Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Just thinking once again about how Andrew Garfield winning Best Actor for TICK, TICK… BOOM! would’ve been one of the great wins in recent memory

92,002 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

9 Yorum

Joe Hughes profil fotoğrafı
Joe Hughes1 yıl önce

He should've! Outside of maybe Benedict for Power of The Dog, no one is talking about the other nominated performances from that year (nearly 3 years on), only about Andrew! But, in hindsight, I think his win would've been unfortunately overshadowed...

Bryan Sudfield profil fotoğrafı
Bryan Sudfield1 yıl önce

Garfield, Cumberbatch and Washington were very deserving of their slots and while I do like Smith, there was nothing about that performance that made me scream “nominate him”. And then Bardem, well…

Orphan tears profil fotoğrafı
Orphan tears1 yıl önce

This was his best for the oscar role win but academy gives to will smith which was undeserving for that movie

Rachel McKay Steele profil fotoğrafı
Rachel McKay Steele1 yıl önce

I watched this twice in a row. Finished it, started it over again. Such a moving film and an incredible performance.

Nobody profil fotoğrafı
Nobody1 yıl önce

I always forget Andrew Garfield is mad talented, Hollywood needs to do more with him

G profil fotoğrafı
G1 yıl önce

He’s truly an incredible actor. He’ll get his Oscar someday

Ellie Leonard profil fotoğrafı
Ellie Leonard1 yıl önce

I need him to suddenly be in everything

Antonio Lopez profil fotoğrafı
Antonio Lopez1 yıl önce

On the other hand Smith winning is one of the worst and most forgettable in recent memory as well

Sam profil fotoğrafı
Sam1 yıl önce

If Rami Malek hadnt won for his performance as Freddy Mercury, he AND taron egerton would have won their years and im still upset

Benzer Videolar

Before you trade futures, you MUST the contracts you are trading. Every contract, comes with two key numbers: 1) Tick size 2) Tick value Tick size is the smallest price movement the contract can make Tick value is how much money you make or lose per tick Here's how to calculate what one point is worth: For example, let’s look at the NASDAQ 100 E-mini (NQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $5 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $5 = $20 per point • Margin required: ~$17,600 Or the NASDAQ 100 Micro (MNQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $0.50 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $0.50 = $2 per point • Margin required: ~$1,760 See the difference? The micro contract is 1/10th the size—perfect for beginners. S&P 500 E-mini (ES): • Tick value: $12.50 per tick • One point = $50 • Margin: ~$15,400 S&P 500 Micro (MES): • Tick value: $1.25 per tick • One point = $5 • Margin: ~$1,540 Why this matters: If your stop loss is 10 points away on MES, you're risking $50. On ES? You're risking $500. It’s the same setup, but different exposure. This is why most beginners blow up—they don't understand contract specs and trade position sizes way too large for their account. Pro tip: Stick to micro contracts (MES, MNQ) until you're consistently profitable. Lower margin means mistakes cost less while you learn. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes so you never blow your account • The 3 beginner mistakes that cost traders thousands (and how to avoid them) • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

11,122 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce