Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Just when you thought white progressive women couldn’t stoop any lower, here they are.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ I have just discovered that there is a deranged group of women who are not merely defending Lindsay Clancy. They are actively organizing to elevate and support a woman who deliberately strangled her 3 children....

145,651 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The natural progression of women wanting to copy men is that British Vogue article. The crux of it is that women are jealous of other women being in relationships while they are not, and they use the masculine “boss babe” agenda to hide that fact. Make them believe the latter to deny the former. So it is the collective way for unsuccessful women to shame those who are successful in their personal lives. Women who are winning will then be influenced into believing that something is wrong with them. The single-female-friend-group self-sabotage is now operating on a grand scale through the networking effect of social media. Another example of the female self-stirring “shitshow” the more we give them a voice. The opposite is not true for men, as men are judged on their accomplishments first and foremost. If a man makes his whole or main identity being a husband, he is falling for the feminine value matrix through association in mating. This is how women are currently trying to frame men as accessories - as evidence of their own success, the same way men do with trophy wives. The copying here happens when women don’t want to come across as “less than” within a relationship, because we have entered a matriarchal and gynocratic society where the approval of other women outweighs the approval of the man they are with. This is further evidence of why “husband material” is an insult toward a man and an early sign of his future emasculation by her, in the same way women are being made to feel. Another effort of the mainstream is to eliminate any degree of polarity between the genders.

French OG

37,506 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

When trans activists claim that the drugs euphemistically called "puberty blockers" are "safe and reversible," they are lying to the public. Even experts who criticize the administration of these drugs to children often say, "there is limited research" regarding long-term effects. Yes, research on children is limited, and no long-term follow-up research is currently being required in the US. Yet there are plenty of horrifying reports from adults. Women have been given "puberty blocker" Lupron for a variety of issues - including IVF, surrogacy, and early puberty. (Lupron, like all "puberty blocking" drugs, is classified as a GnRH agonist.) The side effects have been horrendous - debilitating pain, early menopause, and brittle bones. Some women have reported their teeth falling out and their jaw bones detaching. Lupron was developed for the treatment of prostate cancer in men. When it failed to improve the health of dying men, it was pushed onto women, who have been suffering horrendously for decades while being ignored by mainstream media. A drug developed for terminally ill men, which is also used to castrate convicted male pedophiles, is being given to women and to healthy children. This is a failed, category X cancer drug being repurposed for profit. Lupron is only given to men when they are dying or as a punishment, but the drug is called "life-saving" for children. By 2019, the US FDA had received over 25,000 adverse event reports for Lupron products including more than 1500 deaths. This clip is from 2009 and features the investigative reporting of Darcy Spears who has repeatedly tried to bring awareness of this medical scandal. Society at large did not care that this was happening to women, and a result of this medical scandal being neglected is that both women and children are being irreparably harmed.

Genevieve Gluck

161,722 просмотров • 3 лет назад

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows *exactly* what a woman is.

Sall Grover

40,674 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

one thing you need to keep in mind about women is that their IQs converge FAR more onto the mean than men's this is why women with extremely midwit and shallow thoughts walka round and parade themselves like they are some sort of 140 IQ cerebrally gifted philosopher queen with a depth and profoundity that the average person just can't possibly in their mind come close to... it's because as far as statistics go, they practically are! for a woman at least. if they are even on the upper end of midwittery they are basically a genius from a statistical perspective, though not in practical terms. they are as rare as a male genius is amongst women, and because they frame their perception of their own intelligence primarily around other women who they interact with, they develop this inflated ego and perception of their own intellect this is why you get stupid broads posting dumb shit like this and not realizing how retarded they sound. this for the thoughtslop it is probably still takes at least a bit higher IQ than 100 to string together, there are some shallow connections of thought being made, enough to intellectually posture and faintly recreate the prose of speech one would find in the actual intelligent people she is trying to verbally replicate as far as women goes, it takes so many standard deviations above the mean to even reach this level that she may as well think herself a genius. any difference in how her thoughts come out compared to men of an equally rare level of intellect she will chalk up to a difference in how men and women think; the men just don't "get it" and if it pisses them off she's probably triggering some insecurity they have or they're just dumb misogynists writing her off in reality she's actually just not that smart! she is at a rare level of intellect — for a WOMAN — but this is only scratching the surface of true intelligence in nominal terms! i liken it to a female powerlifter, who weighing 49kg manages to blow everyone's minds bench pressing 115kg. "wow, this girl is gifted..." and then an average male gym-goer can go ahead and take her bench press max off of the rack after she's done and bang out a set of bicep curls. her IQ in and of itself as an objective meaure is not actually very high, she is just standing out in a league of her own. and that league is the little leagues genuinely intelligent women do exist, but they are astronomically rare and the overwhelming majority of women are complete midwits so a woman stepping into the room with 120 IQ is baically like encountering nikola tesla for them. once we all accept this as a society we can all stop taking them so seriously and start removing them from positions of institutional power which require actual thinking skills
1:11

Sensitive content

one thing you need to keep in mind about women is that their IQs converge FAR more onto the mean than men's this is why women with extremely midwit and shallow thoughts walka round and parade themselves like they are some sort of 140 IQ cerebrally gifted philosopher queen with a depth and profoundity that the average person just can't possibly in their mind come close to... it's because as far as statistics go, they practically are! for a woman at least. if they are even on the upper end of midwittery they are basically a genius from a statistical perspective, though not in practical terms. they are as rare as a male genius is amongst women, and because they frame their perception of their own intelligence primarily around other women who they interact with, they develop this inflated ego and perception of their own intellect this is why you get stupid broads posting dumb shit like this and not realizing how retarded they sound. this for the thoughtslop it is probably still takes at least a bit higher IQ than 100 to string together, there are some shallow connections of thought being made, enough to intellectually posture and faintly recreate the prose of speech one would find in the actual intelligent people she is trying to verbally replicate as far as women goes, it takes so many standard deviations above the mean to even reach this level that she may as well think herself a genius. any difference in how her thoughts come out compared to men of an equally rare level of intellect she will chalk up to a difference in how men and women think; the men just don't "get it" and if it pisses them off she's probably triggering some insecurity they have or they're just dumb misogynists writing her off in reality she's actually just not that smart! she is at a rare level of intellect — for a WOMAN — but this is only scratching the surface of true intelligence in nominal terms! i liken it to a female powerlifter, who weighing 49kg manages to blow everyone's minds bench pressing 115kg. "wow, this girl is gifted..." and then an average male gym-goer can go ahead and take her bench press max off of the rack after she's done and bang out a set of bicep curls. her IQ in and of itself as an objective meaure is not actually very high, she is just standing out in a league of her own. and that league is the little leagues genuinely intelligent women do exist, but they are astronomically rare and the overwhelming majority of women are complete midwits so a woman stepping into the room with 120 IQ is baically like encountering nikola tesla for them. once we all accept this as a society we can all stop taking them so seriously and start removing them from positions of institutional power which require actual thinking skills

𝖒𝖔𝖌𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖌

1,474,855 просмотров • 1 месяц назад