Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse. Dr John Campbell breaks down the latest South Korean study showing an overall 27% increase in cancer amongst the vaxxed. From a cohort of 8.4 million people comparing vax/unvax. Specific increases- - lung +53% - prostate +69% - thyroid +35% -...

141,698 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Jimmy Dore: Groundbreaking South Korean Study Reveals Alarming Link Between COVID Vaccines and Cancer A massive new study from South Korea, utilizing the national health insurance database of over 8.4 million people, has uncovered a deeply disturbing trend. The research, which tracked patients from 2021-2023, found a statistically significant increase in cancer risk among the vaccinated population. The data paints a devastating picture: - 27% higher risk of overall cancer. - 53% higher risk of lung cancer. - 69% higher risk of prostate cancer. - 34% higher risk of gastric cancer. - 28% higher risk of colorectal cancer. - 35% higher risk of thyroid cancer. - 20% higher risk of breast cancer. As commentator Jimmy Dore highlighted, the probability this result occurred by chance is less than one in a thousand. He points out the critical context the mainstream media refuses to cover: Why was this crucial, large-scale analysis only conducted in South Korea? Why have other nations with similar databases not released such findings? This same research group has previously published data showing vaccines linked to a 68% increase in depression and a 93% increase in sleep disorders. This is the information being systematically suppressed. The very platforms that censored open debate about vaccine efficacy, early treatment, and origins of the virus are now ignoring peer-reviewed science that contradicts the official narrative. The public is demanding answers. Why the silence?

Camus

68,017 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Disturbing data from an Italian study of nearly 300,000 individuals reveals a significant increase in cancer risk post-COVID vaccination. Dr. John Campbell breaks down the alarming findings: • The rate of first cancer hospitalization in the UNvaccinated cohort was 0.85%. • In the VACCINATED cohort, the rate jumped to 1.15%—a concerning and statistically significant increase. This wasn't a fluke. The results have a p-value of <0.001, meaning there's less than a 1 in 1000 chance this happened by random chance. Why is this happening? Dr. Campbell outlines plausible biological mechanisms: • Ongoing spike protein production driving chronic inflammation, a known precursor to cancer. • DNA contamination in the vaccines, potentially inhibiting tumor suppressor genes. • Frameshifting from pseudouridine, creating rogue proteins that can cause cellular damage and mutation. The most damning part? This crucial data is being withheld from the public in the UK and other Western nations. Our governments are depriving scientists of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed data needed to perform this exact analysis. This lack of transparency is, in Dr. Campbell's view, "quite outrageous" and compromises a potential cover-up. This Italian province's data is a canary in the coal mine. If these figures are extrapolated to populations of 50 million or more, the implications are staggering. We are being kept in the dark. It is time to demand transparency. It is time to demand the data.

Camus

62,673 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

In the UK right now, there’s a bid to mandate the ENTIRE population have synthetic folate introduced into their nations food supply. They even want it in wholemeal flour. But this scientist found a 2.6 x increased risk of prostate cancer from increased folic acid. Jeremy Clarkson is campaigning for more screening. That screening might end up doing MORE harm than good. Because the men get tested end up going down the road of standard of care treatments, causing life altering surgery, who would have only died WITH signs of prostate cancer... not FROM it. The quality of life from standard of care is devastating: Dr Clare Craig - “It takes men, who would have died WTIH prostate cancer... without knowing they had prostate cancer... without any horrible interventions and surgery... and puts them through all that... and fails to impact on overall mortality...” “When you have your prostate out, 4 in 5 men will end up impotent.... and 1 in 5 will end up incontinent” Those 2 campaigns working in parallel, become a sort of Double Whammy. A campaign mandating the entire population receive a synthetic product potentially increasing the rate of prostate cancer. The other campaign increasing the people found through screening, leading to life altering standard of care treatments. It reminds me of that study in Sweden, showing more Sun exposure led to women living longer... but they push universal sunscreen use. And those women who lived longer didn’t die from Melanoma even though it was found more. Dr. Claire Craig - “If you are exposed to folic acid... your risk of prostate cancer is more than DOUBLED... If you care about prostate cancer, you need to campaign to get this stuff out of our flour” Jeremy Clarkson (Jeremy Clarkson) needs to watch this.

Humanspective

26,066 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Turbo cancer is not a myth [or] a conspiracy theory, as Wikipedia has [claimed]...All the COVID vaccines are causing dramatic increases in cancer & it's...happening more & more. We're getting proof of it in the literature &...patients need help." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis (McGill Medicine)), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to The Shannon Joy Show Rumble channel on October 16, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "My work is actually extending into pediatrics as well. I have a lot of children with cancer, and these children are vaccinated. Unfortunately, they had the COVID-19 vaccines and they developed extremely aggressive cancers. And I'll tell you something else, Shannon, right now. I've seen a shift in the past year. In the beginning, I had a mix of vaccinated and unvaccinated cancer patients. I thought, okay, that's interesting. The vaccinated are obviously much more aggressive. They're turbo cancers, so they grow much more rapidly. "But I've seen over the last, at least the last six months, a complete shift towards all patients being vaccinated. And I think it's just because more and more cancer is happening in the vaccinated. We're actually seeing huge studies now come out confirming that the vaccinated are suffering anywhere from 20 to 60% increases in cancer. "There was an Italian study that came out recently with 300,000 people and a South Korean study that came out recently with 8 million people confirming that the vaccinated are suffering significant increases in multiple cancers. So that's being confirmed. Turbo cancer is not a myth. It's not a conspiracy theory, as Wikipedia has been trying to claim for the last two years. "And what I've been attacked on is trying to warn people about these vaccines, Covid vaccines, causing turbo cancer, whether it's Pfizer, whether it's Moderna, and now it's being confirmed for Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca as well, the DNA based vaccines as well. So it's all of them. All the COVID vaccines are causing dramatic increases in cancer. And it's just happening more and more. We're getting proof of it in the literature and these patients need help."

Sense Receptor

31,261 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

ALARMING: Cancer Rates Skyrocket Among Young Adults—What’s Really Going On? A shocking trend is unfolding in America’s heartland: young adults in the Corn Belt are facing a cancer epidemic. New reports from the Washington Post and New York Times reveal that cancer rates among those under 50 have surged over the past decade—with Iowans facing some of the highest risks in the nation. For those born in 1990, the risk of rectal cancer is four times higher than for those born in 1950, while colon cancer risk has more than doubled. In Iowa alone, young men face a 35% higher risk of skin cancer, and young women a 66% greater risk compared to peers elsewhere. The state now ranks fifth in cancer incidence for adults under 50, with kidney, blood, and skin cancers leading the surge. What’s causing this crisis? The evidence points to a toxic combination of factors: - Pesticides & Herbicides: Iowa, the farming capital of America, is drenched in chemicals like glyphosate (found in Roundup), which studies link to endocrine disruption, autism, and multiple cancers, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. These chemicals don’t just stay in the fields—they’re in our food, water, and even organic products. As cancer survivor Kenzie Dryden shared, she grew up running barefoot through fields sprayed with these toxins. Now, Iowa’s Senate has passed a bill—dubbed the "Cancer Gag Act"—to shield pesticide companies from lawsuits, even as victims like Dryden fight for accountability. - COVID-19 Vaccines: A peer-reviewed South Korean study found that vaccinated individuals under 65 had a 27% higher risk of developing cancer within a year, with elevated risks for thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. The study controlled for age, sex, and comorbidities, raising urgent questions about long-term effects. This isn’t a conspiracy—it’s a public health emergency. While Big Pharma and agribusiness lobby to protect profits, young people are paying the price. The data is clear: cancer rates are climbing, and the causes demand investigation—not silence. Kim Iversen breaks down the connections between pesticides, vaccines, and the alarming rise in cancer among young adults. Awareness is the first step. Share this, demand answers, and protect your health.

Camus

32,637 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

After a year of intensive research, Dr. William Makis presents the most crucial graph of his career: the ivermectin dosing schedule for cancer. Dr. Makis recommends a starting dose of 1mg per kg of body weight per day for most cancers, including breast, colon, lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and leukemias. For a 60kg individual, this translates to 60mg daily, which can be taken as: - Five 12mg pills - Or 6ml of liquid (approximately one teaspoon plus 1ml) The evidence supporting the efficacy of ivermectin is compelling and dose-dependent. - Dr. Shankara Chetty observed a significant drop in a prostate cancer patient’s PSA from 89 to 11 after taking 45mg/day. - Dr. Tess Lawry’s case study showed a remarkable decrease in CA125 (an ovarian cancer marker) from 288 to 22 after just 0.2mg/kg. - A long-term Castro study on children with leukemia demonstrated no side effects after 6 months at a dose of 1mg/kg. For aggressive cancers like pancreatic and brain cancers, a higher dose may be necessary due to the blood-brain barrier. Dr. Makis cites examples: - Dr. Landrito’s colleague with terminal gallbladder cancer experienced the disappearance of cancer after 14 months at a dose of 2mg/kg/day. - The highest documented dose is 2.5mg/kg, as reported by Dr. Chetty, with only transient visual side effects that resolved. Mainstream oncology is unlikely to offer this treatment due to ivermectin’s generic, off-patent status and unprofitable nature. Consequently, there are no funded clinical trials. Dr. Makis concludes that using ivermectin in cancer treatment is straightforward and highly safe. He strongly suggests that those struggling with cancer should start with a dose of 1mg/kg/day. This can be taken for several months, even over a year, with an excellent safety profile based on long-term anecdotal evidence. The power to fight cancer may already be within your reach.

Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub

101,262 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

(14/57) DR. JAMES ROYLE— “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based–injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers.” In this 2024 presentation for the Stone Summit, U.K.-based surgeon Dr. James Royle describes seeing the same kinds of phenomena regarding turbo cancers as described by Professor Angus Dalgleish, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Ute Krüger, et al. He also notes that the excuses for these cancers that have been used to deflect away from the COVID injections as the cause don’t make any logical sense. “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene-based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers,” Royle says. “These cancers have been termed colloquially ‘turbo cancers.’ Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians…There was [also] a clear, dramatic increase [in cancer rates] that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout.” Royle goes on to note the following: “A robust study recently published from Japan now [retracted] by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer-related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, [and in] 2022, [a] 7.9% increase.” The surgeon adds: “I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out-of-the-blue aggressive stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large, round tumor masses.” The prominent surgeon notes that “many of [his] multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged… [a] sudden change in patterns and [a] dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers…observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.” “This post-2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population-wide change in environmental toxins,” Royle notes. “Ultra-processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID-19,” the surgeon adds. “In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping [cancer] screening given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years [of age].”

Sense Receptor

16,538 просмотров • 1 год назад

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"[With] the messenger RNA vaccines...[there are] 10 ways that it can induce cancer...the spike protein alone...will bind to the major suppressor genes...[which] means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Senator Malcolm Roberts (Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺) et al. during a presentation for Australia's Federal (national) parliament two of the 10 ways that the COVID injections induce cancer in the victims who took the shots. While he mentions the DNA-plasmid/SV40 contamination, here he highlights the phenomenon wherein the "the spike protein alone in messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major [cancer] suppressor genes." Dalgleish notes that this means that "the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous," Dalgleish says. "The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But the messenger RNA vaccines that, we have with the spike protein, that in those 10 ways that it can induce cancer, I mean, there's two or three which are really frightening. One, which has been widely discussed with the contamination issue, is that there are some oncogene stimulants there, SV40 is in the Pfizer. We know that. "We have a list of people here who have been discussed in the Perth conference recently of all the people who have shown the contamination from McKernan in the US, David Speicher, Kony Grao [?], Phillip Buckhaults, etcetera. And there's another paper just come out from Wurzburg [?] that, not only confirms all this but shows that they will convert cells to cancer. So we know that that's a direct thing. "The second thing, which I really want to emphasize, is the spike protein alone and messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major suppressor genes. Now the suppressor genes are basically your cancer policeman. If you do get cancer, they will suppress it. P53, BRCA, MSH. MSH is well associated with a thing called Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer, which is very relevant to the fact we're getting an explosion of colorectal cancers at the moment. So what happens if you have a mutation in any of those three major suppressor genes, you're just unfortunate to be born with it, it means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40. "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent of mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous. The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us. And I believe leaves no doubt at all that these vaccines must be banned now, and anybody who opposes it, anybody says there's reason for it has to be held to account for what not only has happened, but what is going to happen in the future if we persist with this."

Sense Receptor

33,743 просмотров • 1 год назад