正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Just when you thought things couldn’t get any crazier...

158,400 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

21 条评论

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

😳

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

‘I make a point of order that points of order are in order...’ The Senate’s procedural paradoxes never cease to amaze me.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

The world’s greatest deliberative body has the right idea.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

I should have said this at the start: the issue is that this (statutory) rule prohibits points of order, but it also seems to imply that you can appeal from rulings of the chair on points of order—but how can there be a point of order?

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

I don’t know what the right answer to Thune’s point of order is, but *at best* these provisions are confusing. I’ve said this before, but Congress really needs to rewrite and consolidate all the different fast-track procedures; there are some that are *much* worse than the CRA.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Conclusion: You cannot make a point of order while another point of order is pending.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

More dilatory motions

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

The cooler way to do this would be to have other senators offer amendments to the motion to recess to substitute a different time.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

And another one...

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Still going

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

How long until the Senate bans dilatory motions?

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

The funniest possible outcome here would be if Thune’s point of order got filibustered so hard that they had to use cloture on it.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

They got bored of the motion to recess!

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Why restrict yourself to the motions you find in the rulebook?

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

They finally got to the point of order!

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Conclusion #2: Points of order are in order under the Congressional Review Act.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

😳

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Conclusion #3: Joint resolutions that meet all the requirements of section 802 of the CRA or are disapproving of agency actions which have been determined to be rules subject to the CRA by a legal decision from the GAO are entitled to expedited procedures under the CRA.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Final conclusion: When the cloture threshold gets nuked, it will not be by overturning a ruling of the chair, but by sustaining a point of order submitted by the presiding officer to the Senate.

ringwiss 的头像
ringwiss1 年前

Oh, one more thing... For most budget points of order, overturning a ruling of the chair requires 60 votes. If the presiding officer decided to submit that point of order to the Senate for its decision, only a simple majority (or a tie vote) would be required to overrule it. 😳

Sensibo 的头像
Sensibo1 年前

📷 A tough day in the jungle—how does this sloth overcome it? The twist you didn’t see coming

相关视频