Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Just when you thought the failed Palisades Fire response couldn’t get any worse… Reports show Gavin Newsom’s policies prevented action against fires in major parks to avoid harming “rare plants” with heavy equipment. Yes, you heard that right—they let thousands of properties burn to protect plants that ended up...

286,379 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Gavin Newsom’s attorney was just caught lying in court and there is photo proof (shown in video) to prove they’re lying in court about the Pacific Palisades fire “Gavin Newsom and your lying lawyers better wake up and tell the truth, cause you're going down” Spencer Pratt “Yesterday in court, Gavin Newsom's lawyer said it's ridiculous that the state was on site of the Lochman Fire directing LAFD firefighters. Oh, really, Gavin Newsom? (Shows photo proof in video) That looks like a state parks representative right there with the LAFD firefighters at the Lochman burn scar that you then let smolder for a to week, then become the Palisades fire on January 7th. Ready for this also? I personally spoke with the battalion chief that said when they arrived at the fire on December 31st, there was a state representative with a map showing the LAFD firefighters where they couldn't go because of protected plants. Yes, the milk vetch plant. That's all gone now, obviously it all burned. Not only that, the state representative wouldn't give the battalion chief the map, only was letting them look at it, and then the state representative from Gavin Newsom's friggin' state parks told the firefighters they couldn't bring in a dozer which obviously they needed to maintain the burn scar, because clearly it burned 12 people alive six days later, and burned 7,000 structures. So, Gavin Newsom and your lying lawyers better wake up and tell the truth, 'cause you're going down”

Wall Street Apes

208,010 views • 8 months ago

🚨 Fire Departments in Los Angeles had a map that showed a major fire was coming. It was so obvious it was coming Fire Chief Robert Garcia had his department on standby They knew the Pacific Palisades fire was about to happen and Democrats did nothing Spencer Pratt “I went and met with the chief of the US Forest Service and talked to him for a few hours. This guy, Chief Garcia, he's one of the most famous fire chiefs — he told me this was not a surprise. He said they all have a map. I forget the name of this map that it goes to all cities and emergency personnel. They have photos — Everything is bright red leading up to January 7th, bright red. They knew this was coming to the point where Chief Garcia had all of his firefighters on the tarmac, kitted up, in their helicopters. He said his whole team was standing by their computers because it was so obvious this fire was coming” Chief Robert Garcia is the Fire Chief of the Angeles National Forest for the US Forest Service. He is a longtime wildland firefighter with over 30 years of experience, starting in 1994 on the Angeles National Forest in Southern California Democrats had to know this information because this fire chief worked with the Los Angeles Fire Department He works closely with local agencies like LAFD, Los Angeles County Fire Department, and others during major incidents Demand accountability. Democrats should be charged with criminal negligence. There was literally a map saying this was coming

Wall Street Apes

59,138 views • 2 months ago

Gavin Newsom to eliminate up to 2 million home gardens in California Effected residents living in Los Angeles, San Diego and Riverside would be responsible for up to $13,000 to bring themselves into compliance “This policy he is spearheading, also called zone zero, would require that all these good standing trees and vegetation within a five foot radius of your house be removed. And that would include garden plants like fruits and vegetables. This policy will impact roughly 2 million homes within the state of California. And for somebody living in a part of this state like Los Angeles could cost you up to $13,000 to come into compliance. They're so generous about this, they're gonna give you 3 years to comply before they send some sort of inspector to your house. And the neat thing is if the inspector sees stuff that they don't like, they can just pull it out themselves. They can mess with your garden, they can mess with your plants, they can mess with your vegetation” “If you needed to know that Gavin Newsom was responsible for sure, here's the receipt. I mean, they passed two bills in the legislature to create a footprint for implementing something like this. Not only that, but because of the delay in this policy being implemented, here's the specific executive order from Gavin Newsom earlier this year that he wants zone zero regulations to be implemented by December 31st, 2025. And as you as you can see, this policy is so controversial that the California Department of Wildfires, which is responsible for implementing this, hasn't done it yet.“ This policy will affect homeowners the state designates high-risk wildfire areas in southern California, including parts of Los Angeles County Primarily impacts: Wildland-urban interface and certain neighborhoods in cities like Los Angeles (e.g., parts of Pacific Palisades, Altadena, Malibu, Rancho Palos Verdes), San Diego, Ventura, Riverside, and other fire-prone counties Residents must - Remove flammable vegetation, mulch, plants, and combustible materials (e.g., wood piles, flammable fences/outbuildings in that zone). - No live plants directly touching the structure; low-growing, only fire-resistant plants may be allowed

Wall Street Apes

392,954 views • 7 months ago