Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse. Dr John Campbell breaks down the latest South Korean study showing an overall 27% increase in cancer amongst the vaxxed. From a cohort of 8.4 million people comparing vax/unvax. Specific increases- - lung +53% - prostate +69% - thyroid +35% -...

141,808 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 37

Фото профиля Light Me Away ☀️
Light Me Away ☀️11 месяцев назад

Why detox fails without redox ? Detox = expensive on ATP (energy currency). A mitochondrially-weak person has low ATP -> detox pathways stall -> toxins recirculate. 🙄This is why many sick people doing “detox protocols” feel worse or get no results. 🌊 Vaccination tsunami: Vaccines = not just “antigen shots.” They also bring adjuvants, metals, lipid nanoparticles, stabilizers, and frequency mismatches. These disrupt electron flow, circadian timing, and mitochondrial coherence. If your redox is strong (sunlight, grounding, DHA, circadian rhythms, magnetism), your body can buffer, recycle, and adapt. ✅ If your redox is weak, every injection or environmental toxin = accelerates collapse -> autoimmune flares, neurological issues, kidney/liver overload. 😬 You can’t chelate your way out of a mitochondrial collapse. If the power grid is down(no gas ⛽️) it doesn’t matter how many garbage trucks you hire, the trash won’t get picked up. @DrJackKruse says redox comes first, because if your mitochondria are broken, you don’t have the charge, water, or light coherence to even detox properly. A weak system trying to detox is like asking a dead battery to pump water uphill. ✨The solution 🌞 👇🏻 ☀️ Sunlight (UVA/UVB/IR build charge, rebuild circadian clocks). 🦶 Grounding (electron donation from Earth). 🐟 DHA (omega-3 from seafood, builds photonic antennae). 💧 EZ water (structured water = intracellular battery). 🧲 Magnetism (restores coherence to electron flow). 🚫 Avoid fake light, nnEMF, and minimum indoor living (they drain redox) and much more… When this is done, detox happens automatically because your mitochondria are working again. 🤔The deeper paradox The vaccination tsunami is not just about toxins. It’s about frequency mismatch as well; you inject information into a system already decoupled from nature’s light. A high-redox person may still experience stress, but they recode that information better. A low-redox person can’t process it, and it becomes chaos -> inflammation, autoimmunity, despair. If redox didn’t work, Gates-of-Hell would not be pouring billions into geoengineering and dimming the sun. When @BillGates 👹 and similar initiatives like @WHO push “geoengineering” or “solar dimming,” they’re effectively trying to: Reduce UVA/IR -> less EZ water, less nitric oxide, less dopamine = Collapse circadian timing -> more depression, more disease, early death ☠️… Force populations deeper into indoor, artificial light, medical dependency. 💊 And i quote Dr Kruse: “They can’t own your body if you hold the sun.” If they dim the sun, they reduce your charge. A low-redox population is docile, sick, and dependent.

Фото профиля Kat A 🌸
Kat A 🌸11 месяцев назад

The study

Фото профиля Candice 🇦🇺
Candice 🇦🇺11 месяцев назад

I will never forgive this. Never.

Фото профиля Realist_Theory
Realist_Theory11 месяцев назад

My extremely healthy Dad got prostate cancer shortly after getting the shot. He was treated, it went into remission, and then 3 months after stopping treatment it exploded and spread all over his body. He passed away within a week.

Фото профиля 👀 Watcher of The Brutal Truth NZ QWatch
👀 Watcher of The Brutal Truth NZ QWatch11 месяцев назад

@POTUS why are you signing deals with Pfizer?! You should be sending them to jail!

Фото профиля Jawnee
Jawnee11 месяцев назад

@Humanspective And if you follow Geert Vanden Bossche you know this is not going to be anywhere near the half of it.

Фото профиля Hans Rupprecht
Hans Rupprecht11 месяцев назад

And if you've had cancer before or it was in remission you can have even more cancer! 👺💩👻👹😂🤣 Of course its all quite insane. Cheers🥂 C in C 1st St Nicolaas Army🎅🎄🥳 Army Group True North⚔️☠️🏴‍☠️⚱️🪦⚰️🤒🤕❤️‍🩹❤️‍🔥🙏😇

Фото профиля Kat A 🌸
Kat A 🌸11 месяцев назад

So insane !!

Фото профиля Patti Fitz
Patti Fitz11 месяцев назад

My 32 year old niece is battling breast cancer. Just 32!! She has 2 babies at home. Yup - she got the shot so she could go on a honeymoon outside of the country.

Фото профиля Food Cut
Food Cut11 месяцев назад

For individuals concerned about cancer risk, established preventive measures remain most important! Not smoking, maintaining healthy weight, limiting alcohol, sun protection, regular screening, and addressing known environmental risks.

Фото профиля Wesley Ricker
Wesley Ricker11 месяцев назад

They’ve poisoned the world!!!!!

Фото профиля John Harrison 🦘
John Harrison 🦘11 месяцев назад

I have no regrets not getting these Covid injections, all the name calling on here was worth it.

Фото профиля Kat A 🌸
Kat A 🌸11 месяцев назад

@JH_CloSocial Given my gene mutations which I’ve just discovered I would have been at a high risk for injury.

Фото профиля John Harrison 🦘
John Harrison 🦘11 месяцев назад

I have a friend she has hashimoto's disease and her Doctor told her to get it and she now has myocarditis caused by the vaccine, her cardiologist has confirmed, her Doctor wasn't meant to give it to her, apparently she's suing, she is up in QLD

Фото профиля Kat A 🌸
Kat A 🌸11 месяцев назад

@JH_CloSocial Gosh I hope she wins

Фото профиля John Harrison 🦘
John Harrison 🦘11 месяцев назад

She told me Lawyers have said they'll only sue if they are certain she will win, she has just got the go ahead that she will win, they're going for $350,000 apparently

Фото профиля 𝔑𝔢𝔯𝔞 𝔉𝔲𝔬𝔠𝔬 🖤
𝔑𝔢𝔯𝔞 𝔉𝔲𝔬𝔠𝔬 🖤11 месяцев назад

I’m still waiting for the geniuses who compared us with critical thinking skills to dangerous mountain lions and threats to society to apologize. We had concerns about a barely tested “vaccine” that killed all animals in testing that was pushed on public with bribery and threats.

Фото профиля PoiDog72
PoiDog7211 месяцев назад

We see one of these studies every day. The covid vax is still being pushed and sometimes forced everywhere.

Фото профиля Carlos Alberto Gomes
Carlos Alberto Gomes11 месяцев назад

They did it and they knew what they were doing.

Фото профиля I Support Farmers Markets
I Support Farmers Markets11 месяцев назад

First RFK and Trump had to get this info out there.... then we will sort out who Big PHARMA paid to 1) suppress it and 2) mandate the Vax that harmed folks.

Фото профиля stephanie smith
stephanie smith11 месяцев назад

@realDonaldTrump @VP, look at this Korean study showing mRNA VAX increases cancer risk. Add this 2 the fact that mRNA doesn't stay contained in the person who gave Consent 4 the vax. What about others' right NOT to be exposed to cancer causing mRNA?

Фото профиля Yvonne
Yvonne11 месяцев назад

Yep - checked in another young slim woman with metastatic bowel cancer at work today.

Фото профиля Fractalizer
Fractalizer11 месяцев назад

The study may not show causation, but just look around your family and friends and see how many people you warned not to get the Vaxx, turned out to get that cancer diagnosis, compared to those who didn't get the Vaxx.

Фото профиля Paul Ashley
Paul Ashley11 месяцев назад

@thecoastguy Worse than simply not being held accountable, the U S. just made a huge deal with Pfizer and lauded Bourla! It's up to us, the sane normies, to simply refuse to take their junk.

Фото профиля Cora King
Cora King11 месяцев назад

FARK that is huge (not surprising at all) but a great study with frightening results. EEEEEEEK for the vaxxed) 😳

Фото профиля Melinda Cloud
Melinda Cloud11 месяцев назад

@thecoastguy I did not get the jab, having already gotten cancer via chemical poisoning so absolute refusal on my part yet my adult children working in industries which mandated the vaccine (do or fired) did and this report is far beyond alarming for this concerned mama.

Фото профиля The unspeakable self
The unspeakable self11 месяцев назад

These figures are so high that no one should be gullible enough to believe them. And indeed, they are false: "While some statistics from South Korean cancer research may mention the number 27%, the claim of an overall 27% increase in cancer is inaccurate and misleading. Recent studies indicate that the overall age-standardized cancer incidence rate in South Korea has remained stable or slightly decreased in recent years."

Фото профиля Keith Gray
Keith Gray11 месяцев назад

Not a loaded question .. Anyone noticing more cancers , heart attacks , strokes .. in Britain ? I have in my immediate community . Interested if others have ?

Фото профиля Melahi
Melahi11 месяцев назад

well ... we did say that might happen. The spike proteins are similar to the ones that cause AIDS, and reduced immune response won't help your body fight cancer cells.

Фото профиля BT
BT11 месяцев назад

and likely no-one will ever be held accountable because the judiciary are 'owned' world wide by the globalists/NWO/WEF et al

Фото профиля ConservativeVoice✈️ 🇦🇺 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🥩 🍷
ConservativeVoice✈️ 🇦🇺 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🥩 🍷11 месяцев назад

Bladder

Фото профиля Carlos Mendez
Carlos Mendez11 месяцев назад

The assault began before COVID. The deliberate poisoning of humanity

Фото профиля Mike Newman
Mike Newman11 месяцев назад

Jeez, it's much worse than I thought. Everybody should know this, and all the so-called 'clinics' closed immediately. Thank god X is here to protect us.

Фото профиля MostlyVV
MostlyVV11 месяцев назад

But don't worry pfizer has another $70 billion to sell you mrna that can fix your broken DNA. If you don't believe them they might threaten to kill you to get their way.

Фото профиля 🇬🇧 Grahame 🇬🇧
🇬🇧 Grahame 🇬🇧11 месяцев назад

@baggers951 And he was one of the main jab pushing bastards promoting it never forget that. It's "Complicit Campbell"

Фото профиля Ma Frt
Ma Frt11 месяцев назад

This is an observational study showing associations, not definitive causation. Potential confounders include higher healthcare access among vaccinated individuals (leading to more detections) or unmeasured factors like prior COVID-19 infection (which the study did not fully adjust for) The one-year follow-up limits insights into long-term effects. Global health bodies like Cancer Research UK have called the findings "superficially alarming" and emphasized no established causal link, noting mRNA technology's role in emerging cancer prevention vaccines. Independent verification from longer-term studies is needed.

Фото профиля Psihogios
Psihogios11 месяцев назад

Interesting conflict. I believe the lead author owns a vaccine company South Korea is one of the most covid vaxxed countries in the world. So much so I bet the small unvaxxed community has lots of oddities like no access 2 healthcare, don’t go 2 drs, mentally ill, already ill.

Похожие видео

Jimmy Dore: Groundbreaking South Korean Study Reveals Alarming Link Between COVID Vaccines and Cancer A massive new study from South Korea, utilizing the national health insurance database of over 8.4 million people, has uncovered a deeply disturbing trend. The research, which tracked patients from 2021-2023, found a statistically significant increase in cancer risk among the vaccinated population. The data paints a devastating picture: - 27% higher risk of overall cancer. - 53% higher risk of lung cancer. - 69% higher risk of prostate cancer. - 34% higher risk of gastric cancer. - 28% higher risk of colorectal cancer. - 35% higher risk of thyroid cancer. - 20% higher risk of breast cancer. As commentator Jimmy Dore highlighted, the probability this result occurred by chance is less than one in a thousand. He points out the critical context the mainstream media refuses to cover: Why was this crucial, large-scale analysis only conducted in South Korea? Why have other nations with similar databases not released such findings? This same research group has previously published data showing vaccines linked to a 68% increase in depression and a 93% increase in sleep disorders. This is the information being systematically suppressed. The very platforms that censored open debate about vaccine efficacy, early treatment, and origins of the virus are now ignoring peer-reviewed science that contradicts the official narrative. The public is demanding answers. Why the silence?

Camus

68,017 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Disturbing data from an Italian study of nearly 300,000 individuals reveals a significant increase in cancer risk post-COVID vaccination. Dr. John Campbell breaks down the alarming findings: • The rate of first cancer hospitalization in the UNvaccinated cohort was 0.85%. • In the VACCINATED cohort, the rate jumped to 1.15%—a concerning and statistically significant increase. This wasn't a fluke. The results have a p-value of <0.001, meaning there's less than a 1 in 1000 chance this happened by random chance. Why is this happening? Dr. Campbell outlines plausible biological mechanisms: • Ongoing spike protein production driving chronic inflammation, a known precursor to cancer. • DNA contamination in the vaccines, potentially inhibiting tumor suppressor genes. • Frameshifting from pseudouridine, creating rogue proteins that can cause cellular damage and mutation. The most damning part? This crucial data is being withheld from the public in the UK and other Western nations. Our governments are depriving scientists of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed data needed to perform this exact analysis. This lack of transparency is, in Dr. Campbell's view, "quite outrageous" and compromises a potential cover-up. This Italian province's data is a canary in the coal mine. If these figures are extrapolated to populations of 50 million or more, the implications are staggering. We are being kept in the dark. It is time to demand transparency. It is time to demand the data.

Camus

62,673 просмотров • 1 год назад

In the UK right now, there’s a bid to mandate the ENTIRE population have synthetic folate introduced into their nations food supply. They even want it in wholemeal flour. But this scientist found a 2.6 x increased risk of prostate cancer from increased folic acid. Jeremy Clarkson is campaigning for more screening. That screening might end up doing MORE harm than good. Because the men get tested end up going down the road of standard of care treatments, causing life altering surgery, who would have only died WITH signs of prostate cancer... not FROM it. The quality of life from standard of care is devastating: Dr Clare Craig - “It takes men, who would have died WTIH prostate cancer... without knowing they had prostate cancer... without any horrible interventions and surgery... and puts them through all that... and fails to impact on overall mortality...” “When you have your prostate out, 4 in 5 men will end up impotent.... and 1 in 5 will end up incontinent” Those 2 campaigns working in parallel, become a sort of Double Whammy. A campaign mandating the entire population receive a synthetic product potentially increasing the rate of prostate cancer. The other campaign increasing the people found through screening, leading to life altering standard of care treatments. It reminds me of that study in Sweden, showing more Sun exposure led to women living longer... but they push universal sunscreen use. And those women who lived longer didn’t die from Melanoma even though it was found more. Dr. Claire Craig - “If you are exposed to folic acid... your risk of prostate cancer is more than DOUBLED... If you care about prostate cancer, you need to campaign to get this stuff out of our flour” Jeremy Clarkson (Jeremy Clarkson) needs to watch this.

Humanspective

26,291 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 #BREAKING: New PubMed peer reviewed study shows 84% of cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole disappeared, shrunk, or stopped spreading after several months 🔻 The Study and Important Caveats: Researchers followed 197 cancer patients who took a combination of ivermectin and mebendazole (off-label, through a telemedicine service). After 6 months, 122 of them filled out a follow-up survey. Among those 122 people: 84% said their cancer had either completely disappeared, shrunk, or stopped spreading. About 33% reported “no evidence of disease” About 16% reported the tumors got smaller About 36% said the cancer stayed the same (stable) 16% said it got worse Side effects were mostly mild (mainly stomach issues) and most people kept taking the medicine. 🔻 Important caveats: • The results come only from patient surveys — no doctors independently checked scans or medical records. • There was no control group to compare against. • Many patients were also getting regular cancer treatments (chemo, radiation, surgery, etc.) at the same time. • About 38% of the original group didn’t finish the survey. • The journal later issued an official “Expression of Concern” and started an audit because of questions about the data. • The authors say these findings are just a starting point and that proper clinical trials are still needed. 🔻What kinds of cancer were included? Most common Prostate: 55 patients (27.9%) Breast: 36 patients (18.3%) Lung: 17 patients (8.6%) Colon: 10 patients (5.1%) Liver: 5 patients (2.5%) Other cancers (74 patients / 37.6%) Urologic (bladder & kidney): 9 Pancreatic & bile duct: 6 Hematologic (lymphoma): 5 Head, neck & oral: 5 Gynecologic (ovarian & uterine): 5 Thyroid: 4 Brain & neurological: 3 Multiple myeloma: 3 Melanoma (skin & ocular): 3 Sarcoma: 2 Miscellaneous/unspecified: 29 🔻Final Note: The study does not show which cancers benefited the most. All the results (including the 84% figure) are reported only as overall numbers. Clip Study

MJTruthUltra

30,577 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

After a year of intensive research, Dr. William Makis presents the most crucial graph of his career: the ivermectin dosing schedule for cancer. Dr. Makis recommends a starting dose of 1mg per kg of body weight per day for most cancers, including breast, colon, lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and leukemias. For a 60kg individual, this translates to 60mg daily, which can be taken as: - Five 12mg pills - Or 6ml of liquid (approximately one teaspoon plus 1ml) The evidence supporting the efficacy of ivermectin is compelling and dose-dependent. - Dr. Shankara Chetty observed a significant drop in a prostate cancer patient’s PSA from 89 to 11 after taking 45mg/day. - Dr. Tess Lawry’s case study showed a remarkable decrease in CA125 (an ovarian cancer marker) from 288 to 22 after just 0.2mg/kg. - A long-term Castro study on children with leukemia demonstrated no side effects after 6 months at a dose of 1mg/kg. For aggressive cancers like pancreatic and brain cancers, a higher dose may be necessary due to the blood-brain barrier. Dr. Makis cites examples: - Dr. Landrito’s colleague with terminal gallbladder cancer experienced the disappearance of cancer after 14 months at a dose of 2mg/kg/day. - The highest documented dose is 2.5mg/kg, as reported by Dr. Chetty, with only transient visual side effects that resolved. Mainstream oncology is unlikely to offer this treatment due to ivermectin’s generic, off-patent status and unprofitable nature. Consequently, there are no funded clinical trials. Dr. Makis concludes that using ivermectin in cancer treatment is straightforward and highly safe. He strongly suggests that those struggling with cancer should start with a dose of 1mg/kg/day. This can be taken for several months, even over a year, with an excellent safety profile based on long-term anecdotal evidence. The power to fight cancer may already be within your reach.

Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub

102,157 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад