Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Just when you thought things couldn’t get any crazier...

158,400 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

21 Kommentare

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

😳

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

‘I make a point of order that points of order are in order...’ The Senate’s procedural paradoxes never cease to amaze me.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

The world’s greatest deliberative body has the right idea.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

I should have said this at the start: the issue is that this (statutory) rule prohibits points of order, but it also seems to imply that you can appeal from rulings of the chair on points of order—but how can there be a point of order?

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

I don’t know what the right answer to Thune’s point of order is, but *at best* these provisions are confusing. I’ve said this before, but Congress really needs to rewrite and consolidate all the different fast-track procedures; there are some that are *much* worse than the CRA.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Conclusion: You cannot make a point of order while another point of order is pending.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

More dilatory motions

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

The cooler way to do this would be to have other senators offer amendments to the motion to recess to substitute a different time.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

And another one...

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Still going

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

How long until the Senate bans dilatory motions?

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

The funniest possible outcome here would be if Thune’s point of order got filibustered so hard that they had to use cloture on it.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

They got bored of the motion to recess!

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Why restrict yourself to the motions you find in the rulebook?

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

They finally got to the point of order!

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Conclusion #2: Points of order are in order under the Congressional Review Act.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

😳

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Conclusion #3: Joint resolutions that meet all the requirements of section 802 of the CRA or are disapproving of agency actions which have been determined to be rules subject to the CRA by a legal decision from the GAO are entitled to expedited procedures under the CRA.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Final conclusion: When the cloture threshold gets nuked, it will not be by overturning a ruling of the chair, but by sustaining a point of order submitted by the presiding officer to the Senate.

Profilbild von ringwiss
ringwissvor 1 Jahr

Oh, one more thing... For most budget points of order, overturning a ruling of the chair requires 60 votes. If the presiding officer decided to submit that point of order to the Senate for its decision, only a simple majority (or a tie vote) would be required to overrule it. 😳

Profilbild von Sensibo
Sensibovor 1 Jahr

📷 A tough day in the jungle—how does this sloth overcome it? The twist you didn’t see coming

Ähnliche Videos