myself, was deeply offended by this. I didn't take any time to find out what he was saying, but I was bothered by the idea that this defining event in American history, which changed the life of everyone who lived here then, might not actually have unfolded as we were told it did. And that possibility was too destabilizing. And I remember feeling resentment toward Alex Jones for saying that. But several years later, I went up in Austin, Texas, and through a chain of circumstances, wound up meeting Alex Jones. And I learned what everyone who has met him now knows, which is Alex Jones is not a crazy person. Alex Jones has said pretty far out things on TV from time to time. Not that far out. He hasn't said men can become women or Ukraine is a democracy. But within the bounds of, say, cable news, pretty far out. But fundamentally, Alex Jones is right about a lot of things. And, in fact, that's why they don't like him. Alex Jones has an uncanny, really an amazing ability to predict events before they happen. He has called it and he's done it on tape again and again, to the point where it's a meme on the Internet. "Alex Jones prophet," not conspiracy nut, prophet. But when you dig into Alex Jones's predictions, they are so spot-on that it's remarkable. How does he do this? We're guessing there's a kind of spiritual sensitivity to Alex Jones. Maybe that's his secret. He was displaying this years before the average person in this country even thought about matters like that. Now it's pretty obvious to most people that the current war going on in this country is taking place in ways you can't see it most of the time. But ten years ago, people were not thinking that way. Alex Jones was. And so, we thought it'd be interesting to sit down and talk to Alex Jones, the man. He joins us now in our studio.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

510,710 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨👀 KEITH JONES TAKES THE STAND — TESTIFIES ABOUT ALLEGED $1 MILLION HIT ON QUANDO RONDO Keith Jones took the stand and told the courtroom that he is currently in federal custody after pleading guilty to charges involving murder-for-hire and stalking resulting in murder. The prosecution then began walking Jones through photos and exhibits connected to the alleged shooting. 📸 THE GAS STATION SHOOTING Prosecutors showed a photo from the shooting at the gas station and asked Jones to identify the people pictured. • Jones identified himself as one of the shooters. • He said he did not know the name of the person who was killed. • When asked who the intended target was, Jones identified Quando Rondo. Another photo was shown of the group walking toward the gas station through an alley. Jones was asked to explain what was happening in the image. Prosecutors then showed an image from In-N-Out, and Jones confirmed that was where they went after the shooting. ⏱️ 20–30 MINUTES AFTER THE SHOOTING Jones testified that it took approximately 20–30 minutes to get to In-N-Out after the shooting. When prosecutors asked whether he could identify anyone who participated in the killing of Lil Pab, Jones said yes. He identified: • Brown Eyes • Dede • Himself Jones also identified the clothing worn by the people in the photographs, including Dede’s blue outfit. The defense objected, arguing that prosecutors were leading the witness. 🚨 WHAT DID JONES SAY ABOUT DURK? Prosecutors asked Jones if he knew Durk. Jones said yes. When asked whether Durk was involved in the murder of Lil Pab, Jones testified: “He wasn’t there with us, but he was a part of it.” 🏙️ CHICAGO / GANG AFFILIATIONS Jones testified that he is from Chicago’s South Side. He said: • Dede is from Taytown. • Jones identified himself as a Black Disciple. • He identified Dede as a Black Disciple. • He said Brown Eyes was not a BD, but a Vice Lord. • Tony C was also identified as a Vice Lord. • Jones said he knew about OTF but was not a member. 📱 THE FACETIME CALL Jones testified that he became involved after receiving a FaceTime call involving Dede, Brown Eyes and Tony C. He explained to the jury how the FaceTime call worked and said that during the conversation they discussed a location connected to “Dude,” whom Jones identified as Quando Rondo. Jones testified that they were told: “Bro was offering a million for us.” Prosecutors asked Jones if he understood who “Bro” was. Jones said he believed it was Durk, explaining that he considered Durk the person who had the money and said he had heard him referred to as “Bro” before. 💰 THE ALLEGED $1 MILLION Jones testified that he believed there was $1 million being offered to go after and kill Quando Rondo. When prosecutors asked why he believed the offer was real, Jones referenced seeing Durk with a large amount of money during a Million Dollars Worth of Game interview. The prosecution then displayed an exhibit from that interview. Jones testified that he was actually present when it was filmed in Taytown. He said he was positioned on the left side of the image and claimed he could hear what was being discussed because he was there. The judge later instructed the jury that statements concerning the Million Dollars Worth of Game exhibit were not admissible as to Brown Eyes. ✈️ WHY DID JONES GO TO CALIFORNIA? Prosecutors asked Jones whether he would have traveled to California if he believed the trip was going to be for free. Jones said no. He testified that he went because he believed he was going to get paid and said he was thinking about what he could do with the money. Jones said he sent his information to Dede.

Cousin Tino ™️

120,720 次观看 • 1 个月前

So now Alex Jones had a whole show on Candace. I’m about to watch it all but I want to talk for a minute about what I’ve heard so far. Talk it out in my head and write it out to see what you guys think. Alex is telling Candace to come clean. He’s already investigated the podcast and websites and it’s all her accounts. He says She needs to come clean, “Stop letting them use things on you, stop being blackmail-able.” Well that’s an odd thing to say. Blackmail Alex? Interesting you should say that. He also said she was trying to get him to hire her back in Oct 2017. PJW (Georgie’s friend) was the one that brought her to Alex. Let that sink in PJW, George’s good friend was the one that brought Candace to Alex. PJW that brought George to the TPUK event a YEAR after first having her on his show. PJW helped George organize the dinner the second night that Candace and Charlie were there. So you want me to believe that PJW who is good friends with George and knew Candace for a year, and had her on his show, sets up the event with Mappin and does a dinner with George the night after never introduced George to Candace in that year? That George and Candace didn’t know each other? Ok…… Remember I said I believed Candace had been stalking the conservative moment looking for a way in? Apparently she was shopping Alex too. He said he didn’t hire her because she seemed like a loose cannon. PJW, the key. He is the one of the ones that started pushing her out to the podcasters and organizations. I wonder if he knew Ryan. He had to. Where is Ryan? To refresh your memory Candace was a leftist. Ryan was a guy she hooked up with who was a conservative and started her Red Pill Black. Wrote her scripts and directed her YouTube videos. I think he saw a way to make money. Too bad she dumped him when they were oh so close to making it. She meets Farage at CPAC 2/2017. Candace was going around handing out business cards and meeting people. So she was stalking out conservative events and trying to connect then. PJW had her on first in 8/2017, Rubin’s show she was also on in 8/2017 and then PJW got her on with Alex 10/2017. She meets Charlie in 11/2017. The circle was PJW, Russell, Tate, Milo, George among a few others. Now what do all these men have in common? They have a few things in common besides being from the UK and they have been friends since back then. They’ve all also been accused of SA or SA with minors. But yet she still says they are all friends. Just found out about the allegations against PJW today to be honest. Find that weird? A woman who says that everyone is the Epstein class that goes up against her or accuses them of horrible things with no evidence but is fine with the ones that do have evidence against them. Do they have blackmail on Candace? Maybe they even have things on George. Like a business arranged marriage that George and Candace lied about? Found out today that Mappin and a couple of these guys also go back further than I thought too. One day one of them will break. Tates in jail. Milo deported. Russell’s trials are about to start. PJW I don’t know where his investigation is at by the women that accused him. Maybe they dropped it. But someone in that circle or someone they told at some point will say something. Just asking questions.

Raven Grace Op #22 of 92 🐦‍⬛✝️🍿🇺🇸

18,669 次观看 • 7 天前

“Former” CIA agent John Kiriakou, while being interviewed by Mehdi Hasan, withdraws his previous endorsement of James Fishback. He initially claims he never endorsed him, then claims his assistant made the tweet containing his endorsement of him and that he “tore him a new one for it”, then when confronted over the fact he endorsed him in a live interview says “it was a stupid thing to say”. Kiriakou then proceeds to say Fishback’s remarks about blacks and Indians are “dreadful” and that a line needs to be drawn between people who are merely critical of Israel and those who are “racist and antisemitic” and that those who are should not be allied with. Kiriakou has previously stated that he “does not believe there’s any kind of behind the scenes subterfuge” regarding Joe Kent’s resignation over the Iran War. Kiriakou’s evidence for this belief comes from a group he belongs to called the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) that is made up of retired FBI, CIA, NSA, and DOJ agents. Kiriakou says VIPS awarded Kent with the “Sam Adam’s Award for Integrity in Intelligence” for his opposition to the Iran War and that “we believe what we’re seeing is what we’re getting” with regards to Kent and that his resignation was purely motivated by his concerns with Israel’s influence in dragging the US into the conflict with false intelligence. Kiriakou has also previously spread conspiracy theories about Israel’s involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. He added after the discussion regarding them potentially taking out Kirk: “which is why I worry about Tucker”. Kiriakou has also been interviewed multiple times by Tucker Carlson, who also often makes a distinction between simple critics of Israel and “real anti-semites” like Nick Fuentes.

FrostyTheGroyper

203,154 次观看 • 4 个月前

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,540 次观看 • 9 个月前